Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2101 Utah Mojo 17 National 1511 15-19 42% 17 UT
2102 Salt City Boys 15-S trey 1511 19-20 49% 15 UT
2103 CVHS Boys VB Club 18-1 1511 0-0 0% 18 GA
2104 C2 Attack 14-1 regional 1511 12-9 57% 14 TN
2105 ProPlay 14 Terry 1511 18-11 62% 14 CA
2106 FLAMESVC 16-1 1511 6-7 46% 16 PA
2107 Tstreet 16-Cesira 1511 3-2 60% 16 CA
2108 Academy 16-Mt midnight 1511 10-4 71% 16 IN
2109 Wasatch 17-1 1511 18-11 62% 17 UT
2110 A4 Volley Boys 18-Garry 1511 0-0 0% 18 CA
2111 High Flyers 16-Red 1511 13-26 33% 16 NE
2112 674 Manati 16-2 m tati 1511 1-2 33% 16 PR
2113 Iowa Vibe 14-North boys 1511 0-0 0% 14 IA
2114 PalShore 18-2 1510 6-4 60% 18 SC
2115 Bravo 15-Gambit 1510 9-4 69% 15 CA
2116 Apex 15-Acel elite 1510 0-0 0% 15 BC
2117 Miami United 17-Jimmy 1510 24-15 62% 17 FL
2118 True North B 16-Green 1510 10-9 53% 16 MO
2119 Salt City Boys 16 Whitney 1510 16-19 46% 16 UT
2120 MVP FL 15-Black 1510 4-6 40% 15 FL
2121 MAULOA PIKAKE 12 1510 2-1 50% 12 HI
2122 TVC 17-1 1510 1-1 50% 17 AZ
2123 Tool City 18-Yellow 1509 1-4 20% 18 PA
2124 MOVA UA 12-Grey 1509 0-0 0% 12 MO
2125 Golden State 16-Black 1509 26-26 50% 16 CA
2126 IDVB 18-Reg | keyden 1509 9-4 69% 18 MI
2127 SG Elite 12 Elite 1509 18-21 46% 12 CA
2128 Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Brian 1509 8-4 67% 14 AZ
2129 GJ 14-Elite 1509 3-2 60% 14 FL
2130 Centennial Iowa Galaxy 14-1 1509 1-1 50% 14 IA
2131 TOVC 17-Warriors mulero 1509 2-7 22% 17 PR
2132 Slainte 14-Platinum 1508 17-16 52% 14 CA
2133 Ocean Bay 16-Waves 1508 26-25 51% 16 FL
2134 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Grn 1508 6-5 50% 14 NY
2135 Fox Valley Performance 15 B15u Regional (BG) (11) 1508 1-2 33% 15 WI
2136 Bay Area Eagles 16-U jhunel 1508 2-3 40% 16 CA
2137 Durham Attack VBC 15 Durham Attack Extreme 1508 1-3 25% 15 PA
2138 SG Elite 14 Select 1508 15-6 71% 14 CA
2139 Nova Volleyball Club 18 1508 2-2 50% 18 PA
2140 Titan Premier 18 Darryll 1508 15-7 68% 18 CA
2141 SMBC Shack 18 Molten 1507 2-30 6% 18 CA
2142 LHS BVB 18-2 1507 2-2 50% 18 GA
2143 A5 Boys 14 Bradley 1507 2-2 50% 14 GA
2144 Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 17 Athletics APEX 1507 2-3 40% 17
2145 WSA Gators 16-Elite boys 1507 2-2 50% 16 FL
2146 Urban Volleyball 14-Abel 1507 2-4 33% 14 CA
2147 WAVE 17 Evan 1507 13-12 52% 17 CA
2148 310VBC 14-Boys 1507 14-6 70% 14 CA
2149 Spike Milwaukee 15-Pam 1507 29-27 52% 15 WI
2150 Golden State 14-Black 1507 5-5 50% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.