Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 164 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8151 VVA 15-Denhartog 1652 29-21 58% 15 CA
8152 CTX Juniors 15-Apex 1652 34-21 61% 15 TX
8153 HPRIME 15-Gold 1652 25-17 60% 15 TX
8154 SMASH Raiders 16-1 1652 4-4 50% 16 ON
8155 864 Elite 17-Kendall 1652 19-8 70% 17 SC
8156 London Elite 12-Blue 1652 9-2 82% 12 OH
8157 BVC 14-Rennah 1652 19-11 63% 14 CA
8158 575 15-Russell lp 1652 4-4 50% 15 GA
8159 BVA 15-National alyssa 1652 3-5 38% 15 CA
8160 Dinamite 12-Lauren 1652 5-1 83% 12 CA
8161 Integrity 13-Intense blue 1652 22-26 41% 13 TX
8162 WC 14-1 1652 4-3 57% 14 TX
8163 Skyline 12-White lara 1652 26-20 51% 12 TX
8164 DBQ Elite 16 1652 4-0 100% 16
8165 Legit 14-G royal 1652 8-1 89% 14
8166 CTX JR 12-1 1652 7-1 88% 12
8167 Six Pack Legit 13-G 1652 5-1 83% 13
8168 West Branch Bears 13 1652 5-1 83% 13
8169 Ocean Volleyball 15-National 1652 12-9 57% 15 NJ
8170 CCVB 15-1 1652 2-3 40% 15 CA
8171 H. Prep Dev 10-Red 1651 12-4 67% 10
8172 Split Mountain Kris 10 1651 6-2 60% 10
8173 Lawrence Landsharks 16-1 1651 12-5 63% 16
8174 Elite 15 National 1651 14-10 58% 15
8175 SVC JVC 15-Liang 1651 9-2 82% 15
8176 Inspire CLE 14 Sunrise 1651 40-29 58% 14 OH
8177 AP 13-Black 1651 27-16 63% 13 TX
8178 Athlete HQ 15-Whitney 1651 30-29 51% 15 OH
8179 IVBA 18-Ren 1651 10-8 56% 18 MS
8180 Club Integrity 16-1 1651 36-17 68% 16 PA
8181 Innerlight VC 17 GOLD 1651 32-24 57% 17 TN
8182 JJVA Club 16-C 1651 11-3 79% 16 FL
8183 CROI VBC 13 1651 24-11 69% 13 IN
8184 ETA1 18-Black 1651 22-12 65% 18 TX
8185 GP 14-State gold 1651 57-22 72% 14 FL
8186 MOD Elite 15-Gold 1651 22-22 50% 15 IL
8187 MVP 60450 14-Black 1651 29-10 73% 14 IL
8188 NPJ Portland 12 National 1651 38-17 69% 12 OR
8189 OPVBC 14 Reign 1651 39-21 65% 14 WA
8190 SLPVC 18-1 1651 44-17 72% 18 IL
8191 SVC 16 Gold 1651 21-8 72% 16 IA
8192 SVE 18-1 1651 21-28 43% 18 GA
8193 Tstreet SN 16-Kyle 1651 28-23 55% 16 CA
8194 Premier EDGE 13 1651 28-20 54% 13 DE
8195 AFVBC 16 Everest 1651 39-28 58% 16 CA
8196 Laredo Premier 14-Force 1651 18-9 67% 14 TX
8197 NWI Premier 15-Black 1651 22-9 71% 15 IA
8198 Idaho ONE 13-Im gosser 1651 27-19 59% 13 ID
8199 SUSA 17-Navy 1651 12-7 63% 17 UT
8200 SPVC 17-Adidas 1651 23-13 64% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.