Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 51 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2501 EXILE East 16 1470 6-11 32% 16 PA
2502 Energy 18-S 1469 3-2 60% 18 IL
2503 GRV 18-White 1469 2-2 50% 18 MI
2504 BVC B 17 1469 1-3 25% 17 NY
2505 Titan Premier 18 Sydney 1469 17-20 46% 18 CA
2506 Club W 15-Black 1469 24-22 52% 15 WI
2507 SC Legends 14-Nike 1468 7-5 58% 14 CA
2508 Velocity B18-Black 1468 8-10 44% 18 IL
2509 WPVC Boys 17-Armour white 1468 25-33 43% 17 FL
2510 Club GSL 17-Elite - jackson 1468 2-2 50% 17 UT
2511 Ultimate 14-Matt 1468 7-4 64% 14 IL
2512 Club OAHO 18-Black 1468 4-5 44% 18 CA
2513 MVVC B 13-National 1468 34-44 44% 13 CA
2514 South Elite 17-Carlos 1468 3-3 50% 17 PR
2515 Ignite 18-National boys 1468 0-9 0% 18 CA
2516 Boston United Boys 17 Northeast 1468 14-23 38% 17 MA
2517 Team'Sota 18 Premier 1468 15-11 58% 18 MN
2518 NLVA 18-Joe 1468 3-5 38% 18 CA
2519 Maine Jrs 18-B navy 1468 12-10 55% 18 ME
2520 Diablo 18-1 black 1468 2-3 40% 18 CA
2521 I AM VBC Boys 13-1 1468 18-16 53% 13 WI
2522 RAGE 14-Ben 1468 5-5 50% 14 CA
2523 Empowered B17 Onyx 1468 32-33 49% 17 IN
2524 NC Power & Sand 14-Black 1468 5-5 50% 14 NC
2525 Sol Taino 15-1 1467 4-6 40% 15 PR
2526 Empire 14-Blue 1467 14-19 42% 14 CA
2527 FIVA 17-18u 1467 1-4 20% 17 FL
2528 ACAD Boys 14-Red 1467 2-5 29% 14 NY
2529 Ultimate B15-Blue 1467 27-32 46% 15 IL
2530 WildcatVBC 18 1467 13-12 52% 18 CA
2531 ID Strike 18-Purple 1467 15-13 54% 18 ID
2532 KeAloha 18-3 nazare 1466 4-2 67% 18 IN
2533 Buckeye Boys 17-Red 1466 23-22 51% 17 OH
2534 Mamba 16 Gold 1466 31-23 57% 16 WI
2535 Cinci Attack 17-White 1466 27-21 56% 17 OH
2536 AJAXVB 14-1 gold 1466 4-5 44% 14 OR
2537 EVP Rush 14-1 1466 2-3 40% 14 NY
2538 TKVBC 18-2 1466 7-4 64% 18 GA
2539 Pulse 17 Connor 1466 6-4 60% 17 CA
2540 Train Up VB 18-1 1466 13-13 50% 18 NJ
2541 MVC 14-2 1466 3-4 43% 14 OH
2542 Legacy Volleyball Club 15-Premier 1466 6-9 40% 15 NY
2543 Eclipse Mountain 14 1466 5-4 56% 14 UT
2544 Drive Boys 17-Blue 1466 23-45 34% 17 IL
2545 MINOI 14-1 1465 4-6 40% 14 UT
2546 Academy 13-O under armour 1465 27-29 48% 13 IN
2547 Slainte 16-Cobalt 1465 23-30 43% 16 CA
2548 TK 16-Flame 1465 3-7 27% 16 GA
2549 FAV 15 Maverick 1465 4-18 18% 15 CA
2550 Sol Taino 16 10 1465 2-2 50% 16 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.