Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 165 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8201 Slainte 13-National 1652 17-18 49% 13 CA
8202 DVA National 18-1 1652 33-18 65% 18 IA
8203 VC Denver 14-Black 1652 33-21 61% 14 CO
8204 Chi City Elite 16-2 1652 22-28 44% 16 IL
8205 H. Prep Dev 10-Red 1652 12-4 67% 10 TX
8206 NPJ Portland 14 Premier 1652 31-28 53% 14 OR
8207 Balance 14-White 1652 39-29 57% 14 IL
8208 All In 14 Local 1652 25-6 64% 14 AL
8209 MFVB+ 11 1652 9-1 90% 11 IL
8210 Park 18-Black 18 1 1652 8-1 89% 18 AB
8211 METRO Elite 13-Black 1652 13-8 62% 13 GA
8212 L2 Volleyball Club 16-Broadway 1651 3-4 43% 16 MI
8213 Sky High 17-Vasalos 1651 11-2 85% 17 IL
8214 H Skyline 15-Silver 1651 18-8 67% 15 TX
8215 AV 14-2 emerald 1651 5-3 63% 14 GA
8216 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 14-T kaitlyn 1651 16-8 67% 14 NJ
8217 New Age 14-Select 1651 18-16 53% 14 TX
8218 Lunatics Volleyball Club 17-Jeanna 1651 5-0 83% 17 UT
8219 SVC 15 National 1651 23-15 61% 15 IA
8220 Four1Nine Xtreme 13 13-M Hermiller 1651 5-1 83% 13 OH
8221 SOINE 13-1 1651 30-15 67% 13 KY
8222 Summit VC 13-National 1651 33-18 65% 13 MO
8223 Piedmont VBC 14 Mamba 1651 39-23 63% 14 NC
8224 East Coast Power Chesapeake 14-Black 1651 18-17 51% 14 MD
8225 Renegades 16-Adidas 1651 37-24 60% 16 TX
8226 Elevate Volleyball 16 1651 29-9 76% 16 FL
8227 Legit 14-G gray 1651 8-0 100% 14 IA
8228 Mesa Juniors VBCO 14-Black 1651 26-17 59% 14 CO
8229 Kairos 12 Gamma 1651 35-19 65% 12 SD
8230 Instinct 17-Wild gold 1651 22-19 51% 17 TX
8231 ETA1 18-Black 1651 22-12 65% 18 TX
8232 Katy Volleyball 14-Nike 1651 20-11 65% 14 TX
8233 Big City M 13-Select 1651 16-5 76% 13 NY
8234 GRIT 12-Green 1651 16-6 73% 12 IN
8235 Bravo Ignite 12-1 1651 15-4 68% 12 SC
8236 Club Gold 13-Blue 1651 9-3 75% 13 WA
8237 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 14-T lea 1651 19-11 63% 14 NJ
8238 PEAK 14-4 1651 19-9 68% 14 OK
8239 Force 17-Sara 1651 14-5 58% 17 UT
8240 SVBC 18-Elite 1651 25-8 74% 18 IA
8241 Belles 13-4 blue coats 1651 21-7 68% 13 PA
8242 NEA Tomahawks 18-Pink 1651 20-7 74% 18 TN
8243 American 17-Red 1651 37-37 49% 17 VA
8244 CSDP Volleyball Club G11-1 1651 4-7 31% 11 MO
8245 JJVA 13 Teal 1651 33-46 42% 13 FL
8246 SPARKS VBC 16-Red 1651 40-12 77% 16 PA
8247 DBQ Elite 16 1651 4-0 100% 16 IA
8248 Memphis Volleyball Academy 17-1 1651 8-7 53% 17 TN
8249 PCVC 14-Kai 1651 16-11 59% 14 CA
8250 Bootheel SMASH 11-C 1651 9-4 60% 11 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.