Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2601 HICVB 18-1 1460 3-25 11% 18 UT
2602 Colorado Elite Boys 18 1460 21-14 60% 18 CO
2603 Synergy Boys 16-Atlas 1459 6-26 19% 16 PA
2604 Texas Forge 18U 1459 3-4 43% 18 TX
2605 Point Break Volleyball Club 17-Nick 1459 8-8 50% 17 CA
2606 Northern Lights 17-2 boys 1459 24-23 51% 17 MN
2607 SVC 17 Boys 1459 7-14 33% 17 GA
2608 Raining Hot 12 1458 1-2 33% 12 UT
2609 Mamba 18-Purple 1458 31-46 40% 18 WI
2610 MN Select Boys 18-Gray 1458 21-17 55% 18 MN
2611 Vibe Boys 18-Dom 1458 4-5 40% 18 VT
2612 Buckeye Volleyball Club 15-Premier 1458 0-0 0% 15 OH
2613 Cap City 17-White 1458 12-16 39% 17 PA
2614 RCVA 17-East coast black 1458 20-31 39% 17 VA
2615 Buckeye Boys 14-Red 1458 19-14 58% 14 OH
2616 NE Storm 17 Landslide 1458 21-25 46% 17 MA
2617 Inferno 17-2 select 1457 17-21 45% 17 WI
2618 Spanish Fork 16 1457 6-8 43% 16 UT
2619 Aloha VBC 15-1 1457 4-4 50% 15 CA
2620 C-burg 18-Gray 1457 0-2 0% 18 PA
2621 CA Volley 17-Spring 1457 0-0 0% 17 CA
2622 Phoenix 16 Boss 1457 16-21 43% 16 OH
2623 AZ Fear 14-Red 1457 5-7 42% 14 AZ
2624 Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Pink 1457 2-3 40% 16 IA
2625 Boston United Boys 16-Select 1 1457 17-20 46% 16 MA
2626 Gallant 16-White 1457 1-4 20% 16 CA
2627 Aspire 14 Rocket 1456 20-18 53% 14 AZ
2628 TI Elite 17-1 1456 17-33 34% 17 IN
2629 Brandywine Volleyball Club 16 BVC Brawlers (CH) 1456 2-3 40% 16 DE
2630 UNION B17-Green 1456 26-30 46% 17 IN
2631 Pipeline 17-2 1456 16-50 24% 17 IL
2632 Lions Boys 13-1 1456 9-5 60% 13 IL
2633 PEVA Boys 14 Elite 1456 18-17 51% 14 PA
2634 Church&Dodge 17-1 1456 9-10 47% 17 IL
2635 Cinci Attack 13-Red 1456 13-12 52% 13 OH
2636 Five Starz 14-Black 1456 2-3 40% 14 CA
2637 Alliance 18-S tempo 1456 18-15 50% 18 MA
2638 Boys BSVBC 12-Black 1455 17-16 52% 12 IL
2639 UVC 14-Damon/farhad 1455 8-7 53% 14 CA
2640 OD VOLLEYBALL 14 OD Red (GL) (5) 1455 2-2 50% 14 IL
2641 Lomanview 12-Noris 1455 2-3 40% 12 PR
2642 UNION B14-Green 1455 23-30 43% 14 IN
2643 Piedmont Volleyball Club 17-Downtown 1455 1-6 14% 17 NC
2644 Carolina ICE 16-1 1455 18-25 42% 16 SC
2645 Aloha 16-1 gold 1454 24-27 47% 16 CA
2646 EndMo Boys 18-1 1454 10-9 48% 18 PA
2647 Pulse 15-Luke 1454 6-8 43% 15 CA
2648 Hi Bred VBC 14 Elite 1454 7-6 54% 14 HI
2649 VOLTAGE 17-1 1454 6-10 38% 17 CO
2650 Club W 14-Black 1454 17-16 52% 14 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.