2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2101 | Utah Mojo 17 National | 1511 | 15-19 | 42% | 17 | UT |
| 2102 | Salt City Boys 15-S trey | 1511 | 19-20 | 49% | 15 | UT |
| 2103 | CVHS Boys VB Club 18-1 | 1511 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | GA |
| 2104 | C2 Attack 14-1 regional | 1511 | 12-9 | 57% | 14 | TN |
| 2105 | ProPlay 14 Terry | 1511 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 2106 | FLAMESVC 16-1 | 1511 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | PA |
| 2107 | Tstreet 16-Cesira | 1511 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 2108 | Academy 16-Mt midnight | 1511 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | IN |
| 2109 | Wasatch 17-1 | 1511 | 18-11 | 62% | 17 | UT |
| 2110 | A4 Volley Boys 18-Garry | 1511 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 2111 | High Flyers 16-Red | 1511 | 13-26 | 33% | 16 | NE |
| 2112 | 674 Manati 16-2 m tati | 1511 | 1-2 | 33% | 16 | PR |
| 2113 | Iowa Vibe 14-North boys | 1511 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | IA |
| 2114 | PalShore 18-2 | 1510 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | SC |
| 2115 | Bravo 15-Gambit | 1510 | 9-4 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 2116 | Apex 15-Acel elite | 1510 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | BC |
| 2117 | Miami United 17-Jimmy | 1510 | 24-15 | 62% | 17 | FL |
| 2118 | True North B 16-Green | 1510 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | MO |
| 2119 | Salt City Boys 16 Whitney | 1510 | 16-19 | 46% | 16 | UT |
| 2120 | MVP FL 15-Black | 1510 | 4-6 | 40% | 15 | FL |
| 2121 | MAULOA PIKAKE 12 | 1510 | 2-1 | 50% | 12 | HI |
| 2122 | TVC 17-1 | 1510 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | AZ |
| 2123 | Tool City 18-Yellow | 1509 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | PA |
| 2124 | MOVA UA 12-Grey | 1509 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 2125 | Golden State 16-Black | 1509 | 26-26 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2126 | IDVB 18-Reg | keyden | 1509 | 9-4 | 69% | 18 | MI |
| 2127 | SG Elite 12 Elite | 1509 | 18-21 | 46% | 12 | CA |
| 2128 | Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Brian | 1509 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | AZ |
| 2129 | GJ 14-Elite | 1509 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 2130 | Centennial Iowa Galaxy 14-1 | 1509 | 1-1 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 2131 | TOVC 17-Warriors mulero | 1509 | 2-7 | 22% | 17 | PR |
| 2132 | Slainte 14-Platinum | 1508 | 17-16 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 2133 | Ocean Bay 16-Waves | 1508 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | FL |
| 2134 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Grn | 1508 | 6-5 | 50% | 14 | NY |
| 2135 | Fox Valley Performance 15 B15u Regional (BG) (11) | 1508 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | WI |
| 2136 | Bay Area Eagles 16-U jhunel | 1508 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 2137 | Durham Attack VBC 15 Durham Attack Extreme | 1508 | 1-3 | 25% | 15 | PA |
| 2138 | SG Elite 14 Select | 1508 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 2139 | Nova Volleyball Club 18 | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | PA |
| 2140 | Titan Premier 18 Darryll | 1508 | 15-7 | 68% | 18 | CA |
| 2141 | SMBC Shack 18 Molten | 1507 | 2-30 | 6% | 18 | CA |
| 2142 | LHS BVB 18-2 | 1507 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | GA |
| 2143 | A5 Boys 14 Bradley | 1507 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | GA |
| 2144 | Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 17 Athletics APEX | 1507 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | |
| 2145 | WSA Gators 16-Elite boys | 1507 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | FL |
| 2146 | Urban Volleyball 14-Abel | 1507 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 2147 | WAVE 17 Evan | 1507 | 13-12 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 2148 | 310VBC 14-Boys | 1507 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 2149 | Spike Milwaukee 15-Pam | 1507 | 29-27 | 52% | 15 | WI |
| 2150 | Golden State 14-Black | 1507 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.