2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Mamba 15-Black | 1526 | 32-44 | 42% | 15 | WI |
| 2002 | BAE 16-1 jhunel | 1526 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2003 | Husky 15.1 | 1526 | 13-12 | 52% | 15 | CT |
| 2004 | COELB 12-1 | 1526 | 3-5 | 38% | 12 | CO |
| 2005 | Molten 12-Black | 1526 | 23-15 | 61% | 12 | AZ |
| 2006 | Mamba 16-Purple | 1526 | 35-42 | 45% | 16 | WI |
| 2007 | Westside 15-Green | 1526 | 8-5 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 2008 | PA ELITE 15-National | 1525 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | PA |
| 2009 | Pipeline 16-Black | 1525 | 33-22 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 2010 | AJV Boys 18 adidas | 1525 | 14-41 | 25% | 18 | TX |
| 2011 | AJV Boys 15 adidas | 1525 | 27-31 | 47% | 15 | TX |
| 2012 | Boys Panther 16-Red | 1525 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | CO |
| 2013 | TNT Boys 17-Firestorm | 1525 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | PA |
| 2014 | FVC 16-1 | 1525 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | NY |
| 2015 | BAVC 17-2 allan | 1525 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | |
| 2016 | KOKUA BOYS 16-BLACK | 1524 | 9-11 | 45% | 16 | WA |
| 2017 | Midwest Intensity VBC 12U | 1524 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2018 | AZ Fear 14-White | 1524 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 2019 | South County 16-Sarah boys | 1524 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | RI |
| 2020 | Absolute Zero BVC 18-Rankine | 1524 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | WA |
| 2021 | HO'OPA 12 | 1524 | 3-3 | 43% | 12 | |
| 2022 | RVC BYDL 14-Alvin | 1524 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | VA |
| 2023 | InnovativeVC 17-1 rossy | 1524 | 6-11 | 35% | 17 | PR |
| 2024 | SF Elite 14 Ella | 1524 | 28-27 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 2025 | Hot Shots 15 National | 1524 | 25-25 | 48% | 15 | NY |
| 2026 | Roch PaceBootleggr 15-Blue | 1523 | 11-11 | 46% | 15 | NY |
| 2027 | Momentum 17-Yellow | 1523 | 31-31 | 50% | 17 | OH |
| 2028 | LBVC 18-Blue | 1523 | 5-2 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 2029 | Big Wave Riders 15 | 1523 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | |
| 2030 | 674 Manati 16-2 m tati | 1523 | 1-2 | 33% | 16 | PR |
| 2031 | EXILE East 17-5 | 1523 | 3-7 | 30% | 17 | PA |
| 2032 | Centennial Iowa Galaxy 15-1 | 1523 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | |
| 2033 | SPVB 16-Delta | 1523 | 37-23 | 62% | 16 | IL |
| 2034 | FIVA 18-Boys thelma | 1523 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | FL |
| 2035 | Apex NW 17-Ascent | 1523 | 10-9 | 53% | 17 | WA |
| 2036 | Storm 18-S | 1523 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | MN |
| 2037 | Club GSL 13-Sport - kristen | 1523 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | UT |
| 2038 | 949 B13-Black | 1522 | 25-33 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 2039 | MVP Boys 17 Silver | 1522 | 41-27 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 2040 | Epic United 17-Red | 1522 | 20-31 | 39% | 17 | IN |
| 2041 | Sidewinder 16-2 | 1522 | 12-19 | 39% | 16 | AZ |
| 2042 | XVP 16-Elite boys | 1522 | 10-8 | 56% | 16 | NC |
| 2043 | KODA 17-Crown | 1522 | 9-4 | 53% | 17 | NY |
| 2044 | JAX SKYLINE 14-B royal | 1522 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 2045 | RUSH 18-Black | 1522 | 6-17 | 26% | 18 | AZ |
| 2046 | South County Juniors Boys 16-Blue | 1521 | 11-29 | 28% | 16 | RI |
| 2047 | A2 14 Scarlet | 1521 | 12-10 | 55% | 14 | OH |
| 2048 | Kaizen Boys 15-Black | 1521 | 26-26 | 50% | 15 | OK |
| 2049 | AZ Fear 16-White | 1521 | 7-12 | 37% | 16 | AZ |
| 2050 | Crown City 17 Kings | 1521 | 16-18 | 47% | 17 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.