Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2451 CJ Heat Boys 16 1474 8-13 35% 16 NJ
2452 LHV Boys 18-2 blitz 1474 19-16 54% 18 MA
2453 Legacy Boys 16-Premier 1474 9-15 38% 16 NY
2454 Titans Volleyball Association 15 Titans Prodigy 1474 2-3 40% 15 ON
2455 Adversity VBC 15 Adidas 1474 27-49 36% 15 IL
2456 Red Rock Boys 17-1 1474 22-30 42% 17 CA
2457 Inferno 16-3 select 1474 23-16 59% 16 WI
2458 Vengeance 15-Rosenberg 1474 11-15 42% 15 OH
2459 Panther Boys 18-Black 1473 10-8 56% 18 CO
2460 Slainte 12-Platinum 1473 15-15 50% 12 CA
2461 TDV Boys 18-1 1473 25-25 50% 18 OH
2462 Mentor Volley 15-1 1473 5-27 16% 15 CA
2463 Dinamite 17-1 1473 9-7 56% 17 CA
2464 Princeton 18-National 1473 20-19 51% 18 NJ
2465 SVA Boys 15-S 1473 6-10 38% 15 CO
2466 NF 18 Crimson 1473 13-22 33% 18 NY
2467 Illinois Jr's B16-1's 1473 24-46 33% 16 IL
2468 Balboa Bay 12-White 1473 18-23 44% 12 CA
2469 Sixpack Boys 17-Local 1473 2-3 40% 17 NJ
2470 MK 14-3 1473 4-4 50% 14 HI
2471 RVBC 18-1 1472 4-4 50% 18 PA
2472 PEVC 14-Boys 1472 6-10 38% 14 AL
2473 Silver State Boys 18 1472 4-5 44% 18 NV
2474 Northern Lights 16-2 boys 1472 12-11 52% 16 MN
2475 Club Solano 14-B maroon 1472 25-29 46% 14 CA
2476 SMASH Boys 13-1 1472 24-26 48% 13 MA
2477 Northern Lights 18-R boys 1472 13-12 52% 18 MN
2478 Academy 15-Mt - stitle 1472 2-3 40% 15 IN
2479 Panther Boys 18-1 1472 3-5 38% 18 CO
2480 Rancho 15-Blue 1471 4-4 50% 15 CA
2481 Adidas OPV BOYS 18-Ntl 1471 2-2 50% 18 OR
2482 SC Legends 16-Nike 1471 19-27 41% 16 CA
2483 Tampa United BOYS 18-B 1471 4-10 29% 18 FL
2484 RUSH 14-Black - spring 1471 5-7 42% 14 AZ
2485 Absolute Zero VBC 17 Absol SubZero Centrigrade (PS) 1471 2-9 18% 17 WA
2486 CUVC 17-2 boys 1471 9-18 33% 17 NC
2487 Alpha Omega Boys 16-1 1471 13-16 45% 16 MO
2488 TStreet 12-Lance 1471 2-3 40% 12 CA
2489 Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP Dustin (BG) (4) 1471 1-2 33% 17 WI
2490 ECC South Boys 18 1471 9-12 43% 18 NJ
2491 A-10 Boys 15-Black 1471 17-21 45% 15 PA
2492 ACEZ 18-Black 1471 0-0 0% 18 CA
2493 Blast 16 Inferno 1470 7-33 18% 16 RI
2494 Club Solano 18-B maroon 1470 16-21 43% 18 CA
2495 WAVE 16 Gary 1470 26-24 52% 16 CA
2496 Gameday Sports Academy 18-Larissa 1470 17-17 50% 18 CA
2497 Chaos Boys 16U National 1470 4-8 33% 16 OR
2498 Pipeline 18-Mason 1470 9-10 47% 18 CA
2499 Annapolis 15U National 1470 23-41 34% 15 MD
2500 Academy 16-R silver 1470 16-15 52% 16 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.