Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 160 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7951 SVA 15-Aki 1656 37-30 55% 15 WA
7952 MVSA 12 Thunder 1656 34-21 61% 12 MD
7953 Grandlake 10-Kramer 1656 5-1 83% 10 OH
7954 TVS 11 Gabi 1656 9-4 60% 11 TX
7955 Southern Swing 11-BLUE 1656 11-3 79% 11 TX
7956 Diablo VBC 17-1 1656 4-4 50% 17 NV
7957 HOU STELLAR 13-Premier 1656 18-9 64% 13 TX
7958 SG Elite 12-Thunder 1656 13-3 81% 12 CA
7959 OT 12-J will 1656 28-22 56% 12 FL
7960 MichioChicago 13-Bluesmoke 1656 18-21 46% 13 IL
7961 BV Attack 10 1656 5-0 100% 10 MN
7962 Central VBC 12-Gold 1656 7-1 88% 12 CA
7963 Vision 13-Exv white 1656 24-11 63% 13 TX
7964 SOUTH SHORE 16-Mizuno 1656 20-19 51% 16 TX
7965 CVC 16 National (NO) 1656 22-23 49% 16 ND
7966 HICVB 17-Kim 1656 5-3 63% 17 UT
7967 Laredo Infinity 15-Red 1656 19-9 68% 15 TX
7968 NPJ Portland 12 National 1656 38-17 69% 12 OR
7969 Heroes 17 Delta 1656 27-15 63% 17 TX
7970 Tstreet LV 15-Kevin 1656 35-24 59% 15 CA
7971 Alabama Perf 15-N white 1656 31-22 58% 15 AL
7972 CROI VBC 13 1656 24-11 69% 13 IN
7973 Vista 15-Blue 1656 5-3 63% 15 NV
7974 Michio 11-Chicago bears 1656 5-0 100% 11 IL
7975 Impact Pink 12-S 1656 5-0 100% 12 HI
7976 Odessa 4G VBC 16 O4G IMPACT 1656 25-9 74% 16 TX
7977 Northern Lights 12-2 1656 42-25 63% 12 MN
7978 SCVC 17-1 savannah 1656 13-3 81% 17 TN
7979 VOLT 15-1 1656 35-30 53% 15 ND
7980 UP North Jr's DSN 16-Sel 1656 19-9 68% 16 WI
7981 CV Starlings 16-Dre 1656 4-3 57% 16 CA
7982 Galaxy 12 Kayla 1656 17-5 77% 12 NC
7983 FOCUS 13 13-Grace 1655 26-12 68% 13
7984 Ama Xtreme 14-Legacy 1655 3-1 60% 14
7985 CJVA 12-Black 1655 24-15 62% 12 NJ
7986 Allegiant 16-Blue 1655 42-23 62% 16 TX
7987 TEJAS 18-Red chuck 1655 13-10 57% 18 TX
7988 GirlieGirlie 18-1 1655 15-4 79% 18 HI
7989 NPJ Bend 14 Premier 1655 32-21 60% 14 OR
7990 FIELDHOUSE VBC 14-Courtney 1655 3-4 43% 14 TX
7991 PNW VBC 14-2 green 1655 23-8 74% 14 OR
7992 Ballistic Ryan 14 1655 21-6 78% 14 MI
7993 Tier10 14-Black 1655 39-13 75% 14 IN
7994 TFVC 14-1 1655 34-21 62% 14 TN
7995 MVP 60450 14-Black 1655 29-10 73% 14 IL
7996 PJVBC 14 Elite 1655 26-15 63% 14 WA
7997 Club Tonka 14-1 1655 27-22 55% 14 MN
7998 Epic United 15-Select 1655 33-14 70% 15 IL
7999 NASA 16-Purple tori 1655 36-12 75% 16 AL
8000 Academy 12-Mii panthers 1655 13-2 87% 12 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.