2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2101 | BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1m | 1515 | 5-5 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 2102 | PRVA 17-1 | 1514 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 2103 | BSG 10-White | 1514 | 1-1 | 25% | 10 | |
| 2104 | NLVC 18 Meliodas | 1514 | 41-33 | 55% | 18 | TX |
| 2105 | Train Up VB 17-1 | 1514 | 2-2 | 50% | 17 | NJ |
| 2106 | OVC 18-2 | 1514 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | VA |
| 2107 | NF 14-Cobalt | 1514 | 14-23 | 37% | 14 | NY |
| 2108 | FPVC 14-Ren angelo | 1514 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 2109 | FVP 17 Dustin | 1514 | 5-4 | 56% | all | WI |
| 2110 | HPSTL B13-White | 1513 | 19-17 | 51% | 13 | MO |
| 2111 | SLAM 16-1 boys | 1513 | 12-39 | 24% | 16 | MA |
| 2112 | Inferno 16-2 select | 1513 | 17-24 | 41% | 16 | WI |
| 2113 | WSA Gators 16-Elite boys | 1513 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | FL |
| 2114 | APEX1 18-A1BLACK | 1513 | 5-4 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 2115 | IDVB 18-Reg | keyden | 1513 | 9-4 | 69% | 18 | ID |
| 2116 | KODA 17 Select | 1513 | 6-10 | 30% | 17 | NY |
| 2117 | Vegas United B 18-White | 1513 | 11-16 | 41% | 18 | NV |
| 2118 | BAVC 16-3 boys | 1513 | 17-13 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 2119 | RVA 14-1 | 1513 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 2120 | Madtown 11-1 select | 1513 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 2121 | Academy 15-Mt white | 1513 | 8-6 | 57% | 15 | IN |
| 2122 | Miami United 17-Jimmy | 1512 | 24-15 | 62% | 17 | FL |
| 2123 | 380 Devil Dogs VB 18-Alpha | 1512 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | |
| 2124 | MVP FL 15-Black | 1512 | 4-6 | 40% | 15 | |
| 2125 | WPVC Boys 16-Elite orange | 1512 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | FL |
| 2126 | Hive 15 Gold | 1512 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | UT |
| 2127 | FLAMESVC 16-1 | 1512 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | TX |
| 2128 | Urban VAC 17-1 | 1512 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | |
| 2129 | CCVA 16 Power | 1512 | 10-12 | 45% | 16 | CA |
| 2130 | C2 Attack 14-1 regional | 1512 | 12-9 | 57% | 14 | TN |
| 2131 | Pu'uki 16-Boys | 1512 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | HI |
| 2132 | SG Elite 14 Select | 1512 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 2133 | CITY 14-S | 1512 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | NY |
| 2134 | Academy 16-Mt midnight | 1511 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | IN |
| 2135 | High Flyers 16-Red | 1511 | 13-26 | 33% | 16 | NE |
| 2136 | Tstreet 16-Cesira | 1511 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | |
| 2137 | Boys JVBC 16-S | 1511 | 4-8 | 33% | 16 | NJ |
| 2138 | Iowa Vibe 14-North boys | 1511 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2139 | Urban VAC 14-1 | 1511 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2140 | purple storm 14-2 | 1511 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | |
| 2141 | LI Fury 17-1 | 1511 | 16-20 | 44% | 17 | NY |
| 2142 | Bravo 15-Gambit | 1511 | 9-4 | 69% | 15 | KY |
| 2143 | AMS Cobras 13 | 1511 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | |
| 2144 | Northern Lights 15-1 boys | 1511 | 20-24 | 45% | 15 | MN |
| 2145 | JM 12 Navy | 1511 | 1-1 | 25% | 12 | |
| 2146 | CVHS Boys VB Club 18-1 | 1511 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 2147 | Salt City Boys 15-S trey | 1510 | 7-7 | 50% | 15 | UT |
| 2148 | Lakas 15-S nd | 1510 | 28-34 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 2149 | ProPlay 14 Terry | 1510 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 2150 | GSA Boys 18 | 1510 | 14-16 | 47% | 18 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.