Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 172 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8551 Cavalier VBC 18-1 1645 19-16 54% 18 VA
8552 AP 10-Adidas 1645 22-20 52% 10 TX
8553 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 15-National black 1645 16-16 50% 15 NV
8554 Munciana In 15 Grizzlies 1645 33-35 49% 15 IN
8555 Tribe Doral 15-Elite 1645 31-43 42% 15 FL
8556 CJV 15-National navy 1645 24-44 35% 15 NC
8557 Rise 17-Red 1645 39-20 65% 17 CA
8558 KVA Pack 15-Ug chas 1645 7-1 88% 15
8559 H Hawks HHVBC 10-1g 1645 4-1 80% 10
8560 Lawrence Landshark 13-Black 1645 7-2 78% 13
8561 Mustangs 17 1645 6-2 67% 17
8562 Wilton 12 1645 8-0 67% 12
8563 Image 13-Black 1645 26-13 65% 13
8564 KVA Kako'o VBA 14-Hunny 1645 5-3 63% 14
8565 NOLA Taryn/Richie 18 1645 11-8 58% 18
8566 FAUCONS BLACK 14 1645 3-4 43% 14
8567 AVC 14-1 (MT) 1644 15-5 68% 14
8568 Titanium 14 Silver 1644 25-11 66% 14
8569 Hi-Line Hit 14-1 1644 14-8 58% 14
8570 Driven 13-Teal 1644 29-17 63% 13 FL
8571 UNITED 14-Mehdi/farhad 1644 10-8 56% 14 CA
8572 Ohana 17-Girls national 1644 4-3 57% 17 IA
8573 Dynamite 15-Premier 1644 29-10 74% 15 CA
8574 PSVA Houston 18-1 1644 24-9 73% 18 GA
8575 AJV 14-Helix 1644 33-28 54% 14 TX
8576 AVBC 13-R - shifflet 1644 6-0 100% 13 OH
8577 LCVC 13-Blue 1644 6-0 100% 13 IN
8578 Black Hills Juniors 15-Black 1644 10-1 91% 15 SD
8579 Kansas Rise VBC 14-1 1644 16-1 89% 14 KS
8580 SVC 16-TEAL 1644 13-3 81% 16 GA
8581 CWVC 12-Black 1644 8-2 80% 12 WI
8582 DBQ Insanity 18-S 1644 7-2 78% 18 IA
8583 CHOBEE 12 1644 20-6 77% 12 FL
8584 Texas Fury 13-Fusion 1644 24-9 73% 13 TX
8585 Tier10 15-Black 1644 41-15 72% 15 IN
8586 L2 16-4 1644 46-18 72% 16 MI
8587 MN Select 13-3 1644 38-15 72% 13 MN
8588 Apex 15-National navy 1644 5-2 71% 15 MO
8589 Allons 12-Lauren/rebecca 1644 21-9 70% 12 LA
8590 808AC 16-Shantel 1644 19-8 70% 16 HI
8591 Apex 17 1644 26-11 70% 17 SC
8592 Rapid Fire 14-Black 1644 16-7 70% 14 IL
8593 Impact Legends 17-Blue 1644 44-21 68% 17 IN
8594 LAV 13-Regional black 1644 30-14 68% 13 AL
8595 Freeze ND 14-Avalanche 1644 17-8 68% 14 ND
8596 SVC Rips 17-1 1644 29-14 67% 17 GA
8597 Texas One 11-Royal 1644 14-7 67% 11 TX
8598 BoCo VAC 16-Black 1644 11-6 65% 16 CO
8599 Sanford Sports 13-Red 1644 48-26 65% 13 SD
8600 Illini Elite 13-Black 1644 20-11 65% 13 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.