Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 178 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8851 FC Elite 15 Adidas 1640 22-12 65% 15 WI
8852 HNLV 16-2 1640 25-13 66% 16 HI
8853 KNVBC 14-2 1640 8-2 80% 14 KS
8854 LuMaDe 15-Black 1640 47-25 65% 15 FL
8855 OC Lady Elite 17-Black 1640 42-23 65% 17 NY
8856 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 11-1 1640 12-6 63% 11 MN
8857 Husky 14-Northeast 1640 24-22 52% 14 CT
8858 Basin Elite 12 1640 4-3 44% 12 UT
8859 Tsunami 16-2e hannah 1640 38-25 60% 16 GA
8860 Iowa Select 12-Black 1640 20-10 65% 12 IA
8861 Nova 16-Blue 1640 44-20 69% 16 AZ
8862 WEVC 15-Pink 1640 25-14 64% 15 NC
8863 SE Grays 11 1640 5-0 100% 11 NE
8864 United VBA 15-Black 1640 35-26 57% 15 TX
8865 ZTV 14-S 1640 2-2 50% 14 MT
8866 MN Attack 16-1 1640 16-8 67% 16 MN
8867 AEV 11 Select 1640 14-6 70% 11 TX
8868 Train4F 11-1 1640 10-1 91% 11 OH
8869 AZ REV 13-Black 1640 37-22 63% 13 AZ
8870 USA SOUTH 15-Premier black 1640 25-10 71% 15 FL
8871 MAVS 816 14-1 1640 5-2 71% 14 KS
8872 Red Slam 12 1640 16-4 80% 12 IN
8873 Saratoga 12-Blue 1640 28-10 65% 12 NY
8874 LHVA 14-Purple national 1640 28-17 62% 14 NY
8875 Zoom Volleyball Club 18-1 1640 5-3 45% 18 KS
8876 UVA 14-Elite 1640 1-2 33% 14 LA
8877 Legit 12-G white 1640 9-3 64% 12 IA
8878 Wildfire 13-N premier 1640 7-18 28% 13 FL
8879 Driven 13-Teal 1640 29-17 63% 13 FL
8880 Legends Volleyball Club 13 13 Depinet/Johnson 1640 5-1 83% 13 PR
8881 EVOLUTION 14-Red 1640 17-4 74% 14 IA
8882 Game Day 16-National 1640 29-26 53% 16 OR
8883 CCVA 16-Elite 1640 8-5 62% 16 CA
8884 HP South 15-Diamond 1640 39-23 61% 15 MO
8885 WF Waves 12-Cody 1640 25-25 50% 12 AL
8886 PV 11U Navy 1640 13-5 65% 11 IA
8887 HOS 16U Orange 1640 34-15 69% 16 NY
8888 TX LEGACY 16-Adidas 1640 21-30 41% 16 TX
8889 NE Elite 15-Echo 1640 23-8 74% 15 NE
8890 EP STRiVE VBC 15-S black 1640 30-16 64% 15 TX
8891 NSSC 14-Black s 1640 17-7 71% 14 MO
8892 Kelowna Volleyball Club 15-Red 1640 8-1 89% 15
8893 YYC Eagles U17 17 YYC Eagles Blue 1640 5-2 71% 17
8894 Renovators 16 U16 Ryan/Allen (EV) 1639 5-0 100% 16
8895 Storm 14-Gold 1639 19-8 70% 14
8896 Prime 12-Natalia 1639 18-6 75% 12 CA
8897 Elevation 15-Ascent 1639 38-26 59% 15 CO
8898 WCJ 15-1 1639 19-7 73% 15 TX
8899 AVBC 13-R - shifflet 1639 6-0 100% 13 OH
8900 Net Force Volleyball Club 14 Net Force Attack (IA) 1639 7-1 78% 14 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.