2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2151 | ProPlay 14 Terry | 1510 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 2152 | Titan Premier 18 Darryll | 1510 | 15-7 | 68% | 18 | CA |
| 2153 | GSA Boys 18 | 1510 | 14-16 | 47% | 18 | NJ |
| 2154 | MAULOA PIKAKE 12 | 1510 | 2-1 | 50% | 12 | |
| 2155 | BBVCL 12-2 | 1509 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | |
| 2156 | GJ 14-Elite | 1509 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 2157 | Boston United Boys 18-1 | 1509 | 17-19 | 47% | 18 | MA |
| 2158 | TVC 17-1 | 1509 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | AZ |
| 2159 | Centennial Iowa Galaxy 14-1 | 1509 | 1-1 | 50% | 14 | |
| 2160 | Ocean Bay 16-Waves | 1509 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | FL |
| 2161 | MOVA UA 12-Grey | 1509 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 2162 | Bravo 17-Blade | 1509 | 14-11 | 56% | 17 | KY |
| 2163 | Meraki VB 16-1 | 1508 | 14-19 | 42% | 16 | NH |
| 2164 | Dynasty Boys 18-Black | 1508 | 12-17 | 41% | 18 | KS |
| 2165 | MT NW Boys 18 | 1508 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | |
| 2166 | TOVC 17-Warriors mulero | 1508 | 2-7 | 22% | 17 | PR |
| 2167 | MOVA UA 12-Black | 1508 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 2168 | 315 VC 18 NY | 1508 | 5-4 | 36% | 18 | NY |
| 2169 | Golden State 13-Black | 1508 | 18-17 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 2170 | Bay Area Eagles 16-U jhunel | 1508 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 2171 | True North B 16-Green | 1508 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | |
| 2172 | PalShore 18-2 | 1508 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | MI |
| 2173 | Legacy Boys 15 Elite | 1508 | 31-31 | 50% | 15 | MI |
| 2174 | Tool City 18-Yellow | 1508 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | PA |
| 2175 | LHS BVB 18-2 | 1507 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | |
| 2176 | PRV 16-Boys | 1506 | 17-19 | 43% | 16 | SC |
| 2177 | MVC 16-Red | 1506 | 21-32 | 40% | 16 | AZ |
| 2178 | Epic B14-Adidas | 1506 | 15-17 | 47% | 14 | WI |
| 2179 | Velocity B16-Red | 1506 | 15-21 | 42% | 16 | IL |
| 2180 | LVC 12-Blue | 1506 | 4-4 | 44% | 12 | NY |
| 2181 | BAVC 15-2 boys | 1506 | 24-33 | 42% | 15 | CA |
| 2182 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Grn | 1506 | 6-5 | 50% | 14 | NY |
| 2183 | Urban Volleyball 14-Abel | 1505 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | TX |
| 2184 | KVA 10-Kelley | 1505 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | |
| 2185 | STL Crossfire 18-T1 | 1505 | 19-23 | 45% | 18 | MO |
| 2186 | A5 Boys 14 Bradley | 1505 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | GA |
| 2187 | Annapolis 15-1 | 1505 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | MD |
| 2188 | Battle 16-Red | 1505 | 31-32 | 49% | 16 | VA |
| 2189 | Golden State 14-Black | 1505 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2190 | CCVBC 14-2 | 1504 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 2191 | MTA 15-B | 1504 | 4-10 | 29% | 15 | IL |
| 2192 | FRVBC 17-2 | 1504 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | CO |
| 2193 | Aloha 18-1 gold | 1504 | 29-25 | 54% | 18 | CA |
| 2194 | DCVC 14-National | 1504 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 2195 | SAND BOYS 18-Black | 1504 | 14-8 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 2196 | GSL 17-Elite - alan | 1504 | 5-11 | 31% | 17 | UT |
| 2197 | Pulse 16 Shelby | 1504 | 18-19 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 2198 | Neis M 13-1 | 1504 | 1-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 2199 | Palatine 18-Grey | 1504 | 7-9 | 44% | 18 | IL |
| 2200 | LHV Boys 14-1 premier | 1504 | 26-26 | 49% | 14 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.