2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2601 | Flight Academy 14 | 1464 | 12-20 | 38% | 14 | OH |
| 2602 | GSL 17-Elite - jackson | 1464 | 7-15 | 32% | 17 | UT |
| 2603 | Send Me 17-Fabio | 1464 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | AL |
| 2604 | Vaqueros 12-M mario | 1463 | 7-11 | 39% | 12 | PR |
| 2605 | TORRI 17-2 wicho | 1463 | 12-7 | 63% | 17 | PR |
| 2606 | SC Legends 17-Nike | 1463 | 16-14 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 2607 | GSJ 16-B coast | 1463 | 9-12 | 43% | 16 | SC |
| 2608 | BAVC 17-3 elizabeth | 1463 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 2609 | EXCEL 12-White | 1463 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 2610 | Husky 18.3 | 1463 | 19-19 | 50% | 18 | CT |
| 2611 | PEAK 12-1 boys | 1463 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2612 | Mentor Volley 15-1 | 1463 | 5-27 | 16% | 15 | CA |
| 2613 | Tribe 18-B premier cardinal | 1462 | 13-22 | 37% | 18 | FL |
| 2614 | DIGS Boys 15-Red | 1462 | 9-9 | 50% | 15 | NJ |
| 2615 | RCVA 17-East coast black | 1462 | 20-31 | 39% | 17 | VA |
| 2616 | Cangrejeras 18-Boys | 1462 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | PR |
| 2617 | GVG 15-Guayacanes ata | 1462 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | PR |
| 2618 | RVC Boom 17 | 1462 | 12-13 | 48% | 17 | |
| 2619 | Empire 14-Blue | 1462 | 14-19 | 42% | 14 | KS |
| 2620 | Lions Boys 14 | 1462 | 9-5 | 64% | 14 | IL |
| 2621 | PI'OPI'O BEARS 12 | 1462 | 2-1 | 50% | 12 | |
| 2622 | CNVKC Mizuno Boys 14-1 | 1461 | 4-8 | 33% | 14 | MO |
| 2623 | CYVB 17-1 | 1461 | 14-10 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 2624 | South Elite 17-Carlos | 1461 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | PR |
| 2625 | LVC 13-Black | 1461 | 1-2 | 25% | 13 | NY |
| 2626 | Summit Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1461 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | MO |
| 2627 | BAVC 18-3 boys andy | 1461 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | CA |
| 2628 | Tstreet SN 18-Dana [boys] | 1461 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | NV |
| 2629 | 949 B12-Black | 1461 | 11-17 | 39% | 12 | CA |
| 2630 | I AM VBC 11-Red | 1461 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | WI |
| 2631 | Pulse 15-Luke | 1461 | 6-8 | 43% | 15 | MI |
| 2632 | Church&Dodge 17-1 | 1460 | 9-10 | 47% | 17 | IL |
| 2633 | A4 Volley Boys 16-Garry | 1460 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2634 | EXILE East 14 | 1460 | 7-11 | 39% | 14 | PA |
| 2635 | MVP Boys 15-Blue | 1460 | 36-40 | 47% | 15 | TX |
| 2636 | SVC 17 Boys | 1460 | 7-14 | 33% | 17 | GA |
| 2637 | Aspire 16 Loki | 1460 | 3-16 | 16% | 16 | AZ |
| 2638 | Ignite 18-National boys | 1459 | 0-9 | 0% | 18 | AZ |
| 2639 | Team Rockstar 17 Jo | 1459 | 5-9 | 36% | 17 | CA |
| 2640 | UNION B14-Green | 1459 | 23-30 | 43% | 14 | IN |
| 2641 | NE Storm 17 Landslide | 1459 | 21-25 | 46% | 17 | MA |
| 2642 | No Panic 17-Boys | 1459 | 28-25 | 51% | 17 | VA |
| 2643 | Texas Forge 18U | 1459 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | TX |
| 2644 | Club 1 B 14-Skronkstrong | 1459 | 23-25 | 48% | 14 | IL |
| 2645 | Cinci Attack 13-Red | 1458 | 13-12 | 52% | 13 | OH |
| 2646 | TI Elite 17-1 | 1458 | 17-33 | 34% | 17 | IN |
| 2647 | NF 18 Crimson | 1458 | 13-22 | 33% | 18 | NY |
| 2648 | Gallant 16-White | 1458 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | |
| 2649 | Next Level 15-Boys | 1458 | 1-3 | 25% | 15 | MN |
| 2650 | Barrie Elites 18-1 - blizzard | 1458 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.