Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 175 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8701 PVCGA 12-1 1643 13-3 81% 12 GA
8702 SMASH 14-S fire 1643 30-26 54% 14 MA
8703 SA Juniors 15 Baden 1643 38-21 64% 15 TX
8704 MC Panthers 14-Gold 1643 28-16 60% 14 TX
8705 FTL 17-Fusion alex 1643 42-32 57% 17 FL
8706 Rocky Elite 18 National 1643 33-18 65% 18 CO
8707 Victory 14-Nat'l green 1643 4-4 50% 14 TX
8708 Image 13-Black 1643 26-13 65% 13
8709 Panola Aces 13 1643 13-5 62% 13
8710 A5 11-3 1643 7-0 100% 11 GA
8711 Aspire 15-1 black 1642 28-26 52% 15 AB
8712 Summit Volleyball Club 12 Summit vb 1 1642 8-2 73% 12
8713 ITVC 14-1 1642 6-2 75% 14 WA
8714 West TN Volleyball 14 West Tn Warriors-Hanna 1642 6-3 55% 14 TN
8715 CVBC Rallycats 14U 1642 10-6 63% 14 IA
8716 MAVA 14-Hammerhead 1642 34-19 64% 14 KY
8717 Mountain Brook Volleyball Club 14 MBVC Carol and Morgan 1642 15-4 68% 14 AL
8718 Networks Academy 12-1 1642 22-10 58% 12 AL
8719 Dynamite 15-Premier 1642 29-10 74% 15 MI
8720 Apex 17 1642 26-11 70% 17 CA
8721 Crank It 17-Gold 1642 32-10 76% 17 MI
8722 SF TREMORS 12 HAWKS 1642 19-13 59% 12 CA
8723 Victory 16-National green 1642 17-21 39% 16 TX
8724 ClubCENTRAL 15-Black 1642 6-2 75% 15 SD
8725 LEGACY 16-Elite koree 1642 35-32 52% 16 FL
8726 Jr Vikings 11-Blue 1642 16-7 70% 11 WI
8727 Sanford Sports 13-Red 1642 48-26 65% 13 SD
8728 Stingray 15-Black 1642 17-11 61% 15 CA
8729 Spiketown VBC 13-2 1642 5-1 83% 13 OH
8730 Instinct 16-Wild gold 1642 18-21 44% 16 TX
8731 IconVBC 15 Adidas 1642 28-21 57% 15 CA
8732 MAVS KC 18-2 1642 5-2 71% 18 KS
8733 Lincoln Fusion 14-Brooke 1642 20-8 71% 14 IL
8734 Wilton 12 1642 8-0 67% 12 IA
8735 Alliance 13-Premier 1642 29-13 69% 13 TN
8736 ZTV 15-1 select 1642 26-21 53% 15 MT
8737 IVC 16-National-1 1642 15-11 54% 16 AK
8738 Great River elite 16 Great River Elite 1642 17-9 65% 16 MN
8739 208 U12-Blue 1642 26-15 63% 12 ID
8740 ENVY 15-National 1642 34-26 57% 15 RI
8741 Kansas Rise VBC 14-1 1642 16-1 89% 14 IN
8742 Endless Momentum 16-Power blue 1642 6-2 75% 16 MA
8743 Tville Smash 13 1642 19-7 73% 13 IL
8744 Freeze ND 14-Avalanche 1642 17-8 68% 14 ND
8745 West Florida Volleyball Club 16-Chad 1642 27-26 51% 16 AL
8746 West County 17-1 1642 3-2 60% 17 CA
8747 Fuego 17 1642 16-19 44% 17 NM
8748 No Limits 12-Elite 1642 26-16 59% 12 TX
8749 417 Missouri Juniors 17-Black 1642 3-4 43% 17 MO
8750 H2 15 1642 22-8 73% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.