Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2001 CBVC 14-Black 1523 2-4 33% 14 CA
2002 MCVC 16 1523 18-32 36% 16 MA
2003 South County 16-Sarah boys 1522 5-3 63% 16 UT
2004 Club GSL 16-Elite - ashlyn/easton 1522 2-1 50% 16 UT
2005 Midwest Intensity VBC 12U 1522 0-0 0% 12 MO
2006 NF 14-Cobalt 1522 14-23 37% 14 NY
2007 949 B13-Black 1522 25-33 43% 13 CA
2008 Seaside 15-Black 1522 27-24 53% 15 CA
2009 JAX SKYLINE 14-B royal 1522 6-5 55% 14 FL
2010 Tool City 16-Orange 1522 5-6 45% 16 PA
2011 FIVA 18-Boys thelma 1521 3-2 60% 18 FL
2012 MVP Boys 17 Silver 1521 41-27 60% 17 WI
2013 RVC BYDL 14-Alvin 1521 9-6 60% 14
2014 VEVA Boys 18-Blue 1521 23-24 48% 18 PA
2015 Vegas Volley Boys 14-S 1521 5-5 50% 14 NV
2016 Golden State 15-Black 1521 28-25 53% 15 CA
2017 Allatoona High School 18-1 1521 0-0 0% 18 GA
2018 Rockwood 10-Black boys 1521 0-0 0% 10 MO
2019 AZ Fear 16-White 1520 7-12 37% 16 AZ
2020 Kaizen Boys 15-Black 1520 26-26 50% 15 OK
2021 Pipeline 15-1 1520 16-54 23% 15 IL
2022 CCVA 18 Premier 1520 14-6 70% 18 CA
2023 HVA 14-Boys eaglecanes 1520 7-2 78% 14 FL
2024 Island Heat 17-1 1520 7-10 41% 17 FL
2025 SCVC 12-Kimball 1520 7-9 44% 12 UT
2026 FPVC 14-B ren 1520 16-19 46% 14 CA
2027 SF Elite 16 Neil 1520 26-22 54% 16 CA
2028 Core 15 National 1520 25-36 41% 15 CA
2029 Aspire 16 Fury 1519 5-14 26% 16 AZ
2030 SA Empire 17-Boys legacy 1519 22-20 52% 17 TX
2031 AES 10-1 boys 1519 0-0 0% 10 WI
2032 PREVA 12-Jose r 1519 5-4 56% 12 PR
2033 South Mountain Velocity 18-1 1518 5-10 33% 18 AZ
2034 MVC 17-Red 1518 19-38 33% 17 AZ
2035 Colorado Elite VBC 16 1518 8-3 67% 16 CO
2036 Sol Taino Volleyball Club 18 Sol Taino Volleyball Club 1518 3-4 43% 18 PR
2037 Sidewinder 16-2 1518 12-19 39% 16 AZ
2038 Diablo 16-1 black 1518 2-3 40% 16 CA
2039 Valley Volleyball Academy 18-3 1518 4-2 67% 18 CA
2040 A-10 Boys 17-Gray 1518 30-20 60% 17 PA
2041 Big Island Boys 14 1518 2-3 40% 14 HI
2042 APEX1 18-A1BLACK 1518 5-4 56% 18 CA
2043 Ocean Bay 12-Surf 1517 7-6 54% 12 FL
2044 417 Missouri Juniors 17-Red 1517 2-6 25% 17 MO
2045 CVC 18-1 1517 32-34 48% 18 OH
2046 FriscoBay 16-1 1517 13-9 59% 16 CA
2047 Skyline Volleyball Club 14-Boys 1517 0-0 0% 14 AZ
2048 Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mccripsy 1516 3-2 60% 16 WA
2049 MVP BOS 17-Black 1516 21-37 36% 17 MA
2050 OCR 18 Gold 1516 19-13 59% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.