2025-2026 Season — Page 167 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8301 | EP STRiVE VBC 17-S black | 1649 | 40-27 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 8302 | GO Volley 14 N | 1649 | 27-33 | 44% | 14 | VA |
| 8303 | GP 16 Elite | 1649 | 59-25 | 70% | 16 | FL |
| 8304 | HOU STELLAR 17 PREMIER | 1649 | 24-30 | 44% | 17 | TX |
| 8305 | MAVA 14-Hammerhead | 1649 | 34-19 | 64% | 14 | KY |
| 8306 | RVA G16 Navy | 1649 | 36-37 | 49% | 16 | WI |
| 8307 | Sideout 13 Elite | 1649 | 33-17 | 66% | 13 | FL |
| 8308 | SG Elite 13 Elite | 1649 | 27-16 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 8309 | SP2VC 18-Blue | 1649 | 25-13 | 66% | 18 | NC |
| 8310 | SASVBC G 14 KAYA | 1649 | 42-17 | 71% | 14 | HI |
| 8311 | TN Heat 15 Phoenix | 1649 | 17-5 | 77% | 15 | TN |
| 8312 | SF Juniors 11-4 | 1649 | 9-3 | 75% | 11 | CA |
| 8313 | Legends 16-1 de sevilla | 1649 | 16-13 | 55% | 16 | PR |
| 8314 | Idaho ONE 11-Elite | 1649 | 19-9 | 68% | 11 | ID |
| 8315 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-4f | 1649 | 21-6 | 78% | 14 | PR |
| 8316 | XP 17-Elite 1 | 1649 | 35-20 | 64% | 17 | IL |
| 8317 | Club V 16-Lexi | 1649 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | UT |
| 8318 | VCN 18-Black | 1649 | 9-9 | 50% | 18 | NE |
| 8319 | Stingray Black 14-1 | 1649 | 5-8 | 38% | 14 | CA |
| 8320 | 603 United 14-Seacoast black | 1649 | 25-24 | 51% | 14 | NH |
| 8321 | CRSURGEVBC 13 | 1649 | 9-3 | 69% | 13 | IA |
| 8322 | CRSURGEVBC 15-Jeff | 1649 | 17-6 | 65% | 15 | IA |
| 8323 | PSVBA 18-Legacy | 1649 | 29-29 | 50% | 18 | WA |
| 8324 | 14U BPR 14-1 | 1649 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | FL |
| 8325 | Stingers 12 | 1649 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 8326 | MIDTN 16-Silver | 1649 | 11-4 | 73% | 16 | TN |
| 8327 | Arbuckle 17-Lauren | 1649 | 18-10 | 64% | 17 | CA |
| 8328 | Prime 18-1 | 1649 | 10-4 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 8329 | Southland Aces VBC 15-1 | 1649 | 8-2 | 47% | 15 | MO |
| 8330 | Red Slam 12 | 1649 | 16-4 | 80% | 12 | IN |
| 8331 | WCA 12-1 | 1649 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | NC |
| 8332 | FH 15-1 ikaika courtney | 1649 | 7-1 | 88% | 15 | TX |
| 8333 | Premier 11-Black | 1649 | 16-17 | 48% | 11 | TX |
| 8334 | East Texas 14-Green | 1649 | 9-1 | 82% | 14 | TX |
| 8335 | Elites 17-1 black ice | 1649 | 7-2 | 78% | 17 | |
| 8336 | Six Pack Legit 15-G suzanne | 1649 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | |
| 8337 | OLC 18-1 | 1649 | 10-3 | 77% | 18 | |
| 8338 | Five Starz 15-Black jon | 1649 | 28-27 | 51% | 15 | CA |
| 8339 | Slainte 13-National | 1649 | 17-18 | 49% | 13 | CA |
| 8340 | NCVC 17 Mizuno | 1649 | 30-23 | 57% | 17 | CA |
| 8341 | High Tide 15-Ava | 1649 | 35-13 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 8342 | MP Rush 10-Pink | 1648 | 6-1 | 67% | 10 | |
| 8343 | Air VBC 13-Blue | 1648 | 25-6 | 81% | 13 | WI |
| 8344 | JVC 12-Gold | 1648 | 11-5 | 65% | 12 | IN |
| 8345 | Amarillo Xtreme 13-Storm | 1648 | 15-9 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 8346 | Belles 13-4 blue coats | 1648 | 21-7 | 68% | 13 | PA |
| 8347 | TVA 14-Purple olivia | 1648 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | FL |
| 8348 | Fusion 15-White | 1648 | 29-26 | 53% | 15 | PA |
| 8349 | BCS Skyline H 13 Molten | 1648 | 11-4 | 69% | 13 | TX |
| 8350 | Ethos 18-Elite - katie | 1648 | 21-12 | 64% | 18 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.