2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2301 | Ocean Bay 13-Surf | 1491 | 11-5 | 69% | 13 | FL |
| 2302 | CJVA Boys 18-Onyx | 1491 | 7-22 | 24% | 18 | NJ |
| 2303 | SHABO 18-1 | 1491 | 11-9 | 55% | 18 | MN |
| 2304 | NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-Travel | 1490 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | NJ |
| 2305 | Inferno 17-1 national | 1490 | 24-37 | 39% | 17 | WI |
| 2306 | 495 18-Boys | 1490 | 19-21 | 45% | 18 | VA |
| 2307 | Sol Taino 14-8 | 1490 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | PR |
| 2308 | CLEVELAND VOLLEYBALL COMPANY 12-1 | 1490 | 23-16 | 59% | 12 | OH |
| 2309 | SPORTIME VBC 15-Lynbrook | 1490 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | NY |
| 2310 | Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP B17/18 Regional | 1490 | 8-9 | 47% | 17 | WI |
| 2311 | Capital City Elites 16 18U(Boys) Dono (PM) (9) | 1490 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | SC |
| 2312 | ESA 16-Yellow | 1489 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | NV |
| 2313 | SMBC West 15 Molten | 1489 | 12-23 | 34% | 15 | CA |
| 2314 | WSA Gators 18-Premier boys | 1489 | 19-17 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 2315 | Mamba 17-Purple | 1489 | 22-51 | 30% | 17 | WI |
| 2316 | RCVA 14 National | 1489 | 19-30 | 39% | 14 | VA |
| 2317 | Red Rock 14-Regional | 1489 | 2-8 | 20% | 14 | CA |
| 2318 | BORINQUEN COQUI 15-2m | 1489 | 7-11 | 39% | 15 | PR |
| 2319 | TK 18-Bandits premier | 1489 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | GA |
| 2320 | VEVA Boys 18-Black | 1489 | 16-30 | 35% | 18 | PA |
| 2321 | Kali 16-M max | 1489 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | PR |
| 2322 | PVA BOYS 14-Regional | 1489 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | PA |
| 2323 | Aztlan VC 17-Abel | 1489 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2324 | Garden State Elite Volleyball Club 18-Boys national | 1489 | 11-11 | 50% | 18 | NJ |
| 2325 | KC United 14 Navy | 1489 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | MO |
| 2326 | Sequoyah Guys 18-1 | 1489 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | GA |
| 2327 | Chicago Elite B 14 Elite | 1488 | 14-16 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 2328 | LVC 14-White | 1488 | 3-4 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 2329 | Orlando Gold 12-Black | 1488 | 18-19 | 49% | 12 | FL |
| 2330 | AV IMPACT 17-Rion | 1488 | 11-16 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 2331 | Cyclones Boys 17-B | 1488 | 27-35 | 42% | 17 | IL |
| 2332 | FURY Volleyball 16-2 | 1488 | 9-9 | 50% | 16 | NY |
| 2333 | MN Select Boys 17-2 | 1488 | 22-28 | 44% | 17 | MN |
| 2334 | Forza Boys SS 13-Blue | 1488 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | IL |
| 2335 | SC Legends 16-Black | 1488 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2336 | HEAT 16-Black | 1488 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 2337 | ECC South Boys 17 | 1488 | 9-14 | 39% | 17 | NJ |
| 2338 | AZ Fear 16-Red | 1488 | 5-6 | 45% | 16 | AZ |
| 2339 | OVC 18 Tsunami | 1488 | 15-24 | 38% | 18 | VA |
| 2340 | Bama Elite 18-Boys national | 1488 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | AL |
| 2341 | SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff | 1488 | 17-18 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 2342 | Na Koa O Kohala 14-S boys | 1487 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | HI |
| 2343 | South County Boys 17-2 | 1487 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | RI |
| 2344 | BG Lightning 18 Teal | 1487 | 23-15 | 61% | 18 | KY |
| 2345 | MN Select Boys 18-3 | 1487 | 20-16 | 56% | 18 | MN |
| 2346 | Ballhawks 17-2 | 1487 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | ON |
| 2347 | Dinamite 14-FRANC | 1487 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2348 | TVC 18-1s | 1487 | 20-13 | 61% | 18 | IN |
| 2349 | CINCY EAST Boys 12-1black | 1487 | 7-9 | 44% | 12 | OH |
| 2350 | Westside VBC 18-Green | 1487 | 10-24 | 29% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.