Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 160 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7951 MJ 16-Orange 1655 25-11 64% 16
7952 Pequot Lakes 12-Blue 1655 5-0 100% 12
7953 SVC JVC 16-1 1655 13-12 52% 16
7954 Crossfire 15-1 1655 42-44 49% 15 MN
7955 Eclipse Girls 16-S solar 1655 29-7 81% 16 CA
7956 VOLT 15-1 1655 35-30 53% 15 ND
7957 Xcel VB 15-1 adidas 1655 17-12 57% 15 TX
7958 Keweenaw VBC 16 1655 24-9 73% 16 MI
7959 PEAK 14-4 1655 19-9 68% 14 AZ
7960 Vaqueras 17-F keyshla 1655 16-4 80% 17 PR
7961 AZ EVJ 14-Navy 1655 36-15 71% 14 AZ
7962 Club One AZ 14-Blue 1655 22-14 61% 14 AZ
7963 EliteVBTC 13-Pink 1655 22-12 65% 13 OH
7964 Madtown 17-2 national 1655 31-32 49% 17 WI
7965 GSJ West 15 National 1655 34-20 63% 15 SC
7966 MVSA 12 Thunder 1655 34-21 61% 12 MD
7967 Roots 18-1 green 1655 28-18 61% 18 IA
7968 Sandhills 17-Bri 1655 26-13 67% 17 NC
7969 Tstreet LV 15-Kevin 1655 35-24 59% 15 NV
7970 STL Crossfire 12 SR2 1655 30-12 67% 12 MO
7971 TNT 17 Rush 1655 19-21 48% 17 PA
7972 Kairos 12 Gamma 1655 35-19 65% 12 SD
7973 Katy Volleyball 14-Nike 1655 20-11 65% 14 TX
7974 Cen-Tex Lightning 12-Black 1655 8-2 80% 12 TX
7975 SOUTH SHORE 17-Mizuno 1655 30-14 68% 17 MA
7976 NEVA 17-S 1655 4-0 80% 17 UT
7977 Rise 14-Purple 1655 22-15 59% 14 CA
7978 APXVB 13-Tameisha 1655 11-10 44% 13 UT
7979 X TEAM 15 1655 25-19 57% 15 CA
7980 SG Elite 12-Thunder 1655 13-3 81% 12 CA
7981 Digs 18-Red 1655 22-16 58% 18 NJ
7982 FIVA 14-Kiss 1655 21-10 68% 14 FL
7983 Bristol Crush 18-1 1655 14-5 74% 18 CT
7984 Epic United 15-Select 1655 33-14 70% 15 IN
7985 Keweenaw VBC 14-Black 1655 13-6 68% 14 MI
7986 CJHEAT 15-National 1655 33-17 66% 15 NJ
7987 Texas Elite 17-Gold 1655 14-4 78% 17 TX
7988 GVA 16-Pink 1655 4-6 40% 16 PR
7989 Academy 12-Mii panthers 1655 13-2 87% 12 IN
7990 XTEAM 14-1 1655 6-1 86% 14 CA
7991 Vista 15-Blue 1655 5-3 63% 15 CA
7992 Instinct 11-Wild black 1655 17-7 68% 11 TX
7993 Aspire NW 13-1 empire beaverton 1655 3-4 43% 13 WA
7994 SLAM Volleyball 17 1655 6-0 100% 17 MA
7995 SMASH Volleyball 15-Blue 1655 8-1 89% 15 MA
7996 LAVA 16-Liz 1655 22-9 71% 16 NC
7997 PEAK 14-3 1655 28-20 57% 14 AZ
7998 PJVBC 12-Elite 1655 27-7 79% 12 WA
7999 Willows VB 18-1 1655 10-3 77% 18
8000 Legit 11-Gray 1655 4-0 80% 11
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.