2025-2026 Season — Page 164 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8151 | VVA 15-Denhartog | 1652 | 29-21 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 8152 | CTX Juniors 15-Apex | 1652 | 34-21 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 8153 | HPRIME 15-Gold | 1652 | 25-17 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 8154 | SMASH Raiders 16-1 | 1652 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | ON |
| 8155 | 864 Elite 17-Kendall | 1652 | 19-8 | 70% | 17 | SC |
| 8156 | London Elite 12-Blue | 1652 | 9-2 | 82% | 12 | OH |
| 8157 | BVC 14-Rennah | 1652 | 19-11 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 8158 | 575 15-Russell lp | 1652 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | GA |
| 8159 | BVA 15-National alyssa | 1652 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | CA |
| 8160 | Dinamite 12-Lauren | 1652 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | CA |
| 8161 | Integrity 13-Intense blue | 1652 | 22-26 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 8162 | WC 14-1 | 1652 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 8163 | Skyline 12-White lara | 1652 | 26-20 | 51% | 12 | TX |
| 8164 | DBQ Elite 16 | 1652 | 4-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 8165 | Legit 14-G royal | 1652 | 8-1 | 89% | 14 | |
| 8166 | CTX JR 12-1 | 1652 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | |
| 8167 | Six Pack Legit 13-G | 1652 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | |
| 8168 | West Branch Bears 13 | 1652 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | |
| 8169 | Ocean Volleyball 15-National | 1652 | 12-9 | 57% | 15 | NJ |
| 8170 | CCVB 15-1 | 1652 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 8171 | H. Prep Dev 10-Red | 1651 | 12-4 | 67% | 10 | |
| 8172 | Split Mountain Kris 10 | 1651 | 6-2 | 60% | 10 | |
| 8173 | Lawrence Landsharks 16-1 | 1651 | 12-5 | 63% | 16 | |
| 8174 | Elite 15 National | 1651 | 14-10 | 58% | 15 | |
| 8175 | SVC JVC 15-Liang | 1651 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | |
| 8176 | Inspire CLE 14 Sunrise | 1651 | 40-29 | 58% | 14 | OH |
| 8177 | AP 13-Black | 1651 | 27-16 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 8178 | Athlete HQ 15-Whitney | 1651 | 30-29 | 51% | 15 | OH |
| 8179 | IVBA 18-Ren | 1651 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | MS |
| 8180 | Club Integrity 16-1 | 1651 | 36-17 | 68% | 16 | PA |
| 8181 | Innerlight VC 17 GOLD | 1651 | 32-24 | 57% | 17 | TN |
| 8182 | JJVA Club 16-C | 1651 | 11-3 | 79% | 16 | FL |
| 8183 | CROI VBC 13 | 1651 | 24-11 | 69% | 13 | IN |
| 8184 | ETA1 18-Black | 1651 | 22-12 | 65% | 18 | TX |
| 8185 | GP 14-State gold | 1651 | 57-22 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 8186 | MOD Elite 15-Gold | 1651 | 22-22 | 50% | 15 | IL |
| 8187 | MVP 60450 14-Black | 1651 | 29-10 | 73% | 14 | IL |
| 8188 | NPJ Portland 12 National | 1651 | 38-17 | 69% | 12 | OR |
| 8189 | OPVBC 14 Reign | 1651 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | WA |
| 8190 | SLPVC 18-1 | 1651 | 44-17 | 72% | 18 | IL |
| 8191 | SVC 16 Gold | 1651 | 21-8 | 72% | 16 | IA |
| 8192 | SVE 18-1 | 1651 | 21-28 | 43% | 18 | GA |
| 8193 | Tstreet SN 16-Kyle | 1651 | 28-23 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 8194 | Premier EDGE 13 | 1651 | 28-20 | 54% | 13 | DE |
| 8195 | AFVBC 16 Everest | 1651 | 39-28 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 8196 | Laredo Premier 14-Force | 1651 | 18-9 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 8197 | NWI Premier 15-Black | 1651 | 22-9 | 71% | 15 | IA |
| 8198 | Idaho ONE 13-Im gosser | 1651 | 27-19 | 59% | 13 | ID |
| 8199 | SUSA 17-Navy | 1651 | 12-7 | 63% | 17 | UT |
| 8200 | SPVC 17-Adidas | 1651 | 23-13 | 64% | 17 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.