2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2451 | Cinci Attack 18 Gold | 1477 | 24-28 | 46% | 18 | OH |
| 2452 | Premier Boys 16-Black | 1477 | 32-23 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 2453 | Princeton 18-National | 1477 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | NJ |
| 2454 | Petite Elite 12 Troy | 1477 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | |
| 2455 | St Joe STORM 18-1 | 1477 | 5-6 | 45% | 18 | MO |
| 2456 | ARSEL 14-1 johanna | 1477 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | PR |
| 2457 | Impact 15-Red steven | 1477 | 9-8 | 53% | 15 | NV |
| 2458 | Panther Boys 18-1 | 1477 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | CO |
| 2459 | Annapolis 15U National | 1477 | 23-41 | 34% | 15 | MD |
| 2460 | ELKHART BOYS 14 | 1477 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2461 | Absolute SubZero BVC U13/U 14-Cosmics | 1477 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | WA |
| 2462 | True North Volleyball Academy 18-1 | 1477 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | MO |
| 2463 | 787EV 17-Um mickey | 1477 | 1-2 | 33% | 17 | PR |
| 2464 | CHAOS BOYS 17-1 national | 1477 | 22-29 | 43% | 17 | OR |
| 2465 | United 14-Boys | 1477 | 10-9 | 53% | 14 | AL |
| 2466 | ONE Volleyball Academy 18-1 | 1476 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | KS |
| 2467 | TNT Boys 16-Vandals | 1476 | 9-16 | 36% | 16 | PA |
| 2468 | SJVBC Boys 16-Black | 1476 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | NJ |
| 2469 | RVBC 18-1 | 1476 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | |
| 2470 | MWVC 18-Boys barcelo | 1476 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | PR |
| 2471 | Red Rock Boys 17-1 | 1476 | 22-30 | 42% | 17 | CA |
| 2472 | LHV Boys 18-2 blitz | 1475 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | MA |
| 2473 | Academy 13-O under armour | 1475 | 27-29 | 48% | 13 | IN |
| 2474 | Vengeance 15-Rosenberg | 1475 | 11-15 | 42% | 15 | OH |
| 2475 | RVA 17-Boys nazca blue | 1475 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | |
| 2476 | COAST 14-2 colton | 1475 | 21-28 | 43% | 14 | CA |
| 2477 | SPVB 11-Black | 1475 | 1-2 | 33% | 11 | IL |
| 2478 | Evolution 16 Elite | 1475 | 27-31 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 2479 | KUIKAHI 18-Red roshambo | 1475 | 7-11 | 39% | 18 | HI |
| 2480 | Husky 17.3 | 1475 | 14-19 | 42% | 17 | CT |
| 2481 | The Edge 14-White | 1474 | 3-4 | 38% | 14 | VA |
| 2482 | Adversity VBC 15 Adidas | 1474 | 27-49 | 36% | 15 | IL |
| 2483 | SPVB 14-Black | 1474 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 2484 | BOYS AMV 18-Blue | 1474 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | WI |
| 2485 | SMBC North 14-Black | 1474 | 11-8 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 2486 | Team Momentum B16-Orange | 1474 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | MO |
| 2487 | Alpha Omega Volleyball 14-1 | 1474 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | MO |
| 2488 | Yorktowne 13-Blue | 1474 | 15-22 | 41% | 13 | PA |
| 2489 | SVA Boys 15-S | 1474 | 6-10 | 38% | 15 | WA |
| 2490 | WAVE 16 Gary | 1473 | 26-24 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2491 | Colorado Elite Boys 12 | 1473 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | CO |
| 2492 | Sixpack Boys 17-Local | 1473 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | |
| 2493 | Dinamite 17-1 | 1473 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 2494 | Slainte 12-Platinum | 1473 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 2495 | Inferno 16-3 select | 1473 | 23-16 | 59% | 16 | WI |
| 2496 | Rancho 15-Blue | 1473 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 2497 | Balboa Bay 12-White | 1473 | 18-23 | 44% | 12 | CA |
| 2498 | MK 14-3 | 1473 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | |
| 2499 | NSSC Boys 18-Nike | 1473 | 28-22 | 56% | 18 | MO |
| 2500 | Sporting Albany Boys 13 | 1473 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.