2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2351 | AV IMPACT 17-Rion | 1489 | 11-16 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 2352 | SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff | 1489 | 17-18 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 2353 | Alpha Omega Volleyball G16-2 | 1489 | 8-1 | 73% | 16 | MO |
| 2354 | Sequoyah Guys 18-1 | 1489 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | |
| 2355 | Kali 16-M max | 1489 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | PR |
| 2356 | Ballhawks 17-2 | 1489 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | |
| 2357 | LVC 14-White | 1489 | 3-4 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 2358 | BG Lightning 18 Teal | 1489 | 23-15 | 61% | 18 | TX |
| 2359 | PVA BOYS 14-Regional | 1489 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | PA |
| 2360 | Orlando Gold 12-Black | 1488 | 18-19 | 49% | 12 | FL |
| 2361 | Utah Mojo 17 National | 1488 | 9-11 | 41% | 17 | UT |
| 2362 | Battle 14-Black | 1488 | 17-22 | 41% | 14 | VA |
| 2363 | SC Legends 16-Black | 1488 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2364 | Forza Boys SS 13-Blue | 1488 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | IL |
| 2365 | Alpha Omega Boys 14-1 | 1488 | 4-11 | 27% | 14 | MO |
| 2366 | SLAM 17-2 boys | 1488 | 12-39 | 24% | 17 | MA |
| 2367 | Legends 18-2 naldo | 1488 | 7-7 | 50% | 18 | PR |
| 2368 | KC United 14 Navy | 1488 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | MO |
| 2369 | SIVC Sivc 18-S black sam | 1488 | 8-5 | 62% | 18 | |
| 2370 | CINCY EAST Boys 12-1black | 1488 | 7-9 | 44% | 12 | OH |
| 2371 | Na Koa O Kohala 14-S boys | 1487 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | |
| 2372 | UNION B17-Green | 1487 | 26-30 | 46% | 17 | IN |
| 2373 | Aztlan VC 17-Abel | 1487 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2374 | Boston United Boys 14-1 | 1487 | 19-17 | 53% | 14 | MA |
| 2375 | IVC 16-Black | 1487 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 2376 | ECC South Boys 17 | 1487 | 9-14 | 39% | 17 | NJ |
| 2377 | Chicago Elite B 14 Elite | 1487 | 14-16 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 2378 | Rancho 15-Black | 1487 | 11-12 | 48% | 15 | CA |
| 2379 | OVC 18 Tsunami | 1487 | 12-20 | 38% | 18 | VA |
| 2380 | TU Boys 14-Select | 1487 | 4-7 | 36% | 14 | NC |
| 2381 | PREVAIL Boys 18-Purple | 1486 | 12-21 | 35% | 18 | PA |
| 2382 | INLND 18-1 | 1486 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 2383 | ID Strike 18-Purple | 1486 | 15-13 | 54% | 18 | ID |
| 2384 | Dinamite 14-FRANC | 1486 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2385 | NorCal Boys 12-1 | 1486 | 17-21 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 2386 | Westside VBC 18-Green | 1486 | 10-24 | 29% | 18 | CA |
| 2387 | 315 VC 17-1 | 1486 | 12-16 | 38% | 17 | NY |
| 2388 | OMNI 17-2 elite | 1486 | 19-23 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 2389 | Club Solano 18-B maroon | 1486 | 16-21 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 2390 | GOVC Sprouts 10 | 1486 | 1-1 | 33% | 10 | |
| 2391 | Hive 16-Gold | 1485 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | UT |
| 2392 | A5 Calhoun 16-Red | 1485 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | GA |
| 2393 | PSVC 16-Jorge | 1485 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | SC |
| 2394 | No Panic 18-Boys | 1485 | 18-32 | 34% | 18 | VA |
| 2395 | VBA 18-Train up | 1485 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | |
| 2396 | TDV Boys 18-1 | 1485 | 25-25 | 50% | 18 | OH |
| 2397 | Vibe 16-Premier | 1485 | 7-8 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 2398 | Team Colorado 18-Gray | 1485 | 5-8 | 38% | 18 | CO |
| 2399 | SC Legends 16-Gold | 1484 | 15-13 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 2400 | Apple Valley Boys 18-S | 1484 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.