2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2351 | IVC 16-Black | 1487 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | IA |
| 2352 | NSSC Volleyball Club 18-Nike | 1487 | 26-18 | 59% | 18 | MO |
| 2353 | NorCal Boys 12-1 | 1486 | 17-21 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 2354 | Carolina ICE 17-1 | 1486 | 27-30 | 47% | 17 | SC |
| 2355 | ICVB 16-1 | 1486 | 8-6 | 57% | 16 | |
| 2356 | PEVA BOYS 16 NATIONAL | 1486 | 17-24 | 41% | 16 | PA |
| 2357 | Colorado Elite Boys 12 | 1486 | 9-10 | 45% | 12 | CO |
| 2358 | SLAM 17-2 boys | 1486 | 12-39 | 24% | 17 | MA |
| 2359 | TU Boys 14-Select | 1486 | 4-7 | 36% | 14 | NC |
| 2360 | Team Momentum B16-Orange | 1485 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | MO |
| 2361 | No Panic 18-Boys | 1485 | 18-32 | 34% | 18 | VA |
| 2362 | PSVC 16-Jorge | 1485 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | SC |
| 2363 | Crow Creek Volleyball 18 Jackdaws | 1485 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | ID |
| 2364 | Precision Volleyball Academy 18 Precision Kings | 1485 | 13-9 | 59% | 18 | OH |
| 2365 | Club GSL 17-Elite - alan | 1485 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | UT |
| 2366 | Boys BSVBC 16-Blue | 1485 | 18-14 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 2367 | Academy 17-E black | 1484 | 20-39 | 34% | 17 | IN |
| 2368 | RAGE 15 SARAH | 1484 | 31-25 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 2369 | Blue Royals 18 Elite | 1484 | 12-13 | 48% | 18 | WA |
| 2370 | Apple Valley Boys 18-S | 1484 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | MN |
| 2371 | Legends 18-2 naldo | 1484 | 7-7 | 50% | 18 | PR |
| 2372 | Valley Volleyball Academy 17-3 | 1484 | 2-4 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 2373 | CHAOS BOYS 17-1 national | 1483 | 22-29 | 43% | 17 | OR |
| 2374 | FPVC 15-B power | 1483 | 2-8 | 20% | 15 | CA |
| 2375 | Panther Boys 15-Black | 1483 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | CO |
| 2376 | DIGS Volleyball Club 17-Red | 1483 | 13-16 | 45% | 17 | NJ |
| 2377 | Radiate 14-Black | 1483 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | UT |
| 2378 | Team Colorado 18-Gray | 1483 | 5-8 | 38% | 18 | CO |
| 2379 | ARSEL 14-1 johanna | 1483 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | PR |
| 2380 | The Lab Boys 17-S | 1482 | 8-9 | 47% | 17 | CO |
| 2381 | Yuba Elite 17-B black | 1482 | 11-11 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 2382 | PV Boys 16-1 | 1482 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | MA |
| 2383 | Elevate 18-1 elijah | 1482 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 2384 | NPJ Seattle 17-1 boys | 1482 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | WA |
| 2385 | Hot Shots 14-Coastal | 1482 | 8-9 | 44% | 14 | NY |
| 2386 | Surge Boys 18-Lime | 1482 | 4-4 | 44% | 18 | NJ |
| 2387 | VBA 18-Train up | 1482 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | PA |
| 2388 | SPVB 14-Black | 1482 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 2389 | Empowered B16 Onyx | 1482 | 33-25 | 57% | 16 | IN |
| 2390 | Premier Boys 16-Black | 1481 | 32-23 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 2391 | CSI Junior Test Club 14 neis 9-1 (AH) (3) | 1481 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | HI |
| 2392 | MOD B14-White | 1481 | 34-31 | 52% | 14 | IL |
| 2393 | LCVC B15-1 | 1481 | 12-8 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 2394 | OMNI 17-2 elite | 1481 | 19-23 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 2395 | NKYVC 13-1 cyclone | 1481 | 6-9 | 40% | 13 | KY |
| 2396 | Iowa One VBC 16-Wolfjaw | 1481 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | IA |
| 2397 | Premier Boys 12-Black | 1481 | 0-5 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 2398 | Coastal 16 Kenny | 1480 | 15-15 | 50% | 16 | VA |
| 2399 | KUIKAHI 18-Red roshambo | 1480 | 7-11 | 39% | 18 | HI |
| 2400 | 630 Volleyball 16-4 | 1480 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.