2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2301 | Diablo 18-1 black | 1494 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | CA |
| 2302 | South Shore Slam 18-Lime | 1494 | 6-14 | 30% | 18 | WI |
| 2303 | Windy City Premier B16-2 | 1493 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 2304 | FRVBC 18-2 | 1493 | 13-13 | 50% | 18 | CO |
| 2305 | Sportime 15-4 | 1493 | 10-5 | 67% | 15 | NY |
| 2306 | 417 Boys 18-2 | 1493 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | MO |
| 2307 | Mamba 17-Purple | 1493 | 22-51 | 30% | 17 | WI |
| 2308 | TVC 18-1s | 1493 | 20-13 | 61% | 18 | IN |
| 2309 | Eclipse 14-Lunar | 1493 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 2310 | Buckeye Boys 14-Red | 1493 | 19-14 | 58% | 14 | OH |
| 2311 | MoCo Boys 13 Adidas | 1493 | 10-7 | 59% | 13 | MD |
| 2312 | Ocean Bay 13-Surf | 1493 | 11-5 | 69% | 13 | FL |
| 2313 | Selected 18-S carter | 1493 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NV |
| 2314 | WAVE 17 Evan | 1493 | 13-12 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 2315 | Impact Boys 17-Red wes | 1493 | 3-12 | 20% | 17 | NV |
| 2316 | PEVA BOYS 16 NATIONAL | 1493 | 17-24 | 41% | 16 | PA |
| 2317 | GSL 16-Elect josh | 1492 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | UT |
| 2318 | Inferno 17-1 national | 1492 | 24-37 | 39% | 17 | WI |
| 2319 | A4 Volley Boys 14-Chase | 1492 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 2320 | FORZA1 Boys 18 ONE | 1492 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 2321 | NYC VBA 17 Downtown | 1492 | 27-21 | 56% | 17 | NY |
| 2322 | HYPE 16-2 | 1492 | 6-3 | 55% | 16 | |
| 2323 | Ku’e VBC 18-Pane’e | 1492 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | WA |
| 2324 | Legacy Boys 16-Premier | 1492 | 9-15 | 38% | 16 | MI |
| 2325 | 417 Boys 18 Regional | 1492 | 5-4 | 56% | 18 | MO |
| 2326 | 495 18-Boys | 1492 | 19-21 | 45% | 18 | MD |
| 2327 | MN Select Boys 17-2 | 1492 | 22-28 | 44% | 17 | MN |
| 2328 | TUV 12-Blue | 1492 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | |
| 2329 | TK 18-Bandits premier | 1491 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | GA |
| 2330 | SMBC Shack 18 Molten | 1491 | 2-30 | 6% | 18 | CA |
| 2331 | FAV 17 Maverick | 1491 | 2-13 | 13% | 17 | CA |
| 2332 | LCVC B15-1 | 1491 | 12-8 | 60% | 15 | |
| 2333 | Austin Velocity Boys 15-1 | 1491 | 13-15 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 2334 | MN Select Boys 18-3 | 1491 | 20-16 | 56% | 18 | MN |
| 2335 | TNT Boys 16-Goldfinger | 1491 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | PA |
| 2336 | Cyclones Chaparral 14-B | 1491 | 31-18 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 2337 | WAVE 14-Spring clarke | 1491 | 1-1 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2338 | 1W 11-Red | 1490 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | WI |
| 2339 | Red Rock 14-Regional | 1490 | 2-8 | 20% | 14 | CA |
| 2340 | Cyclones Boys 17-B | 1490 | 27-35 | 42% | 17 | IL |
| 2341 | Mintonette Sports 16-2 | 1490 | 34-36 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 2342 | GSL 16-St. george victor | 1490 | 8-7 | 53% | 16 | UT |
| 2343 | SPVB 18-Delta | 1490 | 33-26 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 2344 | Precision 18 | 1490 | 14-10 | 58% | 18 | IL |
| 2345 | SQUAD Boys 16-Elite | 1490 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | NV |
| 2346 | Sol Taino 14-8 | 1490 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | PR |
| 2347 | LHV Boys 15-1 eclipse | 1490 | 10-10 | 50% | 15 | MA |
| 2348 | Panther Boys 17-1 | 1490 | 6-8 | 43% | 17 | CO |
| 2349 | WSA Gators 18-Premier boys | 1490 | 19-17 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 2350 | FIVA 18-Boys derek | 1490 | 4-13 | 24% | 18 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.