Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2551 Absolute SubZero BVC U13/U 14-Cosmics 1464 3-3 50% 14 WA
2552 630 Volleyball 14-2 1464 30-48 38% 14 IL
2553 MVVC B 16-Club 1464 12-12 50% 16 CA
2554 BAVC 17-3 elizabeth 1464 3-2 60% 17 CA
2555 CNVKC Mizuno Boys 14-1 1464 4-8 33% 14 MO
2556 Core 18 Elite 1464 33-32 51% 18 CA
2557 District VBC 18-1s 1464 6-4 60% 18 CA
2558 LVC 13-Black 1464 1-2 25% 13 NY
2559 Flight Academy 14 1463 12-20 38% 14 OH
2560 Pacific Rim 14-1 1463 19-30 39% 14 CA
2561 MVP 14-Gold 1463 14-23 38% 14 MD
2562 MVP Boys 15-Blue 1463 36-40 47% 15 WI
2563 MVP 14-Red 1463 14-33 30% 14 MD
2564 Vibe 16-Premier 1463 7-8 44% 16 VT
2565 MEVBC/CT STARS 18-1 1463 9-24 27% 18 CT
2566 PEAK 12-1 boys 1463 0-0 0% 12 OK
2567 MVC 14-Red 1463 7-6 54% 14 AZ
2568 Platinum 14-Bonnie 1463 4-3 44% 14 UT
2569 Coastal Velocity 18 1463 6-4 60% 18 GA
2570 Husky Volleyball 17-3 1462 12-15 44% 17 CT
2571 NVC 18 1462 1-2 33% 18 PA
2572 VEVA Boys 17-Orange 1462 12-18 39% 17 PA
2573 GVG 15-Guayacanes ata 1462 4-3 57% 15 PR
2574 Vaqueros 12-M mario 1462 7-11 39% 12 PR
2575 Sportime 15-3 1462 7-5 58% 15 NY
2576 949 B14-Black 1462 14-37 27% 14 CA
2577 Cangrejeras 18-Boys 1462 2-4 33% 18 PR
2578 Lions Boys 14 1462 9-5 64% 14 IL
2579 GOLDENBULLS 16-B black 1462 4-7 36% 16 FL
2580 PI'OPI'O BEARS 12 1462 2-1 50% 12 HI
2581 Summit Volleyball Club 18-1 1461 2-4 33% 18 MO
2582 949 B12-Black 1461 11-17 39% 12 CA
2583 Tstreet SN 18-Dana [boys] 1461 10-12 45% 18 NV
2584 GSJ 16-B coast 1461 9-12 43% 16 SC
2585 Orlando Gold 18-White 1461 23-10 70% 18 FL
2586 Westside VBC 17-Green 1461 8-9 47% 17 CA
2587 CORE Volleyball 15-Titanium 1461 3-3 50% 15 NJ
2588 VC United 18-2 elite 1461 18-22 45% 18 IL
2589 O-Zone 18u Platinum 1461 7-13 35% 18 FL
2590 No Touch 18 No Touch Blue (8) 1461 1-2 33% 18 FL
2591 Tribe 18-B premier cardinal 1461 13-22 37% 18 FL
2592 Warren Sixpack 16-4 1461 12-19 39% 16 NJ
2593 Aspire 16 Loki 1461 3-16 16% 16 AZ
2594 Flight Academy 18-2 1460 15-13 54% 18 OH
2595 Barrie Elites 18-1 - blizzard 1460 1-4 20% 18 ON
2596 GSL 17-Elite alan 1460 14-14 50% 17 UT
2597 CYVB 17-1 1460 14-10 56% 17 MA
2598 A4 Volley Boys 16-Garry 1460 3-3 50% 16 CA
2599 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 15 Split Mountain Bryan & James 1460 2-3 40% 15 UT
2600 Brandywine Volleyball Club 18 BVC Bombers (CH) (5) 1460 2-2 50% 18 DE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.