Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 49 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2401 PREVAIL Boys 18-Purple 1480 12-21 35% 18 PA
2402 Sporting Albany Boys 13 1480 1-2 33% 13 NY
2403 H Skyline Boys 15 Royal 1480 21-35 38% 15 TX
2404 PREVAIL Boys 16-Southeast 1480 1-4 20% 16 PA
2405 MWVC 18-Boys barcelo 1479 2-5 29% 18 PR
2406 FRVBC 16-2 1479 15-12 56% 16 CO
2407 Precision 18 1479 14-10 58% 18 IL
2408 UtahIce Brin 18 1479 2-5 29% 18
2409 RVA 17-Boys nazca blue 1479 2-5 29% 17 VA
2410 315 VC 17-1 1479 12-16 38% 17 NY
2411 Evolution 16 Elite 1479 27-31 47% 16 CA
2412 A5 Boys 16-2 1479 5-5 50% 16 GA
2413 GSL 16-St. george victor 1479 16-11 59% 16 UT
2414 Prodigy Boys 18-1 premier 1478 7-11 39% 18 NY
2415 Cinci Attack 18 Gold 1478 24-28 46% 18 OH
2416 Junior Bison Volleyball Club 14-Boys 1478 0-0 0% 14
2417 GSL 16-Elite - ashlyn 1478 5-16 24% 16 UT
2418 KIVA 14-S-red 1478 3-2 60% 14 KY
2419 Blue Wave 18-S 1478 9-6 60% 18 CA
2420 787EV 17-Um mickey 1478 1-2 33% 17 PR
2421 Academy 12-R under armour 1478 16-17 48% 12 IN
2422 SAND BOYS 18-Black 1477 14-8 64% 18 CA
2423 United 14-Boys 1477 10-9 53% 14 AL
2424 SCVC 17-Gio 1477 16-12 57% 17 UT
2425 True North Volleyball Academy 18-1 1477 3-3 50% 18 MO
2426 SC Legends 17-Nike 1477 16-14 53% 17 CA
2427 COAST 14-2 colton 1477 21-28 43% 14 CA
2428 MoCo Boys 13 Adidas 1477 10-7 59% 13 TX
2429 Chaos Boys 18U National 1477 4-11 27% 18 OR
2430 ELKHART BOYS 14 1477 0-0 0% 14 IN
2431 EXILE 18-2 blue 1477 9-8 50% 18 PA
2432 SMBC North 14-Black 1476 11-8 58% 14 CA
2433 Yorktowne 13-Blue 1476 15-22 41% 13 PA
2434 TNT Boys 16-Vandals 1476 9-16 36% 16 PA
2435 Five Starz 16-Black 1475 21-20 51% 16 CA
2436 Northern Lights 18-2 boys 1475 23-22 51% 18 MN
2437 Venom Carnage 18-Boys 1475 2-3 40% 18 FL
2438 FSVC 18-Boys 1475 17-12 59% 18 FL
2439 SPVB 11-Black 1475 1-2 33% 11 IL
2440 SJVBC Boys 16-Black 1475 2-5 29% 16 NJ
2441 Tsunami Volleyball Academy 17 Tsunami VBA Boys 1475 6-4 60% 17 FL
2442 ONE Volleyball Academy 18-1 1475 3-4 43% 18 KS
2443 Club North Volleyball KC 14-1 1475 3-4 43% 14 MO
2444 LVC 17BLUE 1475 27-29 48% 17 NY
2445 Salt City Boys 18 T 1475 19-25 43% 18 UT
2446 St Joe STORM 18-1 1475 5-6 45% 18 MO
2447 Bay to Bay 12-Premier 1475 23-47 33% 12 CA
2448 Team Rockstar 17 Jo 1474 5-9 36% 17 CA
2449 GSL 17-Elite - jackson 1474 7-15 32% 17 UT
2450 BBVC Black 17 1474 8-11 42% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.