2025-2026 Season — Page 49 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2401 | AZ Fear 14-Red | 1484 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 2402 | SMBC West 15 Molten | 1484 | 12-23 | 34% | 15 | CA |
| 2403 | Manteca Flight 15-1 benni | 1484 | 2-8 | 20% | 15 | CA |
| 2404 | Hot Shots 14-Coastal | 1484 | 8-9 | 44% | 14 | NY |
| 2405 | NKYVC 13-1 cyclone | 1484 | 6-9 | 40% | 13 | KY |
| 2406 | Panther Boys 15-Black | 1483 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | CO |
| 2407 | NPJ Seattle 17-1 boys | 1483 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | WA |
| 2408 | Vegas Volley Boys 18-1 | 1483 | 14-19 | 42% | 18 | NV |
| 2409 | South County Boys 17-2 | 1483 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | RI |
| 2410 | Flight Academy 18-2 | 1483 | 15-13 | 54% | 18 | OH |
| 2411 | Coastal 16 Kenny | 1483 | 15-15 | 50% | 16 | MA |
| 2412 | VEVA Boys 18-Black | 1482 | 16-30 | 35% | 18 | PA |
| 2413 | Empowered B16 Onyx | 1482 | 33-25 | 57% | 16 | IN |
| 2414 | CVA 16-Brian | 1482 | 7-5 | 58% | 16 | CO |
| 2415 | Boys BSVBC 16-Blue | 1482 | 18-14 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 2416 | Bay to Bay 12-Premier | 1482 | 23-47 | 33% | 12 | CA |
| 2417 | Carolina ICE 17-1 | 1482 | 27-30 | 47% | 17 | SC |
| 2418 | Surge Boys 18-Lime | 1482 | 4-4 | 44% | 18 | PA |
| 2419 | Blue Royals 18 Elite | 1482 | 12-13 | 48% | 18 | WA |
| 2420 | Elevate 18-1 elijah | 1482 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | TX |
| 2421 | Academy 17-E black | 1482 | 20-39 | 34% | 17 | IN |
| 2422 | BMeraki 18-2 | 1481 | 6-6 | 50% | 18 | |
| 2423 | Academy 12-R under armour | 1481 | 16-17 | 48% | 12 | IN |
| 2424 | Titan Premier 18 Sydney | 1481 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 2425 | Premier Boys 12-Black | 1481 | 0-5 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 2426 | GSEVC 18-Boys national | 1481 | 14-14 | 50% | 18 | NJ |
| 2427 | FLAMESVC 15-1 | 1481 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | TX |
| 2428 | MOD B14-White | 1481 | 34-31 | 52% | 14 | IL |
| 2429 | Boston United Boys 16-N 1 | 1480 | 6-12 | 33% | 16 | MA |
| 2430 | H Skyline Boys 15 Royal | 1480 | 21-35 | 38% | 15 | TX |
| 2431 | PREVA 17-Carlos | 1480 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | PR |
| 2432 | PREVAIL Boys 16-Southeast | 1480 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | PA |
| 2433 | Five Starz 16-Black | 1480 | 21-20 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2434 | EXILE 18-2 blue | 1480 | 9-8 | 50% | 18 | PA |
| 2435 | 630 Volleyball 16-4 | 1480 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 2436 | KIVA 14-S-red | 1479 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | KY |
| 2437 | EXILE East 16 | 1479 | 6-11 | 32% | 16 | PA |
| 2438 | Venom Carnage 18-Boys | 1479 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | |
| 2439 | Madtown 11-1 regional | 1479 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 2440 | RAGE 15 SARAH | 1479 | 31-25 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 2441 | A5 Boys 16-2 | 1479 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | GA |
| 2442 | RUSH 14-Black - spring | 1479 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 2443 | Yuba Elite 17-B black | 1479 | 11-11 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 2444 | Club North Volleyball KC 14-1 | 1479 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | MO |
| 2445 | FC Elite 11-Blue | 1478 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 2446 | The Lab Boys 17-S | 1478 | 8-9 | 47% | 17 | CO |
| 2447 | Core 18 Elite | 1478 | 33-32 | 51% | 18 | CA |
| 2448 | Junior Bison Volleyball Club 14-Boys | 1478 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2449 | Alpha Omega Boys 16-1 | 1478 | 10-13 | 43% | 16 | MO |
| 2450 | Cap City 17-White | 1478 | 12-16 | 39% | 17 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.