Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2351 AV IMPACT 17-Rion 1489 11-16 41% 17 CA
2352 SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff 1489 17-18 49% 16 CA
2353 Alpha Omega Volleyball G16-2 1489 8-1 73% 16 MO
2354 Sequoyah Guys 18-1 1489 2-2 50% 18
2355 Kali 16-M max 1489 4-3 57% 16 PR
2356 Ballhawks 17-2 1489 2-3 40% 17
2357 LVC 14-White 1489 3-4 33% 14 NY
2358 BG Lightning 18 Teal 1489 23-15 61% 18 TX
2359 PVA BOYS 14-Regional 1489 1-4 20% 14 PA
2360 Orlando Gold 12-Black 1488 18-19 49% 12 FL
2361 Utah Mojo 17 National 1488 9-11 41% 17 UT
2362 Battle 14-Black 1488 17-22 41% 14 VA
2363 SC Legends 16-Black 1488 3-3 50% 16 CA
2364 Forza Boys SS 13-Blue 1488 0-0 0% 13 IL
2365 Alpha Omega Boys 14-1 1488 4-11 27% 14 MO
2366 SLAM 17-2 boys 1488 12-39 24% 17 MA
2367 Legends 18-2 naldo 1488 7-7 50% 18 PR
2368 KC United 14 Navy 1488 8-7 53% 14 MO
2369 SIVC Sivc 18-S black sam 1488 8-5 62% 18
2370 CINCY EAST Boys 12-1black 1488 7-9 44% 12 OH
2371 Na Koa O Kohala 14-S boys 1487 2-2 40% 14
2372 UNION B17-Green 1487 26-30 46% 17 IN
2373 Aztlan VC 17-Abel 1487 0-0 0% 17 CA
2374 Boston United Boys 14-1 1487 19-17 53% 14 MA
2375 IVC 16-Black 1487 2-2 50% 16 TX
2376 ECC South Boys 17 1487 9-14 39% 17 NJ
2377 Chicago Elite B 14 Elite 1487 14-16 47% 14 IL
2378 Rancho 15-Black 1487 11-12 48% 15 CA
2379 OVC 18 Tsunami 1487 12-20 38% 18 VA
2380 TU Boys 14-Select 1487 4-7 36% 14 NC
2381 PREVAIL Boys 18-Purple 1486 12-21 35% 18 PA
2382 INLND 18-1 1486 3-0 100% 18 CA
2383 ID Strike 18-Purple 1486 15-13 54% 18 ID
2384 Dinamite 14-FRANC 1486 4-4 50% 14 CA
2385 NorCal Boys 12-1 1486 17-21 45% 12 CA
2386 Westside VBC 18-Green 1486 10-24 29% 18 CA
2387 315 VC 17-1 1486 12-16 38% 17 NY
2388 OMNI 17-2 elite 1486 19-23 45% 17 CA
2389 Club Solano 18-B maroon 1486 16-21 43% 18 CA
2390 GOVC Sprouts 10 1486 1-1 33% 10
2391 Hive 16-Gold 1485 0-7 0% 16 UT
2392 A5 Calhoun 16-Red 1485 6-6 50% 16 GA
2393 PSVC 16-Jorge 1485 7-10 41% 16 SC
2394 No Panic 18-Boys 1485 18-32 34% 18 VA
2395 VBA 18-Train up 1485 3-3 50% 18
2396 TDV Boys 18-1 1485 25-25 50% 18 OH
2397 Vibe 16-Premier 1485 7-8 44% 16 CA
2398 Team Colorado 18-Gray 1485 5-8 38% 18 CO
2399 SC Legends 16-Gold 1484 15-13 54% 16 CA
2400 Apple Valley Boys 18-S 1484 3-2 60% 18 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.