Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2251 BAVC 16-2 matthew 1499 4-3 57% 16 CA
2252 674 Manati 16-1 m indio 1499 3-3 50% 16 PR
2253 Tsunami VBA 16-Boys 10 1499 0-0 0% 16 FL
2254 Roch PaceBootleggr 12-Blue 1499 3-2 60% 12 NY
2255 Spike Milwaukee 15-Pam 1499 29-27 52% 15 WI
2256 Mets 10-M arbet 1499 3-3 50% 10 PR
2257 MVVC B 15-Club 1499 7-6 54% 15 CA
2258 Gigasa Elite 16-Black 1499 11-17 39% 16 NJ
2259 Coastal 17 Sean 1498 15-26 37% 17 MA
2260 A2 18 Scarlet 1498 26-22 54% 18 OH
2261 Miami Diamonds 18-1 1498 13-11 54% 18 FL
2262 OPVC 17-Black 1498 21-27 44% 17 OH
2263 G3VB 18-1 boys 1498 16-12 57% 18 MO
2264 Empowr 18-Gold 1497 14-14 50% 18 NC
2265 HICVB 18-1 1497 1-6 14% 18 CA
2266 KeAloha 14-1 rogue 1497 21-16 57% 14 IN
2267 Ignite 14-National boys 1497 6-5 55% 14 AZ
2268 Cen10 18-99 1497 0-0 0% 18
2269 Catalyst 12-White 1497 1-2 25% 12
2270 EXILE 17-3 1497 5-12 29% 17 PA
2271 CJVA Boys 18-Onyx 1496 7-22 24% 18 NJ
2272 BVC 14-Blue 1496 3-3 30% 14 NY
2273 Tyrants 15-Blue 1496 34-30 53% 15 CA
2274 Hot Shots 17 National 1496 25-28 46% 17 NY
2275 FVC 14-1 1496 1-2 33% 14 NY
2276 AES 10-23 1496 0-1 0% 10 CA
2277 MVA BOYs 16-S 1496 21-25 44% 16 MD
2278 WAVE 14 Justin 1495 27-25 52% 14 CA
2279 CHAVC 12-Black 1495 0-0 0% 12
2280 NWI Premier 17-Black 1495 1-1 50% 17 IA
2281 BSG 10-Navy 1495 1-2 33% 10
2282 AMV 18-Blue 1495 4-5 44% 18 WI
2283 Velocity 17-1 regional 1495 1-4 20% 17 IL
2284 ESA 16-Yellow 1495 3-4 43% 16 NV
2285 BBVC 17 1495 6-3 67% 17 CA
2286 Gigantes 17-Angel 1495 1-5 17% 17
2287 HPSTL B12-Orange 1495 21-14 60% 12 MO
2288 540 VB 12 Elite 1494 0-0 0% 12 VA
2289 Digs Boys 17-Red 1494 15-22 41% 17 NJ
2290 Club Z 14-Lanaya 1494 2-1 29% 14
2291 Boys BSVBC 18-Blue 1494 6-10 38% 18 IL
2292 SHABO 18-1 1494 11-9 55% 18 MN
2293 Eclipse Boys 15-S 1494 24-21 53% 15 CA
2294 Ultimate B16-Black 1494 21-11 66% 16 IL
2295 Vaqueros 17-M marcos 1494 5-5 50% 17 PR
2296 Quandomania Boys 17 1494 11-16 41% 17 NJ
2297 SG ELITE BOYS 13-Elite 1494 6-5 55% 13 CA
2298 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-2m 1494 7-11 39% 15 PR
2299 AZ Fear 16-Red 1494 5-6 45% 16 AZ
2300 Academy 16-E black 1494 26-34 43% 16 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.