Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 159 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7901 A4 Volley 15-Kimo 1657 29-30 49% 15 CA
7902 West E 16-Purple 1657 20-8 71% 16 PA
7903 La Jolla 15-1 kayla 1657 32-16 67% 15 CA
7904 Boltz 17-Desertaces 1657 33-38 46% 17 AZ
7905 oe 16-1 1657 21-11 66% 16 OH
7906 Victory 12-Nat'l black 1657 2-1 40% 12 TX
7907 Konza Volleyball Club 17-1 1657 13-7 59% 17 KS
7908 FRVBC 15-3 white 1657 18-4 82% 15 CO
7909 Ark Volley 17-National 1657 52-28 65% 17 AR
7910 501 Volley 15-3 reg plus 1657 25-9 74% 15 AR
7911 Panhandle Elite Volleyball Club 16-N chris p 1657 43-23 65% 16 AL
7912 Idaho Show 17-National wong 1657 7-1 88% 17 ID
7913 360 17-1 1657 21-10 68% 17 TX
7914 Cascade Power League 13 Cadets-White 1657 25-8 76% 13 IN
7915 SVBC Spirit 12-Teal 1657 5-0 100% 12 IA
7916 Eclipse Girls 16-S solar 1657 29-7 81% 16 CA
7917 Genesis 15-White 1657 20-7 74% 15 TN
7918 Galaxy 16 Patrick 1657 21-12 64% 16 NC
7919 CTX Juniors 15-Apex 1657 34-21 61% 15 TX
7920 RVA 16-Jensen 1657 20-19 51% 16 IA
7921 Club One 16-1 black 1657 5-1 83% 16 OH
7922 Castleford 13 Castleford 1657 5-0 100% 13
7923 ZUMAZ 16-1 1656 10-5 63% 16 MN
7924 Summit 14-National green 1656 24-18 55% 14 TX
7925 Summit Volleyball Club 14 14U Orange 1656 19-7 73% 14
7926 RockCity 12 A1 1656 19-10 66% 12 OH
7927 OVVC 18-Green 1656 9-5 64% 18 OH
7928 Bristol Crush 18-1 1656 14-5 74% 18 CT
7929 FCA Clark 14-Force 1656 23-7 77% 14 OR
7930 Club Z 14-Kelsie 1656 23-18 55% 14 NM
7931 Topeka Saints 14-1 1656 18-10 64% 14 KS
7932 Brandywine Volleyball Club 14-Jason and laura 1656 20-11 65% 14 DE
7933 SAVBC 14-1 1656 10-11 48% 14 CA
7934 AJV 14-Helix 1656 33-28 54% 14 TX
7935 K1 VOLLEY 12 K1 Odimar 1656 6-12 33% 12 PR
7936 Apex Volleyball Training Center 16-Apex red 1656 22-24 48% 16 OH
7937 Six Pack Legit 13-G 1656 5-1 83% 13 IA
7938 MWP 15 Gold 1656 13-3 81% 15 MN
7939 DBQ Elite GOLD 16-1 1656 11-5 69% 16 IA
7940 SoDak Juniors 16 Elite 1656 35-14 71% 16 MN
7941 SA Empire 15 Gold 1656 41-17 71% 15 TX
7942 Prime Volleyball 15 Prime SILVER 1656 8-1 80% 15 UT
7943 Rockwood Thunder 15-White 1656 21-24 47% 15 MO
7944 McAllen Fierce 13-1 1656 20-16 56% 13 TX
7945 Eureka Sting 12-Travel 1656 19-3 86% 12 IL
7946 1United 11-Elite blue 1656 24-24 48% 11 TX
7947 Grandlake 16-R yoder 1656 7-3 70% 16 OH
7948 MJ 16-Orange 1656 25-11 64% 16 MT
7949 SC Rockstar 12-Kashi 1656 21-31 40% 12 CA
7950 Club 217 16-Kristy 1656 30-12 71% 16 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.