2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2051 | Delaware Juniors 16-A | 1516 | 10-10 | 43% | 16 | PA |
| 2052 | MVP BOS 17-Black | 1516 | 21-37 | 36% | 17 | MA |
| 2053 | OCR 18 Gold | 1516 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 2054 | Forza 16-Black | 1516 | 2-3 | 33% | 16 | PA |
| 2055 | SLAM 16-1 boys | 1515 | 12-39 | 24% | 16 | MA |
| 2056 | FRVBC 17-2 | 1515 | 19-15 | 56% | 17 | CO |
| 2057 | Urban VAC 14-1 | 1515 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 2058 | FPVC 14-Ren angelo | 1515 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 2059 | STL Crossfire 18-T2 | 1515 | 23-29 | 44% | 18 | MO |
| 2060 | CITY 14-S | 1515 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | NY |
| 2061 | BORINQUEN COQUI 10-1m | 1515 | 5-5 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 2062 | Sidewinder 17-3 | 1515 | 6-14 | 30% | 17 | AZ |
| 2063 | Meraki VB 16-1 | 1515 | 14-19 | 42% | 16 | NH |
| 2064 | CJVA Boys 14-Black | 1515 | 14-13 | 52% | 14 | NJ |
| 2065 | Prodigy VA Boys 18-1 prem | 1515 | 8-11 | 42% | 18 | NJ |
| 2066 | BBVCL 12-2 | 1514 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | NV |
| 2067 | Urban VAC 17-1 | 1514 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 2068 | Academy 15-Mt white | 1514 | 8-6 | 57% | 15 | IN |
| 2069 | Sanger 16 | 1514 | 22-20 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2070 | No Panic 14-Boys | 1514 | 37-37 | 49% | 14 | VA |
| 2071 | WPVC Boys 16-Elite orange | 1514 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | FL |
| 2072 | Hot Shots 16 National | 1513 | 25-20 | 53% | 16 | NY |
| 2073 | SF Elite 18 Roschelle | 1513 | 21-17 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 2074 | Golden State 13-Black | 1513 | 18-17 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 2075 | Inferno 16-2 select | 1513 | 17-24 | 41% | 16 | WI |
| 2076 | Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Monte | 1513 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | AZ |
| 2077 | NLVC 18 Meliodas | 1513 | 41-33 | 55% | 18 | CT |
| 2078 | Northeast 16-3 | 1513 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | CT |
| 2079 | MPV 14-Elite boys | 1513 | 3-2 | 38% | 14 | UT |
| 2080 | Tyrants 14-Blue | 1513 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | CA |
| 2081 | Boston United Boys 18-1 | 1513 | 17-19 | 47% | 18 | MA |
| 2082 | Northern Lights 15-1 boys | 1513 | 20-24 | 45% | 15 | MN |
| 2083 | AMS Cobras 13 | 1513 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | CA |
| 2084 | Boys JVBC 16-S | 1512 | 4-8 | 33% | 16 | NJ |
| 2085 | MILTON EDGE 16 Milton Edge Shock (CA) | 1512 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | |
| 2086 | Upper Bucks 18-1 | 1512 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | PA |
| 2087 | BAVC 16-3 boys | 1512 | 17-13 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 2088 | CCVA 16 Power | 1512 | 10-12 | 45% | 16 | CA |
| 2089 | Maverick 14-Warlock | 1512 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | AZ |
| 2090 | Pulse 16 Shelby | 1512 | 18-19 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 2091 | MiElite 14-Black | 1512 | 8-5 | 62% | 14 | MI |
| 2092 | MT NW Boys 18 | 1512 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | MT |
| 2093 | LHV Boys 14-1 premier | 1512 | 26-26 | 49% | 14 | MA |
| 2094 | Vipers Volleyball Club 16-National | 1512 | 1-7 | 13% | 16 | FL |
| 2095 | Legacy Boys 15 Elite | 1512 | 31-31 | 50% | 15 | MI |
| 2096 | BAE 16-1 jhunel | 1512 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2097 | Pu'uki 16-Boys | 1512 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | HI |
| 2098 | HPSTL B13-White | 1512 | 19-17 | 51% | 13 | MO |
| 2099 | Vaqueros 17-M marcos | 1511 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | PR |
| 2100 | FLAMESVC 16-1 | 1511 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.