Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 162 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8051 787EV 12 1654 9-1 90% 12 PR
8052 LV Force VB 17-White 1654 30-24 55% 17 PA
8053 Triangle 12-Black 1654 34-30 53% 12 NC
8054 NCWVBC 12-1 gold 1654 23-13 64% 12 WA
8055 Momentous VBC 16-Dejah 1654 26-16 62% 16 CA
8056 CCVB 15-1 1654 2-3 40% 15 GA
8057 NWE 12-1 1654 4-3 57% 12 WA
8058 Six Pack 13 1654 28-24 54% 13 IA
8059 Madfrog 16-E green 1654 25-20 51% 16 TX
8060 Grandlake 16-A kramer 1654 7-2 78% 16 OH
8061 BRUSA 13 Mauro 1654 24-11 69% 13 CA
8062 Ignite 12-Red 1654 57-25 67% 12 WA
8063 Titanas 13-1 1654 6-6 50% 13 PR
8064 IA Juniors 16-Black 1654 30-20 60% 16 IA
8065 DYNASTY 16-Gold 1654 24-17 59% 16 KS
8066 NORCO 11-Black 1654 32-15 68% 11 CO
8067 WCJ 13-1 1654 13-3 72% 13 TX
8068 Club 909 13-1 1654 24-14 63% 13 CA
8069 KNVBC 16-2 showtime 1654 12-10 55% 16 KS
8070 Instinct 11-Wild black 1654 17-7 68% 11 TX
8071 Big Sky Volleyball 13-2 1654 33-15 63% 13 MT
8072 AFVBC 16 Everest 1654 39-28 58% 16 CA
8073 Solon 11-Black 1654 8-0 89% 11 IA
8074 ND Elite 17-Feist 1654 19-12 58% 17 ND
8075 NPJ Salem 12 National 1654 45-19 70% 12 OR
8076 Notorious 15-Adam/leo 1654 9-3 75% 15 CA
8077 CGSV 15-Conners 1654 10-6 63% 15 OH
8078 EliteVBTC 13-Pink 1654 22-12 65% 13 OH
8079 Coqui Coast 16 1654 21-11 66% 16 AL
8080 Columbus 12-2 1654 21-7 66% 12 MT
8081 SOSVBC 16-T marissa 1654 12-4 75% 16 NY
8082 MGA 12-Black 1654 18-10 64% 12 MA
8083 Lanier 17-Nat. mary beth 1654 15-10 60% 17 GA
8084 GSA 12 1654 7-2 78% 12 ID
8085 CPAC 16-Black 1654 5-0 100% 16 SD
8086 South Coast 16-1 1654 34-7 83% 16 OR
8087 PEAK 16-3 1654 31-18 63% 16 OK
8088 KINETIKA Volleyball Club 15 KNT-Gravity 1654 11-1 92% 15
8089 Summit 16-National blue 1653 23-22 50% 16 TX
8090 Summit Volleyball Club 16 16U Orange 1653 18-7 72% 16
8091 PROJECT SPIKERS 18-1 1653 23-9 68% 18
8092 Memphis Metro 14-Elite black 1653 3-5 38% 14 TN
8093 AJV 18 Molten 1653 29-16 64% 18 TX
8094 FL HYPE 18 Smack 1653 41-18 69% 18 FL
8095 BVC 18-1 conner 1653 22-8 73% 18 AL
8096 PEAK 14-3 1653 28-20 57% 14 OK
8097 HJV 14-Molten 1653 15-9 63% 14 TX
8098 Hollywood Rise 14 Elite 1653 18-12 60% 14 OH
8099 STARZ 14-Blue 1653 65-18 78% 14 IL
8100 BVA 14 Elite 1653 24-13 65% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.