Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 168 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8351 Gators VBC 14 Premier 1648 25-16 61% 14 OH
8352 FaR Out 11-White 1648 10-5 67% 11 MI
8353 Genesis 15-White 1648 20-7 74% 15 TN
8354 Munciana Indy 11-Coyotes 1648 16-5 76% 11 IN
8355 OMNI 14-Elite 1648 24-30 44% 14 CA
8356 OK Charge 18-Ua tulsa 1648 33-20 62% 18 OK
8357 Nova 16-Blue 1648 44-20 69% 16 FL
8358 Quicksets VBC 18-1 1648 25-10 71% 18 HI
8359 ProPlay 18-Nicky/mer 1648 27-17 61% 18 CA
8360 Tier10 14-Black 1648 39-13 75% 14 IN
8361 VVA 13-Speas 1648 44-26 63% 13 CA
8362 Mets 14-1 arbet 1648 14-10 58% 14 PR
8363 Tenacity 17-Hp 1648 39-18 68% 17 TN
8364 Quicksets 18 1648 35-16 69% 18 HI
8365 Iowa Select 15-Black 1648 27-17 59% 15 IA
8366 LEGACY 12-Premier david 1648 34-23 60% 12 FL
8367 Ho'okino 12-Puko'a 1648 7-1 78% 12 HI
8368 KNVBC 16-2 showtime 1648 12-10 55% 16 KS
8369 PVCGA 12-1 1648 13-3 81% 12 GA
8370 Wrecking Crew 17-1 1648 5-1 83% 17 TX
8371 Flight 16-1 cole 1648 11-2 85% 16 MI
8372 Skyline 16-White stephen 1648 24-28 41% 16 TX
8373 Instinct 17-Wild gold 1648 22-19 51% 17 TX
8374 Storm 13-Travel 1648 8-1 89% 13 CO
8375 Madfrog 12-E black 1648 24-8 71% 12 TX
8376 oe 16-1 1648 21-11 66% 16 OH
8377 Evie 12-Nat pc 1648 4-0 100% 12 VA
8378 GSEVC 17-National blue 1648 24-18 57% 17 NJ
8379 Air VBC 14-Black 1648 19-6 76% 14 WI
8380 Metro 16-Black 1648 22-12 65% 16 DC
8381 Northern Attack 13-1 1648 20-10 67% 13 WI
8382 Pgh Elite 16-Black 1648 15-11 58% 16 PA
8383 STARZ 14-Blue 1648 65-18 78% 14 IL
8384 A-10 Black 16-Girls 1648 34-29 54% 16 PA
8385 PVA 16-1 1648 34-11 76% 16 SC
8386 Club Apex 13-Grey 1648 42-13 76% 13 SC
8387 Konza Volleyball Club 17-1 1647 13-7 59% 17
8388 NITRO 13-Blue 1647 23-25 48% 13
8389 Delano 12-1 1647 8-2 80% 12
8390 Minneota 12-Blue 1647 10-3 77% 12
8391 Iron 12-Black 1647 7-2 70% 12
8392 Elevation 10-Amanda 2 1647 5-1 83% 10 OH
8393 JJVA 13 Teal 1647 33-46 42% 13 FL
8394 TX LEGACY 14-Adidas 1647 38-21 64% 14 TX
8395 EVRC 18-Jordan 1647 21-7 75% 18 IN
8396 BTownVBC 12-Red 1647 22-10 69% 12 IN
8397 FCE 13-1 1647 7-8 47% 13 WI
8398 LA6 16-Jamie 1647 20-5 80% 16 LA
8399 Chicago Elite 15 Elite 1647 25-37 40% 15 IL
8400 Dynamite Adidas 17-1 1647 31-28 53% 17 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.