Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 173 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8601 TPV 14-Red 1645 31-15 67% 14 TN
8602 IVC Crush 14-S 1644 18-6 75% 14
8603 Ballers Performance 14-Coleman 1644 21-6 78% 14 IL
8604 MVBC 14-Red 1644 33-15 69% 14 NJ
8605 I AM VBC 14-Black 1644 38-31 55% 14 WI
8606 Panther Girls 14-Black 1644 25-15 63% 14 CO
8607 CVC 14 SILVER 1644 42-16 72% 14 OH
8608 ZTV 14-3 gold 1644 15-8 54% 14 MT
8609 CGSV 14-Jarrett 1644 15-7 68% 14 OH
8610 Miles City Volleyball Club 14 MCVC U14- team 1 (EV) 1644 11-11 48% 14 MT
8611 OVC 15-1 1644 30-22 55% 15 MO
8612 TVA Smack 18-Top tier 1644 32-18 64% 18 CA
8613 Paradigm Rebellion 16-S 1644 62-26 67% 16 NY
8614 Impact Legends 17-Blue 1644 44-21 68% 17 IN
8615 Club Apex 13-Grey 1644 42-13 76% 13 KY
8616 LHVA 16-Purple national 1644 24-19 56% 16 NY
8617 Tier10 15-Black 1644 41-15 72% 15 IN
8618 M2 Volleyball 15-E2 1644 43-31 58% 15 GA
8619 CALI 15-Red 1644 34-16 68% 15 NY
8620 PREVAIL Girls 15-Platinum 1644 26-11 70% 15 PA
8621 Academy North 13-Hp-1 1644 49-54 48% 13 CA
8622 SG Elite 15-Elite lei 1644 31-19 62% 15 CA
8623 CLVC 16-Black 1644 31-23 57% 16 NC
8624 WyoBraska Sky Volleyball Club 16 WyoBraska Sky ' 1644 16-6 73% 16 NE
8625 Gladiadores VBC 13-99 1644 5-1 83% 13 CA
8626 Four1Nine Xtreme 14 14-Parker (OV) 1644 6-0 100% 14 OH
8627 DBQ Insanity 16-1 national 1644 26-23 53% 16 IA
8628 Innerlight VC 17 GOLD 1644 32-24 57% 17 TN
8629 Illini Elite 12-Lizzie 1644 11-4 73% 12 IL
8630 FORZA1 NORTH 16-Nat red 1644 13-7 65% 16 CA
8631 STORM VBC 12-Marleena 1644 6-1 86% 12 CO
8632 Quicksets VBC 18-1 1644 25-10 71% 18 HI
8633 DCVC 13-Regional 1644 16-6 70% 13 IA
8634 IMPACT WAHINE 14 1644 6-1 86% 14 HI
8635 KRATOS Volley Academy 15 Ice Phoenix 1644 33-19 63% 15 CT
8636 MOJO Volleyball Academy 16-Black 1644 8-15 35% 16 MD
8637 Club Unite 15 National 1644 30-23 57% 15 TN
8638 NKYVC 16-3.2 typhoon 1644 33-32 51% 16 KY
8639 London Elite 14-Blue 1644 6-0 100% 14 OH
8640 CVIBE 15-1-billy 1644 9-7 56% 15 NC
8641 Six Pack Legit 12-G gray 1644 4-1 80% 12 IA
8642 Lakes 13-1 1644 11-4 73% 13 MN
8643 Iowa Select 15-Black 1644 27-17 59% 15 IA
8644 Texas Fury 13-Fusion 1644 24-9 73% 13 TX
8645 KC Power 11-2 1644 9-11 45% 11 KS
8646 Coamo Select 11-Red 1644 3-3 50% 11 PR
8647 Kako'o 12-Richard 1644 8-3 73% 12 HI
8648 SF TREMORS 11 HAWKS 1644 29-23 56% 11 CA
8649 14U BPR 14-1 1644 6-1 86% 14 FL
8650 PSVA Houston 18-1 1644 24-9 73% 18 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.