Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2001 Mamba 15-Black 1526 32-44 42% 15 WI
2002 BAE 16-1 jhunel 1526 25-24 51% 16 CA
2003 Husky 15.1 1526 13-12 52% 15 CT
2004 COELB 12-1 1526 3-5 38% 12 CO
2005 Molten 12-Black 1526 23-15 61% 12 AZ
2006 Mamba 16-Purple 1526 35-42 45% 16 WI
2007 Westside 15-Green 1526 8-5 62% 15 CA
2008 PA ELITE 15-National 1525 5-9 36% 15 PA
2009 Pipeline 16-Black 1525 33-22 60% 16 IL
2010 AJV Boys 18 adidas 1525 14-41 25% 18 TX
2011 AJV Boys 15 adidas 1525 27-31 47% 15 TX
2012 Boys Panther 16-Red 1525 4-3 57% 16 CO
2013 TNT Boys 17-Firestorm 1525 2-3 40% 17 PA
2014 FVC 16-1 1525 3-2 60% 16 NY
2015 BAVC 17-2 allan 1525 0-0 0% 17
2016 KOKUA BOYS 16-BLACK 1524 9-11 45% 16 WA
2017 Midwest Intensity VBC 12U 1524 0-0 0% 12
2018 AZ Fear 14-White 1524 6-6 50% 14 AZ
2019 South County 16-Sarah boys 1524 5-3 63% 16 RI
2020 Absolute Zero BVC 18-Rankine 1524 3-2 60% 18 WA
2021 HO'OPA 12 1524 3-3 43% 12
2022 RVC BYDL 14-Alvin 1524 9-6 60% 14 VA
2023 InnovativeVC 17-1 rossy 1524 6-11 35% 17 PR
2024 SF Elite 14 Ella 1524 28-27 51% 14 CA
2025 Hot Shots 15 National 1524 25-25 48% 15 NY
2026 Roch PaceBootleggr 15-Blue 1523 11-11 46% 15 NY
2027 Momentum 17-Yellow 1523 31-31 50% 17 OH
2028 LBVC 18-Blue 1523 5-2 56% 18 CA
2029 Big Wave Riders 15 1523 0-0 0% 15
2030 674 Manati 16-2 m tati 1523 1-2 33% 16 PR
2031 EXILE East 17-5 1523 3-7 30% 17 PA
2032 Centennial Iowa Galaxy 15-1 1523 2-2 50% 15
2033 SPVB 16-Delta 1523 37-23 62% 16 IL
2034 FIVA 18-Boys thelma 1523 3-2 60% 18 FL
2035 Apex NW 17-Ascent 1523 10-9 53% 17 WA
2036 Storm 18-S 1523 6-4 60% 18 MN
2037 Club GSL 13-Sport - kristen 1523 1-1 25% 13 UT
2038 949 B13-Black 1522 25-33 43% 13 CA
2039 MVP Boys 17 Silver 1522 41-27 60% 17 TX
2040 Epic United 17-Red 1522 20-31 39% 17 IN
2041 Sidewinder 16-2 1522 12-19 39% 16 AZ
2042 XVP 16-Elite boys 1522 10-8 56% 16 NC
2043 KODA 17-Crown 1522 9-4 53% 17 NY
2044 JAX SKYLINE 14-B royal 1522 6-5 55% 14 FL
2045 RUSH 18-Black 1522 6-17 26% 18 AZ
2046 South County Juniors Boys 16-Blue 1521 11-29 28% 16 RI
2047 A2 14 Scarlet 1521 12-10 55% 14 OH
2048 Kaizen Boys 15-Black 1521 26-26 50% 15 OK
2049 AZ Fear 16-White 1521 7-12 37% 16 AZ
2050 Crown City 17 Kings 1521 16-18 47% 17 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.