Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2151 ProPlay 14 Terry 1510 18-11 62% 14 CA
2152 Titan Premier 18 Darryll 1510 15-7 68% 18 CA
2153 GSA Boys 18 1510 14-16 47% 18 NJ
2154 MAULOA PIKAKE 12 1510 2-1 50% 12
2155 BBVCL 12-2 1509 3-3 50% 12
2156 GJ 14-Elite 1509 3-2 60% 14 FL
2157 Boston United Boys 18-1 1509 17-19 47% 18 MA
2158 TVC 17-1 1509 1-1 50% 17 AZ
2159 Centennial Iowa Galaxy 14-1 1509 1-1 50% 14
2160 Ocean Bay 16-Waves 1509 26-25 51% 16 FL
2161 MOVA UA 12-Grey 1509 0-0 0% 12 MO
2162 Bravo 17-Blade 1509 14-11 56% 17 KY
2163 Meraki VB 16-1 1508 14-19 42% 16 NH
2164 Dynasty Boys 18-Black 1508 12-17 41% 18 KS
2165 MT NW Boys 18 1508 4-3 57% 18
2166 TOVC 17-Warriors mulero 1508 2-7 22% 17 PR
2167 MOVA UA 12-Black 1508 0-0 0% 12 MO
2168 315 VC 18 NY 1508 5-4 36% 18 NY
2169 Golden State 13-Black 1508 18-17 51% 13 CA
2170 Bay Area Eagles 16-U jhunel 1508 2-3 40% 16 CA
2171 True North B 16-Green 1508 10-9 53% 16
2172 PalShore 18-2 1508 6-4 60% 18 MI
2173 Legacy Boys 15 Elite 1508 31-31 50% 15 MI
2174 Tool City 18-Yellow 1508 1-4 20% 18 PA
2175 LHS BVB 18-2 1507 2-2 50% 18
2176 PRV 16-Boys 1506 17-19 43% 16 SC
2177 MVC 16-Red 1506 21-32 40% 16 AZ
2178 Epic B14-Adidas 1506 15-17 47% 14 WI
2179 Velocity B16-Red 1506 15-21 42% 16 IL
2180 LVC 12-Blue 1506 4-4 44% 12 NY
2181 BAVC 15-2 boys 1506 24-33 42% 15 CA
2182 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Grn 1506 6-5 50% 14 NY
2183 Urban Volleyball 14-Abel 1505 2-4 33% 14 TX
2184 KVA 10-Kelley 1505 2-2 50% 10
2185 STL Crossfire 18-T1 1505 19-23 45% 18 MO
2186 A5 Boys 14 Bradley 1505 2-2 50% 14 GA
2187 Annapolis 15-1 1505 0-0 0% 15 MD
2188 Battle 16-Red 1505 31-32 49% 16 VA
2189 Golden State 14-Black 1505 5-5 50% 14 CA
2190 CCVBC 14-2 1504 7-5 58% 14 CA
2191 MTA 15-B 1504 4-10 29% 15 IL
2192 FRVBC 17-2 1504 19-15 56% 17 CO
2193 Aloha 18-1 gold 1504 29-25 54% 18 CA
2194 DCVC 14-National 1504 2-2 50% 14 IA
2195 SAND BOYS 18-Black 1504 14-8 64% 18 CA
2196 GSL 17-Elite - alan 1504 5-11 31% 17 UT
2197 Pulse 16 Shelby 1504 18-19 49% 16 CA
2198 Neis M 13-1 1504 1-0 100% 13
2199 Palatine 18-Grey 1504 7-9 44% 18 IL
2200 LHV Boys 14-1 premier 1504 26-26 49% 14 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.