2025-2026 Season — Page 178 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8851 | Air Attack Volleyball Club 14-Girls gold | 1639 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 8852 | Champions 16-Elite | 1639 | 14-5 | 74% | 16 | |
| 8853 | Arsenal 17-Gold | 1639 | 20-18 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 8854 | KNVBC 14-2 | 1639 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | KS |
| 8855 | ZTV 14-S | 1639 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | MT |
| 8856 | MARIN 14 Slate | 1639 | 27-27 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 8857 | NIVA 17-BLACK | 1639 | 47-41 | 53% | 17 | IN |
| 8858 | Train4F 11-1 | 1639 | 10-1 | 91% | 11 | OH |
| 8859 | MAVS KC Select 12-1 | 1639 | 16-1 | 84% | 12 | KS |
| 8860 | USA MI Momentum 18 | 1639 | 10-2 | 83% | 18 | MI |
| 8861 | UVA 16-S elite | 1639 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | LA |
| 8862 | Lady Hawks 12 | 1639 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | IA |
| 8863 | SouthJamm 16-Red | 1639 | 18-5 | 75% | 16 | AL |
| 8864 | NC Intensity 14-Laina | 1639 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | NC |
| 8865 | Columbus Classics 16-1 | 1639 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 8866 | Force 16-Adidas sel bl gr | 1639 | 32-11 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 8867 | Legend 12-Black | 1639 | 20-6 | 74% | 12 | CA |
| 8868 | ONE Volleyball 14-2 | 1639 | 44-16 | 73% | 14 | GA |
| 8869 | CVC 14 SILVER | 1639 | 42-16 | 72% | 14 | OH |
| 8870 | TAV 15-Metro green | 1639 | 20-6 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 8871 | MAVA 15-Hammerhead | 1639 | 38-16 | 70% | 15 | KY |
| 8872 | ICA 14-Colibri | 1639 | 20-9 | 69% | 14 | TX |
| 8873 | ARVC 16-White adidas | 1639 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | NM |
| 8874 | Aleta 17-2 | 1639 | 22-11 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 8875 | RVBC 12U Blue | 1639 | 15-7 | 65% | 12 | PA |
| 8876 | Rocky Elite 18 National | 1639 | 33-18 | 65% | 18 | CO |
| 8877 | PREVAIL Girls 18-Platinum | 1639 | 23-13 | 64% | 18 | PA |
| 8878 | Sideout 16-Elite | 1639 | 40-24 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 8879 | Valkyries 18 Elite | 1639 | 46-27 | 63% | 18 | IN |
| 8880 | CCVA 16-Elite | 1639 | 8-5 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 8881 | Unified 11-1 | 1639 | 23-15 | 61% | 11 | MI |
| 8882 | VC United 14-1 premier | 1639 | 14-9 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 8883 | Revolution 17-Blue | 1639 | 24-16 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 8884 | HP Illinois 16-Select | 1639 | 28-16 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 8885 | SAND 13-Gold | 1639 | 25-17 | 60% | 13 | UT |
| 8886 | SEV 18-1 | 1639 | 23-16 | 59% | 18 | AL |
| 8887 | One Ohana 16 Adidas | 1639 | 28-20 | 58% | 16 | WA |
| 8888 | FTL 17-Fusion alex | 1639 | 42-32 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 8889 | NE Elite 15-2 | 1639 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | NE |
| 8890 | Rise 17-1 | 1639 | 23-18 | 56% | 17 | OH |
| 8891 | Alabama Perf 18-N white | 1639 | 37-30 | 55% | 18 | AL |
| 8892 | LAVA North 16 Molten | 1639 | 31-27 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 8893 | Loudoun Elite 18 Marissa | 1639 | 26-26 | 50% | 18 | VA |
| 8894 | Net Force 15-1 | 1639 | 5-2 | 50% | 15 | IA |
| 8895 | WF Waves 12-Cody | 1639 | 25-25 | 50% | 12 | FL |
| 8896 | American 17-Red | 1639 | 37-37 | 49% | 17 | VA |
| 8897 | Apex VBTC 17-Apex red | 1639 | 21-27 | 44% | 17 | OH |
| 8898 | MT NW 16-1 aubrey | 1639 | 17-19 | 40% | 16 | MT |
| 8899 | CinciVB Acad 14-1 | 1639 | 17-30 | 36% | 14 | OH |
| 8900 | HJV 14-Molten | 1639 | 15-9 | 63% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.