2025-2026 Season — Page 160 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7951 | MJ 16-Orange | 1655 | 25-11 | 64% | 16 | |
| 7952 | Pequot Lakes 12-Blue | 1655 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 7953 | SVC JVC 16-1 | 1655 | 13-12 | 52% | 16 | |
| 7954 | Crossfire 15-1 | 1655 | 42-44 | 49% | 15 | MN |
| 7955 | Eclipse Girls 16-S solar | 1655 | 29-7 | 81% | 16 | CA |
| 7956 | VOLT 15-1 | 1655 | 35-30 | 53% | 15 | ND |
| 7957 | Xcel VB 15-1 adidas | 1655 | 17-12 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 7958 | Keweenaw VBC 16 | 1655 | 24-9 | 73% | 16 | MI |
| 7959 | PEAK 14-4 | 1655 | 19-9 | 68% | 14 | AZ |
| 7960 | Vaqueras 17-F keyshla | 1655 | 16-4 | 80% | 17 | PR |
| 7961 | AZ EVJ 14-Navy | 1655 | 36-15 | 71% | 14 | AZ |
| 7962 | Club One AZ 14-Blue | 1655 | 22-14 | 61% | 14 | AZ |
| 7963 | EliteVBTC 13-Pink | 1655 | 22-12 | 65% | 13 | OH |
| 7964 | Madtown 17-2 national | 1655 | 31-32 | 49% | 17 | WI |
| 7965 | GSJ West 15 National | 1655 | 34-20 | 63% | 15 | SC |
| 7966 | MVSA 12 Thunder | 1655 | 34-21 | 61% | 12 | MD |
| 7967 | Roots 18-1 green | 1655 | 28-18 | 61% | 18 | IA |
| 7968 | Sandhills 17-Bri | 1655 | 26-13 | 67% | 17 | NC |
| 7969 | Tstreet LV 15-Kevin | 1655 | 35-24 | 59% | 15 | NV |
| 7970 | STL Crossfire 12 SR2 | 1655 | 30-12 | 67% | 12 | MO |
| 7971 | TNT 17 Rush | 1655 | 19-21 | 48% | 17 | PA |
| 7972 | Kairos 12 Gamma | 1655 | 35-19 | 65% | 12 | SD |
| 7973 | Katy Volleyball 14-Nike | 1655 | 20-11 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 7974 | Cen-Tex Lightning 12-Black | 1655 | 8-2 | 80% | 12 | TX |
| 7975 | SOUTH SHORE 17-Mizuno | 1655 | 30-14 | 68% | 17 | MA |
| 7976 | NEVA 17-S | 1655 | 4-0 | 80% | 17 | UT |
| 7977 | Rise 14-Purple | 1655 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 7978 | APXVB 13-Tameisha | 1655 | 11-10 | 44% | 13 | UT |
| 7979 | X TEAM 15 | 1655 | 25-19 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 7980 | SG Elite 12-Thunder | 1655 | 13-3 | 81% | 12 | CA |
| 7981 | Digs 18-Red | 1655 | 22-16 | 58% | 18 | NJ |
| 7982 | FIVA 14-Kiss | 1655 | 21-10 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 7983 | Bristol Crush 18-1 | 1655 | 14-5 | 74% | 18 | CT |
| 7984 | Epic United 15-Select | 1655 | 33-14 | 70% | 15 | IN |
| 7985 | Keweenaw VBC 14-Black | 1655 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | MI |
| 7986 | CJHEAT 15-National | 1655 | 33-17 | 66% | 15 | NJ |
| 7987 | Texas Elite 17-Gold | 1655 | 14-4 | 78% | 17 | TX |
| 7988 | GVA 16-Pink | 1655 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | PR |
| 7989 | Academy 12-Mii panthers | 1655 | 13-2 | 87% | 12 | IN |
| 7990 | XTEAM 14-1 | 1655 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | CA |
| 7991 | Vista 15-Blue | 1655 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 7992 | Instinct 11-Wild black | 1655 | 17-7 | 68% | 11 | TX |
| 7993 | Aspire NW 13-1 empire beaverton | 1655 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | WA |
| 7994 | SLAM Volleyball 17 | 1655 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | MA |
| 7995 | SMASH Volleyball 15-Blue | 1655 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | MA |
| 7996 | LAVA 16-Liz | 1655 | 22-9 | 71% | 16 | NC |
| 7997 | PEAK 14-3 | 1655 | 28-20 | 57% | 14 | AZ |
| 7998 | PJVBC 12-Elite | 1655 | 27-7 | 79% | 12 | WA |
| 7999 | Willows VB 18-1 | 1655 | 10-3 | 77% | 18 | |
| 8000 | Legit 11-Gray | 1655 | 4-0 | 80% | 11 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.