Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 51 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2501 Northern Lights 16-2 boys 1473 12-11 52% 16 MN
2502 ACEZ 18-Black 1472 0-0 0% 18
2503 Empowered B17 Onyx 1472 32-33 49% 17 IN
2504 Academy 15-Mt - stitle 1472 2-3 40% 15 IN
2505 FRVBC 16-2 1472 15-12 56% 16 CO
2506 PV Boys 16-1 1472 9-14 39% 16 MA
2507 PE 10-Stacy/monse 1472 1-1 33% 10
2508 Club OAHO 18-Black 1472 4-5 44% 18 CA
2509 CJ Heat Boys 16 1472 8-13 35% 16 NJ
2510 VEVA Boys 17-Orange 1472 12-18 39% 17 PA
2511 LVC 17BLUE 1472 27-29 48% 17 NY
2512 Northern Lights 18-R boys 1472 13-12 52% 18 MN
2513 Club Solano 14-B maroon 1472 25-29 46% 14 CA
2514 PEVC 14-Boys 1472 6-10 38% 14
2515 Sideout U12 1472 1-4 20% 12
2516 Ultimate 14-Matt 1472 7-4 64% 14 IL
2517 ECC South Boys 18 1471 9-12 43% 18 NJ
2518 SQUAD Boys 18-Elite 1471 1-3 25% 18 NV
2519 Panther Boys 18-Black 1471 10-8 56% 18 CO
2520 WPVC Boys 17-Armour white 1471 25-33 43% 17 FL
2521 Raining Hot 12 1471 1-2 33% 12 UT
2522 JOMO G16-1 1471 0-0 0% 16
2523 MEVBC/CT STARS 18-1 1471 9-24 27% 18 CT
2524 Adidas OPV BOYS 18-Ntl 1471 2-2 50% 18 OR
2525 Diablo VBC 16-1 1471 4-4 50% 16 CA
2526 TStreet 12-Lance 1471 2-3 40% 12
2527 Slainte 16-Cobalt 1470 23-30 43% 16 CA
2528 District VBC 18-1s 1470 6-4 60% 18 CA
2529 Velocity 18-1 regional 1470 11-9 55% 18 PA
2530 Paramount VBC 12 Yasemin 1470 0-0 0% 12
2531 MVP 14-Gold 1470 14-23 38% 14 MD
2532 Boston United Boys 17 Northeast 1470 14-23 38% 17 MA
2533 Chaos Boys 16U National 1470 4-8 33% 16 OR
2534 NVC 18 1470 1-2 33% 18 MN
2535 Academy 16-R silver 1470 16-15 52% 16 IN
2536 Energy 18-S 1470 3-2 60% 18 IL
2537 St. George Aces 15-Gold 1469 1-6 14% 15 UT
2538 COELB 18-1 1469 4-3 57% 18 CO
2539 Silver State Boys 18 1469 4-5 44% 18
2540 JM 12-Orange 1469 0-1 0% 12
2541 Blast 16 Inferno 1469 7-33 18% 16 PA
2542 Team'Sota 18 Premier 1469 15-11 58% 18 MN
2543 Warren Sixpack 16-4 1469 12-19 39% 16 NJ
2544 Sideout 15 1468 0-5 0% 15
2545 Northern Lights 17-2 boys 1468 24-23 51% 17 MN
2546 BVC B 17 1468 1-3 25% 17
2547 NC Power & Sand 14-Black 1468 5-5 50% 14 NC
2548 SC Legends 16-Nike 1468 19-27 41% 16 CA
2549 SC Legends 14-Nike 1468 7-5 58% 14 CA
2550 A-10 Boys 15-Black 1468 17-21 45% 15 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.