2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2451 | CJ Heat Boys 16 | 1474 | 8-13 | 35% | 16 | NJ |
| 2452 | LHV Boys 18-2 blitz | 1474 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | MA |
| 2453 | Legacy Boys 16-Premier | 1474 | 9-15 | 38% | 16 | NY |
| 2454 | Titans Volleyball Association 15 Titans Prodigy | 1474 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | ON |
| 2455 | Adversity VBC 15 Adidas | 1474 | 27-49 | 36% | 15 | IL |
| 2456 | Red Rock Boys 17-1 | 1474 | 22-30 | 42% | 17 | CA |
| 2457 | Inferno 16-3 select | 1474 | 23-16 | 59% | 16 | WI |
| 2458 | Vengeance 15-Rosenberg | 1474 | 11-15 | 42% | 15 | OH |
| 2459 | Panther Boys 18-Black | 1473 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | CO |
| 2460 | Slainte 12-Platinum | 1473 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 2461 | TDV Boys 18-1 | 1473 | 25-25 | 50% | 18 | OH |
| 2462 | Mentor Volley 15-1 | 1473 | 5-27 | 16% | 15 | CA |
| 2463 | Dinamite 17-1 | 1473 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 2464 | Princeton 18-National | 1473 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | NJ |
| 2465 | SVA Boys 15-S | 1473 | 6-10 | 38% | 15 | CO |
| 2466 | NF 18 Crimson | 1473 | 13-22 | 33% | 18 | NY |
| 2467 | Illinois Jr's B16-1's | 1473 | 24-46 | 33% | 16 | IL |
| 2468 | Balboa Bay 12-White | 1473 | 18-23 | 44% | 12 | CA |
| 2469 | Sixpack Boys 17-Local | 1473 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | NJ |
| 2470 | MK 14-3 | 1473 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | HI |
| 2471 | RVBC 18-1 | 1472 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | PA |
| 2472 | PEVC 14-Boys | 1472 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | AL |
| 2473 | Silver State Boys 18 | 1472 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | NV |
| 2474 | Northern Lights 16-2 boys | 1472 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | MN |
| 2475 | Club Solano 14-B maroon | 1472 | 25-29 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 2476 | SMASH Boys 13-1 | 1472 | 24-26 | 48% | 13 | MA |
| 2477 | Northern Lights 18-R boys | 1472 | 13-12 | 52% | 18 | MN |
| 2478 | Academy 15-Mt - stitle | 1472 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IN |
| 2479 | Panther Boys 18-1 | 1472 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | CO |
| 2480 | Rancho 15-Blue | 1471 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 2481 | Adidas OPV BOYS 18-Ntl | 1471 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | OR |
| 2482 | SC Legends 16-Nike | 1471 | 19-27 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 2483 | Tampa United BOYS 18-B | 1471 | 4-10 | 29% | 18 | FL |
| 2484 | RUSH 14-Black - spring | 1471 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 2485 | Absolute Zero VBC 17 Absol SubZero Centrigrade (PS) | 1471 | 2-9 | 18% | 17 | WA |
| 2486 | CUVC 17-2 boys | 1471 | 9-18 | 33% | 17 | NC |
| 2487 | Alpha Omega Boys 16-1 | 1471 | 13-16 | 45% | 16 | MO |
| 2488 | TStreet 12-Lance | 1471 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 2489 | Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP Dustin (BG) (4) | 1471 | 1-2 | 33% | 17 | WI |
| 2490 | ECC South Boys 18 | 1471 | 9-12 | 43% | 18 | NJ |
| 2491 | A-10 Boys 15-Black | 1471 | 17-21 | 45% | 15 | PA |
| 2492 | ACEZ 18-Black | 1471 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 2493 | Blast 16 Inferno | 1470 | 7-33 | 18% | 16 | RI |
| 2494 | Club Solano 18-B maroon | 1470 | 16-21 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 2495 | WAVE 16 Gary | 1470 | 26-24 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2496 | Gameday Sports Academy 18-Larissa | 1470 | 17-17 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 2497 | Chaos Boys 16U National | 1470 | 4-8 | 33% | 16 | OR |
| 2498 | Pipeline 18-Mason | 1470 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 2499 | Annapolis 15U National | 1470 | 23-41 | 34% | 15 | MD |
| 2500 | Academy 16-R silver | 1470 | 16-15 | 52% | 16 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.