2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2551 | GRV 18-White | 1468 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | MI |
| 2552 | Ultimate B15-Blue | 1468 | 27-32 | 46% | 15 | IL |
| 2553 | Snipers 18-1 | 1468 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NV |
| 2554 | Buckeye Boys 17-Red | 1468 | 23-22 | 51% | 17 | OH |
| 2555 | I AM VBC Boys 13-1 | 1468 | 18-16 | 53% | 13 | WI |
| 2556 | KeAloha 18-3 nazare | 1467 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | IN |
| 2557 | PEVA Boys 14 Elite | 1467 | 18-17 | 51% | 14 | PA |
| 2558 | CUVC 17-2 boys | 1467 | 9-18 | 33% | 17 | NC |
| 2559 | Club W 15-Black | 1467 | 24-22 | 52% | 15 | WI |
| 2560 | Mamba 16 Gold | 1467 | 31-23 | 57% | 16 | WI |
| 2561 | Epic Boys VBC 17-1 | 1467 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | WI |
| 2562 | Impact 18 | 1467 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | OR |
| 2563 | Prodigy Boys 18-1 premier | 1467 | 7-11 | 39% | 18 | NY |
| 2564 | SMASH Boys 13-1 | 1467 | 24-26 | 48% | 13 | MA |
| 2565 | Prior Lake Extreme Boys 14-1 | 1467 | 11-13 | 46% | 14 | MN |
| 2566 | FIVA 17-18u | 1467 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | FL |
| 2567 | SCB 12-Salty mondo | 1467 | 2-5 | 29% | 12 | LA |
| 2568 | Blue Wave 18-S | 1467 | 9-6 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 2569 | Drive Boys 17-Blue | 1466 | 23-45 | 34% | 17 | IL |
| 2570 | MVVC B 13-National | 1466 | 34-44 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 2571 | RAGE 14-Ben | 1466 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2572 | MN Select Boys 18-Gray | 1466 | 21-17 | 55% | 18 | MN |
| 2573 | SMBC North 16 Elite | 1466 | 23-15 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 2574 | Tampa United BOYS 18-B | 1466 | 4-10 | 29% | 18 | FL |
| 2575 | SMBC West 14 Premier | 1466 | 25-19 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 2576 | Illinois Jr's B16-1's | 1466 | 24-46 | 33% | 16 | IL |
| 2577 | TKVBC 18-2 | 1465 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | GA |
| 2578 | 540 VB 18-Boys | 1465 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | VA |
| 2579 | Pulse 17 Connor | 1465 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 2580 | AVA 15-Boys | 1465 | 17-20 | 46% | 15 | FL |
| 2581 | TK 16-Flame | 1465 | 3-7 | 27% | 16 | GA |
| 2582 | AJAXVB 14-1 gold | 1465 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | OR |
| 2583 | Maine Jrs 18-B navy | 1465 | 12-10 | 55% | 18 | ME |
| 2584 | Northern Lights 18-2 boys | 1465 | 23-22 | 51% | 18 | MN |
| 2585 | Redline Zia VBC 14-2 | 1465 | 2-3 | 29% | 14 | |
| 2586 | Cinci Attack 17-White | 1465 | 27-21 | 56% | 17 | OH |
| 2587 | FSVC 18-Boys | 1465 | 17-12 | 59% | 18 | FL |
| 2588 | Velocity B18-Black | 1465 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | IL |
| 2589 | Salt City Boys 16-S coleman | 1464 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | UT |
| 2590 | NLVA 15-Sam | 1464 | 14-14 | 50% | 15 | MO |
| 2591 | MCVC 15 | 1464 | 11-7 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 2592 | Excel 12-White boys | 1464 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 2593 | Orlando Gold 18-White | 1464 | 23-10 | 70% | 18 | FL |
| 2594 | OVBC 10-Black | 1464 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 2595 | ALL IN Aaliyah/Peter 18-1 | 1464 | 5-11 | 31% | 18 | |
| 2596 | Pipeline 18-Mason | 1464 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 2597 | Sportime 14-2 | 1464 | 12-14 | 46% | 14 | NY |
| 2598 | Prolink 12 Deb | 1464 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | |
| 2599 | Sky High 18-Clark | 1464 | 15-10 | 60% | 18 | IL |
| 2600 | VC United 18-2 elite | 1464 | 18-22 | 45% | 18 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.