2025-2026 Season — Page 162 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8051 | 787EV 12 | 1654 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | PR |
| 8052 | LV Force VB 17-White | 1654 | 30-24 | 55% | 17 | PA |
| 8053 | Triangle 12-Black | 1654 | 34-30 | 53% | 12 | NC |
| 8054 | NCWVBC 12-1 gold | 1654 | 23-13 | 64% | 12 | WA |
| 8055 | Momentous VBC 16-Dejah | 1654 | 26-16 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 8056 | CCVB 15-1 | 1654 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | GA |
| 8057 | NWE 12-1 | 1654 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | WA |
| 8058 | Six Pack 13 | 1654 | 28-24 | 54% | 13 | IA |
| 8059 | Madfrog 16-E green | 1654 | 25-20 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 8060 | Grandlake 16-A kramer | 1654 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | OH |
| 8061 | BRUSA 13 Mauro | 1654 | 24-11 | 69% | 13 | CA |
| 8062 | Ignite 12-Red | 1654 | 57-25 | 67% | 12 | WA |
| 8063 | Titanas 13-1 | 1654 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | PR |
| 8064 | IA Juniors 16-Black | 1654 | 30-20 | 60% | 16 | IA |
| 8065 | DYNASTY 16-Gold | 1654 | 24-17 | 59% | 16 | KS |
| 8066 | NORCO 11-Black | 1654 | 32-15 | 68% | 11 | CO |
| 8067 | WCJ 13-1 | 1654 | 13-3 | 72% | 13 | TX |
| 8068 | Club 909 13-1 | 1654 | 24-14 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 8069 | KNVBC 16-2 showtime | 1654 | 12-10 | 55% | 16 | KS |
| 8070 | Instinct 11-Wild black | 1654 | 17-7 | 68% | 11 | TX |
| 8071 | Big Sky Volleyball 13-2 | 1654 | 33-15 | 63% | 13 | MT |
| 8072 | AFVBC 16 Everest | 1654 | 39-28 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 8073 | Solon 11-Black | 1654 | 8-0 | 89% | 11 | IA |
| 8074 | ND Elite 17-Feist | 1654 | 19-12 | 58% | 17 | ND |
| 8075 | NPJ Salem 12 National | 1654 | 45-19 | 70% | 12 | OR |
| 8076 | Notorious 15-Adam/leo | 1654 | 9-3 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 8077 | CGSV 15-Conners | 1654 | 10-6 | 63% | 15 | OH |
| 8078 | EliteVBTC 13-Pink | 1654 | 22-12 | 65% | 13 | OH |
| 8079 | Coqui Coast 16 | 1654 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | AL |
| 8080 | Columbus 12-2 | 1654 | 21-7 | 66% | 12 | MT |
| 8081 | SOSVBC 16-T marissa | 1654 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | NY |
| 8082 | MGA 12-Black | 1654 | 18-10 | 64% | 12 | MA |
| 8083 | Lanier 17-Nat. mary beth | 1654 | 15-10 | 60% | 17 | GA |
| 8084 | GSA 12 | 1654 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | ID |
| 8085 | CPAC 16-Black | 1654 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | SD |
| 8086 | South Coast 16-1 | 1654 | 34-7 | 83% | 16 | OR |
| 8087 | PEAK 16-3 | 1654 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | OK |
| 8088 | KINETIKA Volleyball Club 15 KNT-Gravity | 1654 | 11-1 | 92% | 15 | |
| 8089 | Summit 16-National blue | 1653 | 23-22 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 8090 | Summit Volleyball Club 16 16U Orange | 1653 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | |
| 8091 | PROJECT SPIKERS 18-1 | 1653 | 23-9 | 68% | 18 | |
| 8092 | Memphis Metro 14-Elite black | 1653 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | TN |
| 8093 | AJV 18 Molten | 1653 | 29-16 | 64% | 18 | TX |
| 8094 | FL HYPE 18 Smack | 1653 | 41-18 | 69% | 18 | FL |
| 8095 | BVC 18-1 conner | 1653 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | AL |
| 8096 | PEAK 14-3 | 1653 | 28-20 | 57% | 14 | OK |
| 8097 | HJV 14-Molten | 1653 | 15-9 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 8098 | Hollywood Rise 14 Elite | 1653 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 8099 | STARZ 14-Blue | 1653 | 65-18 | 78% | 14 | IL |
| 8100 | BVA 14 Elite | 1653 | 24-13 | 65% | 14 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.