2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2251 | STL Crossfire 18-T1 | 1497 | 19-23 | 45% | 18 | MO |
| 2252 | KeAloha 14-1 rogue | 1497 | 21-16 | 57% | 14 | IN |
| 2253 | FVC 14-1 | 1496 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 2254 | Ultimate B16-Black | 1496 | 21-11 | 66% | 16 | IL |
| 2255 | Chaos Boys 17-National | 1496 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | OR |
| 2256 | HEAT 14-Black | 1496 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2257 | AES 10-23 | 1496 | 0-1 | 0% | 10 | WI |
| 2258 | Hot Shots 17 National | 1496 | 25-28 | 46% | 17 | NY |
| 2259 | Idaho Strike 16-Black | 1495 | 14-20 | 41% | 16 | ID |
| 2260 | Tyrants 15-Blue | 1495 | 34-30 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2261 | SC Legends 16-Gold | 1495 | 15-13 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 2262 | HPSTL B12-Orange | 1495 | 21-14 | 60% | 12 | MO |
| 2263 | Velocity 17-1 regional | 1495 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | AR |
| 2264 | Empowr 18-Gold | 1495 | 14-14 | 50% | 18 | NC |
| 2265 | NWI Premier 17-Black | 1495 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | IA |
| 2266 | BVC 14-Blue | 1495 | 3-3 | 30% | 14 | NY |
| 2267 | BSG 10-Navy | 1495 | 1-2 | 33% | 10 | |
| 2268 | Sideout 17 Jeff | 1494 | 13-14 | 48% | 17 | NY |
| 2269 | Windy City Premier B16-2 | 1494 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 2270 | Gigantes 17-Angel | 1494 | 1-5 | 17% | 17 | FL |
| 2271 | Academy 14-Mt black | 1494 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | IN |
| 2272 | Battle 14-Black | 1494 | 17-22 | 41% | 14 | VA |
| 2273 | Eclipse Boys 15-S | 1494 | 24-21 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2274 | 417 Boys 18 Regional | 1494 | 5-4 | 56% | 18 | MO |
| 2275 | FIVA 18-Boys derek | 1494 | 4-13 | 24% | 18 | FL |
| 2276 | Mintonette Sports 16-2 | 1493 | 34-36 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 2277 | Selected 18-S carter | 1493 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NV |
| 2278 | A4 Volley Boys 14-Chase | 1493 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 2279 | Rockland Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1493 | 8-5 | 62% | 14 | NY |
| 2280 | South Shore Slam 18-Lime | 1493 | 6-14 | 30% | 18 | WI |
| 2281 | Eclipse 14-Lunar | 1493 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 2282 | Miami Diamonds 18-1 | 1493 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | FL |
| 2283 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 15 Ryan | 1492 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | UT |
| 2284 | Roots Volleyball Academy 18-1 | 1492 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | TX |
| 2285 | OMNI 18-2 elite | 1492 | 31-29 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 2286 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 16-Titanium | 1492 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | MI |
| 2287 | MPV 14-Jana | 1492 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | UT |
| 2288 | Ku’e VBC 18-Pane’e | 1492 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | WA |
| 2289 | Club GSL 13-Sport - kristen | 1492 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | UT |
| 2290 | Boys BSVBC 18-Blue | 1492 | 6-10 | 38% | 18 | IL |
| 2291 | Academy 16-E black | 1492 | 26-34 | 43% | 16 | IN |
| 2292 | Ignite Volleyball 18 18 National Boys | 1492 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | CA |
| 2293 | Salt City Boys 17-S teria | 1492 | 21-16 | 57% | 17 | UT |
| 2294 | 417 Boys 18-2 | 1492 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | MO |
| 2295 | Austin Velocity Boys 15-1 | 1491 | 13-15 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 2296 | TNT Boys 16-Goldfinger | 1491 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | PA |
| 2297 | Coastal 17 Sean | 1491 | 15-26 | 37% | 17 | VA |
| 2298 | WAVE 14-Spring clarke | 1491 | 1-1 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2299 | FLAMESVC 15-1 | 1491 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | PA |
| 2300 | Boys BSVBC 13-Black | 1491 | 32-30 | 52% | 13 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.