Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 178 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8851 Air Attack Volleyball Club 14-Girls gold 1639 6-3 67% 14
8852 Champions 16-Elite 1639 14-5 74% 16
8853 Arsenal 17-Gold 1639 20-18 50% 17 TX
8854 KNVBC 14-2 1639 8-2 80% 14 KS
8855 ZTV 14-S 1639 2-2 50% 14 MT
8856 MARIN 14 Slate 1639 27-27 50% 14 CA
8857 NIVA 17-BLACK 1639 47-41 53% 17 IN
8858 Train4F 11-1 1639 10-1 91% 11 OH
8859 MAVS KC Select 12-1 1639 16-1 84% 12 KS
8860 USA MI Momentum 18 1639 10-2 83% 18 MI
8861 UVA 16-S elite 1639 5-1 83% 16 LA
8862 Lady Hawks 12 1639 4-1 80% 12 IA
8863 SouthJamm 16-Red 1639 18-5 75% 16 AL
8864 NC Intensity 14-Laina 1639 9-3 75% 14 NC
8865 Columbus Classics 16-1 1639 12-4 75% 16 TX
8866 Force 16-Adidas sel bl gr 1639 32-11 74% 16 CA
8867 Legend 12-Black 1639 20-6 74% 12 CA
8868 ONE Volleyball 14-2 1639 44-16 73% 14 GA
8869 CVC 14 SILVER 1639 42-16 72% 14 OH
8870 TAV 15-Metro green 1639 20-6 71% 15 TX
8871 MAVA 15-Hammerhead 1639 38-16 70% 15 KY
8872 ICA 14-Colibri 1639 20-9 69% 14 TX
8873 ARVC 16-White adidas 1639 33-16 67% 16 NM
8874 Aleta 17-2 1639 22-11 67% 17 OH
8875 RVBC 12U Blue 1639 15-7 65% 12 PA
8876 Rocky Elite 18 National 1639 33-18 65% 18 CO
8877 PREVAIL Girls 18-Platinum 1639 23-13 64% 18 PA
8878 Sideout 16-Elite 1639 40-24 63% 16 FL
8879 Valkyries 18 Elite 1639 46-27 63% 18 IN
8880 CCVA 16-Elite 1639 8-5 62% 16 CA
8881 Unified 11-1 1639 23-15 61% 11 MI
8882 VC United 14-1 premier 1639 14-9 61% 14 IL
8883 Revolution 17-Blue 1639 24-16 60% 17 IL
8884 HP Illinois 16-Select 1639 28-16 60% 16 IL
8885 SAND 13-Gold 1639 25-17 60% 13 UT
8886 SEV 18-1 1639 23-16 59% 18 AL
8887 One Ohana 16 Adidas 1639 28-20 58% 16 WA
8888 FTL 17-Fusion alex 1639 42-32 57% 17 FL
8889 NE Elite 15-2 1639 4-3 57% 15 NE
8890 Rise 17-1 1639 23-18 56% 17 OH
8891 Alabama Perf 18-N white 1639 37-30 55% 18 AL
8892 LAVA North 16 Molten 1639 31-27 53% 16 CA
8893 Loudoun Elite 18 Marissa 1639 26-26 50% 18 VA
8894 Net Force 15-1 1639 5-2 50% 15 IA
8895 WF Waves 12-Cody 1639 25-25 50% 12 FL
8896 American 17-Red 1639 37-37 49% 17 VA
8897 Apex VBTC 17-Apex red 1639 21-27 44% 17 OH
8898 MT NW 16-1 aubrey 1639 17-19 40% 16 MT
8899 CinciVB Acad 14-1 1639 17-30 36% 14 OH
8900 HJV 14-Molten 1639 15-9 63% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.