Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2301 Diablo 18-1 black 1494 2-3 40% 18 CA
2302 South Shore Slam 18-Lime 1494 6-14 30% 18 WI
2303 Windy City Premier B16-2 1493 31-18 63% 16 IL
2304 FRVBC 18-2 1493 13-13 50% 18 CO
2305 Sportime 15-4 1493 10-5 67% 15 NY
2306 417 Boys 18-2 1493 4-4 50% 18 MO
2307 Mamba 17-Purple 1493 22-51 30% 17 WI
2308 TVC 18-1s 1493 20-13 61% 18 IN
2309 Eclipse 14-Lunar 1493 0-0 0% 14 CA
2310 Buckeye Boys 14-Red 1493 19-14 58% 14 OH
2311 MoCo Boys 13 Adidas 1493 10-7 59% 13 MD
2312 Ocean Bay 13-Surf 1493 11-5 69% 13 FL
2313 Selected 18-S carter 1493 0-0 0% 18 NV
2314 WAVE 17 Evan 1493 13-12 52% 17 CA
2315 Impact Boys 17-Red wes 1493 3-12 20% 17 NV
2316 PEVA BOYS 16 NATIONAL 1493 17-24 41% 16 PA
2317 GSL 16-Elect josh 1492 2-5 29% 16 UT
2318 Inferno 17-1 national 1492 24-37 39% 17 WI
2319 A4 Volley Boys 14-Chase 1492 10-11 48% 14 CA
2320 FORZA1 Boys 18 ONE 1492 9-10 47% 18 CA
2321 NYC VBA 17 Downtown 1492 27-21 56% 17 NY
2322 HYPE 16-2 1492 6-3 55% 16
2323 Ku’e VBC 18-Pane’e 1492 4-2 67% 18 WA
2324 Legacy Boys 16-Premier 1492 9-15 38% 16 MI
2325 417 Boys 18 Regional 1492 5-4 56% 18 MO
2326 495 18-Boys 1492 19-21 45% 18 MD
2327 MN Select Boys 17-2 1492 22-28 44% 17 MN
2328 TUV 12-Blue 1492 2-2 50% 12
2329 TK 18-Bandits premier 1491 23-21 52% 18 GA
2330 SMBC Shack 18 Molten 1491 2-30 6% 18 CA
2331 FAV 17 Maverick 1491 2-13 13% 17 CA
2332 LCVC B15-1 1491 12-8 60% 15
2333 Austin Velocity Boys 15-1 1491 13-15 46% 15 TX
2334 MN Select Boys 18-3 1491 20-16 56% 18 MN
2335 TNT Boys 16-Goldfinger 1491 1-4 20% 16 PA
2336 Cyclones Chaparral 14-B 1491 31-18 61% 14 IL
2337 WAVE 14-Spring clarke 1491 1-1 50% 14 CA
2338 1W 11-Red 1490 0-0 0% 11 WI
2339 Red Rock 14-Regional 1490 2-8 20% 14 CA
2340 Cyclones Boys 17-B 1490 27-35 42% 17 IL
2341 Mintonette Sports 16-2 1490 34-36 49% 16 OH
2342 GSL 16-St. george victor 1490 8-7 53% 16 UT
2343 SPVB 18-Delta 1490 33-26 56% 18 IL
2344 Precision 18 1490 14-10 58% 18 IL
2345 SQUAD Boys 16-Elite 1490 1-4 20% 16 NV
2346 Sol Taino 14-8 1490 2-2 50% 14 PR
2347 LHV Boys 15-1 eclipse 1490 10-10 50% 15 MA
2348 Panther Boys 17-1 1490 6-8 43% 17 CO
2349 WSA Gators 18-Premier boys 1490 19-17 53% 18 FL
2350 FIVA 18-Boys derek 1490 4-13 24% 18 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.