Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 51 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is 630 Volleyball 18-1 with a 2133 Elo rating and 44-11 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2501 Bravo 16-Falcon 1484 11-10 52% 16 KY
2502 PA ELITE 17-National 1484 10-11 48% 17 PA
2503 MVC 17-Red 1484 18-28 39% 17 AZ
2504 H Skyline Boys 15 Royal 1484 17-24 41% 15 TX
2505 Slainte 15-Platinum 1484 22-21 51% 15 CA
2506 Club GSL 13-Sport - kristen 1484 0-1 0% 13 UT
2507 The Edge 14-White 1484 2-3 40% 14 VA
2508 Vibe 16-Premier 1484 7-8 44% 16 CA
2509 Train Up VB 18-1 1484 13-13 50% 18 NJ
2510 Impact 18 1484 1-2 33% 18 OR
2511 CinciVB Acad 14-4 1483 2-3 40% 14 OH
2512 Phoenix 16 Boss 1483 16-21 43% 16 OH
2513 Stormbreaker 17 Prime 1483 1-2 33% 17 CA
2514 Tampa United BOYS 18-B 1483 4-10 29% 18 FL
2515 Power Volleyball 16-Teal 1483 5-16 24% 16 TX
2516 NC Power & Sand 16-Black 1483 4-6 40% 16 NC
2517 KeAloha 18-3 banzai 1483 18-14 56% 18 IN
2518 MN Select Boys 17-2 1483 17-22 44% 17 MN
2519 EVA Boys 17-1 1483 7-9 44% 17 NJ
2520 Boston United Boys 14-1 1483 19-17 53% 14 MA
2521 SFVC 18-Blue 1483 1-2 33% 18 FL
2522 DCVC 14-National 1483 1-2 33% 14 IA
2523 VAQUEROS 14-M perez 1483 3-4 43% 14 PR
2524 MVP 14-Gold 1482 11-19 37% 14
2525 VC United 18-2 elite 1482 18-22 45% 18 IL
2526 FLAMESVC 15-1 1482 5-6 45% 15 TX
2527 Full Force 18-Red 1482 2-3 40% 18 OH
2528 Pulse 16 Shelby 1482 12-11 52% 16 CA
2529 Salt City Boys 18 T 1482 12-11 52% 18 UT
2530 BVA 15-Navy kayla 1482 2-3 40% 15 KY
2531 KIVA 14-B red 1482 16-28 36% 14 KY
2532 Alta 14 1482 13-9 59% 14 AZ
2533 Eclipse 15-S 1482 3-3 50% 15 NJ
2534 Dive 18-Orange 1482 4-5 44% 18 CO
2535 Raining Hot 12 1482 1-2 33% 12 UT
2536 NVC 18 1482 1-2 33% 18 MN
2537 Send Me 17-Fabio 1482 2-3 40% 17 AL
2538 Maverick 13-Coyote 1482 6-6 50% 13 OH
2539 Creole Big Apple 16-Boys 1481 8-9 47% 16 NY
2540 Eclipse Mountain 14 1481 3-4 43% 14
2541 United 14-Boys 1481 4-5 44% 14 AL
2542 Xplosion 17-A - chadrick 1481 2-3 40% 17 CA
2543 SEIVB 15-Elite 1481 2-3 40% 15 IN
2544 Mentor Volley 15-1 1481 7-20 26% 15 CA
2545 St. George Aces 15-Gold 1481 1-6 14% 15 UT
2546 BAVC Boys 18-1 1481 17-20 46% 18 OK
2547 TORRIMAR 14-Cristian 1481 3-4 43% 14 PR
2548 ID Strike 16-Black 1481 4-4 50% 16 ID
2549 Orlando Gold 17-White 1481 12-13 48% 17 FL
2550 Stormbreaker 17 Titans 1481 1-2 33% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.