Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2051 CCVA 18 Premier 1521 14-6 70% 18 CA
2052 True North Volleyball Academy 16-2 1521 5-3 63% 16 MO
2053 AZ Fear 16-White 1521 7-12 37% 16 AZ
2054 Rockwood 10-Black boys 1521 0-0 0% 10
2055 Princeton 18-Black boys 1521 7-6 54% 18 NJ
2056 Island Heat 17-1 1520 7-10 41% 17
2057 Aspire 16 Fury 1520 5-14 26% 16 AZ
2058 SCVC 18-Jarrett 1520 10-7 59% 18 CA
2059 CCVA 15-Aldaco 1520 6-9 40% 15 CA
2060 CJVA Boys 14-Black 1520 14-13 52% 14 NJ
2061 HVA 14-Boys eaglecanes 1520 7-2 78% 14 FL
2062 Colorado Elite VBC 12 1520 3-3 43% 12 CO
2063 PREVA 12-Jose r 1519 5-4 56% 12 PR
2064 VEVA Boys 18-Blue 1519 23-24 48% 18 PA
2065 Bay to Bay 11-1 1519 25-45 36% 11 CA
2066 Golden State 16-Black 1519 26-26 50% 16 CA
2067 Golden State 15-Black 1519 28-25 53% 15 CA
2068 Tool City 14-Orange 1519 6-5 55% 14 PA
2069 Roanoke United 14-Boys 1519 11-11 50% 14 VA
2070 SMV 18-1 1518 5-10 33% 18 AZ
2071 Seaside 15-Black 1518 27-24 53% 15 CA
2072 Prodigy VA Boys 18-1 prem 1518 8-11 42% 18 NJ
2073 SA Empire 17-Boys legacy 1518 22-20 52% 17 TX
2074 MVC 17-Red 1518 19-38 33% 17 AZ
2075 Delaware Juniors 16-A 1518 10-10 43% 16 DE
2076 Diablo 16-1 black 1518 2-3 40% 16 CA
2077 Colorado Elite VBC 16 1518 8-3 67% 16 CO
2078 Big Island Boys 14 1518 2-3 40% 14 HI
2079 Ocean Bay 12-Surf 1517 7-6 54% 12 FL
2080 Forza 16-Black 1517 2-3 33% 16 IL
2081 SCVC 17-Gio 1517 5-3 63% 17 CA
2082 FriscoBay 16-1 1517 13-9 59% 16 CA
2083 STL Crossfire 18-T2 1517 23-29 44% 18 MO
2084 Ohana 17-Regional 1517 1-1 50% 17 IA
2085 Sting 10 Bumblebees 1517 0-0 0% 10 WI
2086 Skyline Volleyball Club 14-Boys 1517 0-0 0% 14
2087 FPVC 14-B ren 1517 16-19 46% 14 CA
2088 A4 Volley Boys 18-Garry 1516 0-0 0% 18 CA
2089 The HBC 14-Black 1516 0-0 0% 14 CA
2090 APEX1 14-A1BLACK 1516 18-10 64% 14 CA
2091 CVC 18-1 1516 32-34 48% 18 OH
2092 A-10 Boys 17-Gray 1516 30-20 60% 17 PA
2093 Pipeline 15-1 1516 16-54 23% 15 IL
2094 Hot Shots 16 National 1516 25-20 53% 16 NY
2095 SG Elite 12 Elite 1516 18-21 46% 12 CA
2096 Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mccripsy 1516 3-2 60% 16 WA
2097 SF Elite 18 Roschelle 1515 21-17 55% 18 CA
2098 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1m 1515 5-5 50% 10 PR
2099 GSA 18-Larissa 1515 17-17 50% 18 NJ
2100 Husky 16.2 1515 19-15 56% 16 CT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.