Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 161 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8001 MVA 14-National (CH) 1655 22-10 69% 14
8002 Ama Xtreme 14-Legacy 1655 3-1 60% 14
8003 Houston Stellar 15-Premier 1655 3-5 38% 15
8004 Memphis Metro 14-Elite black 1655 3-5 38% 14
8005 SGV 14-Wildfire 1655 8-1 89% 14 CA
8006 CPAC 16-Black 1654 5-0 100% 16
8007 FOG Rage 15 11 1654 3-4 43% 11
8008 No Limits 12-Elite 1654 26-16 59% 12 FL
8009 ND Elite 16-Schaeffer 1654 23-10 68% 16 ND
8010 RCVC 16-N autumn 1654 20-12 63% 16 AL
8011 EKJV 17-National 1654 10-5 67% 17 KY
8012 Renaissance 17-Black 1654 36-46 44% 17 PA
8013 Legend 13 1654 24-26 48% 13 CA
8014 S.A. STARS 14-Black 1654 28-12 70% 14 TX
8015 K1V 14u 1654 40-17 70% 14 KY
8016 Corpus Christi Storm 12-1 1654 21-6 78% 12 TX
8017 EPUERTO 16-1 1654 20-9 69% 16 OR
8018 Big Sky Volleyball 13-2 1654 33-15 63% 13 MT
8019 Athlete HQ 14-Smith 1654 28-14 67% 14 OH
8020 CC Force 13-1 crossfire 1654 21-15 58% 13 TX
8021 DVA National 18-1 1654 33-18 65% 18 IA
8022 MSVB 15-R bethany/marett 1654 10-5 67% 15 AK
8023 GRIT 12-Green 1654 16-6 73% 12 AL
8024 GirlieGirlie 18-1 1654 15-4 79% 18 HI
8025 MMVC 17 Gold 1654 22-31 42% 17 OH
8026 MOVA UA 16 GOLD 1654 36-25 59% 16 MO
8027 NCWVBC 12-1 gold 1654 23-13 64% 12 WA
8028 MJVA 12-Elite black 1654 35-22 60% 12 TN
8029 PNW VBC 14-2 green 1654 23-8 74% 14 WA
8030 Piedmont VBC 14 Mamba 1654 39-23 63% 14 NC
8031 OVC 18-1 1654 21-12 64% 18 MO
8032 PJVBC 14 Elite 1654 26-15 63% 14 WA
8033 South Coast 16-1 1654 34-7 83% 16 OR
8034 LOBOS 18-Black 1654 35-24 59% 18 CO
8035 LMVC 17-Elite sue 1654 32-36 47% 17 SC
8036 Laredo Infinity 15-Red 1654 19-9 68% 15 TX
8037 MSVB 12-Red 1654 10-2 83% 12 AK
8038 Momentum Volleyball 12-Cathryn 1654 24-14 63% 12 CO
8039 Club V 13-Prodigy kris 1654 17-44 28% 13 UT
8040 SC Legends 17-Elite 1654 15-14 52% 17 CA
8041 Northern Lights 18-1 1654 26-22 54% 18 MN
8042 Academy North 13-Hp-1 1654 22-26 46% 13 CA
8043 OC Lady Elite 14-Black 1654 20-8 71% 14 NY
8044 HP 15-2 1654 36-29 55% 15 MI
8045 EXCEL 14-National blue 1654 23-23 44% 14 TX
8046 ECVC 14-National - india 1654 14-9 61% 14 FL
8047 adidas DYNASTY 18-1 1654 6-2 75% 18 KS
8048 GSA 12 1654 7-2 78% 12 NJ
8049 Solon 11-Black 1654 8-0 89% 11 IA
8050 Diablo VBC 17-1 1654 4-4 50% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.