Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2101 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1m 1515 5-5 50% 10 PR
2102 PRVA 17-1 1514 3-4 43% 17 CA
2103 BSG 10-White 1514 1-1 25% 10
2104 NLVC 18 Meliodas 1514 41-33 55% 18 TX
2105 Train Up VB 17-1 1514 2-2 50% 17 NJ
2106 OVC 18-2 1514 3-4 43% 18 VA
2107 NF 14-Cobalt 1514 14-23 37% 14 NY
2108 FPVC 14-Ren angelo 1514 2-4 33% 14 CA
2109 FVP 17 Dustin 1514 5-4 56% all WI
2110 HPSTL B13-White 1513 19-17 51% 13 MO
2111 SLAM 16-1 boys 1513 12-39 24% 16 MA
2112 Inferno 16-2 select 1513 17-24 41% 16 WI
2113 WSA Gators 16-Elite boys 1513 2-2 50% 16 FL
2114 APEX1 18-A1BLACK 1513 5-4 56% 18 CA
2115 IDVB 18-Reg | keyden 1513 9-4 69% 18 ID
2116 KODA 17 Select 1513 6-10 30% 17 NY
2117 Vegas United B 18-White 1513 11-16 41% 18 NV
2118 BAVC 16-3 boys 1513 17-13 57% 16 CA
2119 RVA 14-1 1513 2-2 50% 14 AZ
2120 Madtown 11-1 select 1513 0-0 0% 11
2121 Academy 15-Mt white 1513 8-6 57% 15 IN
2122 Miami United 17-Jimmy 1512 24-15 62% 17 FL
2123 380 Devil Dogs VB 18-Alpha 1512 3-2 60% 18
2124 MVP FL 15-Black 1512 4-6 40% 15
2125 WPVC Boys 16-Elite orange 1512 7-15 32% 16 FL
2126 Hive 15 Gold 1512 3-5 38% 15 UT
2127 FLAMESVC 16-1 1512 6-7 46% 16 TX
2128 Urban VAC 17-1 1512 3-4 43% 17
2129 CCVA 16 Power 1512 10-12 45% 16 CA
2130 C2 Attack 14-1 regional 1512 12-9 57% 14 TN
2131 Pu'uki 16-Boys 1512 7-6 54% 16 HI
2132 SG Elite 14 Select 1512 15-6 71% 14 CA
2133 CITY 14-S 1512 5-4 56% 14 NY
2134 Academy 16-Mt midnight 1511 10-4 71% 16 IN
2135 High Flyers 16-Red 1511 13-26 33% 16 NE
2136 Tstreet 16-Cesira 1511 3-2 60% 16
2137 Boys JVBC 16-S 1511 4-8 33% 16 NJ
2138 Iowa Vibe 14-North boys 1511 0-0 0% 14
2139 Urban VAC 14-1 1511 0-0 0% 14
2140 purple storm 14-2 1511 2-1 50% 14
2141 LI Fury 17-1 1511 16-20 44% 17 NY
2142 Bravo 15-Gambit 1511 9-4 69% 15 KY
2143 AMS Cobras 13 1511 2-3 40% 13
2144 Northern Lights 15-1 boys 1511 20-24 45% 15 MN
2145 JM 12 Navy 1511 1-1 25% 12
2146 CVHS Boys VB Club 18-1 1511 0-0 0% 18
2147 Salt City Boys 15-S trey 1510 7-7 50% 15 UT
2148 Lakas 15-S nd 1510 28-34 45% 15 CA
2149 ProPlay 14 Terry 1510 18-11 62% 14 CA
2150 GSA Boys 18 1510 14-16 47% 18 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.