Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2551 District VBC 18 GOLD 1481 9-9 50% 18 CA
2552 Five Starz 16-Black 1481 14-14 50% 16 CA
2553 Princeton 17-National 1481 12-13 48% 17 PA
2554 CNVKC Mizuno Boys 14-1 1481 4-8 33% 14 MO
2555 BRVC 18-1boys 1481 2-3 40% 18 PA
2556 GSL 17-Elite - jackson 1481 4-10 29% 17 UT
2557 AZ Fear 14-Red 1481 5-7 42% 14 AZ
2558 SIVC Sivc 18-S black sam 1480 4-5 44% 18
2559 Lomanview 12-Noris 1480 2-3 40% 12
2560 WSA Gators 18-Premier boys 1480 11-19 37% 18 MA
2561 A-10 Boys 16-Gray 1480 16-19 46% 16 PA
2562 Momentum 16-Yellow 1480 3-3 50% 16 CO
2563 Iowa Galaxy 14-1 1480 2-3 40% 14 IA
2564 NWJRS 18-Slate 1480 2-3 40% 18 WA
2565 LVC 13-Black 1480 1-2 25% 13 NY
2566 Pillar 15-Black 1480 2-3 40% 15 OH
2567 Buckeye Boys 17-Red 1480 23-22 51% 17 OH
2568 EnERgy 16-Boys 1480 9-6 60% 16 IL
2569 Hammerhead Boys 18-1 1480 13-11 54% 18 MN
2570 Quandomania Boys 17 1480 11-16 41% 17 NJ
2571 Volitude 14 Ian 1480 14-15 48% 14 CA
2572 PSVC 16-Jorge 1480 7-10 41% 16 SC
2573 Absolute SubZero BVC 17-Centigrade 1480 2-3 40% 17 WA
2574 GSL 14-Sport kristen 1480 1-6 14% 14 UT
2575 118 14-Mac 1480 1-2 33% 14 CA
2576 TopSpin 13-Blue 1479 2-3 40% 13 IL
2577 Spiketown VBC 14-2 1479 2-3 40% 14
2578 MWVC 18-Boys barcelo 1479 2-5 29% 18
2579 CINCY EAST 15-3 white 1479 2-3 40% 15 OH
2580 LAVA 16-1 1479 2-3 40% 16 OH
2581 SynergyForce 15-1 natl 1479 15-28 35% 15 CA
2582 Pillar 13-Black 1479 2-3 40% 13 OH
2583 TopSpin 11-Red 1479 2-3 40% 11 IL
2584 AJAXVB 14-1 gold 1479 4-5 44% 14 OR
2585 Academy 17-E black 1479 14-21 40% 17 IN
2586 Club W 15-Black 1479 24-22 52% 15 WI
2587 Blue Royals 16 Elite 1479 7-8 47% 16 WA
2588 SF Elite VBC 16 Neil 1479 4-4 50% 16 CA
2589 Squad VBC Boys 16 Elite 1479 8-8 50% 16 NV
2590 BAVC 17-4 emerald 1479 1-4 20% 17 CA
2591 RUSH 14-Black - spring 1479 5-7 42% 14 AZ
2592 CVC 15-Elite 1478 2-3 40% 15 CT
2593 Headlines VBC 13-Orange 1478 2-3 40% 13 OH
2594 Flight Academy 18-2 1478 15-13 54% 18 CA
2595 JJVA Boys 12-A 1478 10-10 50% 12 FL
2596 SJVBC Boys 15-Red 1478 2-5 29% 15 NJ
2597 SVC 16-Boys 1478 2-5 29% 16 MO
2598 Oly Reign 16-Boys 1478 2-4 33% 16 WA
2599 SCWave 16-Tide 1478 2-3 40% 16 CA
2600 Golden State 16-Black 1478 17-23 43% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.