2025-2026 Season — Page 168 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8351 | Gators VBC 14 Premier | 1648 | 25-16 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 8352 | FaR Out 11-White | 1648 | 10-5 | 67% | 11 | MI |
| 8353 | Genesis 15-White | 1648 | 20-7 | 74% | 15 | TN |
| 8354 | Munciana Indy 11-Coyotes | 1648 | 16-5 | 76% | 11 | IN |
| 8355 | OMNI 14-Elite | 1648 | 24-30 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 8356 | OK Charge 18-Ua tulsa | 1648 | 33-20 | 62% | 18 | OK |
| 8357 | Nova 16-Blue | 1648 | 44-20 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 8358 | Quicksets VBC 18-1 | 1648 | 25-10 | 71% | 18 | HI |
| 8359 | ProPlay 18-Nicky/mer | 1648 | 27-17 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 8360 | Tier10 14-Black | 1648 | 39-13 | 75% | 14 | IN |
| 8361 | VVA 13-Speas | 1648 | 44-26 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 8362 | Mets 14-1 arbet | 1648 | 14-10 | 58% | 14 | PR |
| 8363 | Tenacity 17-Hp | 1648 | 39-18 | 68% | 17 | TN |
| 8364 | Quicksets 18 | 1648 | 35-16 | 69% | 18 | HI |
| 8365 | Iowa Select 15-Black | 1648 | 27-17 | 59% | 15 | IA |
| 8366 | LEGACY 12-Premier david | 1648 | 34-23 | 60% | 12 | FL |
| 8367 | Ho'okino 12-Puko'a | 1648 | 7-1 | 78% | 12 | HI |
| 8368 | KNVBC 16-2 showtime | 1648 | 12-10 | 55% | 16 | KS |
| 8369 | PVCGA 12-1 | 1648 | 13-3 | 81% | 12 | GA |
| 8370 | Wrecking Crew 17-1 | 1648 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | TX |
| 8371 | Flight 16-1 cole | 1648 | 11-2 | 85% | 16 | MI |
| 8372 | Skyline 16-White stephen | 1648 | 24-28 | 41% | 16 | TX |
| 8373 | Instinct 17-Wild gold | 1648 | 22-19 | 51% | 17 | TX |
| 8374 | Storm 13-Travel | 1648 | 8-1 | 89% | 13 | CO |
| 8375 | Madfrog 12-E black | 1648 | 24-8 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 8376 | oe 16-1 | 1648 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | OH |
| 8377 | Evie 12-Nat pc | 1648 | 4-0 | 100% | 12 | VA |
| 8378 | GSEVC 17-National blue | 1648 | 24-18 | 57% | 17 | NJ |
| 8379 | Air VBC 14-Black | 1648 | 19-6 | 76% | 14 | WI |
| 8380 | Metro 16-Black | 1648 | 22-12 | 65% | 16 | DC |
| 8381 | Northern Attack 13-1 | 1648 | 20-10 | 67% | 13 | WI |
| 8382 | Pgh Elite 16-Black | 1648 | 15-11 | 58% | 16 | PA |
| 8383 | STARZ 14-Blue | 1648 | 65-18 | 78% | 14 | IL |
| 8384 | A-10 Black 16-Girls | 1648 | 34-29 | 54% | 16 | PA |
| 8385 | PVA 16-1 | 1648 | 34-11 | 76% | 16 | SC |
| 8386 | Club Apex 13-Grey | 1648 | 42-13 | 76% | 13 | SC |
| 8387 | Konza Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1647 | 13-7 | 59% | 17 | |
| 8388 | NITRO 13-Blue | 1647 | 23-25 | 48% | 13 | |
| 8389 | Delano 12-1 | 1647 | 8-2 | 80% | 12 | |
| 8390 | Minneota 12-Blue | 1647 | 10-3 | 77% | 12 | |
| 8391 | Iron 12-Black | 1647 | 7-2 | 70% | 12 | |
| 8392 | Elevation 10-Amanda 2 | 1647 | 5-1 | 83% | 10 | OH |
| 8393 | JJVA 13 Teal | 1647 | 33-46 | 42% | 13 | FL |
| 8394 | TX LEGACY 14-Adidas | 1647 | 38-21 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 8395 | EVRC 18-Jordan | 1647 | 21-7 | 75% | 18 | IN |
| 8396 | BTownVBC 12-Red | 1647 | 22-10 | 69% | 12 | IN |
| 8397 | FCE 13-1 | 1647 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | WI |
| 8398 | LA6 16-Jamie | 1647 | 20-5 | 80% | 16 | LA |
| 8399 | Chicago Elite 15 Elite | 1647 | 25-37 | 40% | 15 | IL |
| 8400 | Dynamite Adidas 17-1 | 1647 | 31-28 | 53% | 17 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.