Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 174 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8651 CCVC 15-Eric 1643 7-3 70% 15 CA
8652 HOU STELLAR 12-Premier 1643 13-6 68% 12 TX
8653 FVA 13-1 1643 39-17 68% 13 AK
8654 M2 Volleyball 15-E2 1643 43-31 58% 15 GA
8655 CLVC 16-Black 1643 31-23 57% 16 NC
8656 FC Elite 18-White 1643 29-23 56% 18 WI
8657 LHVA 16-Purple national 1643 24-19 56% 16 NY
8658 HVC 13-Black 1643 10-8 56% 13 BC
8659 EVA 13-Blue 1643 31-25 55% 13 KY
8660 Loudoun Elite 14 Josi 1643 44-36 54% 14 VA
8661 M1 16-Blue 1643 35-30 54% 16 TN
8662 SDVBC 16-Chris 1643 10-10 50% 16 CA
8663 Boise Ignite 15 National 1643 19-19 50% 15 ID
8664 Tstreet IE 14-Moriah 1643 18-19 49% 14 CA
8665 OJVA 18-1 gold 1643 23-24 49% 18 OR
8666 WSA Gators 14-Elite 1643 23-27 46% 14 FL
8667 KC Power 11-2 1643 9-11 45% 11 KS
8668 CT Juniors 16-National 1643 12-16 43% 16 CT
8669 575 15-Wse danielle 1643 23-32 42% 15 GA
8670 New Age 16-Select 1643 17-35 33% 16 TX
8671 Impact 15-Taejah 1643 12-4 75% 15 MI
8672 IMPACT WAHINE 14 1643 6-1 86% 14
8673 Gladiadores VBC 13-99 1643 5-1 83% 13
8674 Sonshine 18 1643 10-2 83% 18
8675 Paradigm Riot 14-S 1643 35-12 74% 14
8676 SVBC 13-Elite 1643 17-8 68% 13 IA
8677 MN Attack 14-1 1643 16-8 67% 14 MN
8678 AVC 12-2 1643 12-4 67% 12 FL
8679 CI ELITE 13-Red 1643 22-13 63% 13 IL
8680 IA Juniors 12-Black 1643 25-16 61% 12 IA
8681 SPVB 15-White 1643 34-23 60% 15 IL
8682 IVBA SOAR 15-Ren 1643 27-19 59% 15 MS
8683 SKY Elite 17-Black 1643 23-17 57% 17 PA
8684 ClubCENTRAL 15-Black 1642 6-2 75% 15
8685 LES 17-Tina 1642 24-9 73% 17
8686 Fuego 17 1642 16-19 44% 17
8687 USA South 16-1 elite 1642 17-8 68% 16 FL
8688 HOU STELLAR 14-Premier 1642 29-33 47% 14 TX
8689 ITVC 14-1 1642 6-2 75% 14 WA
8690 United VBA 14-Black 1642 34-13 72% 14 TX
8691 Stayton Athletics 14-1 1642 26-6 74% 14 OR
8692 Victory 14-Nat'l green 1642 4-4 50% 14 TX
8693 NP Dragons 11 Lindeman 1642 4-0 100% 11 IN
8694 Sartell 12-1 1642 9-1 90% 12 MN
8695 Starlings 505 16 1642 7-1 88% 16 NM
8696 Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 14-1 1642 6-1 86% 14 KS
8697 Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Nick 1642 5-1 83% 16 MI
8698 Lancers 13-Scarlet 1642 5-1 83% 13 IA
8699 UNION 15-In white 1642 37-11 77% 15 CA
8700 Twisters 15-Dennise 1642 19-6 76% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.