Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2551 GRV 18-White 1468 2-2 50% 18 MI
2552 Ultimate B15-Blue 1468 27-32 46% 15 IL
2553 Snipers 18-1 1468 0-0 0% 18 NV
2554 Buckeye Boys 17-Red 1468 23-22 51% 17 OH
2555 I AM VBC Boys 13-1 1468 18-16 53% 13 WI
2556 KeAloha 18-3 nazare 1467 4-2 67% 18 IN
2557 PEVA Boys 14 Elite 1467 18-17 51% 14 PA
2558 CUVC 17-2 boys 1467 9-18 33% 17 NC
2559 Club W 15-Black 1467 24-22 52% 15 WI
2560 Mamba 16 Gold 1467 31-23 57% 16 WI
2561 Epic Boys VBC 17-1 1467 1-1 50% 17 WI
2562 Impact 18 1467 1-2 33% 18 OR
2563 Prodigy Boys 18-1 premier 1467 7-11 39% 18 NY
2564 SMASH Boys 13-1 1467 24-26 48% 13 MA
2565 Prior Lake Extreme Boys 14-1 1467 11-13 46% 14 MN
2566 FIVA 17-18u 1467 1-4 20% 17 FL
2567 SCB 12-Salty mondo 1467 2-5 29% 12 LA
2568 Blue Wave 18-S 1467 9-6 60% 18 CA
2569 Drive Boys 17-Blue 1466 23-45 34% 17 IL
2570 MVVC B 13-National 1466 34-44 44% 13 CA
2571 RAGE 14-Ben 1466 5-5 50% 14 CA
2572 MN Select Boys 18-Gray 1466 21-17 55% 18 MN
2573 SMBC North 16 Elite 1466 23-15 61% 16 CA
2574 Tampa United BOYS 18-B 1466 4-10 29% 18 FL
2575 SMBC West 14 Premier 1466 25-19 57% 14 CA
2576 Illinois Jr's B16-1's 1466 24-46 33% 16 IL
2577 TKVBC 18-2 1465 7-4 64% 18 GA
2578 540 VB 18-Boys 1465 2-5 29% 18 VA
2579 Pulse 17 Connor 1465 6-4 60% 17 CA
2580 AVA 15-Boys 1465 17-20 46% 15 FL
2581 TK 16-Flame 1465 3-7 27% 16 GA
2582 AJAXVB 14-1 gold 1465 4-5 44% 14 OR
2583 Maine Jrs 18-B navy 1465 12-10 55% 18 ME
2584 Northern Lights 18-2 boys 1465 23-22 51% 18 MN
2585 Redline Zia VBC 14-2 1465 2-3 29% 14
2586 Cinci Attack 17-White 1465 27-21 56% 17 OH
2587 FSVC 18-Boys 1465 17-12 59% 18 FL
2588 Velocity B18-Black 1465 8-10 44% 18 IL
2589 Salt City Boys 16-S coleman 1464 4-4 50% 16 UT
2590 NLVA 15-Sam 1464 14-14 50% 15 MO
2591 MCVC 15 1464 11-7 61% 15 CA
2592 Excel 12-White boys 1464 0-0 0% 12 TX
2593 Orlando Gold 18-White 1464 23-10 70% 18 FL
2594 OVBC 10-Black 1464 0-0 0% 10
2595 ALL IN Aaliyah/Peter 18-1 1464 5-11 31% 18
2596 Pipeline 18-Mason 1464 9-10 47% 18 CA
2597 Sportime 14-2 1464 12-14 46% 14 NY
2598 Prolink 12 Deb 1464 3-2 60% 12
2599 Sky High 18-Clark 1464 15-10 60% 18 IL
2600 VC United 18-2 elite 1464 18-22 45% 18 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.