Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2451 Cinci Attack 18 Gold 1477 24-28 46% 18 OH
2452 Premier Boys 16-Black 1477 32-23 57% 16 TX
2453 Princeton 18-National 1477 20-19 51% 18 NJ
2454 Petite Elite 12 Troy 1477 1-2 33% 12
2455 St Joe STORM 18-1 1477 5-6 45% 18 MO
2456 ARSEL 14-1 johanna 1477 2-4 33% 14 PR
2457 Impact 15-Red steven 1477 9-8 53% 15 NV
2458 Panther Boys 18-1 1477 3-5 38% 18 CO
2459 Annapolis 15U National 1477 23-41 34% 15 MD
2460 ELKHART BOYS 14 1477 0-0 0% 14
2461 Absolute SubZero BVC U13/U 14-Cosmics 1477 3-3 50% 14 WA
2462 True North Volleyball Academy 18-1 1477 3-3 50% 18 MO
2463 787EV 17-Um mickey 1477 1-2 33% 17 PR
2464 CHAOS BOYS 17-1 national 1477 22-29 43% 17 OR
2465 United 14-Boys 1477 10-9 53% 14 AL
2466 ONE Volleyball Academy 18-1 1476 3-4 43% 18 KS
2467 TNT Boys 16-Vandals 1476 9-16 36% 16 PA
2468 SJVBC Boys 16-Black 1476 2-5 29% 16 NJ
2469 RVBC 18-1 1476 4-4 50% 18
2470 MWVC 18-Boys barcelo 1476 2-5 29% 18 PR
2471 Red Rock Boys 17-1 1476 22-30 42% 17 CA
2472 LHV Boys 18-2 blitz 1475 19-16 54% 18 MA
2473 Academy 13-O under armour 1475 27-29 48% 13 IN
2474 Vengeance 15-Rosenberg 1475 11-15 42% 15 OH
2475 RVA 17-Boys nazca blue 1475 2-5 29% 17
2476 COAST 14-2 colton 1475 21-28 43% 14 CA
2477 SPVB 11-Black 1475 1-2 33% 11 IL
2478 Evolution 16 Elite 1475 27-31 47% 16 CA
2479 KUIKAHI 18-Red roshambo 1475 7-11 39% 18 HI
2480 Husky 17.3 1475 14-19 42% 17 CT
2481 The Edge 14-White 1474 3-4 38% 14 VA
2482 Adversity VBC 15 Adidas 1474 27-49 36% 15 IL
2483 SPVB 14-Black 1474 5-2 71% 14 IL
2484 BOYS AMV 18-Blue 1474 6-4 60% 18 WI
2485 SMBC North 14-Black 1474 11-8 58% 14 CA
2486 Team Momentum B16-Orange 1474 26-25 51% 16 MO
2487 Alpha Omega Volleyball 14-1 1474 3-3 50% 14 MO
2488 Yorktowne 13-Blue 1474 15-22 41% 13 PA
2489 SVA Boys 15-S 1474 6-10 38% 15 WA
2490 WAVE 16 Gary 1473 26-24 52% 16 CA
2491 Colorado Elite Boys 12 1473 3-2 60% 12 CO
2492 Sixpack Boys 17-Local 1473 2-3 40% 17
2493 Dinamite 17-1 1473 9-7 56% 17 CA
2494 Slainte 12-Platinum 1473 15-15 50% 12 CA
2495 Inferno 16-3 select 1473 23-16 59% 16 WI
2496 Rancho 15-Blue 1473 4-4 50% 15 CA
2497 Balboa Bay 12-White 1473 18-23 44% 12 CA
2498 MK 14-3 1473 4-4 50% 14
2499 NSSC Boys 18-Nike 1473 28-22 56% 18 MO
2500 Sporting Albany Boys 13 1473 1-2 33% 13 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.