Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2351 IVC 16-Black 1487 2-2 50% 16 IA
2352 NSSC Volleyball Club 18-Nike 1487 26-18 59% 18 MO
2353 NorCal Boys 12-1 1486 17-21 45% 12 CA
2354 Carolina ICE 17-1 1486 27-30 47% 17 SC
2355 ICVB 16-1 1486 8-6 57% 16
2356 PEVA BOYS 16 NATIONAL 1486 17-24 41% 16 PA
2357 Colorado Elite Boys 12 1486 9-10 45% 12 CO
2358 SLAM 17-2 boys 1486 12-39 24% 17 MA
2359 TU Boys 14-Select 1486 4-7 36% 14 NC
2360 Team Momentum B16-Orange 1485 26-25 51% 16 MO
2361 No Panic 18-Boys 1485 18-32 34% 18 VA
2362 PSVC 16-Jorge 1485 7-10 41% 16 SC
2363 Crow Creek Volleyball 18 Jackdaws 1485 4-4 50% 18 ID
2364 Precision Volleyball Academy 18 Precision Kings 1485 13-9 59% 18 OH
2365 Club GSL 17-Elite - alan 1485 3-2 60% 17 UT
2366 Boys BSVBC 16-Blue 1485 18-14 56% 16 IL
2367 Academy 17-E black 1484 20-39 34% 17 IN
2368 RAGE 15 SARAH 1484 31-25 55% 15 CA
2369 Blue Royals 18 Elite 1484 12-13 48% 18 WA
2370 Apple Valley Boys 18-S 1484 3-2 60% 18 MN
2371 Legends 18-2 naldo 1484 7-7 50% 18 PR
2372 Valley Volleyball Academy 17-3 1484 2-4 33% 17 CA
2373 CHAOS BOYS 17-1 national 1483 22-29 43% 17 OR
2374 FPVC 15-B power 1483 2-8 20% 15 CA
2375 Panther Boys 15-Black 1483 7-9 44% 15 CO
2376 DIGS Volleyball Club 17-Red 1483 13-16 45% 17 NJ
2377 Radiate 14-Black 1483 6-9 40% 14 UT
2378 Team Colorado 18-Gray 1483 5-8 38% 18 CO
2379 ARSEL 14-1 johanna 1483 2-4 33% 14 PR
2380 The Lab Boys 17-S 1482 8-9 47% 17 CO
2381 Yuba Elite 17-B black 1482 11-11 50% 17 CA
2382 PV Boys 16-1 1482 9-14 39% 16 MA
2383 Elevate 18-1 elijah 1482 0-0 0% 18 CA
2384 NPJ Seattle 17-1 boys 1482 2-3 40% 17 WA
2385 Hot Shots 14-Coastal 1482 8-9 44% 14 NY
2386 Surge Boys 18-Lime 1482 4-4 44% 18 NJ
2387 VBA 18-Train up 1482 3-3 50% 18 PA
2388 SPVB 14-Black 1482 5-2 71% 14 IL
2389 Empowered B16 Onyx 1482 33-25 57% 16 IN
2390 Premier Boys 16-Black 1481 32-23 57% 16 TX
2391 CSI Junior Test Club 14 neis 9-1 (AH) (3) 1481 0-0 0% 14 HI
2392 MOD B14-White 1481 34-31 52% 14 IL
2393 LCVC B15-1 1481 12-8 60% 15 CA
2394 OMNI 17-2 elite 1481 19-23 45% 17 CA
2395 NKYVC 13-1 cyclone 1481 6-9 40% 13 KY
2396 Iowa One VBC 16-Wolfjaw 1481 4-3 57% 16 IA
2397 Premier Boys 12-Black 1481 0-5 0% 12 TX
2398 Coastal 16 Kenny 1480 15-15 50% 16 VA
2399 KUIKAHI 18-Red roshambo 1480 7-11 39% 18 HI
2400 630 Volleyball 16-4 1480 36-26 58% 16 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.