Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 163 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8101 Hunter's 14-Red c. ricardo 1653 47-16 75% 14 FL
8102 FIVA 14-Hiram 1653 42-22 66% 14 FL
8103 DYS 17-Thunder 1653 33-13 72% 17 VA
8104 SWMN 17-1 1653 2-1 67% 17 MN
8105 SVC JVC 15-Liang 1653 9-2 82% 15 GA
8106 Allons 15-Mack 1653 30-10 75% 15 LA
8107 WOVC 15-Red 1653 46-23 67% 15 FL
8108 WSRVC 12-Kugler 1653 16-5 76% 12 WY
8109 DSVC 12 NATIONAL 1653 26-12 68% 12 AL
8110 New Age 16-Select 1653 17-35 33% 16 TX
8111 DVVC 15-1 1653 6-2 75% 15 NV
8112 Integrity 13-Intense blue 1653 22-26 41% 13 TX
8113 HPRIME 15-Gold 1653 25-17 60% 15 TX
8114 West County 16 1653 16-7 70% 16 CA
8115 ND Elite 16-Schaeffer 1653 23-10 68% 16 ND
8116 NM Rev 17-Trey 1653 38-20 66% 17 NM
8117 DE.Club Net 13-1 premier 1653 6-2 55% 13 AR
8118 VCN 18-Black 1653 9-9 50% 18 NE
8119 Club V 13-Prodigy kris 1653 17-44 28% 13 UT
8120 SMASH Raiders 16-1 1653 4-4 50% 16 OH
8121 LMVC 17-Elite sue 1653 32-36 47% 17 SC
8122 UVA 15-Select 1653 2-1 67% 15 LA
8123 Premier Nebraska 11-Black 1653 13-13 50% 11 NE
8124 QCVC 16-Elite 1653 4-3 57% 16 NV
8125 Premier 12-3 black 1653 16-8 57% 12 AL
8126 AAVC 12-Regxtra 1653 9-2 82% 12 IL
8127 EMV 15-National black marquise 1653 3-4 43% 15 TX
8128 CC Force 13-1 crossfire 1653 21-15 58% 13 TX
8129 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-2 1653 8-1 89% 16 MO
8130 PVA 16-1 1653 34-11 76% 16 SC
8131 Austin Skyline 13 Molten 1653 27-16 61% 13 TX
8132 CHiX 12-PiNK 1653 19-12 61% 12 OH
8133 BVA 15-National alyssa 1653 3-5 38% 15 MN
8134 Eastlake 12-Aysa 1653 7-2 78% 12 CA
8135 Metro Volleyball Club 12-Central 1653 28-13 67% 12 DC
8136 FPVC 13-Ren 1653 22-11 67% 13 CA
8137 HBJ 15-Haleigh/chandler 1653 30-14 68% 15 AR
8138 High Tide 15-Ava 1653 35-13 73% 15 CA
8139 CTX JR 12-1 1653 7-1 88% 12 TX
8140 Ne Jrs 13-Black 1653 14-5 74% 13 NE
8141 EPUERTO 16-1 1653 20-9 69% 16 OR
8142 RCVC 16-N autumn 1653 20-12 63% 16 TN
8143 Elevate Volleyball Club 15-Blue 1653 23-26 47% 15 IL
8144 SG Elite 16-Elite shari 1653 36-17 68% 16 CA
8145 Inspired VB 16-Black 1653 44-19 70% 16 MN
8146 Lawrence Landsharks 16-1 1653 12-5 63% 16 KS
8147 Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 17-Empire 1653 34-23 60% 17 NY
8148 VVB 16-Serena 1653 32-10 76% 16 GA
8149 Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 12 BRVBC Sliver (Dylan) 1653 10-3 71% 12
8150 The Panthers 14 The Panthers 1652 10-0 100% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.