2025-2026 Season — Page 161 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8001 | MVA 14-National (CH) | 1655 | 22-10 | 69% | 14 | |
| 8002 | Ama Xtreme 14-Legacy | 1655 | 3-1 | 60% | 14 | |
| 8003 | Houston Stellar 15-Premier | 1655 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | |
| 8004 | Memphis Metro 14-Elite black | 1655 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | |
| 8005 | SGV 14-Wildfire | 1655 | 8-1 | 89% | 14 | CA |
| 8006 | CPAC 16-Black | 1654 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 8007 | FOG Rage 15 11 | 1654 | 3-4 | 43% | 11 | |
| 8008 | No Limits 12-Elite | 1654 | 26-16 | 59% | 12 | FL |
| 8009 | ND Elite 16-Schaeffer | 1654 | 23-10 | 68% | 16 | ND |
| 8010 | RCVC 16-N autumn | 1654 | 20-12 | 63% | 16 | AL |
| 8011 | EKJV 17-National | 1654 | 10-5 | 67% | 17 | KY |
| 8012 | Renaissance 17-Black | 1654 | 36-46 | 44% | 17 | PA |
| 8013 | Legend 13 | 1654 | 24-26 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 8014 | S.A. STARS 14-Black | 1654 | 28-12 | 70% | 14 | TX |
| 8015 | K1V 14u | 1654 | 40-17 | 70% | 14 | KY |
| 8016 | Corpus Christi Storm 12-1 | 1654 | 21-6 | 78% | 12 | TX |
| 8017 | EPUERTO 16-1 | 1654 | 20-9 | 69% | 16 | OR |
| 8018 | Big Sky Volleyball 13-2 | 1654 | 33-15 | 63% | 13 | MT |
| 8019 | Athlete HQ 14-Smith | 1654 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | OH |
| 8020 | CC Force 13-1 crossfire | 1654 | 21-15 | 58% | 13 | TX |
| 8021 | DVA National 18-1 | 1654 | 33-18 | 65% | 18 | IA |
| 8022 | MSVB 15-R bethany/marett | 1654 | 10-5 | 67% | 15 | AK |
| 8023 | GRIT 12-Green | 1654 | 16-6 | 73% | 12 | AL |
| 8024 | GirlieGirlie 18-1 | 1654 | 15-4 | 79% | 18 | HI |
| 8025 | MMVC 17 Gold | 1654 | 22-31 | 42% | 17 | OH |
| 8026 | MOVA UA 16 GOLD | 1654 | 36-25 | 59% | 16 | MO |
| 8027 | NCWVBC 12-1 gold | 1654 | 23-13 | 64% | 12 | WA |
| 8028 | MJVA 12-Elite black | 1654 | 35-22 | 60% | 12 | TN |
| 8029 | PNW VBC 14-2 green | 1654 | 23-8 | 74% | 14 | WA |
| 8030 | Piedmont VBC 14 Mamba | 1654 | 39-23 | 63% | 14 | NC |
| 8031 | OVC 18-1 | 1654 | 21-12 | 64% | 18 | MO |
| 8032 | PJVBC 14 Elite | 1654 | 26-15 | 63% | 14 | WA |
| 8033 | South Coast 16-1 | 1654 | 34-7 | 83% | 16 | OR |
| 8034 | LOBOS 18-Black | 1654 | 35-24 | 59% | 18 | CO |
| 8035 | LMVC 17-Elite sue | 1654 | 32-36 | 47% | 17 | SC |
| 8036 | Laredo Infinity 15-Red | 1654 | 19-9 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 8037 | MSVB 12-Red | 1654 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | AK |
| 8038 | Momentum Volleyball 12-Cathryn | 1654 | 24-14 | 63% | 12 | CO |
| 8039 | Club V 13-Prodigy kris | 1654 | 17-44 | 28% | 13 | UT |
| 8040 | SC Legends 17-Elite | 1654 | 15-14 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 8041 | Northern Lights 18-1 | 1654 | 26-22 | 54% | 18 | MN |
| 8042 | Academy North 13-Hp-1 | 1654 | 22-26 | 46% | 13 | CA |
| 8043 | OC Lady Elite 14-Black | 1654 | 20-8 | 71% | 14 | NY |
| 8044 | HP 15-2 | 1654 | 36-29 | 55% | 15 | MI |
| 8045 | EXCEL 14-National blue | 1654 | 23-23 | 44% | 14 | TX |
| 8046 | ECVC 14-National - india | 1654 | 14-9 | 61% | 14 | FL |
| 8047 | adidas DYNASTY 18-1 | 1654 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | KS |
| 8048 | GSA 12 | 1654 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | NJ |
| 8049 | Solon 11-Black | 1654 | 8-0 | 89% | 11 | IA |
| 8050 | Diablo VBC 17-1 | 1654 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.