Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 177 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8801 SoCal VBC 14-Cardiff 1641 17-24 41% 14 CA
8802 EVA 12 National 1641 36-21 61% 12 AR
8803 FRVBC 17-2 red 1641 22-17 56% 17 CO
8804 Legacy 18-2 adidas 1641 13-32 29% 18 MI
8805 NS 13-Sea serpents 1641 36-21 63% 13 MI
8806 Wasatch United 13 1641 13-4 59% 13 UT
8807 Boss CLE 11-1 1641 31-20 61% 11 OH
8808 RAGE 11-Amanda 1641 15-7 68% 11 CA
8809 S.A. STARS 11-Navy 1641 19-6 73% 11 TX
8810 LIVEWIRE 18 Prime 1641 27-25 52% 18 AZ
8811 Premier 15-Crimson t 1641 23-18 55% 15 TX
8812 Epic United 12-B red 1641 12-5 67% 12 IL
8813 1 Flight VBC 16-1 1641 7-1 88% 16 OR
8814 Arsenal 17-Gold 1641 20-18 50% 17 TX
8815 Oly Reign 16-1 1641 10-6 63% 16 WA
8816 SPVB 15-White 1641 34-23 60% 15 IL
8817 A5 10 Aneska 1641 24-18 57% 10 GA
8818 OMNI Volleyball Club 12 OMNI Black (NC) 1641 15-5 75% 12 CA
8819 Hamden Hall Volleyball Club 16-1 1641 14-4 78% 16 CT
8820 CTX Juniors 16-Mizuno 1641 28-21 57% 16 TX
8821 Illini Elite 13-Black 1641 20-11 65% 13 IL
8822 Bristol Crush 17-1 1641 31-12 69% 17 CT
8823 M1 16-Blue 1641 35-30 54% 16 TN
8824 Elevation 12-Timberline 1641 35-27 56% 12 CO
8825 Xcel 15-Blue 1641 6-2 75% 15 AL
8826 Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 13 BRVBC Red (Bethanie) 1641 13-3 68% 13
8827 IBV 12 10 1640 7-2 78% 10 IN
8828 FTL 15-Fusion open-usa h 1640 5-0 100% 15 FL
8829 PULELEHUA 10 1640 5-1 83% 10 HI
8830 Inspire CLE 14 Sunrise 1640 40-29 58% 14 OH
8831 808AC 16-Shantel 1640 33-14 70% 16 HI
8832 VC United 10-1 regional 1640 12-3 75% 10 IL
8833 Columbus Classics 16-1 1640 12-4 75% 16 TX
8834 Nebraska Top Flight 12-1 1640 6-1 86% 12 NE
8835 Sharks Volleyball Club 15-Silver 1640 11-4 73% 15 FL
8836 UNION 15-In white 1640 37-11 77% 15 IN
8837 SOVC Smith 11-R 1640 4-1 80% 11 OH
8838 COVC 16-S regionals gold 1640 14-4 78% 16 OR
8839 Club GSL St. George 16-Comp - josh 1640 15-1 71% 16 UT
8840 Victory 12-National black 1640 16-19 39% 12 TX
8841 Wildfire Volleyball Academy 17 Wildfire 17/18N Rezart 1640 20-20 50% 17 FL
8842 Husky 17-Northeast black 1640 36-17 68% 17 CT
8843 MATRIX 17 National 1640 37-21 64% 17 AL
8844 Elevate 14-Green spring 1640 7-0 100% 14 IL
8845 Twisters 15-Dennise 1640 19-6 76% 15 CA
8846 ALL IN 18-1 1640 5-0 100% 18 SC
8847 Club MVP 18-1 1640 14-8 61% 18 MO
8848 FeVA 15 (BG) 1640 39-20 66% 15 WI
8849 ATOMIC 10-Smack premier 1640 8-4 67% 10 AZ
8850 FAUCONS BLACK 14 1640 3-4 43% 14 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.