Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 167 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8301 VolleyFX 16 Charm 1650 30-15 65% 16 NY
8302 VVA 13-Speas 1650 44-26 63% 13 CA
8303 Pipeline SCVBC 12-Adidas 1650 27-16 63% 12 CA
8304 SMASH 17-Focus 1650 26-24 52% 17 MA
8305 UPTEMPO 12 Jamie 1650 11-3 79% 12 CA
8306 Texas Wave 15-Orange 1650 8-1 89% 15 CA
8307 E-town Elite 17 E-town Elite 1650 18-7 72% 17
8308 Idaho ONE 13-Im gosser 1650 27-19 59% 13 ID
8309 Arbuckle 17-Lauren 1649 18-10 64% 17 CA
8310 SPVC 17-Adidas 1649 23-13 64% 17 CA
8311 AP 13-Black 1649 27-16 63% 13 TX
8312 Tsunami 11-1e gabriella 1649 31-15 67% 11 GA
8313 SVE 18-1 1649 21-28 43% 18 GA
8314 Skyline 16-White stephen 1649 24-28 41% 16 TX
8315 LAWAKUA 14 1649 15-7 68% 14 HI
8316 Lawrence Landshark 13-Black 1649 7-2 78% 13 KS
8317 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 15-National black 1649 16-16 50% 15 NV
8318 OJVA 18-1 gold 1649 23-24 49% 18 OR
8319 Iowa United 15-2 elite 1649 36-30 55% 15 IA
8320 RIV 12-Red 1649 8-6 57% 12 WY
8321 LMVC 16-Nat shawn 1649 30-16 65% 16 SC
8322 Flyers 15-Usa-ed 1649 23-26 41% 15 TX
8323 NCVC 17 Mizuno 1649 30-23 57% 17 CA
8324 MC 14-1 shepherd 1649 22-15 51% 14 MT
8325 H. Prep 14-White 1649 26-12 68% 14 TX
8326 South Texas STVA 15-Navy 1 1649 4-4 50% 15 NV
8327 EXCEL 14-National blue 1649 23-23 44% 14 TX
8328 HOU STELLAR 14-Premier 1649 29-33 47% 14 TX
8329 Decatur Force 13-Aqua 1649 17-5 77% 13 IN
8330 NOLA Taryn/Richie 18 1649 11-8 58% 18 LA
8331 Split Mountain Kris 10 1649 6-2 60% 10 UT
8332 Northern Lights 18-1 1649 26-22 54% 18 MN
8333 STORM 16 Yvonne 1649 15-12 56% 16 CA
8334 Reign 11-Black 1649 39-13 75% 11 FL
8335 DSVC 11-BLUE 1649 17-8 68% 11 AL
8336 Miami Hype 11-Prep 1649 32-13 71% 11 FL
8337 East Texas 14-Green 1649 9-1 82% 14 LA
8338 Fennimore Impact 12 1649 4-0 100% 12 WI
8339 GSEVC 17-National blue 1649 24-18 57% 17 NJ
8340 Northern Alliance 18 1649 23-7 74% 18 ND
8341 AVC CLE 15-Maroon 1649 19-7 73% 15 OH
8342 Wisconsin Ice 16 National 1649 40-27 60% 16 WI
8343 FIGSV 17-1 1649 29-28 51% 17 CA
8344 OCVB 12-Mackenzie 1649 5-1 83% 12 ID
8345 WCA 12-1 1649 4-1 80% 12 MN
8346 MEVC 13 National 1649 46-26 61% 13 MD
8347 Austin Skyline 15-Black-jose 1649 6-0 100% 15 TX
8348 Chicago Elite 14 National 1649 41-19 68% 14 IL
8349 Vaqueras 17-F keyshla 1649 16-4 80% 17 PR
8350 Quicksets 18 1649 35-16 69% 18 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.