2025-2026 Season — Page 173 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8601 | TPV 14-Red | 1645 | 31-15 | 67% | 14 | TN |
| 8602 | IVC Crush 14-S | 1644 | 18-6 | 75% | 14 | |
| 8603 | Ballers Performance 14-Coleman | 1644 | 21-6 | 78% | 14 | IL |
| 8604 | MVBC 14-Red | 1644 | 33-15 | 69% | 14 | NJ |
| 8605 | I AM VBC 14-Black | 1644 | 38-31 | 55% | 14 | WI |
| 8606 | Panther Girls 14-Black | 1644 | 25-15 | 63% | 14 | CO |
| 8607 | CVC 14 SILVER | 1644 | 42-16 | 72% | 14 | OH |
| 8608 | ZTV 14-3 gold | 1644 | 15-8 | 54% | 14 | MT |
| 8609 | CGSV 14-Jarrett | 1644 | 15-7 | 68% | 14 | OH |
| 8610 | Miles City Volleyball Club 14 MCVC U14- team 1 (EV) | 1644 | 11-11 | 48% | 14 | MT |
| 8611 | OVC 15-1 | 1644 | 30-22 | 55% | 15 | MO |
| 8612 | TVA Smack 18-Top tier | 1644 | 32-18 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 8613 | Paradigm Rebellion 16-S | 1644 | 62-26 | 67% | 16 | NY |
| 8614 | Impact Legends 17-Blue | 1644 | 44-21 | 68% | 17 | IN |
| 8615 | Club Apex 13-Grey | 1644 | 42-13 | 76% | 13 | KY |
| 8616 | LHVA 16-Purple national | 1644 | 24-19 | 56% | 16 | NY |
| 8617 | Tier10 15-Black | 1644 | 41-15 | 72% | 15 | IN |
| 8618 | M2 Volleyball 15-E2 | 1644 | 43-31 | 58% | 15 | GA |
| 8619 | CALI 15-Red | 1644 | 34-16 | 68% | 15 | NY |
| 8620 | PREVAIL Girls 15-Platinum | 1644 | 26-11 | 70% | 15 | PA |
| 8621 | Academy North 13-Hp-1 | 1644 | 49-54 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 8622 | SG Elite 15-Elite lei | 1644 | 31-19 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 8623 | CLVC 16-Black | 1644 | 31-23 | 57% | 16 | NC |
| 8624 | WyoBraska Sky Volleyball Club 16 WyoBraska Sky ' | 1644 | 16-6 | 73% | 16 | NE |
| 8625 | Gladiadores VBC 13-99 | 1644 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | CA |
| 8626 | Four1Nine Xtreme 14 14-Parker (OV) | 1644 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 8627 | DBQ Insanity 16-1 national | 1644 | 26-23 | 53% | 16 | IA |
| 8628 | Innerlight VC 17 GOLD | 1644 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | TN |
| 8629 | Illini Elite 12-Lizzie | 1644 | 11-4 | 73% | 12 | IL |
| 8630 | FORZA1 NORTH 16-Nat red | 1644 | 13-7 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 8631 | STORM VBC 12-Marleena | 1644 | 6-1 | 86% | 12 | CO |
| 8632 | Quicksets VBC 18-1 | 1644 | 25-10 | 71% | 18 | HI |
| 8633 | DCVC 13-Regional | 1644 | 16-6 | 70% | 13 | IA |
| 8634 | IMPACT WAHINE 14 | 1644 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | HI |
| 8635 | KRATOS Volley Academy 15 Ice Phoenix | 1644 | 33-19 | 63% | 15 | CT |
| 8636 | MOJO Volleyball Academy 16-Black | 1644 | 8-15 | 35% | 16 | MD |
| 8637 | Club Unite 15 National | 1644 | 30-23 | 57% | 15 | TN |
| 8638 | NKYVC 16-3.2 typhoon | 1644 | 33-32 | 51% | 16 | KY |
| 8639 | London Elite 14-Blue | 1644 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 8640 | CVIBE 15-1-billy | 1644 | 9-7 | 56% | 15 | NC |
| 8641 | Six Pack Legit 12-G gray | 1644 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | IA |
| 8642 | Lakes 13-1 | 1644 | 11-4 | 73% | 13 | MN |
| 8643 | Iowa Select 15-Black | 1644 | 27-17 | 59% | 15 | IA |
| 8644 | Texas Fury 13-Fusion | 1644 | 24-9 | 73% | 13 | TX |
| 8645 | KC Power 11-2 | 1644 | 9-11 | 45% | 11 | KS |
| 8646 | Coamo Select 11-Red | 1644 | 3-3 | 50% | 11 | PR |
| 8647 | Kako'o 12-Richard | 1644 | 8-3 | 73% | 12 | HI |
| 8648 | SF TREMORS 11 HAWKS | 1644 | 29-23 | 56% | 11 | CA |
| 8649 | 14U BPR 14-1 | 1644 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | FL |
| 8650 | PSVA Houston 18-1 | 1644 | 24-9 | 73% | 18 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.