Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 176 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8751 SoDak Juniors 15 Elite 1641 33-13 72% 15 SD
8752 Gators VBC 18 Premier 1641 44-18 71% 18 OH
8753 XFVBC 14-1 1641 16-7 70% 14 VA
8754 Kelly 13-National 1641 9-4 69% 13 VA
8755 Bristol Crush 17-1 1641 31-12 69% 17 CT
8756 NorthShore 14-Knoll 1641 17-8 68% 14 OH
8757 Tribe 15 Stanley 1641 21-10 68% 15 OH
8758 EVA 14-Green 1641 20-10 67% 14 KY
8759 ENCORE 14-Red 1641 28-14 67% 14 CA
8760 ID Peak 17-Kaitlyn national 1641 4-2 67% 17 ID
8761 REAL Sports 16-Blue 1641 18-9 67% 16 NC
8762 Saratoga 12-Blue 1641 28-10 65% 12 NY
8763 FeVA 16 (BG) 1641 54-30 64% 16 WI
8764 TVA Smack 18-Top tier 1641 32-18 64% 18 CA
8765 All In 14 Local 1641 25-6 64% 14 AL
8766 Tsunami 14-2e burney 1641 36-20 64% 14 GA
8767 Viper 16-1 jolynn/hannah 1641 5-3 63% 16 CA
8768 Epic United 14-National 1641 27-16 63% 14 IN
8769 LIV 17-Adidas 1641 28-17 62% 17 LA
8770 HRVC Hurricanes 14-1 1641 3-2 60% 14 ON
8771 MVA 12-1 1641 45-31 59% 12 FL
8772 Core STL 12-Navy 1641 26-18 58% 12 MO
8773 Club V 15-Drew 1641 22-16 58% 15 UT
8774 IVC 16-National-1 1641 15-11 54% 16 AK
8775 CLUB 43 13-1 1641 25-21 54% 13 MN
8776 Princeton 14-1 national 1641 6-6 50% 14 NJ
8777 SAND 17-Gold 1641 24-26 48% 17 UT
8778 BSVBC 11-Black 1641 13-14 48% 11 IL
8779 Excel NW 16-1 lux 1641 31-34 48% 16 WA
8780 417 MoJrs 17-Elite royal 1641 12-13 46% 17 MO
8781 Instinct 16-Wild gold 1641 18-21 44% 16 TX
8782 CINCY EAST 18-1 black 1641 19-25 43% 18 OH
8783 603 United 16-Seacoast black 1641 13-21 38% 16 NH
8784 RUV 16-Red 1641 13-10 57% 16 VA
8785 ECVA 18-Teal 1641 29-18 62% 18 NC
8786 Gold Cal Jrs 15-Air 1641 11-3 79% 15
8787 East Coast Power KOP 18-Black 1641 2-4 33% 18
8788 Lions SWest Prairie 16-1 1641 30-17 64% 16 IL
8789 BPV 12 1641 21-9 62% 12 TX
8790 Lincoln Fusion 14-Brooke 1640 20-8 71% 14
8791 NY Cobra Attack 14U 1640 26-10 72% 14
8792 Storm 14-Gold 1640 19-8 70% 14
8793 FCVBC 17-Black 1640 22-8 73% 17
8794 CRU MAX 17 1640 16-12 57% 17
8795 EPFury 16-S 1640 32-12 73% 16
8796 Rockwood Thunder 14-Black 1640 52-25 68% 14 MO
8797 Black Hills Juniors 15-Gold 1640 4-2 67% 15 SD
8798 A5 11-3 1640 7-0 100% 11 GA
8799 SCBandits 16-2 1640 10-2 83% 16 ON
8800 Zero Gravity 15-Orange 1640 5-1 83% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.