Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 163 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8101 NPJ Bend 14 Premier 1653 32-21 60% 14 OR
8102 Illini Elite 15-White 1653 57-24 70% 15 IL
8103 Palm Beach Jrs 14 Elite 1653 24-8 75% 14 FL
8104 MichioChicago 13-Bluesmoke 1653 18-21 46% 13 IL
8105 Xtreme 16-National deb 1653 18-8 69% 16 NJ
8106 TEJAS 18-Red chuck 1653 13-10 57% 18 TX
8107 Eastlake 12-Aysa 1653 7-2 78% 12
8108 Aura 13-Purple 1653 21-9 70% 13 CA
8109 Madfrog East 14-Diamond 1653 14-4 70% 14
8110 SWMN 17-1 1653 2-1 67% 17
8111 Summit 16-National blue 1653 23-22 50% 16 TX
8112 Summit 14-National green 1653 24-18 55% 14 TX
8113 MFVB+ 11 1652 9-1 90% 11
8114 WSRVC 12-Henrikson/kugler 1652 6-1 86% 12
8115 AV 14-2 emerald 1652 5-3 63% 14
8116 WSRVC 12-Kugler 1652 16-5 76% 12
8117 Mighty Mo 13-1 1652 23-10 66% 13
8118 Kairos 13 Gamma 1652 36-23 61% 13 SD
8119 SJVC 12-Blue 1652 6-0 100% 12 FL
8120 LV Force VB 17-White 1652 30-24 55% 17 PA
8121 NorthShore 14-Hohler 1652 13-3 81% 14 OH
8122 Set'em Up! 14-2n 1652 26-15 63% 14 FL
8123 AP 18 adidas 1652 12-23 34% 18 TX
8124 Apex NW 16-Summit 1652 32-20 62% 16 WA
8125 Crosscourt 16 1652 33-22 60% 16 PA
8126 BRUSA 13 Mauro 1652 24-11 69% 13 CA
8127 Delaware Juniors 16-Ace 1652 23-17 57% 16 DE
8128 CVC 17-BLUE 1652 22-34 39% 17 OH
8129 Dynamite 17-1 1652 29-11 73% 17 CA
8130 Excel NW 17-1 lux 1652 27-24 53% 17 WA
8131 FTL 16-Fusion open-usa c 1652 5-0 100% 16 FL
8132 Galaxy 16 Patrick 1652 21-12 64% 16 NC
8133 Fennimore Impact 12 1652 4-0 100% 12 WI
8134 Anthem United 15-Agape 1652 31-9 78% 15 GA
8135 Peak Elite 17U 1652 26-34 43% 17 PA
8136 OVA 14-G legacy 1652 35-31 53% 14 FL
8137 OT 14-T ike 1652 35-15 70% 14 FL
8138 Shakopee 17-1 1652 16-11 57% 17 MN
8139 Topeka Saints 14-1 1652 18-10 64% 14 KS
8140 Triangle 12-Black 1652 34-30 53% 12 NC
8141 Tulsa Power 15-2 1652 34-20 63% 15 OK
8142 Vantage 16-Blue smack 1652 36-15 71% 16 WV
8143 Tville Smash 12 1652 46-16 74% 12 IL
8144 757 17-Teal 1652 44-24 65% 17 VA
8145 WI Shock 16-White 1652 22-7 76% 16 WI
8146 Holy Trinity Cruisers 13 1652 5-0 100% 13 IA
8147 NORCO 11-Black 1652 32-15 68% 11 CO
8148 Net Force 17-1 elite 1652 18-8 67% 17 IL
8149 CCVBC 12-1 - marilu 1652 25-15 63% 12 CA
8150 Sky High 17-Vasalos 1652 11-2 85% 17 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.