2025-2026 Season — Page 51 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2501 | Northern Lights 16-2 boys | 1473 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | MN |
| 2502 | ACEZ 18-Black | 1472 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 2503 | Empowered B17 Onyx | 1472 | 32-33 | 49% | 17 | IN |
| 2504 | Academy 15-Mt - stitle | 1472 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IN |
| 2505 | FRVBC 16-2 | 1472 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | CO |
| 2506 | PV Boys 16-1 | 1472 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | MA |
| 2507 | PE 10-Stacy/monse | 1472 | 1-1 | 33% | 10 | |
| 2508 | Club OAHO 18-Black | 1472 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | CA |
| 2509 | CJ Heat Boys 16 | 1472 | 8-13 | 35% | 16 | NJ |
| 2510 | VEVA Boys 17-Orange | 1472 | 12-18 | 39% | 17 | PA |
| 2511 | LVC 17BLUE | 1472 | 27-29 | 48% | 17 | NY |
| 2512 | Northern Lights 18-R boys | 1472 | 13-12 | 52% | 18 | MN |
| 2513 | Club Solano 14-B maroon | 1472 | 25-29 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 2514 | PEVC 14-Boys | 1472 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | |
| 2515 | Sideout U12 | 1472 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | |
| 2516 | Ultimate 14-Matt | 1472 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | IL |
| 2517 | ECC South Boys 18 | 1471 | 9-12 | 43% | 18 | NJ |
| 2518 | SQUAD Boys 18-Elite | 1471 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | NV |
| 2519 | Panther Boys 18-Black | 1471 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | CO |
| 2520 | WPVC Boys 17-Armour white | 1471 | 25-33 | 43% | 17 | FL |
| 2521 | Raining Hot 12 | 1471 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | UT |
| 2522 | JOMO G16-1 | 1471 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 2523 | MEVBC/CT STARS 18-1 | 1471 | 9-24 | 27% | 18 | CT |
| 2524 | Adidas OPV BOYS 18-Ntl | 1471 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | OR |
| 2525 | Diablo VBC 16-1 | 1471 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2526 | TStreet 12-Lance | 1471 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | |
| 2527 | Slainte 16-Cobalt | 1470 | 23-30 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 2528 | District VBC 18-1s | 1470 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 2529 | Velocity 18-1 regional | 1470 | 11-9 | 55% | 18 | PA |
| 2530 | Paramount VBC 12 Yasemin | 1470 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2531 | MVP 14-Gold | 1470 | 14-23 | 38% | 14 | MD |
| 2532 | Boston United Boys 17 Northeast | 1470 | 14-23 | 38% | 17 | MA |
| 2533 | Chaos Boys 16U National | 1470 | 4-8 | 33% | 16 | OR |
| 2534 | NVC 18 | 1470 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | MN |
| 2535 | Academy 16-R silver | 1470 | 16-15 | 52% | 16 | IN |
| 2536 | Energy 18-S | 1470 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | IL |
| 2537 | St. George Aces 15-Gold | 1469 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | UT |
| 2538 | COELB 18-1 | 1469 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | CO |
| 2539 | Silver State Boys 18 | 1469 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | |
| 2540 | JM 12-Orange | 1469 | 0-1 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2541 | Blast 16 Inferno | 1469 | 7-33 | 18% | 16 | PA |
| 2542 | Team'Sota 18 Premier | 1469 | 15-11 | 58% | 18 | MN |
| 2543 | Warren Sixpack 16-4 | 1469 | 12-19 | 39% | 16 | NJ |
| 2544 | Sideout 15 | 1468 | 0-5 | 0% | 15 | |
| 2545 | Northern Lights 17-2 boys | 1468 | 24-23 | 51% | 17 | MN |
| 2546 | BVC B 17 | 1468 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | |
| 2547 | NC Power & Sand 14-Black | 1468 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | NC |
| 2548 | SC Legends 16-Nike | 1468 | 19-27 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 2549 | SC Legends 14-Nike | 1468 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 2550 | A-10 Boys 15-Black | 1468 | 17-21 | 45% | 15 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.