Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 174 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8651 VoltageVB 13-Blue-yaya 1644 22-7 76% 13 FL
8652 EP STRiVE VBC 17-S black 1644 40-27 60% 17 TX
8653 MCE 18-1 1644 16-9 64% 18 MN
8654 GJV 11-1 1644 15-5 75% 11 AR
8655 SVC 13 Silver 1644 16-6 73% 13 IA
8656 FSVC 16-Nike 1644 48-43 53% 16 FL
8657 Endless 14-Navy 1644 16-14 46% 14 TX
8658 Blast Volleyball Club 16 16U Blast Black 1644 35-23 60% 16 PA
8659 Victory 17-Nat'l black 1644 7-3 64% 17 TX
8660 Mizuno M1 16-Blu 1644 45-20 69% 16 MN
8661 AVA 10-Molly 1644 34-13 72% 10 FL
8662 AP 10-Adidas 1644 22-20 52% 10 TX
8663 Georgetown Impact 18-1 1644 13-6 68% 18 OH
8664 Five Starz 15-Black jon 1644 30-32 48% 15 CA
8665 Galena Vipers 15U 1644 16-7 62% 15 IA
8666 SCBandits 13-1 1644 29-10 71% 13 ON
8667 BSVBC 11-Black 1643 13-14 48% 11 IL
8668 Spiketown VBC 15-1 1643 23-12 66% 15 OH
8669 Green Wave 18 1643 7-5 54% 18 ND
8670 MN Attack 14-1 1643 16-8 67% 14 MN
8671 Premier 12-Black cat 1643 14-20 35% 12 TX
8672 LES 17-Tina 1643 24-9 73% 17 AL
8673 Kulia 12-Gold 1643 27-17 61% 12 HI
8674 Storm 15-National black 1643 11-5 69% 15 TX
8675 Firecrackers 15-Red 1643 42-15 74% 15 NC
8676 Metro Volleyball Club 17-Black 1643 22-8 73% 17 GA
8677 Valencianas 17 1643 7-1 88% 17 PR
8678 Black Hills Juniors 15-Gold 1643 4-2 67% 15 WY
8679 VC Denver 16-Black 1643 33-27 55% 16 CO
8680 Boise Ignite 15 National 1643 19-19 50% 15 UT
8681 Dinamite 12-Lauren 1643 5-1 83% 12 CA
8682 CI ELITE 13-Red 1643 22-13 63% 13 IL
8683 Gold VBC 17 (NC) 1643 4-1 80% 17 CA
8684 Club Gold 13-Black 1643 11-4 73% 13 WA
8685 Hot Shots 18-Black 1643 20-9 69% 18 OH
8686 Sandhills 17-Bri 1643 26-13 67% 17 NC
8687 MVA 13 National 1643 29-19 60% 13 MN
8688 Rockwood Thunder 17-Black 1643 35-16 65% 17 MO
8689 PVA 16-Molten 1643 22-15 59% 16 MO
8690 CJV 12-Select navy 1643 17-7 71% 12 NC
8691 PREVA 13-Enrique 1643 8-10 44% 13 PR
8692 Gators VBC 16 Elite 1643 29-14 67% 16 OH
8693 Aces 15-S 1643 17-17 40% 15 MT
8694 Revolution CBURG 15-White 1643 34-32 52% 15 PA
8695 DINAMITE 16-1 1643 5-3 63% 16 CA
8696 OK Charge 11-West 1643 21-6 75% 11 OK
8697 Texas Heat 18-1 1643 19-20 49% 18 TX
8698 MN Select 15-2 1643 36-50 42% 15 MN
8699 Top Flight SC 12-Falcon 1643 10-2 63% 12 SC
8700 AVBC 14-National red 1643 31-27 53% 14 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.