Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 179 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8901 Mauloa 12 1639 15-4 75% 12
8902 White Stone 15-Power 1639 27-12 69% 15
8903 HOU PVA 13-Mizuno 1639 5-3 63% 13
8904 Yuba Elite VBC 14-Blue 1639 23-9 72% 14 CA
8905 Iowa PowerPlex 17-Mendoza 1638 5-1 83% 17
8906 Vienna Elite 15 Travel 1638 41-29 59% 15 VA
8907 BBVCL 17 Brittany 1638 32-24 57% 17 NV
8908 Fearless Elite 13-2 1638 23-14 59% 13 AR
8909 Kansas Rise VBC 17-1 1638 6-1 86% 17 KS
8910 NorthShore 15-Bond 1638 12-3 80% 15 OH
8911 COVC 16-S regionals gold 1638 14-4 78% 16 OR
8912 Adrenaline 16-Traci 1638 23-6 77% 16 IA
8913 Club Gold 14-Blue 1638 6-2 75% 14 WA
8914 YSVC 14-1 1638 14-5 74% 14 NC
8915 Heroes 14-Seal 1638 28-10 74% 14 TX
8916 Tribe 14-Regional red 1638 26-10 72% 14 FL
8917 LADYA 14-1 1638 10-3 71% 14 PA
8918 JJVA Club 15-E 1638 10-4 71% 15 FL
8919 LA6 10 1638 24-8 71% 10 LA
8920 Roanoke United 13-Red 1638 26-11 70% 13 VA
8921 Sports Academy VBC 12-Premier 1638 7-3 70% 12 CA
8922 WCJ 14-1 1638 21-9 68% 14 TX
8923 CGSV 18-Huff 1638 23-11 68% 18 OH
8924 IJV 10-Green 1638 14-3 67% 10 IL
8925 Kokoro Volleyball 15-3 1638 45-22 67% 15 MN
8926 APXVB 15 Rylee 1638 24-13 65% 15 UT
8927 NS 13-Sea serpents 1638 36-21 63% 13 MI
8928 High Voltage 16-1 1638 11-7 61% 16 MN
8929 MEVC 13 National 1638 46-26 61% 13 MD
8930 MVSA 14 Heat 1638 47-28 60% 14 MD
8931 TVS 11 Gabi 1638 9-4 60% 11 TX
8932 PAEVA 16-Maroon 1638 26-21 55% 16 CA
8933 Shockwave VBC 16-National 1638 19-17 53% 16 KS
8934 OVC 15-1 1638 24-21 52% 15 MO
8935 MOJO Elite 17-Black 1638 35-32 51% 17 VA
8936 Warren Sixpack 16-Red 1638 22-23 49% 16 NJ
8937 NWJRS 14-Slate 1638 5-0 100% 14
8938 Wasatch United 13 1638 13-4 59% 13
8939 Pacific Coast 14-Black 1638 4-5 44% 14
8940 VVB 13-Andria 1638 12-4 75% 13 CA
8941 EndMo VBC 15-Power blue 1638 40-15 73% 15 PA
8942 Impact 16-Red alicia 1638 31-24 56% 16 NV
8943 Nordiques 18 1637 7-2 78% 18
8944 ZVC VBC 16-S 1637 5-2 71% 16
8945 ACS 16-Elite 1637 26-11 70% 16
8946 PBEVC Fury Black 18-1 1637 40-13 75% 18
8947 Blue Thunder 11 1637 8-2 73% 11
8948 Bridger 12-1 1637 14-14 48% 12
8949 Viperes 15-Black 1637 3-3 50% 15
8950 AVA 14-Coral 1637 30-39 43% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.