2025-2026 Season — Page 45 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2201 | HEAT 14-Black | 1504 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2202 | NW Jrs 18-Ua slate | 1504 | 13-8 | 62% | 18 | WA |
| 2203 | VAQUEROS 16-M manuel | 1503 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | PR |
| 2204 | Orlando Gold 16-Gold dere | 1503 | 5-8 | 38% | 16 | FL |
| 2205 | Columbia 12-Black | 1503 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2206 | Sideout 17 Jeff | 1503 | 13-14 | 48% | 17 | NJ |
| 2207 | Vegas Volley Boys 14-S | 1503 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | NV |
| 2208 | Sol Taino 18 10 | 1503 | 4-7 | 36% | 10 | PR |
| 2209 | Boys BSVBC 13-Black | 1502 | 32-30 | 52% | 13 | IL |
| 2210 | Alpha Omega Volleyball 16-1 | 1502 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 2211 | Flight Club 14-Boys | 1502 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2212 | 310VBC 14-Boys | 1502 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 2213 | Velocity 18-East | 1502 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | IL |
| 2214 | Maverick 14-Warlock | 1502 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | AZ |
| 2215 | WPVC Boys 15-Armour silver | 1501 | 27-36 | 43% | 15 | FL |
| 2216 | Eden Prairie Boys 18-1 | 1501 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | MN |
| 2217 | CA Volley 17-1 | 1501 | 13-18 | 42% | 17 | CA |
| 2218 | Manteca Flight 14-1 angela | 1501 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | CA |
| 2219 | Slainte 14-Platinum | 1501 | 17-16 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 2220 | Apex 15-Acel elite | 1501 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | MO |
| 2221 | OMNI 18-2 elite | 1501 | 31-29 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 2222 | FPVC 15-B power | 1501 | 2-8 | 20% | 15 | CA |
| 2223 | KOKUA BOYS 18 | 1501 | 10-20 | 33% | 18 | WA |
| 2224 | Kulia 12-Ku'ualoha | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | HI |
| 2225 | Roots Volleyball Academy 18-1 | 1500 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | TX |
| 2226 | Kulia 10-Gold | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | HI |
| 2227 | Vegas United 15-White | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | |
| 2228 | SCVC 16-Emma | 1500 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 2229 | Lakas 18-S dm | 1500 | 16-19 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 2230 | AJAXVB 15-1 gold | 1500 | 25-17 | 60% | 15 | OR |
| 2231 | Boston United Boys 18-N | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | MA |
| 2232 | Jammers 10-Black | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | HI |
| 2233 | SEVA Boys 17-Katie | 1500 | 4-6 | 36% | 17 | NC |
| 2234 | North Shore 12 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | HI |
| 2235 | Mexico Vixens G16-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 2236 | Star Aquila G16-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 2237 | AES 10-1 boys | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | CA |
| 2238 | Lakas 16-Ea | 1500 | 19-18 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2239 | E3 18-Eclipse | 1500 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | NM |
| 2240 | WVA 14-B | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2241 | OCVC 12-Slunks | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 2242 | BAVC 16-4 boys kevin | 1500 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 2243 | Alpha Omega Boys 18-1 | 1500 | 14-9 | 61% | 18 | MO |
| 2244 | FL Conquer 16-National boy | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 2245 | Kulia 10-Black | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | HI |
| 2246 | 630 Volleyball 17-3 | 1499 | 40-38 | 51% | 17 | IL |
| 2247 | Academy 14-Mt black | 1499 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | IN |
| 2248 | SNVF 15-Mount olympus | 1499 | 13-25 | 34% | 15 | WA |
| 2249 | FIVA 18-Thelma | 1499 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | FL |
| 2250 | RAGE 16-Scott | 1499 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.