2025-2026 Season — Page 159 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7901 | A4 Volley 15-Kimo | 1657 | 29-30 | 49% | 15 | CA |
| 7902 | West E 16-Purple | 1657 | 20-8 | 71% | 16 | PA |
| 7903 | La Jolla 15-1 kayla | 1657 | 32-16 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 7904 | Boltz 17-Desertaces | 1657 | 33-38 | 46% | 17 | AZ |
| 7905 | oe 16-1 | 1657 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | OH |
| 7906 | Victory 12-Nat'l black | 1657 | 2-1 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 7907 | Konza Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1657 | 13-7 | 59% | 17 | KS |
| 7908 | FRVBC 15-3 white | 1657 | 18-4 | 82% | 15 | CO |
| 7909 | Ark Volley 17-National | 1657 | 52-28 | 65% | 17 | AR |
| 7910 | 501 Volley 15-3 reg plus | 1657 | 25-9 | 74% | 15 | AR |
| 7911 | Panhandle Elite Volleyball Club 16-N chris p | 1657 | 43-23 | 65% | 16 | AL |
| 7912 | Idaho Show 17-National wong | 1657 | 7-1 | 88% | 17 | ID |
| 7913 | 360 17-1 | 1657 | 21-10 | 68% | 17 | TX |
| 7914 | Cascade Power League 13 Cadets-White | 1657 | 25-8 | 76% | 13 | IN |
| 7915 | SVBC Spirit 12-Teal | 1657 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | IA |
| 7916 | Eclipse Girls 16-S solar | 1657 | 29-7 | 81% | 16 | CA |
| 7917 | Genesis 15-White | 1657 | 20-7 | 74% | 15 | TN |
| 7918 | Galaxy 16 Patrick | 1657 | 21-12 | 64% | 16 | NC |
| 7919 | CTX Juniors 15-Apex | 1657 | 34-21 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 7920 | RVA 16-Jensen | 1657 | 20-19 | 51% | 16 | IA |
| 7921 | Club One 16-1 black | 1657 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | OH |
| 7922 | Castleford 13 Castleford | 1657 | 5-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 7923 | ZUMAZ 16-1 | 1656 | 10-5 | 63% | 16 | MN |
| 7924 | Summit 14-National green | 1656 | 24-18 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 7925 | Summit Volleyball Club 14 14U Orange | 1656 | 19-7 | 73% | 14 | |
| 7926 | RockCity 12 A1 | 1656 | 19-10 | 66% | 12 | OH |
| 7927 | OVVC 18-Green | 1656 | 9-5 | 64% | 18 | OH |
| 7928 | Bristol Crush 18-1 | 1656 | 14-5 | 74% | 18 | CT |
| 7929 | FCA Clark 14-Force | 1656 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | OR |
| 7930 | Club Z 14-Kelsie | 1656 | 23-18 | 55% | 14 | NM |
| 7931 | Topeka Saints 14-1 | 1656 | 18-10 | 64% | 14 | KS |
| 7932 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 14-Jason and laura | 1656 | 20-11 | 65% | 14 | DE |
| 7933 | SAVBC 14-1 | 1656 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 7934 | AJV 14-Helix | 1656 | 33-28 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 7935 | K1 VOLLEY 12 K1 Odimar | 1656 | 6-12 | 33% | 12 | PR |
| 7936 | Apex Volleyball Training Center 16-Apex red | 1656 | 22-24 | 48% | 16 | OH |
| 7937 | Six Pack Legit 13-G | 1656 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | IA |
| 7938 | MWP 15 Gold | 1656 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | MN |
| 7939 | DBQ Elite GOLD 16-1 | 1656 | 11-5 | 69% | 16 | IA |
| 7940 | SoDak Juniors 16 Elite | 1656 | 35-14 | 71% | 16 | MN |
| 7941 | SA Empire 15 Gold | 1656 | 41-17 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 7942 | Prime Volleyball 15 Prime SILVER | 1656 | 8-1 | 80% | 15 | UT |
| 7943 | Rockwood Thunder 15-White | 1656 | 21-24 | 47% | 15 | MO |
| 7944 | McAllen Fierce 13-1 | 1656 | 20-16 | 56% | 13 | TX |
| 7945 | Eureka Sting 12-Travel | 1656 | 19-3 | 86% | 12 | IL |
| 7946 | 1United 11-Elite blue | 1656 | 24-24 | 48% | 11 | TX |
| 7947 | Grandlake 16-R yoder | 1656 | 7-3 | 70% | 16 | OH |
| 7948 | MJ 16-Orange | 1656 | 25-11 | 64% | 16 | MT |
| 7949 | SC Rockstar 12-Kashi | 1656 | 21-31 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 7950 | Club 217 16-Kristy | 1656 | 30-12 | 71% | 16 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.