Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 173 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8601 NecTr 17-Rue 1644 38-21 64% 17 NV
8602 Idaho LUV 15-Tressa 1644 17-10 63% 15 ID
8603 APV 13-Regional black 1644 30-15 63% 13 TX
8604 Reef 18-National dustin 1644 31-20 61% 18 CA
8605 Kulia 12-Gold 1644 27-17 61% 12 HI
8606 HHVBC 14-1g 1644 11-6 61% 14 IA
8607 Alamo 14-Gold 1 1644 34-22 61% 14 TX
8608 City Juniors 13 Nike 1644 30-18 61% 13 TX
8609 Stingray 15-Black 1644 17-11 61% 15 CA
8610 MC Panthers 14-Gold 1644 28-16 60% 14 TX
8611 CJV 11 Mizuno 1644 18-12 60% 11 NC
8612 ID Crush 15-Martens 1644 37-26 59% 15 ID
8613 SMASH 15-S lava 1644 24-21 53% 15 MA
8614 DBQ Insanity 16-1 national 1644 26-23 53% 16 IA
8615 Aspire 15-1 black 1644 28-26 52% 15 AB
8616 SMASH 17-Focus 1644 26-24 52% 17 MA
8617 NPJ Portland 13 Premier 1644 35-32 52% 13 OR
8618 Coamo Select 11-Red 1644 3-3 50% 11 PR
8619 Vegas United G17-Black 1644 13-13 50% 17 NV
8620 SAVBC 14-1 1644 10-11 48% 14 CA
8621 Endless 14-Navy 1644 16-14 46% 14 TX
8622 CoJrs 13-Emily 1644 13-18 42% 13 CO
8623 Club V 15-Prodigy kyle 1644 9-14 39% 15 UT
8624 Victory 12-National black 1644 16-19 39% 12 TX
8625 Hobcab VBC 15-1 1644 25-9 74% 15 KY
8626 Ama Xtreme 13-Surge 1644 4-0 100% 13
8627 PULELEHUA 10 1644 5-1 83% 10
8628 CVS 16 Brandi 1644 16-5 76% 16
8629 Panola Aces 13 1644 13-5 62% 13
8630 TOV 15-Royal 1644 4-3 57% 15
8631 SynergyForce 16-Silver 1644 33-16 67% 16 CA
8632 VUVC 14-Black 1644 8-7 53% 14 NV
8633 Believe 15 Premier 1643 25-10 71% 15
8634 Stars 14-Blue 1643 13-5 68% 14
8635 NALU 16-1 1643 18-7 72% 16
8636 SE Grays 11 1643 5-0 100% 11
8637 E381 ADA 18-1 1643 6-1 86% 18
8638 Club One 16-2 white 1643 5-1 83% 16 OH
8639 Maine Jrs 15-Silver 1643 26-6 81% 15 ME
8640 UPTEMPO 12 Jamie 1643 11-3 79% 12 CA
8641 Intense 18-State 1643 17-5 77% 18 SC
8642 VCN 12-Black 1643 6-2 75% 12 NE
8643 Apex Volleyball Club 16-2 1643 6-1 75% 16 MO
8644 TVC 16 National 1643 28-10 74% 16 VA
8645 Vortex 14-Select - art 1643 29-9 74% 14 UT
8646 Western Mass 16-Nala 1643 46-16 74% 16 MA
8647 H2 15 1643 22-8 73% 15 MO
8648 Momentum 15-White 1643 28-11 72% 15 CO
8649 Palm Beach Jrs 16-1 1643 15-6 71% 16 FL
8650 APVA 14 Adam 1643 24-10 71% 14 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.