Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2151 Bay to Bay 11-1 1507 25-45 36% 11 CA
2152 Battle 16-Red 1506 31-32 49% 16 VA
2153 Train Up Sports Volleyball Academy 18 18B-TUSVA Nationals (GE) 1506 10-6 63% 18 NJ
2154 GSA Boys 18 1506 14-16 47% 18 NJ
2155 Epic B14-Adidas 1506 15-17 47% 14 WI
2156 MVC 16-Red 1506 21-32 40% 16 AZ
2157 315 VC 18 NY 1506 5-4 36% 18 NY
2158 BAVC 15-2 boys 1505 24-33 42% 15 CA
2159 Dynasty Boys 18-Black 1505 12-17 41% 18 KS
2160 WAVE 14 Justin 1505 27-25 52% 14 CA
2161 Velocity B16-Red 1505 15-21 42% 16 IL
2162 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 15-National 1505 6-4 60% 15 NJ
2163 AMV 18-Blue 1505 10-9 53% 18 FL
2164 MTA 15-B 1505 4-10 29% 15 IL
2165 Aloha 18-1 gold 1505 29-25 54% 18 CA
2166 Premier Volleyball 17 Premier Nova (CH) 1505 7-14 33% 17 DE
2167 NW Jrs 18-Ua slate 1505 13-8 62% 18 WA
2168 Panther Boys 17-1 1504 6-8 43% 17 CO
2169 Neis M 13-1 1504 1-0 100% 13 HI
2170 LVC 12-Blue 1504 4-4 44% 12 NY
2171 WPVC Boys 15-Armour silver 1503 27-36 43% 15 FL
2172 E3 18-Eclipse 1503 11-8 58% 18 NM
2173 Orlando Gold 16-Gold dere 1503 5-8 38% 16 FL
2174 A2 14 Scarlet 1503 12-10 55% 14 OH
2175 Ignite 14-National boys 1503 6-5 55% 14 CA
2176 Valley Volleyball Academy 17-2 1503 3-3 50% 17 CA
2177 KOKUA BOYS 18 1503 10-20 33% 18 WA
2178 CCVBC 14-2 1503 7-5 58% 14 WI
2179 VUVC B18-WHITE 1503 11-16 41% 18 NV
2180 Centennial Iowa Galaxy 15-1 1503 2-2 50% 15 IA
2181 Lakas 18-S dm 1503 16-19 46% 18 CA
2182 Flight Club 14-Boys 1502 0-0 0% 14 CA
2183 Boston United Boys 14-1 1502 19-17 53% 14 MA
2184 Buckeye Volleyball Club 17-Premier 1502 4-3 57% 17 OH
2185 PRV 16-Boys 1502 17-19 43% 16 SC
2186 MVP Academy BOS 18-Blue 1502 22-25 47% 18 MA
2187 PREVA 17-Carlos 1502 5-5 50% 17 PR
2188 540 VB 18-Boys 1502 2-5 29% 18 VA
2189 Lakas 16-Ea 1502 19-18 51% 16 CA
2190 Velocity 18-East 1502 2-3 40% 18 IL
2191 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 13 Ali 1502 1-2 25% 13 UT
2192 Lakas 15-S nd 1501 28-34 45% 15 CA
2193 Bravo Athletics Volleyball Club 17-Blade 1501 14-11 56% 17 CA
2194 FRVBC 18-2 1501 13-13 50% 18 CO
2195 Corn Palace Area Club 18-Onyx 1500 0-0 0% 18 SD
2196 NYC Volleyball Academy 17-Downtown 1500 26-15 63% 17 NY
2197 TNT Volleyball 17-Jared 1500 0-0 0% 17 PA
2198 Gigasa Elite 16-Black 1500 11-17 39% 16 NJ
2199 A5 Volleyball Club 18-National 1500 0-0 0% 18 GA
2200 Tier 10 17-Blade 1500 0-0 0% 17 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.