Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2051 Delaware Juniors 16-A 1516 10-10 43% 16 PA
2052 MVP BOS 17-Black 1516 21-37 36% 17 MA
2053 OCR 18 Gold 1516 19-13 59% 18 CA
2054 Forza 16-Black 1516 2-3 33% 16 PA
2055 SLAM 16-1 boys 1515 12-39 24% 16 MA
2056 FRVBC 17-2 1515 19-15 56% 17 CO
2057 Urban VAC 14-1 1515 0-0 0% 14 CA
2058 FPVC 14-Ren angelo 1515 2-4 33% 14 CA
2059 STL Crossfire 18-T2 1515 23-29 44% 18 MO
2060 CITY 14-S 1515 5-4 56% 14 NY
2061 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1m 1515 5-5 50% 10 PR
2062 Sidewinder 17-3 1515 6-14 30% 17 AZ
2063 Meraki VB 16-1 1515 14-19 42% 16 NH
2064 CJVA Boys 14-Black 1515 14-13 52% 14 NJ
2065 Prodigy VA Boys 18-1 prem 1515 8-11 42% 18 NJ
2066 BBVCL 12-2 1514 3-3 50% 12 NV
2067 Urban VAC 17-1 1514 3-4 43% 17 CA
2068 Academy 15-Mt white 1514 8-6 57% 15 IN
2069 Sanger 16 1514 22-20 52% 16 CA
2070 No Panic 14-Boys 1514 37-37 49% 14 VA
2071 WPVC Boys 16-Elite orange 1514 7-15 32% 16 FL
2072 Hot Shots 16 National 1513 25-20 53% 16 NY
2073 SF Elite 18 Roschelle 1513 21-17 55% 18 CA
2074 Golden State 13-Black 1513 18-17 51% 13 CA
2075 Inferno 16-2 select 1513 17-24 41% 16 WI
2076 Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Monte 1513 8-4 67% 14 AZ
2077 NLVC 18 Meliodas 1513 41-33 55% 18 CT
2078 Northeast 16-3 1513 5-3 63% 16 CT
2079 MPV 14-Elite boys 1513 3-2 38% 14 UT
2080 Tyrants 14-Blue 1513 3-7 30% 14 CA
2081 Boston United Boys 18-1 1513 17-19 47% 18 MA
2082 Northern Lights 15-1 boys 1513 20-24 45% 15 MN
2083 AMS Cobras 13 1513 2-3 40% 13 CA
2084 Boys JVBC 16-S 1512 4-8 33% 16 NJ
2085 MILTON EDGE 16 Milton Edge Shock (CA) 1512 2-3 40% 16
2086 Upper Bucks 18-1 1512 2-2 50% 18 PA
2087 BAVC 16-3 boys 1512 17-13 57% 16 CA
2088 CCVA 16 Power 1512 10-12 45% 16 CA
2089 Maverick 14-Warlock 1512 5-4 56% 14 AZ
2090 Pulse 16 Shelby 1512 18-19 49% 16 CA
2091 MiElite 14-Black 1512 8-5 62% 14 MI
2092 MT NW Boys 18 1512 4-3 57% 18 MT
2093 LHV Boys 14-1 premier 1512 26-26 49% 14 MA
2094 Vipers Volleyball Club 16-National 1512 1-7 13% 16 FL
2095 Legacy Boys 15 Elite 1512 31-31 50% 15 MI
2096 BAE 16-1 jhunel 1512 25-24 51% 16 CA
2097 Pu'uki 16-Boys 1512 7-6 54% 16 HI
2098 HPSTL B13-White 1512 19-17 51% 13 MO
2099 Vaqueros 17-M marcos 1511 5-5 50% 17 PR
2100 FLAMESVC 16-1 1511 6-7 46% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.