Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 49 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2401 AZ Fear 14-Red 1484 5-7 42% 14 AZ
2402 SMBC West 15 Molten 1484 12-23 34% 15 CA
2403 Manteca Flight 15-1 benni 1484 2-8 20% 15 CA
2404 Hot Shots 14-Coastal 1484 8-9 44% 14 NY
2405 NKYVC 13-1 cyclone 1484 6-9 40% 13 KY
2406 Panther Boys 15-Black 1483 7-9 44% 15 CO
2407 NPJ Seattle 17-1 boys 1483 2-3 40% 17 WA
2408 Vegas Volley Boys 18-1 1483 14-19 42% 18 NV
2409 South County Boys 17-2 1483 6-4 60% 17 RI
2410 Flight Academy 18-2 1483 15-13 54% 18 OH
2411 Coastal 16 Kenny 1483 15-15 50% 16 MA
2412 VEVA Boys 18-Black 1482 16-30 35% 18 PA
2413 Empowered B16 Onyx 1482 33-25 57% 16 IN
2414 CVA 16-Brian 1482 7-5 58% 16 CO
2415 Boys BSVBC 16-Blue 1482 18-14 56% 16 IL
2416 Bay to Bay 12-Premier 1482 23-47 33% 12 CA
2417 Carolina ICE 17-1 1482 27-30 47% 17 SC
2418 Surge Boys 18-Lime 1482 4-4 44% 18 PA
2419 Blue Royals 18 Elite 1482 12-13 48% 18 WA
2420 Elevate 18-1 elijah 1482 0-0 0% 18 TX
2421 Academy 17-E black 1482 20-39 34% 17 IN
2422 BMeraki 18-2 1481 6-6 50% 18
2423 Academy 12-R under armour 1481 16-17 48% 12 IN
2424 Titan Premier 18 Sydney 1481 17-20 46% 18 CA
2425 Premier Boys 12-Black 1481 0-5 0% 12 TX
2426 GSEVC 18-Boys national 1481 14-14 50% 18 NJ
2427 FLAMESVC 15-1 1481 5-6 45% 15 TX
2428 MOD B14-White 1481 34-31 52% 14 IL
2429 Boston United Boys 16-N 1 1480 6-12 33% 16 MA
2430 H Skyline Boys 15 Royal 1480 21-35 38% 15 TX
2431 PREVA 17-Carlos 1480 5-5 50% 17 PR
2432 PREVAIL Boys 16-Southeast 1480 1-4 20% 16 PA
2433 Five Starz 16-Black 1480 21-20 51% 16 CA
2434 EXILE 18-2 blue 1480 9-8 50% 18 PA
2435 630 Volleyball 16-4 1480 36-26 58% 16 IL
2436 KIVA 14-S-red 1479 3-2 60% 14 KY
2437 EXILE East 16 1479 6-11 32% 16 PA
2438 Venom Carnage 18-Boys 1479 2-3 40% 18
2439 Madtown 11-1 regional 1479 0-0 0% 11
2440 RAGE 15 SARAH 1479 31-25 55% 15 CA
2441 A5 Boys 16-2 1479 5-5 50% 16 GA
2442 RUSH 14-Black - spring 1479 5-7 42% 14 AZ
2443 Yuba Elite 17-B black 1479 11-11 50% 17 CA
2444 Club North Volleyball KC 14-1 1479 3-4 43% 14 MO
2445 FC Elite 11-Blue 1478 0-0 0% 11
2446 The Lab Boys 17-S 1478 8-9 47% 17 CO
2447 Core 18 Elite 1478 33-32 51% 18 CA
2448 Junior Bison Volleyball Club 14-Boys 1478 0-0 0% 14
2449 Alpha Omega Boys 16-1 1478 10-13 43% 16 MO
2450 Cap City 17-White 1478 12-16 39% 17 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.