2025-2026 Season — Page 160 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7951 | SVA 15-Aki | 1656 | 37-30 | 55% | 15 | WA |
| 7952 | MVSA 12 Thunder | 1656 | 34-21 | 61% | 12 | MD |
| 7953 | Grandlake 10-Kramer | 1656 | 5-1 | 83% | 10 | OH |
| 7954 | TVS 11 Gabi | 1656 | 9-4 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 7955 | Southern Swing 11-BLUE | 1656 | 11-3 | 79% | 11 | TX |
| 7956 | Diablo VBC 17-1 | 1656 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | NV |
| 7957 | HOU STELLAR 13-Premier | 1656 | 18-9 | 64% | 13 | TX |
| 7958 | SG Elite 12-Thunder | 1656 | 13-3 | 81% | 12 | CA |
| 7959 | OT 12-J will | 1656 | 28-22 | 56% | 12 | FL |
| 7960 | MichioChicago 13-Bluesmoke | 1656 | 18-21 | 46% | 13 | IL |
| 7961 | BV Attack 10 | 1656 | 5-0 | 100% | 10 | MN |
| 7962 | Central VBC 12-Gold | 1656 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | CA |
| 7963 | Vision 13-Exv white | 1656 | 24-11 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 7964 | SOUTH SHORE 16-Mizuno | 1656 | 20-19 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 7965 | CVC 16 National (NO) | 1656 | 22-23 | 49% | 16 | ND |
| 7966 | HICVB 17-Kim | 1656 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | UT |
| 7967 | Laredo Infinity 15-Red | 1656 | 19-9 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 7968 | NPJ Portland 12 National | 1656 | 38-17 | 69% | 12 | OR |
| 7969 | Heroes 17 Delta | 1656 | 27-15 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 7970 | Tstreet LV 15-Kevin | 1656 | 35-24 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 7971 | Alabama Perf 15-N white | 1656 | 31-22 | 58% | 15 | AL |
| 7972 | CROI VBC 13 | 1656 | 24-11 | 69% | 13 | IN |
| 7973 | Vista 15-Blue | 1656 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | NV |
| 7974 | Michio 11-Chicago bears | 1656 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | IL |
| 7975 | Impact Pink 12-S | 1656 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | HI |
| 7976 | Odessa 4G VBC 16 O4G IMPACT | 1656 | 25-9 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 7977 | Northern Lights 12-2 | 1656 | 42-25 | 63% | 12 | MN |
| 7978 | SCVC 17-1 savannah | 1656 | 13-3 | 81% | 17 | TN |
| 7979 | VOLT 15-1 | 1656 | 35-30 | 53% | 15 | ND |
| 7980 | UP North Jr's DSN 16-Sel | 1656 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | WI |
| 7981 | CV Starlings 16-Dre | 1656 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 7982 | Galaxy 12 Kayla | 1656 | 17-5 | 77% | 12 | NC |
| 7983 | FOCUS 13 13-Grace | 1655 | 26-12 | 68% | 13 | |
| 7984 | Ama Xtreme 14-Legacy | 1655 | 3-1 | 60% | 14 | |
| 7985 | CJVA 12-Black | 1655 | 24-15 | 62% | 12 | NJ |
| 7986 | Allegiant 16-Blue | 1655 | 42-23 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 7987 | TEJAS 18-Red chuck | 1655 | 13-10 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 7988 | GirlieGirlie 18-1 | 1655 | 15-4 | 79% | 18 | HI |
| 7989 | NPJ Bend 14 Premier | 1655 | 32-21 | 60% | 14 | OR |
| 7990 | FIELDHOUSE VBC 14-Courtney | 1655 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 7991 | PNW VBC 14-2 green | 1655 | 23-8 | 74% | 14 | OR |
| 7992 | Ballistic Ryan 14 | 1655 | 21-6 | 78% | 14 | MI |
| 7993 | Tier10 14-Black | 1655 | 39-13 | 75% | 14 | IN |
| 7994 | TFVC 14-1 | 1655 | 34-21 | 62% | 14 | TN |
| 7995 | MVP 60450 14-Black | 1655 | 29-10 | 73% | 14 | IL |
| 7996 | PJVBC 14 Elite | 1655 | 26-15 | 63% | 14 | WA |
| 7997 | Club Tonka 14-1 | 1655 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | MN |
| 7998 | Epic United 15-Select | 1655 | 33-14 | 70% | 15 | IL |
| 7999 | NASA 16-Purple tori | 1655 | 36-12 | 75% | 16 | AL |
| 8000 | Academy 12-Mii panthers | 1655 | 13-2 | 87% | 12 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.