Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 172 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8551 SF Juniors 11-3 1645 9-3 75% 11 CA
8552 Galena Invasion 12U 1645 14-5 74% 12 IA
8553 NorthShore 18 Wood 1645 32-9 78% 18 OH
8554 USA SOUTH 16-Premier black 1645 34-12 74% 16 FL
8555 Stayton Athletics 14-1 1645 26-6 74% 14 OR
8556 Supernova 16 Allstars 1645 14-31 31% 16 CA
8557 AR SELECT 11-Navy 1645 20-5 80% 11 AR
8558 Coqui VBC 14-Ripit 1645 29-11 73% 14 MS
8559 TEJAS 16-Red gabby 1645 14-4 74% 16 TX
8560 Adrenaline 16-Traci 1645 23-6 77% 16 IA
8561 Blue Water Wave 15-2 1645 12-4 75% 15 MI
8562 Valley Fusion 14-S 1645 4-0 100% 14 CO
8563 Madfrog 12-E black 1645 24-8 71% 12 TX
8564 Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 15-Morales 1645 46-35 57% 15 VA
8565 Set'em Up! 14-2n 1645 26-15 63% 14 FL
8566 OK Charge 14-2 west 1645 18-7 72% 14 OK
8567 Valley Juniors 17-Black 1645 30-15 67% 17 VA
8568 United VBA 14-Black 1645 34-13 72% 14 TX
8569 Empire 17-National bear & becky 1645 4-3 57% 17 CA
8570 HHVBC 14-1g 1645 11-6 61% 14 IA
8571 MIDTN Volleyball 12-Black 1645 49-28 63% 12 TN
8572 BVC 16-National embrey 1645 26-15 63% 16 AL
8573 EndMo VBC 15-Power blue 1645 40-15 73% 15 PA
8574 JCVC 15-1 1645 7-4 64% 15 NC
8575 Mighty Mo 14-Periman 1645 12-16 39% 14 MT
8576 Cavalier VBC 18-1 1645 19-16 54% 18 CA
8577 575 15-Russell lp 1645 4-4 50% 15 GA
8578 Prime Time 10-Monkeys 1645 14-6 70% 10 IL
8579 Tenacity 17-Hp 1645 39-18 68% 17 TN
8580 USA South 15-Mizuno 1645 33-23 59% 15 FL
8581 PREVA 11-Lymaris 1645 19-11 63% 11 PR
8582 Bristol Crush 14-Stifel 1645 18-5 67% 14 CT
8583 Intensity 16 Sapphires 1645 39-16 71% 16 MD
8584 BVA Davie 15-N andres 1645 35-21 63% 15 FL
8585 IVBA SOAR 15-Ren 1645 27-19 59% 15 MS
8586 LV Force VB 12-Red 1645 22-10 69% 12 PA
8587 SVC 13-Teal 1 1645 30-13 70% 13 FL
8588 The Flatlands Volleyball Club 12 Flatlands-Colt 1645 9-5 64% 12 OH
8589 OVC 14-1 1645 25-25 49% 14 MO
8590 NecTr 17-Rue 1645 38-21 64% 17 NV
8591 NYC Juniors Volleyball 14-Brooklyn 1645 16-7 70% 14 NY
8592 Circle City 16-Pink 1645 49-24 67% 16 IN
8593 Locked In 16-1 1645 0-0 0% 16 AL
8594 L2 16-3 1645 44-21 68% 16 MI
8595 CJV 11 Mizuno 1645 18-12 60% 11 NC
8596 SOUTH SHORE 17-Mizuno 1645 30-14 68% 17 TX
8597 Munciana In 15 Grizzlies 1645 33-35 49% 15 IN
8598 GPA 17-Green elite 1645 41-23 64% 17 OH
8599 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-2f 1645 14-7 67% 10 PR
8600 SUSA 17-Navy 1645 12-7 63% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.