2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | CBVC 14-Black | 1523 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 2002 | MCVC 16 | 1523 | 18-32 | 36% | 16 | MA |
| 2003 | South County 16-Sarah boys | 1522 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | UT |
| 2004 | Club GSL 16-Elite - ashlyn/easton | 1522 | 2-1 | 50% | 16 | UT |
| 2005 | Midwest Intensity VBC 12U | 1522 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 2006 | NF 14-Cobalt | 1522 | 14-23 | 37% | 14 | NY |
| 2007 | 949 B13-Black | 1522 | 25-33 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 2008 | Seaside 15-Black | 1522 | 27-24 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2009 | JAX SKYLINE 14-B royal | 1522 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 2010 | Tool City 16-Orange | 1522 | 5-6 | 45% | 16 | PA |
| 2011 | FIVA 18-Boys thelma | 1521 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | FL |
| 2012 | MVP Boys 17 Silver | 1521 | 41-27 | 60% | 17 | WI |
| 2013 | RVC BYDL 14-Alvin | 1521 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | |
| 2014 | VEVA Boys 18-Blue | 1521 | 23-24 | 48% | 18 | PA |
| 2015 | Vegas Volley Boys 14-S | 1521 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | NV |
| 2016 | Golden State 15-Black | 1521 | 28-25 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2017 | Allatoona High School 18-1 | 1521 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | GA |
| 2018 | Rockwood 10-Black boys | 1521 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | MO |
| 2019 | AZ Fear 16-White | 1520 | 7-12 | 37% | 16 | AZ |
| 2020 | Kaizen Boys 15-Black | 1520 | 26-26 | 50% | 15 | OK |
| 2021 | Pipeline 15-1 | 1520 | 16-54 | 23% | 15 | IL |
| 2022 | CCVA 18 Premier | 1520 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 2023 | HVA 14-Boys eaglecanes | 1520 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | FL |
| 2024 | Island Heat 17-1 | 1520 | 7-10 | 41% | 17 | FL |
| 2025 | SCVC 12-Kimball | 1520 | 7-9 | 44% | 12 | UT |
| 2026 | FPVC 14-B ren | 1520 | 16-19 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 2027 | SF Elite 16 Neil | 1520 | 26-22 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 2028 | Core 15 National | 1520 | 25-36 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 2029 | Aspire 16 Fury | 1519 | 5-14 | 26% | 16 | AZ |
| 2030 | SA Empire 17-Boys legacy | 1519 | 22-20 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 2031 | AES 10-1 boys | 1519 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | WI |
| 2032 | PREVA 12-Jose r | 1519 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | PR |
| 2033 | South Mountain Velocity 18-1 | 1518 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | AZ |
| 2034 | MVC 17-Red | 1518 | 19-38 | 33% | 17 | AZ |
| 2035 | Colorado Elite VBC 16 | 1518 | 8-3 | 67% | 16 | CO |
| 2036 | Sol Taino Volleyball Club 18 Sol Taino Volleyball Club | 1518 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | PR |
| 2037 | Sidewinder 16-2 | 1518 | 12-19 | 39% | 16 | AZ |
| 2038 | Diablo 16-1 black | 1518 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 2039 | Valley Volleyball Academy 18-3 | 1518 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | CA |
| 2040 | A-10 Boys 17-Gray | 1518 | 30-20 | 60% | 17 | PA |
| 2041 | Big Island Boys 14 | 1518 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | HI |
| 2042 | APEX1 18-A1BLACK | 1518 | 5-4 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 2043 | Ocean Bay 12-Surf | 1517 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 2044 | 417 Missouri Juniors 17-Red | 1517 | 2-6 | 25% | 17 | MO |
| 2045 | CVC 18-1 | 1517 | 32-34 | 48% | 18 | OH |
| 2046 | FriscoBay 16-1 | 1517 | 13-9 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 2047 | Skyline Volleyball Club 14-Boys | 1517 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | AZ |
| 2048 | Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mccripsy | 1516 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | WA |
| 2049 | MVP BOS 17-Black | 1516 | 21-37 | 36% | 17 | MA |
| 2050 | OCR 18 Gold | 1516 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.