Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 177 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8801 South Volley 14-2 milton 1640 9-2 82% 14 PR
8802 TIC 14-1 1640 6-2 75% 14 PR
8803 PIRATAS ADN 14-1 1640 12-4 75% 14 PR
8804 Velocity 219 13-E jen 1640 46-16 74% 13 IN
8805 AVA 10-Molly 1640 34-13 72% 10 FL
8806 NKYVC 11-3 typhoon 1640 18-7 72% 11 KY
8807 Gibbstown Spikers 13U 1640 29-10 71% 13 NJ
8808 Alamo 14 Silver 1640 34-14 71% 14 TX
8809 DCVC 13-Regional 1640 16-6 70% 13 IA
8810 Ignite 13-1 1640 31-9 70% 13 TX
8811 AEV 11 Select 1640 14-6 70% 11 TX
8812 Midwest Intensity VBC 14 1640 32-11 70% 14 IL
8813 Chi City 13-1 regional 1640 18-8 69% 13 IL
8814 Cincy Crush 16-2 1640 27-12 69% 16 OH
8815 ATOMIC 10-Smack premier 1640 8-4 67% 10 MI
8816 608 Juniors 14-Select 1640 41-21 66% 14 WI
8817 FIVA 14-Hiram 1640 42-22 66% 14 FL
8818 SPVB 12 Elite 1640 41-21 66% 12 IL
8819 Platform 14-Molten 1640 30-15 65% 14 IA
8820 LuMaDe 15-Black 1640 47-25 65% 15 FL
8821 Iowa Select 12-Black 1640 20-10 65% 12 IA
8822 SIVBA 12-Blue 1640 13-4 65% 12 IL
8823 MIDTN Volleyball 17-Black 1640 17-10 63% 17 TN
8824 MAVA 11-Hammerhead 1640 33-19 63% 11 KY
8825 Top Flight SC 12-Falcon 1640 10-2 63% 12 SC
8826 Elevation 15-Regional 1640 28-17 62% 15 CO
8827 GVA 18-Pink 1640 14-9 61% 18 PR
8828 Boss CLE 11-1 1640 31-20 61% 11 OH
8829 HP South 15-Diamond 1640 39-23 61% 15 MO
8830 Creole Big Apple 16 1640 24-17 59% 16 NY
8831 Impact 13-Black 1640 30-20 57% 13 TX
8832 I AM VBC 14-Black 1640 38-31 55% 14 WI
8833 ZTV 14-3 gold 1640 15-8 54% 14 MT
8834 Club V 14-Prodigy lily 1640 32-30 51% 14 UT
8835 SVC 17-1 1640 31-30 49% 17 FL
8836 A5 West 16-Aerion 1640 17-20 46% 16 GA
8837 Bay Area Eagles 13-2 1640 27-32 46% 13 CA
8838 Victory 16-National green 1640 17-21 39% 16 TX
8839 Legacy 18-2 adidas 1640 13-32 29% 18 MI
8840 RAGE 11-Amanda 1640 15-7 68% 11 CA
8841 Kelowna Volleyball Club 15-Red 1640 8-1 89% 15
8842 Send Me Surge 14-Fabio 1640 14-7 67% 14
8843 Impact 14-1 (NE) 1640 13-7 65% 14
8844 TAV 13-Blue (NTR) 1640 21-13 58% 13
8845 Top Select 10-Elite 1640 51-16 76% 10 FL
8846 VVB 14-Ted 1640 5-4 56% 14 CA
8847 NorCal 16-2 blue 1640 24-23 51% 16 CA
8848 Northern Alliance 18 1639 23-7 74% 18
8849 CJ Heat 13-National 1639 13-6 68% 13
8850 NSA 13-SAJ 1639 24-10 71% 13
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.