Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 171 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8501 IVC Crush 14-S 1646 18-6 75% 14
8502 Oasis OVA 18-G legacy 1646 4-2 67% 18
8503 Vegas VS 16-S 1646 6-3 67% 16
8504 South Texas STVA 15-Navy 1 1646 4-4 50% 15
8505 NSSC 14-Black s 1646 17-7 71% 14 MO
8506 Absolute 16-White 1646 27-30 47% 16 CA
8507 Top Flight SC 14 Eagle 1646 17-13 57% 14 SC
8508 1United 11-Elite blue 1646 24-24 48% 11 TX
8509 Zoom Volleyball Club 18-1 1646 5-3 45% 18 KS
8510 Delano 17-1 1645 5-0 100% 17
8511 LAWAKUA 14 1645 15-7 68% 14
8512 C2 13-1 reg blue molly 1645 20-10 67% 13 TN
8513 GJV 11-1 1645 15-5 75% 11
8514 MC 14-1 shepherd 1645 22-15 51% 14
8515 Exodus VBC 14-2 1645 5-1 83% 14 CA
8516 Cut Shot 16-Madison 1645 22-6 79% 16 CA
8517 PEVC 18-Sloan 1645 20-6 77% 18 SC
8518 Inferno 13 Firestorm 1645 29-8 76% 13 IN
8519 LAV 15-Regional white 1645 32-10 76% 15 AL
8520 TEJAS 16-Red gabby 1645 14-4 74% 16 TX
8521 Legacy 16-David 1645 51-19 73% 16 NY
8522 S.A. STARS 11-Navy 1645 19-6 73% 11 TX
8523 Club Gold 13-Black 1645 11-4 73% 13 WA
8524 Rancho Valley 15-Gold 1645 8-3 73% 15 CA
8525 SCBandits 13-1 1645 29-10 71% 13 ON
8526 SA Empire 15 Gold 1645 41-17 71% 15 TX
8527 WGVBA 12-Bumpin baddies 1645 16-5 70% 12 TX
8528 Prime Time 10-Monkeys 1645 14-6 70% 10 IL
8529 LV Force VB 12-Red 1645 22-10 69% 12 PA
8530 Mizuno M1 16-Blu 1645 45-20 69% 16 MN
8531 CALI 15-Red 1645 34-16 68% 15 NY
8532 Club SyrV 13-Premier 1645 42-19 68% 13 NY
8533 Club SyrV 14-New york 1645 30-12 67% 14 NY
8534 Pine Bush VBC 17 1645 20-9 67% 17 NY
8535 UVA 15-Select 1645 2-1 67% 15 LA
8536 DBQ Insanity 14-2n black 1645 37-21 64% 14 IA
8537 Victory 17-Nat'l black 1645 7-3 64% 17 TX
8538 WEVC 15-Pink 1645 25-14 64% 15 NC
8539 RVA 12-Mixed 1645 9-4 64% 12 MD
8540 APV 14-Regional black 1645 36-17 63% 14 TX
8541 EMV 14-National black rosanna 1645 5-3 63% 14 TX
8542 Arete 10-Navy telos 1645 24-12 63% 10 TX
8543 MIDTN 17-BLACK 1645 22-14 61% 17 TN
8544 Club OAHO 13-Black 1645 29-19 60% 13 CA
8545 PIRATAS ADN 12-1 1645 9-6 60% 12 PR
8546 SADDLEBACK 18-Lael 1645 31-23 57% 18 CA
8547 Venom 15-1 1645 4-3 57% 15 TX
8548 STORM 16 Yvonne 1645 15-12 56% 16 CA
8549 Freeze ND 16 Polar 1645 27-20 56% 16 ND
8550 VC Denver 16-Black 1645 33-27 55% 16 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.