Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 170 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8451 Green Wave 18 1646 7-5 54% 18
8452 915 11-Victor 1646 25-22 53% 11 TX
8453 Vaqueras 11-F oscar f 1646 13-10 57% 11 PR
8454 Lex United 16-Black 1646 41-14 75% 16 KY
8455 AR SELECT 11-Navy 1646 20-5 80% 11 AR
8456 AZ EVJ 12-Elite 1646 38-26 59% 12 AZ
8457 Empire 14 National 1646 41-23 64% 14 CA
8458 Chi City Elite 16-2 1646 22-28 44% 16 IL
8459 Circle City 16-Pink 1646 49-24 67% 16 IN
8460 DSVC 12 NATIONAL 1646 26-12 68% 12 AL
8461 Gators VBC 16 Elite 1646 29-14 67% 16 OH
8462 Empowered 16-Elite black 1646 26-36 42% 16 IN
8463 Freeze ND 14 Ice 1646 33-17 63% 14 ND
8464 MICA 16 1646 17-4 81% 16 MI
8465 Hot Shots 14-Black 1646 13-6 68% 14 OH
8466 Momentous VBC 16-Dejah 1646 26-16 62% 16 CA
8467 Mid-Michigan ACES 18-Austyn 1646 12-3 80% 18 MI
8468 PEAK 11-2 1646 28-15 65% 11 AZ
8469 River City Jrs 16-Red 1646 26-9 74% 16 NE
8470 Precision 14-Blue 1646 33-9 75% 14 IL
8471 REAL Sports 14 1646 15-7 68% 14 NC
8472 SVC 13 Silver 1646 16-6 73% 13 IA
8473 TEVC 14-Black 1646 24-17 59% 14 TN
8474 WOVC 15-Red 1646 46-23 67% 15 FL
8475 3CVBC 13 Elite 1646 44-23 66% 13 TX
8476 ACE 16-1 1646 43-17 72% 16 MD
8477 WSA Gators 17-Elite orange 1646 35-26 57% 17 FL
8478 FC United 17-Black 1646 20-10 63% 17 MO
8479 Club Serve 17-Navy 1646 12-3 80% 17 TX
8480 Iowa PowerPlex 14-Mcquade 1646 7-2 78% 14 IA
8481 Club MVP 18-1 1646 14-8 61% 18 MO
8482 CITY 16-1 1646 24-14 63% 16 CA
8483 Elite 16-National grayson 1646 34-20 63% 16 FL
8484 MVA 12-D 1646 10-1 83% 12 FL
8485 Keweenaw VBC 13 1646 11-6 65% 13 MI
8486 Grandlake 16-A kramer 1646 7-2 78% 16 OH
8487 Flyers 15-Usa-ed 1646 23-26 41% 15 TX
8488 APV 15-National royal 1646 31-18 57% 15 TX
8489 Pohaku Volleyball Club 13-1 1646 6-2 75% 13 KS
8490 Zoom Volleyball Club 18-1 1646 5-3 45% 18 KS
8491 PVA 17-3 1646 7-1 88% 17 MO
8492 AVC CLE 15-Maroon 1646 19-7 73% 15 OH
8493 Bristol Crush 14-Stifel 1646 18-5 67% 14 CT
8494 TVC 17 National 1646 27-9 75% 17 VA
8495 Bristol Crush 16-Adam 1646 15-2 75% 16 CT
8496 Blue Water Wave 15-2 1646 12-4 75% 15 IL
8497 1United 11-Elite blue 1646 24-24 48% 11 TX
8498 NSSC 14-Black s 1646 17-7 71% 14 MO
8499 Hard Hitters 14-Ub 1646 11-4 73% 14 TX
8500 Kako'o 12-Richard 1646 8-3 73% 12 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.