Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 162 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8051 Tribe 14 1654 8-1 89% 14 FL
8052 SKPV 14-1 1654 9-0 100% 14 KY
8053 Illini Elite 12-Lizzie 1654 11-4 73% 12 IL
8054 Michio 11-Chicago bears 1654 5-0 100% 11 IL
8055 FWFIRE 12-W 1654 28-8 78% 12 TX
8056 Titanas 13-1 1654 6-6 50% 13 PR
8057 787EV 12 1654 9-1 90% 12 PR
8058 WYO 14 1654 6-1 86% 14
8059 NWE 12-1 1654 4-3 57% 12
8060 Hunter's 14-Red c. ricardo 1654 47-16 75% 14 FL
8061 Force 17-Sara 1654 14-5 58% 17 CA
8062 Freedom 13-Blue 1653 19-13 59% 13
8063 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-2 1653 8-1 89% 16
8064 Believe 16 Premier 1653 19-7 73% 16
8065 EC IMPACT 12 1653 23-7 74% 12 TX
8066 EVA 16-Green 1653 23-7 77% 16 KY
8067 Six Pack 13 1653 28-24 54% 13 IA
8068 Austin Skyline 13 Molten 1653 27-16 61% 13 TX
8069 Jax Skyline 16-Black 1653 42-32 57% 16 FL
8070 CJV 12-Select navy 1653 17-7 71% 12 NC
8071 Impulse 16-Red 1653 23-13 64% 16 IL
8072 Boltz 17-Desertaces 1653 33-38 46% 17 AZ
8073 BEV 17 Empire 1653 37-27 58% 17 NY
8074 Chicago Elite 14 National 1653 41-19 68% 14 IL
8075 CHiX 12-PiNK 1653 19-12 61% 12 OH
8076 Coast Crew 16-1 blue 1653 20-6 77% 16 OR
8077 Diablos 14-S 1653 41-26 61% 14 AZ
8078 FRVBC 17-3 white 1653 19-13 59% 17 CO
8079 FCA Clark 14-Force 1653 23-7 77% 14 OR
8080 FVP 13-Regional 1653 15-7 68% 13 WI
8081 MOVA UA 13 GOLD 1653 38-25 60% 13 MO
8082 ROCK Volleyball 15-Sky 1653 37-37 50% 15 PA
8083 Rancho 15 Select 1653 23-13 64% 15 CA
8084 South Shore Slam 14-Navy 1653 14-5 74% 14 WI
8085 Pulse 16 Gonzalez 1653 38-13 75% 16 CA
8086 SG Elite 16-Elite shari 1653 36-17 68% 16 CA
8087 SVA 15-Aki 1653 37-30 55% 15 AZ
8088 Surge 15-Black 1653 18-19 49% 15 RI
8089 Coqui Coast 16 1653 21-11 66% 16 MS
8090 Rockwood Thunder 17-Black 1653 35-16 65% 17 MO
8091 SF Juniors 14-Black 1653 13-10 57% 14 CA
8092 Lanier 17-Nat. mary beth 1653 15-10 60% 17 GA
8093 Bristol Crush 15-1 1653 16-5 76% 15 CT
8094 FPVC 13-Ren 1653 22-11 67% 13 CA
8095 OVA 15-National dani/veronica 1653 20-10 67% 15 FL
8096 Voltage 14-Coach josh 1653 7-3 58% 14 FL
8097 AAVC 12-Regxtra 1653 9-2 82% 12 IL
8098 Phoenix 14-Red 1653 14-9 61% 14 OH
8099 1United 16-N black 1653 30-20 53% 16 TX
8100 FUSION 16-1 1653 16-5 70% 16 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.