Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 169 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8401 EVA 15-Gold 1648 26-15 63% 15 NJ
8402 NE Elite 14-Shockwave 1648 6-1 86% 14 NE
8403 Gators VBC 14 Premier 1648 25-16 61% 14 OH
8404 Synergy 16-Riptide 1648 40-23 63% 16 PA
8405 TX LEGACY 14-Adidas 1648 38-21 64% 14 TX
8406 AZ EVJ 14-Black 1648 36-11 77% 14 AZ
8407 Tville Smash 12 1648 46-16 74% 12 IL
8408 Prime 18-1 1648 10-4 59% 18 CA
8409 Metro 16-Black 1648 22-12 65% 16 GA
8410 MiElite 12-National west 1648 17-5 77% 12 MI
8411 NE Elite 15-Prime 1648 23-19 55% 15 NE
8412 Pulse 13-Select 1648 23-9 72% 13 MI
8413 Club Serve 17-Navy 1648 12-3 80% 17 MO
8414 Spartan Select 16-1 1648 16-8 67% 16 IN
8415 Ho'okino 12-Puko'a 1648 7-1 78% 12 HI
8416 SAVBC 18-1 1648 13-25 34% 18 CA
8417 NALU 16-1 1648 18-7 72% 16 ID
8418 Excel NW 17-1 lux 1648 27-24 53% 17 WA
8419 Altitude 16-Black 1648 53-27 65% 16 AZ
8420 WGVBA 12-Bumpin baddies 1648 16-5 70% 12 TX
8421 Elites 17-1 black ice 1648 7-2 78% 17 ON
8422 CLUB de VOLEIBOL BORIQUEN COQUI 17 BORINQUEN COQUI CPT 2027 1648 8-7 53% 17 PR
8423 NSSC 16 Nike 1647 39-21 62% 16 MO
8424 Legit 14-G royal 1647 8-1 89% 14 IA
8425 Alamo 14 Silver 1647 34-14 71% 14 TX
8426 Tstreet IE 14-Moriah 1647 18-19 49% 14 CA
8427 Mill City 14 1647 30-19 61% 14 MA
8428 Club SyrV 14-New york 1647 30-12 67% 14 NY
8429 Empire 14 National 1647 41-23 64% 14 CA
8430 Tribe 14-Regional red 1647 26-10 72% 14 FL
8431 Alliance 14-Tornado 1647 18-7 67% 14 MA
8432 EASTON VBC 14-1 1647 37-11 73% 14 PA
8433 Alamo 14-Gold 1 1647 34-22 61% 14 TX
8434 3CVBC 13 Elite 1647 44-23 66% 13 TX
8435 Dynamite Adidas 17-1 1647 31-28 53% 17 MI
8436 Tstreet SN 15-Sierra 1647 4-1 80% 15 CA
8437 Supreme 15-1 1647 13-11 42% 15 MO
8438 OK Charge 18-Ua tulsa 1647 33-20 62% 18 OK
8439 MDJRS 15-Elite yellow 1647 39-26 57% 15 MD
8440 Idaho ONE 11-Elite 1647 19-9 68% 11 ID
8441 Xcel VB 15-1 adidas 1647 21-16 55% 15 TX
8442 Croix Attack 13-1 1647 19-10 66% 13 WI
8443 OT 16-O erick 1647 14-38 27% 16 FL
8444 Elevation 10-Amanda 2 1647 5-1 83% 10 OH
8445 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 17-1 1647 3-4 43% 17 TX
8446 H Hawks HHVBC 10-1g 1647 4-1 80% 10 IA
8447 Ethos 18-Elite - katie 1647 21-12 64% 18 TN
8448 EVOLUTION RED 16 1647 5-0 100% 16 IA
8449 SVBC 13-Elite 1647 18-11 62% 13 IA
8450 Renaissance 17-Black 1647 36-46 44% 17 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.