2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2151 | Bay to Bay 11-1 | 1507 | 25-45 | 36% | 11 | CA |
| 2152 | Battle 16-Red | 1506 | 31-32 | 49% | 16 | VA |
| 2153 | Train Up Sports Volleyball Academy 18 18B-TUSVA Nationals (GE) | 1506 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | NJ |
| 2154 | GSA Boys 18 | 1506 | 14-16 | 47% | 18 | NJ |
| 2155 | Epic B14-Adidas | 1506 | 15-17 | 47% | 14 | WI |
| 2156 | MVC 16-Red | 1506 | 21-32 | 40% | 16 | AZ |
| 2157 | 315 VC 18 NY | 1506 | 5-4 | 36% | 18 | NY |
| 2158 | BAVC 15-2 boys | 1505 | 24-33 | 42% | 15 | CA |
| 2159 | Dynasty Boys 18-Black | 1505 | 12-17 | 41% | 18 | KS |
| 2160 | WAVE 14 Justin | 1505 | 27-25 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 2161 | Velocity B16-Red | 1505 | 15-21 | 42% | 16 | IL |
| 2162 | NYC Impact Volleyball Club 15-National | 1505 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | NJ |
| 2163 | AMV 18-Blue | 1505 | 10-9 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 2164 | MTA 15-B | 1505 | 4-10 | 29% | 15 | IL |
| 2165 | Aloha 18-1 gold | 1505 | 29-25 | 54% | 18 | CA |
| 2166 | Premier Volleyball 17 Premier Nova (CH) | 1505 | 7-14 | 33% | 17 | DE |
| 2167 | NW Jrs 18-Ua slate | 1505 | 13-8 | 62% | 18 | WA |
| 2168 | Panther Boys 17-1 | 1504 | 6-8 | 43% | 17 | CO |
| 2169 | Neis M 13-1 | 1504 | 1-0 | 100% | 13 | HI |
| 2170 | LVC 12-Blue | 1504 | 4-4 | 44% | 12 | NY |
| 2171 | WPVC Boys 15-Armour silver | 1503 | 27-36 | 43% | 15 | FL |
| 2172 | E3 18-Eclipse | 1503 | 11-8 | 58% | 18 | NM |
| 2173 | Orlando Gold 16-Gold dere | 1503 | 5-8 | 38% | 16 | FL |
| 2174 | A2 14 Scarlet | 1503 | 12-10 | 55% | 14 | OH |
| 2175 | Ignite 14-National boys | 1503 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 2176 | Valley Volleyball Academy 17-2 | 1503 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 2177 | KOKUA BOYS 18 | 1503 | 10-20 | 33% | 18 | WA |
| 2178 | CCVBC 14-2 | 1503 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | WI |
| 2179 | VUVC B18-WHITE | 1503 | 11-16 | 41% | 18 | NV |
| 2180 | Centennial Iowa Galaxy 15-1 | 1503 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | IA |
| 2181 | Lakas 18-S dm | 1503 | 16-19 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 2182 | Flight Club 14-Boys | 1502 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 2183 | Boston United Boys 14-1 | 1502 | 19-17 | 53% | 14 | MA |
| 2184 | Buckeye Volleyball Club 17-Premier | 1502 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | OH |
| 2185 | PRV 16-Boys | 1502 | 17-19 | 43% | 16 | SC |
| 2186 | MVP Academy BOS 18-Blue | 1502 | 22-25 | 47% | 18 | MA |
| 2187 | PREVA 17-Carlos | 1502 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | PR |
| 2188 | 540 VB 18-Boys | 1502 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | VA |
| 2189 | Lakas 16-Ea | 1502 | 19-18 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2190 | Velocity 18-East | 1502 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | IL |
| 2191 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 13 Ali | 1502 | 1-2 | 25% | 13 | UT |
| 2192 | Lakas 15-S nd | 1501 | 28-34 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 2193 | Bravo Athletics Volleyball Club 17-Blade | 1501 | 14-11 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 2194 | FRVBC 18-2 | 1501 | 13-13 | 50% | 18 | CO |
| 2195 | Corn Palace Area Club 18-Onyx | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | SD |
| 2196 | NYC Volleyball Academy 17-Downtown | 1500 | 26-15 | 63% | 17 | NY |
| 2197 | TNT Volleyball 17-Jared | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | PA |
| 2198 | Gigasa Elite 16-Black | 1500 | 11-17 | 39% | 16 | NJ |
| 2199 | A5 Volleyball Club 18-National | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | GA |
| 2200 | Tier 10 17-Blade | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.