Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 161 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8001 HHVC 15-1 1655 19-6 76% 15 CT
8002 Shakopee 17-1 1655 16-11 57% 17 MN
8003 Cats Volleyball 12 1655 9-2 82% 12 IA
8004 TEV 16-Gary/cindy 1655 20-6 77% 16 TN
8005 Bay Area Eagles 13-2 1655 27-32 46% 13 CA
8006 Vaqueras 11-F oscar f 1655 13-10 57% 11 PR
8007 Freedom 13-Blue 1655 19-13 59% 13 MO
8008 SNVF 15 STORM 1655 35-29 55% 15 WA
8009 SVC 13-U hammerheads 1655 29-11 73% 13 SC
8010 WSRVC 12-Henrikson/kugler 1655 6-1 86% 12 WY
8011 Five Starz 16-Red april 1655 15-17 47% 16 CA
8012 NM Rev 16-Jackie 1655 35-17 67% 16 NM
8013 AVC 12-2 1655 12-4 67% 12 MN
8014 FUSION 16-1 1655 16-5 70% 16 ND
8015 Premier 15-Crimson w 1655 18-24 42% 15 TX
8016 AVA 16-Midnight 1655 40-27 60% 16 PA
8017 Oiler Attack 16-Black 1655 18-9 67% 16 OH
8018 Fusion 15-White 1655 29-26 53% 15 PA
8019 SMASH Volleyball 15-Blue 1655 8-1 89% 15 MA
8020 Erie Elite Cadence 15 1655 12-3 80% 15 OH
8021 Tulsa Power 15-2 1655 34-20 63% 15 OK
8022 Manhattan Mamba 17-1 1655 30-14 68% 17 KS
8023 SMVA 13-1 1655 14-8 61% 13 AL
8024 PJVBC 12-Elite 1655 27-7 79% 12 WA
8025 Legit 11-Gray 1655 4-0 80% 11 IA
8026 APXVB 13-Tameisha 1655 11-10 44% 13 UT
8027 Holy Trinity Cruisers 13 1655 5-0 100% 13 IA
8028 OK Charge 17-Select tulsa 1655 34-20 63% 17 OK
8029 NE D-League 15 1655 17-10 63% 15 IA
8030 ZVC 18-1 1655 13-8 62% 18
8031 Sonora DRG 13 1655 7-1 88% 13 MX
8032 SCBandits 12-1 1655 28-11 72% 12 ON
8033 OP2 10-1 elite 1655 5-0 83% 10
8034 208 15-Elite 1655 41-36 53% 15 ID
8035 Premier Nebraska 14-Red 1654 17-10 63% 14 NE
8036 PRVC 18-Stacey 1654 26-19 58% 18 WY
8037 ESO 18-Elite 1654 28-17 62% 18 OH
8038 Palm Beach Jrs 14 Elite 1654 24-8 75% 14 FL
8039 BEVBC 14 Navy 1654 36-12 75% 14 MD
8040 Paradigm Riot 14-S 1654 35-12 74% 14 NY
8041 OPVBC 14 Reign 1654 39-21 65% 14 WA
8042 SASVBC G 14 KAYA 1654 42-17 71% 14 HI
8043 SC Legends 14-Nike 1654 27-20 57% 14 CA
8044 Titanium 14 Silver 1654 25-11 66% 14 MO
8045 OMNI 14 Power 1654 36-19 65% 14 CA
8046 MVA 12-D 1654 10-1 83% 12 SC
8047 Bemidji 13-Katie/ella 1654 5-0 83% 13 ND
8048 Legends 16-1 de sevilla 1654 16-13 55% 16 PR
8049 Xtreme 16-National deb 1654 18-8 69% 16 NJ
8050 Premier EDGE 13 1654 28-20 54% 13 DE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.