2025-2026 Season — Page 174 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8651 | CCVC 15-Eric | 1643 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 8652 | HOU STELLAR 12-Premier | 1643 | 13-6 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 8653 | FVA 13-1 | 1643 | 39-17 | 68% | 13 | AK |
| 8654 | M2 Volleyball 15-E2 | 1643 | 43-31 | 58% | 15 | GA |
| 8655 | CLVC 16-Black | 1643 | 31-23 | 57% | 16 | NC |
| 8656 | FC Elite 18-White | 1643 | 29-23 | 56% | 18 | WI |
| 8657 | LHVA 16-Purple national | 1643 | 24-19 | 56% | 16 | NY |
| 8658 | HVC 13-Black | 1643 | 10-8 | 56% | 13 | BC |
| 8659 | EVA 13-Blue | 1643 | 31-25 | 55% | 13 | KY |
| 8660 | Loudoun Elite 14 Josi | 1643 | 44-36 | 54% | 14 | VA |
| 8661 | M1 16-Blue | 1643 | 35-30 | 54% | 16 | TN |
| 8662 | SDVBC 16-Chris | 1643 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 8663 | Boise Ignite 15 National | 1643 | 19-19 | 50% | 15 | ID |
| 8664 | Tstreet IE 14-Moriah | 1643 | 18-19 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 8665 | OJVA 18-1 gold | 1643 | 23-24 | 49% | 18 | OR |
| 8666 | WSA Gators 14-Elite | 1643 | 23-27 | 46% | 14 | FL |
| 8667 | KC Power 11-2 | 1643 | 9-11 | 45% | 11 | KS |
| 8668 | CT Juniors 16-National | 1643 | 12-16 | 43% | 16 | CT |
| 8669 | 575 15-Wse danielle | 1643 | 23-32 | 42% | 15 | GA |
| 8670 | New Age 16-Select | 1643 | 17-35 | 33% | 16 | TX |
| 8671 | Impact 15-Taejah | 1643 | 12-4 | 75% | 15 | MI |
| 8672 | IMPACT WAHINE 14 | 1643 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | |
| 8673 | Gladiadores VBC 13-99 | 1643 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | |
| 8674 | Sonshine 18 | 1643 | 10-2 | 83% | 18 | |
| 8675 | Paradigm Riot 14-S | 1643 | 35-12 | 74% | 14 | |
| 8676 | SVBC 13-Elite | 1643 | 17-8 | 68% | 13 | IA |
| 8677 | MN Attack 14-1 | 1643 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 8678 | AVC 12-2 | 1643 | 12-4 | 67% | 12 | FL |
| 8679 | CI ELITE 13-Red | 1643 | 22-13 | 63% | 13 | IL |
| 8680 | IA Juniors 12-Black | 1643 | 25-16 | 61% | 12 | IA |
| 8681 | SPVB 15-White | 1643 | 34-23 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 8682 | IVBA SOAR 15-Ren | 1643 | 27-19 | 59% | 15 | MS |
| 8683 | SKY Elite 17-Black | 1643 | 23-17 | 57% | 17 | PA |
| 8684 | ClubCENTRAL 15-Black | 1642 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | |
| 8685 | LES 17-Tina | 1642 | 24-9 | 73% | 17 | |
| 8686 | Fuego 17 | 1642 | 16-19 | 44% | 17 | |
| 8687 | USA South 16-1 elite | 1642 | 17-8 | 68% | 16 | FL |
| 8688 | HOU STELLAR 14-Premier | 1642 | 29-33 | 47% | 14 | TX |
| 8689 | ITVC 14-1 | 1642 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | WA |
| 8690 | United VBA 14-Black | 1642 | 34-13 | 72% | 14 | TX |
| 8691 | Stayton Athletics 14-1 | 1642 | 26-6 | 74% | 14 | OR |
| 8692 | Victory 14-Nat'l green | 1642 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 8693 | NP Dragons 11 Lindeman | 1642 | 4-0 | 100% | 11 | IN |
| 8694 | Sartell 12-1 | 1642 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | MN |
| 8695 | Starlings 505 16 | 1642 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | NM |
| 8696 | Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1642 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | KS |
| 8697 | Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Nick | 1642 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MI |
| 8698 | Lancers 13-Scarlet | 1642 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | IA |
| 8699 | UNION 15-In white | 1642 | 37-11 | 77% | 15 | CA |
| 8700 | Twisters 15-Dennise | 1642 | 19-6 | 76% | 15 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.