Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2301 Ocean Bay 13-Surf 1491 11-5 69% 13 FL
2302 CJVA Boys 18-Onyx 1491 7-22 24% 18 NJ
2303 SHABO 18-1 1491 11-9 55% 18 MN
2304 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-Travel 1490 3-2 60% 16 NJ
2305 Inferno 17-1 national 1490 24-37 39% 17 WI
2306 495 18-Boys 1490 19-21 45% 18 VA
2307 Sol Taino 14-8 1490 2-2 50% 14 PR
2308 CLEVELAND VOLLEYBALL COMPANY 12-1 1490 23-16 59% 12 OH
2309 SPORTIME VBC 15-Lynbrook 1490 7-9 44% 15 NY
2310 Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP B17/18 Regional 1490 8-9 47% 17 WI
2311 Capital City Elites 16 18U(Boys) Dono (PM) (9) 1490 2-3 40% 16 SC
2312 ESA 16-Yellow 1489 3-4 43% 16 NV
2313 SMBC West 15 Molten 1489 12-23 34% 15 CA
2314 WSA Gators 18-Premier boys 1489 19-17 53% 18 FL
2315 Mamba 17-Purple 1489 22-51 30% 17 WI
2316 RCVA 14 National 1489 19-30 39% 14 VA
2317 Red Rock 14-Regional 1489 2-8 20% 14 CA
2318 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-2m 1489 7-11 39% 15 PR
2319 TK 18-Bandits premier 1489 23-21 52% 18 GA
2320 VEVA Boys 18-Black 1489 16-30 35% 18 PA
2321 Kali 16-M max 1489 4-3 57% 16 PR
2322 PVA BOYS 14-Regional 1489 1-4 20% 14 PA
2323 Aztlan VC 17-Abel 1489 0-0 0% 17 CA
2324 Garden State Elite Volleyball Club 18-Boys national 1489 11-11 50% 18 NJ
2325 KC United 14 Navy 1489 8-7 53% 14 MO
2326 Sequoyah Guys 18-1 1489 2-2 50% 18 GA
2327 Chicago Elite B 14 Elite 1488 14-16 47% 14 IL
2328 LVC 14-White 1488 3-4 33% 14 NY
2329 Orlando Gold 12-Black 1488 18-19 49% 12 FL
2330 AV IMPACT 17-Rion 1488 11-16 41% 17 CA
2331 Cyclones Boys 17-B 1488 27-35 42% 17 IL
2332 FURY Volleyball 16-2 1488 9-9 50% 16 NY
2333 MN Select Boys 17-2 1488 22-28 44% 17 MN
2334 Forza Boys SS 13-Blue 1488 0-0 0% 13 IL
2335 SC Legends 16-Black 1488 3-3 50% 16 CA
2336 HEAT 16-Black 1488 3-4 43% 16 CA
2337 ECC South Boys 17 1488 9-14 39% 17 NJ
2338 AZ Fear 16-Red 1488 5-6 45% 16 AZ
2339 OVC 18 Tsunami 1488 15-24 38% 18 VA
2340 Bama Elite 18-Boys national 1488 3-3 50% 18 AL
2341 SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff 1488 17-18 49% 16 CA
2342 Na Koa O Kohala 14-S boys 1487 2-2 40% 14 HI
2343 South County Boys 17-2 1487 6-4 60% 17 RI
2344 BG Lightning 18 Teal 1487 23-15 61% 18 KY
2345 MN Select Boys 18-3 1487 20-16 56% 18 MN
2346 Ballhawks 17-2 1487 2-3 40% 17 ON
2347 Dinamite 14-FRANC 1487 4-4 50% 14 CA
2348 TVC 18-1s 1487 20-13 61% 18 IN
2349 CINCY EAST Boys 12-1black 1487 7-9 44% 12 OH
2350 Westside VBC 18-Green 1487 10-24 29% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.