Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 165 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8201 City 14-Silver 1651 27-9 75% 14 CA
8202 OT 14-O katie 1651 34-19 64% 14 FL
8203 PCVC 14-Kai 1651 16-11 59% 14 BC
8204 Mesa Juniors VBCO 14-Black 1651 26-17 59% 14 CO
8205 Lions West 14-2 1651 28-10 74% 14 IL
8206 NNJ 12-White 1651 11-2 79% 12 NV
8207 Pipeline 12-Adidas 1651 27-16 63% 12 CA
8208 H. Prep 14-White 1651 26-12 68% 14 TX
8209 Crank It 17-Gold 1651 32-10 76% 17 MI
8210 NYC Juniors 14-Orange 1651 30-18 63% 14 NY
8211 Premier Nebraska 11-Black 1651 13-13 50% 11 NE
8212 Elevate Volleyball 16 1651 29-9 76% 16 FL
8213 RVC 13-1 blue 1651 9-3 75% 13 OH
8214 United 13-Black 1651 16-15 52% 13 AL
8215 Storm 14 Adidas 1651 45-31 59% 14 AR
8216 Sideout VBC 16-1 1651 5-3 63% 16 WA
8217 Elevate 14-Green spring 1651 7-0 100% 14 TX
8218 FEVA 16-Elite future 1651 3-2 60% 16 KY
8219 Austin Skyline 15-Black-jose 1651 6-0 100% 15 TX
8220 ECVC 17-National scott 1651 11-1 92% 17 FL
8221 Lakes 13-1 1651 11-4 73% 13 MN
8222 SynergyForce 16-Black 1651 29-21 58% 16 CA
8223 EVA 15-Gold 1651 26-15 63% 15 NJ
8224 DGF 14-Black 1651 5-0 100% 14
8225 Ducks Volleyball Club 15-2 manson 1651 8-1 89% 15
8226 SF JRS White 11-2 1651 9-3 75% 11
8227 Niagara Rapids Blue Reign 14 1651 21-8 68% 14
8228 Fort Worth Fire 16-1 purple 1651 6-3 67% 16
8229 FIELDHOUSE VBC 17-Ikaika daniel 1651 3-4 43% 17
8230 CSDP Volleyball Club G11-1 1650 4-7 31% 11
8231 Georgetown Impact 18-1 1650 13-6 68% 18
8232 Sonora DRG 13 1650 7-1 88% 13
8233 NWAJS 15-Adidas 1650 7-2 78% 15
8234 AJV 18 Molten 1650 29-16 64% 18 TX
8235 Alabama Perf 15-N white 1650 31-22 58% 15 AL
8236 MAVS 10 Elite 1650 17-19 46% 10 KS
8237 AZ EVJ 14-Black 1650 36-11 77% 14 AZ
8238 HVC Teisa 17-1 1650 10-10 50% 17 HI
8239 JJVA Club 14-G 1650 12-3 80% 14 FL
8240 I.C. Stars 15 Nerissa 1650 12-8 60% 15 NC
8241 LMVC 16-Nat shawn 1650 30-16 65% 16 SC
8242 Ignite 12-Red 1650 57-25 67% 12 WA
8243 Crossroads 12-White 1650 10-3 67% 12 TX
8244 DYNASTY 16-Gold 1650 24-17 59% 16 KS
8245 Coqui VBC 14-Ripit 1650 29-11 73% 14 MS
8246 DSVC 11-BLUE 1650 17-8 68% 11 AL
8247 Heroes 17 Delta 1650 27-15 63% 17 TX
8248 Mem Metro 15-Elite blk 1650 30-35 46% 15 TN
8249 MVA 13 National 1650 29-19 60% 13 FL
8250 NASA 16-Purple tori 1650 36-12 75% 16 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.