Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 166 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8251 MVBC 14-Red 1650 33-15 69% 14 CA
8252 PacWest 16-Travis 1650 29-11 73% 16 CA
8253 NPJ Salem 12 National 1650 45-19 70% 12 OR
8254 SG Elite 15-Elite andy 1650 30-15 67% 15 CA
8255 Topeka Saints 12 Gold 1650 9-9 50% 12 KS
8256 Whirlwind 18 Elite 1650 16-10 62% 18 NY
8257 Rockwood Thunder 15-White 1650 21-24 47% 15 MO
8258 PVA 12-Yellow 1650 14-8 64% 12 SC
8259 Pulse 13-Select 1650 23-9 72% 13 CA
8260 SVC 13-Teal 1 1650 30-13 70% 13 FL
8261 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 16-Blue 1650 44-23 66% 16 FL
8262 1st Alliance 11-1 1650 28-15 65% 11 IL
8263 Synergy 14-Young 1650 8-2 80% 14 PA
8264 Spiketown VBC 15-1 1650 18-9 67% 15 OH
8265 Oiler Attack 16-Black 1650 18-9 67% 16 OH
8266 DE.Club Net 13-1 premier 1650 6-2 55% 13 AR
8267 Titanas 16 1650 10-4 71% 16 PR
8268 CPA 13-Cari 1650 12-6 67% 13 WA
8269 VEVA Fury 15-Orange 1650 33-21 61% 15 PA
8270 Windthorst 16-Bussey 1650 27-10 71% 16 TX
8271 Allegiant 16-Blue 1650 42-23 62% 16 TX
8272 LSV Orange 12 1650 8-3 73% 12 FL
8273 Premier 15-Crimson w 1650 18-24 42% 15 TX
8274 H Skyline 15-Silver 1650 18-8 67% 15 TX
8275 Iowa United 15-2 elite 1650 36-30 55% 15 IA
8276 Cajunland 15-N 1650 35-10 78% 15 LA
8277 BC Rise 13-Adidas 1650 19-8 70% 13 TX
8278 Madfrog 16-E green 1650 25-20 51% 16 TX
8279 LI Legacy VBC 15-White 1650 26-9 74% 15
8280 Bravo Ignite 12-1 1650 15-4 68% 12
8281 Landsharks 15-Black 1650 12-10 55% 15
8282 Iowa United 16-Timmerman 1650 6-2 75% 16 IA
8283 OCVB 12-Mackenzie 1649 5-1 83% 12
8284 VBAY AU 16-Papaya 1649 3-5 38% 16
8285 Kohala 14-1 1649 4-5 44% 14
8286 TPV 14-Red 1649 31-15 67% 14
8287 Ta'ahine AZ 17-N tukia 1649 14-5 74% 17 AZ
8288 NSSC 16 Nike 1649 39-21 62% 16 MO
8289 Junior Mints 12-Navy 1649 10-2 67% 12 KY
8290 Inspired VB 16-Black 1649 44-19 70% 16 ND
8291 Uptime VB 15-1 1649 15-5 75% 15 TN
8292 Croix Attack 12-1 1649 20-7 74% 12 WI
8293 Country Fire 14-1 1649 27-13 66% 14 TX
8294 Alliance 13-Premier 1649 29-13 69% 13 TN
8295 Altitude 16-Black 1649 53-27 65% 16 AZ
8296 Bootheel SMASH 11-C 1649 9-4 60% 11 MO
8297 CPA 15 Hayley 1649 18-15 55% 15 WA
8298 Aspire NW 15-2 beaverton 1649 26-15 63% 15 WA
8299 Cajun Elite 15 Paige 1649 15-7 68% 15 LA
8300 DCVA 12-Aaron 1649 12-16 43% 12 NM
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.