Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 169 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8401 EP STRiVE VBC 15-S black 1647 30-16 64% 15 TX
8402 EMV 18-Black marquise 1647 19-16 51% 18 TX
8403 FRVBC 17-2 red 1647 22-17 56% 17 CO
8404 GSJ 12 MB 1647 23-13 64% 12 SC
8405 Midwest Juniors 17-1 1647 15-6 71% 17 KS
8406 METRO Elite 17-Black 1647 7-4 64% 17 SC
8407 Mindset Premier 12-Black 1647 27-10 69% 12 IL
8408 NNJ 16-Donny 1647 23-14 62% 16 NV
8409 NOVA Juniors 18-S gold 1647 30-12 71% 18 OH
8410 Palm Beach Jrs 13 Elite 1647 20-5 80% 13 FL
8411 River City Jrs 17 Navy 1647 20-19 51% 17 NE
8412 RVBC 16U Blue 1647 20-8 69% 16 PA
8413 RVA 17-Navy 1647 40-30 57% 17 WI
8414 Seal Beach 13-Blue 1647 40-20 67% 13 CA
8415 Synergy 16-Riptide 1647 40-23 63% 16 CA
8416 Valley Flames 12-Black 1647 19-12 61% 12 TX
8417 HF Club 14-1 1647 8-1 80% 14 TN
8418 Air VBC 12-Blue 1647 20-9 69% 12 WI
8419 Renegades 16-Adidas 1647 37-24 60% 16 TX
8420 GVA 12-White 1647 21-7 75% 12 PR
8421 Idaho Show 14-National hadden 1647 13-8 62% 14 ID
8422 USA SOUTH 16-Premier black 1647 34-12 74% 16 FL
8423 CCVA 15-Elite 1647 20-12 63% 15 CA
8424 SC Rockstar 12-Kashi 1647 21-31 40% 12 CA
8425 SAVBC 18-1 1647 13-25 34% 18 CA
8426 SoCal VBC 14-Cardiff 1647 17-24 41% 14 CA
8427 MiElite 14-Gold north 1647 21-5 81% 14 MI
8428 863 Elite 13-1 black 1647 31-23 57% 13 FL
8429 NE Elite 14-Shockwave 1647 6-1 86% 14 NE
8430 Mill City 14 1647 30-19 61% 14 MA
8431 Premier Nebraska 14-Red 1647 17-10 63% 14 NE
8432 Storm 15-National black 1647 11-5 69% 15 CO
8433 VoltageVB 13-Blue-yaya 1647 22-7 76% 13 FL
8434 1 Flight VBC 16-1 1647 7-1 88% 16 OR
8435 Grandlake 16-Tonuc 1647 8-2 80% 16 OH
8436 VCNebraska 12-Black 1647 6-6 50% 12 NE
8437 Yaquina Juniors 12-1 1647 4-1 80% 12 OR
8438 Arsenal 13-Gold 1647 19-14 53% 13 TX
8439 TopFlight 16-Alpha 1647 4-1 80% 16 NV
8440 Upontop 13-S honey 1647 10-10 50% 13 FL
8441 CVVBH 16-1 charlie 1647 5-8 38% 16 PR
8442 LIVEWIRE 18 Prime 1647 27-25 52% 18 AZ
8443 EVOLUTION RED 16 1647 5-0 100% 16
8444 RRHVBC 14-1 shai 1647 6-1 86% 14
8445 Legit 12-G white 1647 9-3 64% 12
8446 UVA 14-National-fremont 1647 16-14 53% 14 LA
8447 Downstate 17-Cobras 1646 45-27 63% 17
8448 Ne Jrs 12-Black 1646 8-2 80% 12
8449 Intensity 15 Onyx 1646 39-23 63% 15
8450 OCVB 14-Holtry 1646 4-1 80% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.