2025-2026 Season — Page 179 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8901 | Mauloa 12 | 1639 | 15-4 | 75% | 12 | |
| 8902 | White Stone 15-Power | 1639 | 27-12 | 69% | 15 | |
| 8903 | HOU PVA 13-Mizuno | 1639 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | |
| 8904 | Yuba Elite VBC 14-Blue | 1639 | 23-9 | 72% | 14 | CA |
| 8905 | Iowa PowerPlex 17-Mendoza | 1638 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | |
| 8906 | Vienna Elite 15 Travel | 1638 | 41-29 | 59% | 15 | VA |
| 8907 | BBVCL 17 Brittany | 1638 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | NV |
| 8908 | Fearless Elite 13-2 | 1638 | 23-14 | 59% | 13 | AR |
| 8909 | Kansas Rise VBC 17-1 | 1638 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | KS |
| 8910 | NorthShore 15-Bond | 1638 | 12-3 | 80% | 15 | OH |
| 8911 | COVC 16-S regionals gold | 1638 | 14-4 | 78% | 16 | OR |
| 8912 | Adrenaline 16-Traci | 1638 | 23-6 | 77% | 16 | IA |
| 8913 | Club Gold 14-Blue | 1638 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | WA |
| 8914 | YSVC 14-1 | 1638 | 14-5 | 74% | 14 | NC |
| 8915 | Heroes 14-Seal | 1638 | 28-10 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 8916 | Tribe 14-Regional red | 1638 | 26-10 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 8917 | LADYA 14-1 | 1638 | 10-3 | 71% | 14 | PA |
| 8918 | JJVA Club 15-E | 1638 | 10-4 | 71% | 15 | FL |
| 8919 | LA6 10 | 1638 | 24-8 | 71% | 10 | LA |
| 8920 | Roanoke United 13-Red | 1638 | 26-11 | 70% | 13 | VA |
| 8921 | Sports Academy VBC 12-Premier | 1638 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | CA |
| 8922 | WCJ 14-1 | 1638 | 21-9 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 8923 | CGSV 18-Huff | 1638 | 23-11 | 68% | 18 | OH |
| 8924 | IJV 10-Green | 1638 | 14-3 | 67% | 10 | IL |
| 8925 | Kokoro Volleyball 15-3 | 1638 | 45-22 | 67% | 15 | MN |
| 8926 | APXVB 15 Rylee | 1638 | 24-13 | 65% | 15 | UT |
| 8927 | NS 13-Sea serpents | 1638 | 36-21 | 63% | 13 | MI |
| 8928 | High Voltage 16-1 | 1638 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | MN |
| 8929 | MEVC 13 National | 1638 | 46-26 | 61% | 13 | MD |
| 8930 | MVSA 14 Heat | 1638 | 47-28 | 60% | 14 | MD |
| 8931 | TVS 11 Gabi | 1638 | 9-4 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 8932 | PAEVA 16-Maroon | 1638 | 26-21 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 8933 | Shockwave VBC 16-National | 1638 | 19-17 | 53% | 16 | KS |
| 8934 | OVC 15-1 | 1638 | 24-21 | 52% | 15 | MO |
| 8935 | MOJO Elite 17-Black | 1638 | 35-32 | 51% | 17 | VA |
| 8936 | Warren Sixpack 16-Red | 1638 | 22-23 | 49% | 16 | NJ |
| 8937 | NWJRS 14-Slate | 1638 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 8938 | Wasatch United 13 | 1638 | 13-4 | 59% | 13 | |
| 8939 | Pacific Coast 14-Black | 1638 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | |
| 8940 | VVB 13-Andria | 1638 | 12-4 | 75% | 13 | CA |
| 8941 | EndMo VBC 15-Power blue | 1638 | 40-15 | 73% | 15 | PA |
| 8942 | Impact 16-Red alicia | 1638 | 31-24 | 56% | 16 | NV |
| 8943 | Nordiques 18 | 1637 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | |
| 8944 | ZVC VBC 16-S | 1637 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | |
| 8945 | ACS 16-Elite | 1637 | 26-11 | 70% | 16 | |
| 8946 | PBEVC Fury Black 18-1 | 1637 | 40-13 | 75% | 18 | |
| 8947 | Blue Thunder 11 | 1637 | 8-2 | 73% | 11 | |
| 8948 | Bridger 12-1 | 1637 | 14-14 | 48% | 12 | |
| 8949 | Viperes 15-Black | 1637 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | |
| 8950 | AVA 14-Coral | 1637 | 30-39 | 43% | 14 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.