2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2051 | CCVA 18 Premier | 1521 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 2052 | True North Volleyball Academy 16-2 | 1521 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | MO |
| 2053 | AZ Fear 16-White | 1521 | 7-12 | 37% | 16 | AZ |
| 2054 | Rockwood 10-Black boys | 1521 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 2055 | Princeton 18-Black boys | 1521 | 7-6 | 54% | 18 | NJ |
| 2056 | Island Heat 17-1 | 1520 | 7-10 | 41% | 17 | |
| 2057 | Aspire 16 Fury | 1520 | 5-14 | 26% | 16 | AZ |
| 2058 | SCVC 18-Jarrett | 1520 | 10-7 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 2059 | CCVA 15-Aldaco | 1520 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 2060 | CJVA Boys 14-Black | 1520 | 14-13 | 52% | 14 | NJ |
| 2061 | HVA 14-Boys eaglecanes | 1520 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | FL |
| 2062 | Colorado Elite VBC 12 | 1520 | 3-3 | 43% | 12 | CO |
| 2063 | PREVA 12-Jose r | 1519 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | PR |
| 2064 | VEVA Boys 18-Blue | 1519 | 23-24 | 48% | 18 | PA |
| 2065 | Bay to Bay 11-1 | 1519 | 25-45 | 36% | 11 | CA |
| 2066 | Golden State 16-Black | 1519 | 26-26 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2067 | Golden State 15-Black | 1519 | 28-25 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2068 | Tool City 14-Orange | 1519 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | PA |
| 2069 | Roanoke United 14-Boys | 1519 | 11-11 | 50% | 14 | VA |
| 2070 | SMV 18-1 | 1518 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | AZ |
| 2071 | Seaside 15-Black | 1518 | 27-24 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2072 | Prodigy VA Boys 18-1 prem | 1518 | 8-11 | 42% | 18 | NJ |
| 2073 | SA Empire 17-Boys legacy | 1518 | 22-20 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 2074 | MVC 17-Red | 1518 | 19-38 | 33% | 17 | AZ |
| 2075 | Delaware Juniors 16-A | 1518 | 10-10 | 43% | 16 | DE |
| 2076 | Diablo 16-1 black | 1518 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 2077 | Colorado Elite VBC 16 | 1518 | 8-3 | 67% | 16 | CO |
| 2078 | Big Island Boys 14 | 1518 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | HI |
| 2079 | Ocean Bay 12-Surf | 1517 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 2080 | Forza 16-Black | 1517 | 2-3 | 33% | 16 | IL |
| 2081 | SCVC 17-Gio | 1517 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 2082 | FriscoBay 16-1 | 1517 | 13-9 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 2083 | STL Crossfire 18-T2 | 1517 | 23-29 | 44% | 18 | MO |
| 2084 | Ohana 17-Regional | 1517 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | IA |
| 2085 | Sting 10 Bumblebees | 1517 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | WI |
| 2086 | Skyline Volleyball Club 14-Boys | 1517 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 2087 | FPVC 14-B ren | 1517 | 16-19 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 2088 | A4 Volley Boys 18-Garry | 1516 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 2089 | The HBC 14-Black | 1516 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 2090 | APEX1 14-A1BLACK | 1516 | 18-10 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 2091 | CVC 18-1 | 1516 | 32-34 | 48% | 18 | OH |
| 2092 | A-10 Boys 17-Gray | 1516 | 30-20 | 60% | 17 | PA |
| 2093 | Pipeline 15-1 | 1516 | 16-54 | 23% | 15 | IL |
| 2094 | Hot Shots 16 National | 1516 | 25-20 | 53% | 16 | NY |
| 2095 | SG Elite 12 Elite | 1516 | 18-21 | 46% | 12 | CA |
| 2096 | Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mccripsy | 1516 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | WA |
| 2097 | SF Elite 18 Roschelle | 1515 | 21-17 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 2098 | BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1m | 1515 | 5-5 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 2099 | GSA 18-Larissa | 1515 | 17-17 | 50% | 18 | NJ |
| 2100 | Husky 16.2 | 1515 | 19-15 | 56% | 16 | CT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.