2025-2026 Season — Page 170 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8451 | Green Wave 18 | 1646 | 7-5 | 54% | 18 | |
| 8452 | 915 11-Victor | 1646 | 25-22 | 53% | 11 | TX |
| 8453 | Vaqueras 11-F oscar f | 1646 | 13-10 | 57% | 11 | PR |
| 8454 | Lex United 16-Black | 1646 | 41-14 | 75% | 16 | KY |
| 8455 | AR SELECT 11-Navy | 1646 | 20-5 | 80% | 11 | AR |
| 8456 | AZ EVJ 12-Elite | 1646 | 38-26 | 59% | 12 | AZ |
| 8457 | Empire 14 National | 1646 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 8458 | Chi City Elite 16-2 | 1646 | 22-28 | 44% | 16 | IL |
| 8459 | Circle City 16-Pink | 1646 | 49-24 | 67% | 16 | IN |
| 8460 | DSVC 12 NATIONAL | 1646 | 26-12 | 68% | 12 | AL |
| 8461 | Gators VBC 16 Elite | 1646 | 29-14 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 8462 | Empowered 16-Elite black | 1646 | 26-36 | 42% | 16 | IN |
| 8463 | Freeze ND 14 Ice | 1646 | 33-17 | 63% | 14 | ND |
| 8464 | MICA 16 | 1646 | 17-4 | 81% | 16 | MI |
| 8465 | Hot Shots 14-Black | 1646 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | OH |
| 8466 | Momentous VBC 16-Dejah | 1646 | 26-16 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 8467 | Mid-Michigan ACES 18-Austyn | 1646 | 12-3 | 80% | 18 | MI |
| 8468 | PEAK 11-2 | 1646 | 28-15 | 65% | 11 | AZ |
| 8469 | River City Jrs 16-Red | 1646 | 26-9 | 74% | 16 | NE |
| 8470 | Precision 14-Blue | 1646 | 33-9 | 75% | 14 | IL |
| 8471 | REAL Sports 14 | 1646 | 15-7 | 68% | 14 | NC |
| 8472 | SVC 13 Silver | 1646 | 16-6 | 73% | 13 | IA |
| 8473 | TEVC 14-Black | 1646 | 24-17 | 59% | 14 | TN |
| 8474 | WOVC 15-Red | 1646 | 46-23 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 8475 | 3CVBC 13 Elite | 1646 | 44-23 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 8476 | ACE 16-1 | 1646 | 43-17 | 72% | 16 | MD |
| 8477 | WSA Gators 17-Elite orange | 1646 | 35-26 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 8478 | FC United 17-Black | 1646 | 20-10 | 63% | 17 | MO |
| 8479 | Club Serve 17-Navy | 1646 | 12-3 | 80% | 17 | TX |
| 8480 | Iowa PowerPlex 14-Mcquade | 1646 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | IA |
| 8481 | Club MVP 18-1 | 1646 | 14-8 | 61% | 18 | MO |
| 8482 | CITY 16-1 | 1646 | 24-14 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 8483 | Elite 16-National grayson | 1646 | 34-20 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 8484 | MVA 12-D | 1646 | 10-1 | 83% | 12 | FL |
| 8485 | Keweenaw VBC 13 | 1646 | 11-6 | 65% | 13 | MI |
| 8486 | Grandlake 16-A kramer | 1646 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | OH |
| 8487 | Flyers 15-Usa-ed | 1646 | 23-26 | 41% | 15 | TX |
| 8488 | APV 15-National royal | 1646 | 31-18 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 8489 | Pohaku Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1646 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | KS |
| 8490 | Zoom Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1646 | 5-3 | 45% | 18 | KS |
| 8491 | PVA 17-3 | 1646 | 7-1 | 88% | 17 | MO |
| 8492 | AVC CLE 15-Maroon | 1646 | 19-7 | 73% | 15 | OH |
| 8493 | Bristol Crush 14-Stifel | 1646 | 18-5 | 67% | 14 | CT |
| 8494 | TVC 17 National | 1646 | 27-9 | 75% | 17 | VA |
| 8495 | Bristol Crush 16-Adam | 1646 | 15-2 | 75% | 16 | CT |
| 8496 | Blue Water Wave 15-2 | 1646 | 12-4 | 75% | 15 | IL |
| 8497 | 1United 11-Elite blue | 1646 | 24-24 | 48% | 11 | TX |
| 8498 | NSSC 14-Black s | 1646 | 17-7 | 71% | 14 | MO |
| 8499 | Hard Hitters 14-Ub | 1646 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 8500 | Kako'o 12-Richard | 1646 | 8-3 | 73% | 12 | HI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.