2025-2026 Season — Page 162 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8051 | Tribe 14 | 1654 | 8-1 | 89% | 14 | FL |
| 8052 | SKPV 14-1 | 1654 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | KY |
| 8053 | Illini Elite 12-Lizzie | 1654 | 11-4 | 73% | 12 | IL |
| 8054 | Michio 11-Chicago bears | 1654 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | IL |
| 8055 | FWFIRE 12-W | 1654 | 28-8 | 78% | 12 | TX |
| 8056 | Titanas 13-1 | 1654 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | PR |
| 8057 | 787EV 12 | 1654 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | PR |
| 8058 | WYO 14 | 1654 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | |
| 8059 | NWE 12-1 | 1654 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | |
| 8060 | Hunter's 14-Red c. ricardo | 1654 | 47-16 | 75% | 14 | FL |
| 8061 | Force 17-Sara | 1654 | 14-5 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 8062 | Freedom 13-Blue | 1653 | 19-13 | 59% | 13 | |
| 8063 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-2 | 1653 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | |
| 8064 | Believe 16 Premier | 1653 | 19-7 | 73% | 16 | |
| 8065 | EC IMPACT 12 | 1653 | 23-7 | 74% | 12 | TX |
| 8066 | EVA 16-Green | 1653 | 23-7 | 77% | 16 | KY |
| 8067 | Six Pack 13 | 1653 | 28-24 | 54% | 13 | IA |
| 8068 | Austin Skyline 13 Molten | 1653 | 27-16 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 8069 | Jax Skyline 16-Black | 1653 | 42-32 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 8070 | CJV 12-Select navy | 1653 | 17-7 | 71% | 12 | NC |
| 8071 | Impulse 16-Red | 1653 | 23-13 | 64% | 16 | IL |
| 8072 | Boltz 17-Desertaces | 1653 | 33-38 | 46% | 17 | AZ |
| 8073 | BEV 17 Empire | 1653 | 37-27 | 58% | 17 | NY |
| 8074 | Chicago Elite 14 National | 1653 | 41-19 | 68% | 14 | IL |
| 8075 | CHiX 12-PiNK | 1653 | 19-12 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 8076 | Coast Crew 16-1 blue | 1653 | 20-6 | 77% | 16 | OR |
| 8077 | Diablos 14-S | 1653 | 41-26 | 61% | 14 | AZ |
| 8078 | FRVBC 17-3 white | 1653 | 19-13 | 59% | 17 | CO |
| 8079 | FCA Clark 14-Force | 1653 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | OR |
| 8080 | FVP 13-Regional | 1653 | 15-7 | 68% | 13 | WI |
| 8081 | MOVA UA 13 GOLD | 1653 | 38-25 | 60% | 13 | MO |
| 8082 | ROCK Volleyball 15-Sky | 1653 | 37-37 | 50% | 15 | PA |
| 8083 | Rancho 15 Select | 1653 | 23-13 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 8084 | South Shore Slam 14-Navy | 1653 | 14-5 | 74% | 14 | WI |
| 8085 | Pulse 16 Gonzalez | 1653 | 38-13 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 8086 | SG Elite 16-Elite shari | 1653 | 36-17 | 68% | 16 | CA |
| 8087 | SVA 15-Aki | 1653 | 37-30 | 55% | 15 | AZ |
| 8088 | Surge 15-Black | 1653 | 18-19 | 49% | 15 | RI |
| 8089 | Coqui Coast 16 | 1653 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | MS |
| 8090 | Rockwood Thunder 17-Black | 1653 | 35-16 | 65% | 17 | MO |
| 8091 | SF Juniors 14-Black | 1653 | 13-10 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 8092 | Lanier 17-Nat. mary beth | 1653 | 15-10 | 60% | 17 | GA |
| 8093 | Bristol Crush 15-1 | 1653 | 16-5 | 76% | 15 | CT |
| 8094 | FPVC 13-Ren | 1653 | 22-11 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 8095 | OVA 15-National dani/veronica | 1653 | 20-10 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 8096 | Voltage 14-Coach josh | 1653 | 7-3 | 58% | 14 | FL |
| 8097 | AAVC 12-Regxtra | 1653 | 9-2 | 82% | 12 | IL |
| 8098 | Phoenix 14-Red | 1653 | 14-9 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 8099 | 1United 16-N black | 1653 | 30-20 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 8100 | FUSION 16-1 | 1653 | 16-5 | 70% | 16 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.