Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 166 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8251 Junior Mints 12-Navy 1651 10-2 67% 12 TX
8252 915 11-Victor 1651 25-22 53% 11 TX
8253 Synergy 14-Young 1651 8-2 80% 14 OH
8254 LCVC 13-Blue 1651 6-0 100% 13 IN
8255 Ducks Volleyball Club 15-2 manson 1651 8-1 89% 15
8256 Apex NW 16-Summit 1651 32-20 62% 16 WA
8257 OVC 18-1 1650 23-14 62% 18 MO
8258 Ocean Volleyball 15-National 1650 12-9 57% 15 MA
8259 575 15-Wse danielle 1650 23-32 42% 15 GA
8260 Windthorst 16-Bussey 1650 27-10 71% 16 TX
8261 SOSVBC 17-N justin 1650 5-11 31% 17 NY
8262 NBVBC 15-White 1650 16-4 80% 15 PA
8263 PacWest 16-Travis 1650 29-11 73% 16 CA
8264 OT 14-T ike 1650 35-15 70% 14 FL
8265 Athlete HQ 14-Smith 1650 28-14 67% 14 OH
8266 TeamLVC 18-Black 1650 39-27 59% 18 NY
8267 GSJ West 15 National 1650 66-38 63% 15 SC
8268 Topeka Saints 12 Gold 1650 9-9 50% 12 KS
8269 NKYVC 16-3.1 typhoon 1650 26-31 46% 16 KY
8270 WC 14-1 1650 4-3 57% 14 GA
8271 Skyline 12-White lara 1650 26-20 51% 12 TX
8272 OMNI 14-Elite 1650 24-30 44% 14 CA
8273 BOOST 14 Navy 1650 24-15 62% 14 IA
8274 PIRATAS ADN 12-1 1650 9-6 60% 12 PR
8275 TVA 14-Purple olivia 1650 6-1 86% 14 FL
8276 CULVER CITY VOLLEYBALL CLUB 12-1 - marilu 1650 25-15 63% 12 CA
8277 Rapid Fire 14-Black 1650 16-7 70% 14 IL
8278 OPVC 12-Castner 1650 25-21 54% 12 OH
8279 SAND 17-Gold 1650 24-26 48% 17 CA
8280 Chi City Elite 14-1 1650 25-35 42% 14 IL
8281 GP 16 Elite 1650 59-25 70% 16 FL
8282 Premier 11-Black 1650 16-17 48% 11 TX
8283 DGF 14-Black 1650 5-0 100% 14 MN
8284 Border West 17-1 1650 10-3 53% 17 MN
8285 Believe 15 Premier 1650 25-10 71% 15 CO
8286 SG Elite 15-Elite andy 1650 30-15 67% 15 CA
8287 Northeast 13-2 1650 33-13 72% 13 CT
8288 Sideout 13 Elite 1650 33-17 66% 13 FL
8289 LI Legacy VBC 15-White 1650 26-9 74% 15 NY
8290 Croix Attack 12-1 1650 20-7 74% 12 WI
8291 Madtown 18-2 national 1650 31-17 65% 18 WI
8292 RVBC 16U Blue 1650 20-8 69% 16 PA
8293 Landsharks 15-Black 1650 12-10 55% 15 KS
8294 Elevate 15-Pink 1650 15-6 71% 15 IL
8295 PVA 12-Yellow 1650 14-8 64% 12 SC
8296 FTL 12-Nuclear tania 1650 43-22 66% 12 FL
8297 APV 13-Regional black 1650 30-15 63% 13 TX
8298 VCN 12-Black 1650 6-2 75% 12 NE
8299 PSVBA 18-Legacy 1650 29-29 50% 18 WA
8300 Rise 17-Red 1650 39-20 65% 17 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.