Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 159 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7901 STEEL 14 NAVY 1656 22-12 65% 14 FL
7902 SF TREMORS 11 CHEETAHS 1656 39-33 54% 11 CA
7903 SCBandits 12-1 1656 28-11 72% 12 ON
7904 SC Legends 13-Nike 1656 22-18 55% 13 CA
7905 Temecula Viper 15-1 michael/luci 1656 19-14 58% 15 CA
7906 SVC 15 National 1656 23-15 61% 15 IA
7907 TNT 16-Starstruck 1656 17-29 37% 16 PA
7908 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 16-National red 1656 18-17 51% 16 NV
7909 Tulsa Power 14-2 1656 42-17 71% 14 OK
7910 WCJ 13-1 1656 13-3 72% 13 TX
7911 Zona VBC 16-Red 1656 19-19 50% 16 AZ
7912 Lakes 15-1 1656 18-8 67% 15 MN
7913 Sky High Adidas 12-Elite 1656 22-30 42% 12 IL
7914 CLUB 43 15-1 1656 49-22 69% 15 MN
7915 COVC 18-1 1656 3-4 43% 18 OR
7916 Border West 17-1 1656 10-3 53% 17 MN
7917 BVA Davie 15-N andres 1656 35-21 63% 15 FL
7918 Sideout 14-T lea 1656 27-15 64% 14 NJ
7919 McAllen Fierce 13-1 1656 20-16 56% 13 TX
7920 FL Momentum 14-Neon 1656 13-7 65% 14 FL
7921 Tstreet SN 15-Sierra 1656 4-1 80% 15 CA
7922 Intense 17-S - bb 1656 42-10 81% 17 SC
7923 Vision 13-Exv white 1656 24-11 63% 13 CA
7924 Normal Flight 13-1 1656 16-6 73% 13 IL
7925 Erie Elite Cadence 15 1656 12-3 80% 15 PA
7926 FC Elite 15-Ex gregg 1656 12-4 75% 15 WI
7927 AVB Fire 18-1 black 1656 5-1 83% 18 MN
7928 HICVB 17-Kim 1656 5-3 63% 17 UT
7929 Bemidji 13-Katie/ella 1656 5-0 83% 13 MN
7930 Mintonette Sports 13-2 1656 21-33 39% 13 OH
7931 Ridgetop VBC 16 1656 11-1 92% 16 PA
7932 Notorious 15-Adam/leo 1656 9-3 75% 15 CA
7933 Lex United 18 Elite 1656 23-19 55% 18 KY
7934 SVBC Spirit 12-Teal 1656 5-0 100% 12
7935 Park 18-Black 18 1 1656 8-1 89% 18
7936 DBQ County WDVB 15-1 1656 5-2 71% 15
7937 Frisco Bay 13-1 1656 7-3 70% 13
7938 Molten 18-Red 1656 17-12 59% 18 AZ
7939 LVC 13-Pink 1656 12-6 60% 13 NY
7940 Central VBC 12-Gold 1656 7-1 88% 12 CA
7941 Ignite 12-National (SC) 1656 28-22 56% 12 CA
7942 Preds 15-Girls apex 1656 10-3 77% 15 ON
7943 Ocean Volleyball 14-National 1656 14-14 50% 14 NJ
7944 Lakes 14-1 1656 10-5 67% 14 MN
7945 Waco Lightning 11-Black 1656 11-4 69% 11 TX
7946 360 17-1 1656 21-10 68% 17 TX
7947 OP2 10-1 elite 1655 5-0 83% 10
7948 Supreme 15-1 1655 8-7 53% 15
7949 Intensity 14-Black 1655 35-16 69% 14
7950 QCVC 16-Elite 1655 4-3 57% 16
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.