Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 167 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8301 EP STRiVE VBC 17-S black 1649 40-27 60% 17 TX
8302 GO Volley 14 N 1649 27-33 44% 14 VA
8303 GP 16 Elite 1649 59-25 70% 16 FL
8304 HOU STELLAR 17 PREMIER 1649 24-30 44% 17 TX
8305 MAVA 14-Hammerhead 1649 34-19 64% 14 KY
8306 RVA G16 Navy 1649 36-37 49% 16 WI
8307 Sideout 13 Elite 1649 33-17 66% 13 FL
8308 SG Elite 13 Elite 1649 27-16 63% 13 CA
8309 SP2VC 18-Blue 1649 25-13 66% 18 NC
8310 SASVBC G 14 KAYA 1649 42-17 71% 14 HI
8311 TN Heat 15 Phoenix 1649 17-5 77% 15 TN
8312 SF Juniors 11-4 1649 9-3 75% 11 CA
8313 Legends 16-1 de sevilla 1649 16-13 55% 16 PR
8314 Idaho ONE 11-Elite 1649 19-9 68% 11 ID
8315 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-4f 1649 21-6 78% 14 PR
8316 XP 17-Elite 1 1649 35-20 64% 17 IL
8317 Club V 16-Lexi 1649 25-17 60% 16 UT
8318 VCN 18-Black 1649 9-9 50% 18 NE
8319 Stingray Black 14-1 1649 5-8 38% 14 CA
8320 603 United 14-Seacoast black 1649 25-24 51% 14 NH
8321 CRSURGEVBC 13 1649 9-3 69% 13 IA
8322 CRSURGEVBC 15-Jeff 1649 17-6 65% 15 IA
8323 PSVBA 18-Legacy 1649 29-29 50% 18 WA
8324 14U BPR 14-1 1649 6-1 86% 14 FL
8325 Stingers 12 1649 7-2 78% 12 CA
8326 MIDTN 16-Silver 1649 11-4 73% 16 TN
8327 Arbuckle 17-Lauren 1649 18-10 64% 17 CA
8328 Prime 18-1 1649 10-4 59% 18 CA
8329 Southland Aces VBC 15-1 1649 8-2 47% 15 MO
8330 Red Slam 12 1649 16-4 80% 12 IN
8331 WCA 12-1 1649 4-1 80% 12 NC
8332 FH 15-1 ikaika courtney 1649 7-1 88% 15 TX
8333 Premier 11-Black 1649 16-17 48% 11 TX
8334 East Texas 14-Green 1649 9-1 82% 14 TX
8335 Elites 17-1 black ice 1649 7-2 78% 17
8336 Six Pack Legit 15-G suzanne 1649 5-1 83% 15
8337 OLC 18-1 1649 10-3 77% 18
8338 Five Starz 15-Black jon 1649 28-27 51% 15 CA
8339 Slainte 13-National 1649 17-18 49% 13 CA
8340 NCVC 17 Mizuno 1649 30-23 57% 17 CA
8341 High Tide 15-Ava 1649 35-13 73% 15 CA
8342 MP Rush 10-Pink 1648 6-1 67% 10
8343 Air VBC 13-Blue 1648 25-6 81% 13 WI
8344 JVC 12-Gold 1648 11-5 65% 12 IN
8345 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Storm 1648 15-9 63% 13 TX
8346 Belles 13-4 blue coats 1648 21-7 68% 13 PA
8347 TVA 14-Purple olivia 1648 6-1 86% 14 FL
8348 Fusion 15-White 1648 29-26 53% 15 PA
8349 BCS Skyline H 13 Molten 1648 11-4 69% 13 TX
8350 Ethos 18-Elite - katie 1648 21-12 64% 18 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.