Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 170 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8451 SVC 16 Gold 1647 21-8 72% 16 IA
8452 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Storm 1647 15-9 63% 13 TX
8453 Minneota 12-Blue 1647 10-3 77% 12 MN
8454 HVC Teisa 17-1 1647 10-10 50% 17 HI
8455 Crossroads 12-White 1647 10-3 67% 12 TX
8456 Club OAHO 13-Black 1647 29-19 60% 13 CA
8457 REAL Sports 16-Blue 1647 18-9 67% 16 NC
8458 Inferno 13 Firestorm 1647 29-8 76% 13 IL
8459 SynergyForce 16-Silver 1647 33-16 67% 16 CA
8460 Mavericks Volleyball 12 12U REGIONAL MAVERICKS 1647 11-8 55% 12 LA
8461 ND Elite 16 Winter 1647 11-4 73% 16 ND
8462 MN Freeze 13-Black 1647 10-5 67% 13 MN
8463 Infinity Volleyball CLub 17-National 1647 18-8 69% 17 TX
8464 TVC 17 National 1647 27-9 75% 17 VA
8465 APV 15-National royal 1647 31-18 57% 15 TX
8466 WI Shock 16-White 1647 22-7 76% 16 WI
8467 Golden State Volleyball Club 12 Golden State Juniors Black 1647 13-3 81% 12 CA
8468 LVC 13-Pink 1647 12-6 60% 13 NY
8469 PEAK 11-2 1647 28-15 65% 11 OK
8470 Palm Beach Jrs 13 Elite 1647 20-5 80% 13 FL
8471 TopFlight 16-Alpha 1647 4-1 80% 16 NV
8472 MN Select 13-3 1647 38-15 72% 13 MN
8473 Willows VB 18-1 1647 10-3 77% 18 CA
8474 VCNebraska 12-Black 1647 6-6 50% 12 NE
8475 Empowered 16-Elite black 1647 26-36 42% 16 IN
8476 Paradigm Rampage 13-S 1647 18-9 58% 13 NY
8477 FCVBC 17-Black 1647 22-8 73% 17 CO
8478 KVA Pack 15-Ug chas 1647 7-1 88% 15
8479 FeVA 16 (BG) 1647 54-30 64% 16 WI
8480 Troy Club Volleyball 18 U-18 Troy Trojans (EV) 1646 17-8 68% 18
8481 OCVBC 13-1 1646 19-10 63% 13 MO
8482 Club SyrV 13-Premier 1646 42-19 68% 13 NY
8483 Delano 17-1 1646 5-0 100% 17 MN
8484 Aura 13-Purple 1646 21-9 70% 13 CA
8485 Western Mass 16-Nala 1646 46-16 74% 16 MA
8486 Midwest Juniors 17-1 1646 18-8 60% 17 KS
8487 Maine Jrs 15-Silver 1646 26-6 81% 15 ME
8488 516 Elite 15-Black 1646 27-17 61% 15 NY
8489 JJVA Club 14-G 1646 12-3 80% 14 FL
8490 Vortex 14-Select - art 1646 29-9 74% 14 UT
8491 FWFIRE 12-W 1646 28-8 78% 12 TX
8492 K1V 14u 1646 40-17 70% 14 KY
8493 MICA 16 1646 17-4 81% 16 MI
8494 NE Elite 15-2 1646 4-3 57% 15 NE
8495 Apex 15-National navy 1646 5-2 71% 15 MO
8496 DBQ Insanity 18-S 1646 7-2 78% 18 IA
8497 Vantage 13-Blue smack 1646 10-5 67% 13 OH
8498 REAL Sports 14 1646 15-7 68% 14 NC
8499 Munciana Indy 11-Coyotes 1646 16-5 76% 11 IN
8500 MSVB 12-Red 1646 10-2 83% 12 AK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.