Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 179 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8901 Roots 16-2 blue 1639 26-28 48% 16 TX
8902 COV Team FB 11-1 1639 35-26 57% 11 CA
8903 FaR Out 14-Grey 1639 34-10 77% 14 MI
8904 Delano 12-1 1639 8-2 80% 12 MN
8905 PVA 17-3 1639 7-1 88% 17 MO
8906 ENCORE 14-Red 1639 28-14 67% 14 CA
8907 Air Attack Volleyball Club 14-Girls gold 1639 6-3 67% 14 HI
8908 TIC 14-1 1639 6-2 75% 14 PR
8909 Club Gold 14-Blue 1639 6-2 75% 14 WA
8910 FaR Out 11-White 1639 10-5 67% 11 MI
8911 Miami Wave 13-Teal 1639 35-12 74% 13 FL
8912 Club One 16-2 white 1639 5-1 83% 16 OH
8913 Champions 17-Elite 1639 11-4 73% 17 AL
8914 Pgh Elite 15-Premier 1639 26-39 40% 15 PA
8915 Tribe 14-Elite white 1639 30-41 42% 14 FL
8916 Cool Sunshine 17-1 1639 19-10 66% 17 NM
8917 ACESZ 16-Black 1639 13-8 62% 16 MI
8918 Kokoro Volleyball 15-3 1639 45-22 67% 15 MN
8919 Upontop 13-S honey 1639 10-10 50% 13 FL
8920 603 United 16-Seacoast black 1639 13-21 38% 16 NH
8921 NITRO 13-Blue 1639 23-25 48% 13 TX
8922 Club V 16-Prodigy jaime 1639 24-23 51% 16 UT
8923 Arsenal 13-Gold 1639 19-14 53% 13 TX
8924 LIV 17-Adidas 1639 28-17 62% 17 LA
8925 Ne Jrs 12-Black 1639 8-2 80% 12 NE
8926 Diggersz 14-Spring 1639 9-3 75% 14 IL
8927 PIRATAS ADN 14-1 1639 12-4 75% 14 PR
8928 Attack VBC 16-Elite 1639 29-12 71% 16 MI
8929 Palm Beach Jrs 16-1 1639 15-6 71% 16 FL
8930 Hot Shots 14-Black 1639 13-6 68% 14 OH
8931 Flight 15 Marigolds 1639 24-11 69% 15 IL
8932 Core STL 12-Navy 1639 26-18 58% 12 MO
8933 MAVA 11-Hammerhead 1639 33-19 63% 11 KY
8934 UVA 16-S elite 1639 5-1 83% 16 LA
8935 DBQ Thunder 13 1639 10-1 91% 13 IA
8936 Spiketown 15-1 national 1639 21-21 50% 15 OH
8937 Slainte 18-Nationals 1639 6-8 43% 18 CA
8938 VAQUERAS 12-F juan 1639 12-9 57% 12 PR
8939 Motion Volleyball Program 16-Silver 1639 46-27 63% 16 WI
8940 EP Elite 13-Smack 1639 24-16 57% 13 TX
8941 NEWPORT SPORTS ACADEMY 13-Saj 1639 24-10 71% 13 CA
8942 Epic 14-Adidas 1639 30-20 60% 14 WI
8943 MAVA 15-Hammerhead 1639 38-16 70% 15 KY
8944 NKYVC 11-3 typhoon 1639 18-7 72% 11 KY
8945 H2 14-1 longhorns 1639 23-17 55% 14 MO
8946 Yorktowne VB 14-Red 1639 31-14 69% 14 PA
8947 APVA 14 Adam 1639 24-10 71% 14 TN
8948 CMASS EDGE 17-Blue 1639 42-32 57% 17 MA
8949 Velocity 219 13-E jen 1639 46-16 74% 13 IN
8950 Circle City 10-Purple 1639 17-11 61% 10 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.