Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 176 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8751 Impact 16-Red alicia 1642 31-24 56% 16 NV
8752 FC Elite 15-Ex amber 1642 10-6 63% 15 WI
8753 River City Jrs 16-Red 1642 29-14 67% 16 IA
8754 VIPER 13-Elite 1642 27-14 66% 13 TN
8755 LEGACY 12-Premier david 1642 34-23 60% 12 FL
8756 Gators VBC 18 Premier 1642 44-18 71% 18 OH
8757 ID Peak 17-Kaitlyn national 1642 4-2 67% 17 WA
8758 Aspire NW 12-1 vancouver 1642 6-3 67% 12 WA
8759 NP Dragons 11 Lindeman 1642 4-0 100% 11 IN
8760 Excel NW 16-1 lux 1642 31-34 48% 16 WA
8761 Elite 16-National grayson 1642 34-20 63% 16 FL
8762 SVC 16-TEAL 1642 13-3 81% 16 GA
8763 Canuck VBC 16-2 1642 3-4 43% 16 AB
8764 HRVC Hurricanes 14-1 1642 3-2 60% 14 ON
8765 Send Me Surge 14-Fabio 1641 14-7 67% 14 AL
8766 Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 14-Josi 1641 44-36 54% 14 VA
8767 ICA 14-Colibri 1641 20-9 69% 14 CA
8768 Tsunami 14-2e burney 1641 36-20 64% 14 GA
8769 CINCY EAST 18-1 black 1641 19-25 43% 18 OH
8770 BBVCL 17 Brittany 1641 32-24 57% 17 NV
8771 CinciVB Acad 14-1 1641 17-30 36% 14 OH
8772 TORCH 12-Avery 1641 28-19 60% 12 CA
8773 L2 16-4 1641 46-18 72% 16 MI
8774 Lancers 13-Scarlet 1641 5-1 83% 13 IA
8775 SOVC Winter 17-R 1641 5-1 83% 17 OH
8776 A3 13-X 1641 50-16 76% 13 TN
8777 Downstate North 15-Huskies 1641 6-2 75% 15 NY
8778 Tstreet IE 16-Taylor 1641 21-35 38% 16 CA
8779 USA South 16-1 elite 1641 17-8 68% 16 FL
8780 RVC 16-Relentless 1641 50-24 68% 16 CO
8781 Gold Cal Jrs 15-Air 1641 11-3 79% 15 NV
8782 SP2VC 18-Blue 1641 25-13 66% 18 NC
8783 STRiVEVBC 17-1 1641 5-4 56% 17 TX
8784 SMVA 15-Quantum nationals 1641 25-17 58% 15 MO
8785 Lions 13-Sky 1641 11-7 61% 13 IL
8786 CORE Girls 15-Platinum 1641 31-31 50% 15 NJ
8787 NOVA Juniors 18-S gold 1641 30-12 71% 18 OH
8788 Blue Thunder 11 1641 8-2 73% 11 MO
8789 208vbc 16 208 U15/16 SE (EV) 1641 18-11 62% 16 ID
8790 CRU MAX 17 1641 16-12 57% 17 WA
8791 SIVBA 12-Blue 1641 13-4 65% 12 MO
8792 Nordiques 18 1641 7-2 78% 18 IL
8793 SoDak Juniors 15 Elite 1641 33-13 72% 15 MN
8794 ICE 15-Premier 1641 28-19 60% 15 WA
8795 Northern Lights 13-B 1641 36-24 60% 13 MN
8796 Starlings 505 16 1641 7-1 88% 16 NM
8797 PowerPlex 15-Mueller 1641 34-25 57% 15 IA
8798 Vienna Elite 15 Travel 1641 41-29 59% 15 VA
8799 FC Elite 18-White 1641 29-23 56% 18 WI
8800 CJ Heat 13-National 1641 13-6 68% 13 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.