Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2251 STL Crossfire 18-T1 1497 19-23 45% 18 MO
2252 KeAloha 14-1 rogue 1497 21-16 57% 14 IN
2253 FVC 14-1 1496 1-2 33% 14 NY
2254 Ultimate B16-Black 1496 21-11 66% 16 IL
2255 Chaos Boys 17-National 1496 5-4 56% 17 OR
2256 HEAT 14-Black 1496 6-6 50% 14 CA
2257 AES 10-23 1496 0-1 0% 10 WI
2258 Hot Shots 17 National 1496 25-28 46% 17 NY
2259 Idaho Strike 16-Black 1495 14-20 41% 16 ID
2260 Tyrants 15-Blue 1495 34-30 53% 15 CA
2261 SC Legends 16-Gold 1495 15-13 54% 16 CA
2262 HPSTL B12-Orange 1495 21-14 60% 12 MO
2263 Velocity 17-1 regional 1495 1-4 20% 17 AR
2264 Empowr 18-Gold 1495 14-14 50% 18 NC
2265 NWI Premier 17-Black 1495 1-1 50% 17 IA
2266 BVC 14-Blue 1495 3-3 30% 14 NY
2267 BSG 10-Navy 1495 1-2 33% 10
2268 Sideout 17 Jeff 1494 13-14 48% 17 NY
2269 Windy City Premier B16-2 1494 31-18 63% 16 IL
2270 Gigantes 17-Angel 1494 1-5 17% 17 FL
2271 Academy 14-Mt black 1494 3-1 75% 14 IN
2272 Battle 14-Black 1494 17-22 41% 14 VA
2273 Eclipse Boys 15-S 1494 24-21 53% 15 CA
2274 417 Boys 18 Regional 1494 5-4 56% 18 MO
2275 FIVA 18-Boys derek 1494 4-13 24% 18 FL
2276 Mintonette Sports 16-2 1493 34-36 49% 16 OH
2277 Selected 18-S carter 1493 0-0 0% 18 NV
2278 A4 Volley Boys 14-Chase 1493 10-11 48% 14 CA
2279 Rockland Volleyball Club 14-1 1493 8-5 62% 14 NY
2280 South Shore Slam 18-Lime 1493 6-14 30% 18 WI
2281 Eclipse 14-Lunar 1493 0-0 0% 14 CA
2282 Miami Diamonds 18-1 1493 13-11 54% 18 FL
2283 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 15 Ryan 1492 2-2 50% 15 UT
2284 Roots Volleyball Academy 18-1 1492 3-4 43% 18 TX
2285 OMNI 18-2 elite 1492 31-29 52% 18 CA
2286 Michigan Volleyball Academy 16-Titanium 1492 4-3 57% 16 MI
2287 MPV 14-Jana 1492 5-5 50% 14 UT
2288 Ku’e VBC 18-Pane’e 1492 4-2 67% 18 WA
2289 Club GSL 13-Sport - kristen 1492 1-1 25% 13 UT
2290 Boys BSVBC 18-Blue 1492 6-10 38% 18 IL
2291 Academy 16-E black 1492 26-34 43% 16 IN
2292 Ignite Volleyball 18 18 National Boys 1492 8-7 53% 18 CA
2293 Salt City Boys 17-S teria 1492 21-16 57% 17 UT
2294 417 Boys 18-2 1492 4-4 50% 18 MO
2295 Austin Velocity Boys 15-1 1491 13-15 46% 15 TX
2296 TNT Boys 16-Goldfinger 1491 1-4 20% 16 PA
2297 Coastal 17 Sean 1491 15-26 37% 17 VA
2298 WAVE 14-Spring clarke 1491 1-1 50% 14 CA
2299 FLAMESVC 15-1 1491 5-6 45% 15 PA
2300 Boys BSVBC 13-Black 1491 32-30 52% 13 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.