2025-2026 Season — Page 163 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8101 | Hunter's 14-Red c. ricardo | 1653 | 47-16 | 75% | 14 | FL |
| 8102 | FIVA 14-Hiram | 1653 | 42-22 | 66% | 14 | FL |
| 8103 | DYS 17-Thunder | 1653 | 33-13 | 72% | 17 | VA |
| 8104 | SWMN 17-1 | 1653 | 2-1 | 67% | 17 | MN |
| 8105 | SVC JVC 15-Liang | 1653 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | GA |
| 8106 | Allons 15-Mack | 1653 | 30-10 | 75% | 15 | LA |
| 8107 | WOVC 15-Red | 1653 | 46-23 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 8108 | WSRVC 12-Kugler | 1653 | 16-5 | 76% | 12 | WY |
| 8109 | DSVC 12 NATIONAL | 1653 | 26-12 | 68% | 12 | AL |
| 8110 | New Age 16-Select | 1653 | 17-35 | 33% | 16 | TX |
| 8111 | DVVC 15-1 | 1653 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | NV |
| 8112 | Integrity 13-Intense blue | 1653 | 22-26 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 8113 | HPRIME 15-Gold | 1653 | 25-17 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 8114 | West County 16 | 1653 | 16-7 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 8115 | ND Elite 16-Schaeffer | 1653 | 23-10 | 68% | 16 | ND |
| 8116 | NM Rev 17-Trey | 1653 | 38-20 | 66% | 17 | NM |
| 8117 | DE.Club Net 13-1 premier | 1653 | 6-2 | 55% | 13 | AR |
| 8118 | VCN 18-Black | 1653 | 9-9 | 50% | 18 | NE |
| 8119 | Club V 13-Prodigy kris | 1653 | 17-44 | 28% | 13 | UT |
| 8120 | SMASH Raiders 16-1 | 1653 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 8121 | LMVC 17-Elite sue | 1653 | 32-36 | 47% | 17 | SC |
| 8122 | UVA 15-Select | 1653 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | LA |
| 8123 | Premier Nebraska 11-Black | 1653 | 13-13 | 50% | 11 | NE |
| 8124 | QCVC 16-Elite | 1653 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | NV |
| 8125 | Premier 12-3 black | 1653 | 16-8 | 57% | 12 | AL |
| 8126 | AAVC 12-Regxtra | 1653 | 9-2 | 82% | 12 | IL |
| 8127 | EMV 15-National black marquise | 1653 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | TX |
| 8128 | CC Force 13-1 crossfire | 1653 | 21-15 | 58% | 13 | TX |
| 8129 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-2 | 1653 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | MO |
| 8130 | PVA 16-1 | 1653 | 34-11 | 76% | 16 | SC |
| 8131 | Austin Skyline 13 Molten | 1653 | 27-16 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 8132 | CHiX 12-PiNK | 1653 | 19-12 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 8133 | BVA 15-National alyssa | 1653 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | MN |
| 8134 | Eastlake 12-Aysa | 1653 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 8135 | Metro Volleyball Club 12-Central | 1653 | 28-13 | 67% | 12 | DC |
| 8136 | FPVC 13-Ren | 1653 | 22-11 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 8137 | HBJ 15-Haleigh/chandler | 1653 | 30-14 | 68% | 15 | AR |
| 8138 | High Tide 15-Ava | 1653 | 35-13 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 8139 | CTX JR 12-1 | 1653 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | TX |
| 8140 | Ne Jrs 13-Black | 1653 | 14-5 | 74% | 13 | NE |
| 8141 | EPUERTO 16-1 | 1653 | 20-9 | 69% | 16 | OR |
| 8142 | RCVC 16-N autumn | 1653 | 20-12 | 63% | 16 | TN |
| 8143 | Elevate Volleyball Club 15-Blue | 1653 | 23-26 | 47% | 15 | IL |
| 8144 | SG Elite 16-Elite shari | 1653 | 36-17 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 8145 | Inspired VB 16-Black | 1653 | 44-19 | 70% | 16 | MN |
| 8146 | Lawrence Landsharks 16-1 | 1653 | 12-5 | 63% | 16 | KS |
| 8147 | Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 17-Empire | 1653 | 34-23 | 60% | 17 | NY |
| 8148 | VVB 16-Serena | 1653 | 32-10 | 76% | 16 | GA |
| 8149 | Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 12 BRVBC Sliver (Dylan) | 1653 | 10-3 | 71% | 12 | |
| 8150 | The Panthers 14 The Panthers | 1652 | 10-0 | 100% | 14 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.