Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 45 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2201 HEAT 14-Black 1504 6-6 50% 14 CA
2202 NW Jrs 18-Ua slate 1504 13-8 62% 18 WA
2203 VAQUEROS 16-M manuel 1503 10-10 50% 16 PR
2204 Orlando Gold 16-Gold dere 1503 5-8 38% 16 FL
2205 Columbia 12-Black 1503 0-0 0% 12
2206 Sideout 17 Jeff 1503 13-14 48% 17 NJ
2207 Vegas Volley Boys 14-S 1503 5-5 50% 14 NV
2208 Sol Taino 18 10 1503 4-7 36% 10 PR
2209 Boys BSVBC 13-Black 1502 32-30 52% 13 IL
2210 Alpha Omega Volleyball 16-1 1502 3-3 50% 16 MO
2211 Flight Club 14-Boys 1502 0-0 0% 14
2212 310VBC 14-Boys 1502 14-6 70% 14 CA
2213 Velocity 18-East 1502 2-3 40% 18 IL
2214 Maverick 14-Warlock 1502 5-4 56% 14 AZ
2215 WPVC Boys 15-Armour silver 1501 27-36 43% 15 FL
2216 Eden Prairie Boys 18-1 1501 4-5 44% 18 MN
2217 CA Volley 17-1 1501 13-18 42% 17 CA
2218 Manteca Flight 14-1 angela 1501 3-7 30% 14 CA
2219 Slainte 14-Platinum 1501 17-16 52% 14 CA
2220 Apex 15-Acel elite 1501 0-0 0% 15 MO
2221 OMNI 18-2 elite 1501 31-29 52% 18 CA
2222 FPVC 15-B power 1501 2-8 20% 15 CA
2223 KOKUA BOYS 18 1501 10-20 33% 18 WA
2224 Kulia 12-Ku'ualoha 1500 0-0 0% 12 HI
2225 Roots Volleyball Academy 18-1 1500 3-4 43% 18 TX
2226 Kulia 10-Gold 1500 0-0 0% 10 HI
2227 Vegas United 15-White 1500 0-0 0% 15
2228 SCVC 16-Emma 1500 5-3 63% 16 CA
2229 Lakas 18-S dm 1500 16-19 46% 18 CA
2230 AJAXVB 15-1 gold 1500 25-17 60% 15 OR
2231 Boston United Boys 18-N 1500 0-0 0% 18 MA
2232 Jammers 10-Black 1500 0-0 0% 10 HI
2233 SEVA Boys 17-Katie 1500 4-6 36% 17 NC
2234 North Shore 12 1500 0-0 0% 12 HI
2235 Mexico Vixens G16-1 1500 0-0 0% 16
2236 Star Aquila G16-1 1500 0-0 0% 16
2237 AES 10-1 boys 1500 0-0 0% 10 CA
2238 Lakas 16-Ea 1500 19-18 51% 16 CA
2239 E3 18-Eclipse 1500 11-8 58% 18 NM
2240 WVA 14-B 1500 0-0 0% 14
2241 OCVC 12-Slunks 1500 0-0 0% 12 CA
2242 BAVC 16-4 boys kevin 1500 2-3 40% 16 CA
2243 Alpha Omega Boys 18-1 1500 14-9 61% 18 MO
2244 FL Conquer 16-National boy 1500 0-0 0% 16
2245 Kulia 10-Black 1500 0-0 0% 10 HI
2246 630 Volleyball 17-3 1499 40-38 51% 17 IL
2247 Academy 14-Mt black 1499 3-1 75% 14 IN
2248 SNVF 15-Mount olympus 1499 13-25 34% 15 WA
2249 FIVA 18-Thelma 1499 3-3 50% 18 FL
2250 RAGE 16-Scott 1499 4-5 44% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.