2025-2026 Season — Page 161 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8001 | HHVC 15-1 | 1655 | 19-6 | 76% | 15 | CT |
| 8002 | Shakopee 17-1 | 1655 | 16-11 | 57% | 17 | MN |
| 8003 | Cats Volleyball 12 | 1655 | 9-2 | 82% | 12 | IA |
| 8004 | TEV 16-Gary/cindy | 1655 | 20-6 | 77% | 16 | TN |
| 8005 | Bay Area Eagles 13-2 | 1655 | 27-32 | 46% | 13 | CA |
| 8006 | Vaqueras 11-F oscar f | 1655 | 13-10 | 57% | 11 | PR |
| 8007 | Freedom 13-Blue | 1655 | 19-13 | 59% | 13 | MO |
| 8008 | SNVF 15 STORM | 1655 | 35-29 | 55% | 15 | WA |
| 8009 | SVC 13-U hammerheads | 1655 | 29-11 | 73% | 13 | SC |
| 8010 | WSRVC 12-Henrikson/kugler | 1655 | 6-1 | 86% | 12 | WY |
| 8011 | Five Starz 16-Red april | 1655 | 15-17 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 8012 | NM Rev 16-Jackie | 1655 | 35-17 | 67% | 16 | NM |
| 8013 | AVC 12-2 | 1655 | 12-4 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 8014 | FUSION 16-1 | 1655 | 16-5 | 70% | 16 | ND |
| 8015 | Premier 15-Crimson w | 1655 | 18-24 | 42% | 15 | TX |
| 8016 | AVA 16-Midnight | 1655 | 40-27 | 60% | 16 | PA |
| 8017 | Oiler Attack 16-Black | 1655 | 18-9 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 8018 | Fusion 15-White | 1655 | 29-26 | 53% | 15 | PA |
| 8019 | SMASH Volleyball 15-Blue | 1655 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | MA |
| 8020 | Erie Elite Cadence 15 | 1655 | 12-3 | 80% | 15 | OH |
| 8021 | Tulsa Power 15-2 | 1655 | 34-20 | 63% | 15 | OK |
| 8022 | Manhattan Mamba 17-1 | 1655 | 30-14 | 68% | 17 | KS |
| 8023 | SMVA 13-1 | 1655 | 14-8 | 61% | 13 | AL |
| 8024 | PJVBC 12-Elite | 1655 | 27-7 | 79% | 12 | WA |
| 8025 | Legit 11-Gray | 1655 | 4-0 | 80% | 11 | IA |
| 8026 | APXVB 13-Tameisha | 1655 | 11-10 | 44% | 13 | UT |
| 8027 | Holy Trinity Cruisers 13 | 1655 | 5-0 | 100% | 13 | IA |
| 8028 | OK Charge 17-Select tulsa | 1655 | 34-20 | 63% | 17 | OK |
| 8029 | NE D-League 15 | 1655 | 17-10 | 63% | 15 | IA |
| 8030 | ZVC 18-1 | 1655 | 13-8 | 62% | 18 | |
| 8031 | Sonora DRG 13 | 1655 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | MX |
| 8032 | SCBandits 12-1 | 1655 | 28-11 | 72% | 12 | ON |
| 8033 | OP2 10-1 elite | 1655 | 5-0 | 83% | 10 | |
| 8034 | 208 15-Elite | 1655 | 41-36 | 53% | 15 | ID |
| 8035 | Premier Nebraska 14-Red | 1654 | 17-10 | 63% | 14 | NE |
| 8036 | PRVC 18-Stacey | 1654 | 26-19 | 58% | 18 | WY |
| 8037 | ESO 18-Elite | 1654 | 28-17 | 62% | 18 | OH |
| 8038 | Palm Beach Jrs 14 Elite | 1654 | 24-8 | 75% | 14 | FL |
| 8039 | BEVBC 14 Navy | 1654 | 36-12 | 75% | 14 | MD |
| 8040 | Paradigm Riot 14-S | 1654 | 35-12 | 74% | 14 | NY |
| 8041 | OPVBC 14 Reign | 1654 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | WA |
| 8042 | SASVBC G 14 KAYA | 1654 | 42-17 | 71% | 14 | HI |
| 8043 | SC Legends 14-Nike | 1654 | 27-20 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 8044 | Titanium 14 Silver | 1654 | 25-11 | 66% | 14 | MO |
| 8045 | OMNI 14 Power | 1654 | 36-19 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 8046 | MVA 12-D | 1654 | 10-1 | 83% | 12 | SC |
| 8047 | Bemidji 13-Katie/ella | 1654 | 5-0 | 83% | 13 | ND |
| 8048 | Legends 16-1 de sevilla | 1654 | 16-13 | 55% | 16 | PR |
| 8049 | Xtreme 16-National deb | 1654 | 18-8 | 69% | 16 | NJ |
| 8050 | Premier EDGE 13 | 1654 | 28-20 | 54% | 13 | DE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.