Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 175 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8701 VC United 10-1 regional 1642 12-3 75% 10 IL
8702 OK Charge 11-West 1642 21-6 75% 11 OK
8703 Xcel 15-Blue 1642 6-2 75% 15 TX
8704 Reign 12-Black 1642 34-13 71% 12 FL
8705 LAV 12-Regional white 1642 30-13 70% 12 AL
8706 BEVBC 13 Navy 1642 34-12 68% 13 MD
8707 Epic United 12-B red 1642 12-5 67% 12 IN
8708 MN Attack 16-1 1642 16-8 67% 16 MN
8709 Tsunami 11-1e gabriella 1642 31-15 67% 11 GA
8710 Alliance 14-Tornado 1642 18-7 67% 14 MA
8711 Aspire NW 12-1 vancouver 1642 6-3 67% 12 WA
8712 HOV 14 Navy 1642 28-16 64% 14 VA
8713 SA Juniors 15 Baden 1642 38-21 64% 15 TX
8714 CSA 14 Silver 1642 10-6 63% 14 CO
8715 PREVA 11-Lymaris 1642 19-11 63% 11 PR
8716 208 U12-Blue 1642 26-15 63% 12 WA
8717 Paramount VBC 12 Yasemin 1642 40-23 63% 12 VA
8718 Oly Reign 16-1 1642 10-6 63% 16 WA
8719 SG Elite 15-Elite lei 1642 31-19 62% 15 CA
8720 LHVA 14-Purple national 1642 28-17 62% 14 NY
8721 516 Elite 15-Black 1642 27-17 61% 15 NY
8722 Circle City 10-Purple 1642 17-11 61% 10 IN
8723 Tsunami 16-2e hannah 1642 38-25 60% 16 GA
8724 Club SyrV 17-Premier 1642 34-23 60% 17 NY
8725 West County 17-1 1642 3-2 60% 17 CA
8726 SF TREMORS 12 HAWKS 1642 19-13 59% 12 CA
8727 BHJ 15-Green 1642 11-8 58% 15 SD
8728 United VBA 15-Black 1642 35-26 57% 15 TX
8729 MDJRS 15-Elite yellow 1642 39-26 57% 15 MD
8730 Panda 16-2 1642 24-19 56% 16 CA
8731 Game Day 16-National 1642 29-26 53% 16 OR
8732 New Age 14-Select 1642 18-16 53% 14 TX
8733 Husky 14-Northeast 1642 24-22 52% 14 CT
8734 PREVA 13-Enrique 1642 8-10 44% 13 PR
8735 JERSEY JRS 14-National 1642 10-15 40% 14 NJ
8736 Wildfire 13-N premier 1642 7-18 28% 13 FL
8737 PowerPlex 14-Pelds 1642 28-21 57% 14 IA
8738 Six Pack Legit 12-G gray 1642 4-1 80% 12
8739 EVP Rise 13-1 1642 9-4 69% 13
8740 IconVBC 15 Adidas 1642 28-21 57% 15 CA
8741 ICE 15-Premier 1641 28-19 60% 15
8742 SMVA 15-Quantum nationals 1641 25-17 58% 15
8743 NE Elite 15-Prime 1641 23-19 55% 15 NE
8744 EP Elite 13-Smack 1641 24-16 57% 13 TX
8745 Hard Hitters 14-Black 1641 13-9 54% 14 TX
8746 LS vball 16-1 1641 12-2 80% 16 NY
8747 Ballers Performance 14-Coleman 1641 21-6 78% 14 IL
8748 Miami Wave 13-Teal 1641 35-12 74% 13 FL
8749 ACVC 12-White 1641 11-4 73% 12 TX
8750 Hawks 15-S 1641 31-11 72% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.