2025-2026 Season — Page 166 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8251 | MVBC 14-Red | 1650 | 33-15 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 8252 | PacWest 16-Travis | 1650 | 29-11 | 73% | 16 | CA |
| 8253 | NPJ Salem 12 National | 1650 | 45-19 | 70% | 12 | OR |
| 8254 | SG Elite 15-Elite andy | 1650 | 30-15 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 8255 | Topeka Saints 12 Gold | 1650 | 9-9 | 50% | 12 | KS |
| 8256 | Whirlwind 18 Elite | 1650 | 16-10 | 62% | 18 | NY |
| 8257 | Rockwood Thunder 15-White | 1650 | 21-24 | 47% | 15 | MO |
| 8258 | PVA 12-Yellow | 1650 | 14-8 | 64% | 12 | SC |
| 8259 | Pulse 13-Select | 1650 | 23-9 | 72% | 13 | CA |
| 8260 | SVC 13-Teal 1 | 1650 | 30-13 | 70% | 13 | FL |
| 8261 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 16-Blue | 1650 | 44-23 | 66% | 16 | FL |
| 8262 | 1st Alliance 11-1 | 1650 | 28-15 | 65% | 11 | IL |
| 8263 | Synergy 14-Young | 1650 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | PA |
| 8264 | Spiketown VBC 15-1 | 1650 | 18-9 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 8265 | Oiler Attack 16-Black | 1650 | 18-9 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 8266 | DE.Club Net 13-1 premier | 1650 | 6-2 | 55% | 13 | AR |
| 8267 | Titanas 16 | 1650 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | PR |
| 8268 | CPA 13-Cari | 1650 | 12-6 | 67% | 13 | WA |
| 8269 | VEVA Fury 15-Orange | 1650 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | PA |
| 8270 | Windthorst 16-Bussey | 1650 | 27-10 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 8271 | Allegiant 16-Blue | 1650 | 42-23 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 8272 | LSV Orange 12 | 1650 | 8-3 | 73% | 12 | FL |
| 8273 | Premier 15-Crimson w | 1650 | 18-24 | 42% | 15 | TX |
| 8274 | H Skyline 15-Silver | 1650 | 18-8 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 8275 | Iowa United 15-2 elite | 1650 | 36-30 | 55% | 15 | IA |
| 8276 | Cajunland 15-N | 1650 | 35-10 | 78% | 15 | LA |
| 8277 | BC Rise 13-Adidas | 1650 | 19-8 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 8278 | Madfrog 16-E green | 1650 | 25-20 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 8279 | LI Legacy VBC 15-White | 1650 | 26-9 | 74% | 15 | |
| 8280 | Bravo Ignite 12-1 | 1650 | 15-4 | 68% | 12 | |
| 8281 | Landsharks 15-Black | 1650 | 12-10 | 55% | 15 | |
| 8282 | Iowa United 16-Timmerman | 1650 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | IA |
| 8283 | OCVB 12-Mackenzie | 1649 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | |
| 8284 | VBAY AU 16-Papaya | 1649 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | |
| 8285 | Kohala 14-1 | 1649 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | |
| 8286 | TPV 14-Red | 1649 | 31-15 | 67% | 14 | |
| 8287 | Ta'ahine AZ 17-N tukia | 1649 | 14-5 | 74% | 17 | AZ |
| 8288 | NSSC 16 Nike | 1649 | 39-21 | 62% | 16 | MO |
| 8289 | Junior Mints 12-Navy | 1649 | 10-2 | 67% | 12 | KY |
| 8290 | Inspired VB 16-Black | 1649 | 44-19 | 70% | 16 | ND |
| 8291 | Uptime VB 15-1 | 1649 | 15-5 | 75% | 15 | TN |
| 8292 | Croix Attack 12-1 | 1649 | 20-7 | 74% | 12 | WI |
| 8293 | Country Fire 14-1 | 1649 | 27-13 | 66% | 14 | TX |
| 8294 | Alliance 13-Premier | 1649 | 29-13 | 69% | 13 | TN |
| 8295 | Altitude 16-Black | 1649 | 53-27 | 65% | 16 | AZ |
| 8296 | Bootheel SMASH 11-C | 1649 | 9-4 | 60% | 11 | MO |
| 8297 | CPA 15 Hayley | 1649 | 18-15 | 55% | 15 | WA |
| 8298 | Aspire NW 15-2 beaverton | 1649 | 26-15 | 63% | 15 | WA |
| 8299 | Cajun Elite 15 Paige | 1649 | 15-7 | 68% | 15 | LA |
| 8300 | DCVA 12-Aaron | 1649 | 12-16 | 43% | 12 | NM |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.