2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2601 | HICVB 18-1 | 1460 | 3-25 | 11% | 18 | UT |
| 2602 | Colorado Elite Boys 18 | 1460 | 21-14 | 60% | 18 | CO |
| 2603 | Synergy Boys 16-Atlas | 1459 | 6-26 | 19% | 16 | PA |
| 2604 | Texas Forge 18U | 1459 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | TX |
| 2605 | Point Break Volleyball Club 17-Nick | 1459 | 8-8 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 2606 | Northern Lights 17-2 boys | 1459 | 24-23 | 51% | 17 | MN |
| 2607 | SVC 17 Boys | 1459 | 7-14 | 33% | 17 | GA |
| 2608 | Raining Hot 12 | 1458 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | UT |
| 2609 | Mamba 18-Purple | 1458 | 31-46 | 40% | 18 | WI |
| 2610 | MN Select Boys 18-Gray | 1458 | 21-17 | 55% | 18 | MN |
| 2611 | Vibe Boys 18-Dom | 1458 | 4-5 | 40% | 18 | VT |
| 2612 | Buckeye Volleyball Club 15-Premier | 1458 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | OH |
| 2613 | Cap City 17-White | 1458 | 12-16 | 39% | 17 | PA |
| 2614 | RCVA 17-East coast black | 1458 | 20-31 | 39% | 17 | VA |
| 2615 | Buckeye Boys 14-Red | 1458 | 19-14 | 58% | 14 | OH |
| 2616 | NE Storm 17 Landslide | 1458 | 21-25 | 46% | 17 | MA |
| 2617 | Inferno 17-2 select | 1457 | 17-21 | 45% | 17 | WI |
| 2618 | Spanish Fork 16 | 1457 | 6-8 | 43% | 16 | UT |
| 2619 | Aloha VBC 15-1 | 1457 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 2620 | C-burg 18-Gray | 1457 | 0-2 | 0% | 18 | PA |
| 2621 | CA Volley 17-Spring | 1457 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2622 | Phoenix 16 Boss | 1457 | 16-21 | 43% | 16 | OH |
| 2623 | AZ Fear 14-Red | 1457 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 2624 | Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Pink | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | IA |
| 2625 | Boston United Boys 16-Select 1 | 1457 | 17-20 | 46% | 16 | MA |
| 2626 | Gallant 16-White | 1457 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | CA |
| 2627 | Aspire 14 Rocket | 1456 | 20-18 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 2628 | TI Elite 17-1 | 1456 | 17-33 | 34% | 17 | IN |
| 2629 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 16 BVC Brawlers (CH) | 1456 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | DE |
| 2630 | UNION B17-Green | 1456 | 26-30 | 46% | 17 | IN |
| 2631 | Pipeline 17-2 | 1456 | 16-50 | 24% | 17 | IL |
| 2632 | Lions Boys 13-1 | 1456 | 9-5 | 60% | 13 | IL |
| 2633 | PEVA Boys 14 Elite | 1456 | 18-17 | 51% | 14 | PA |
| 2634 | Church&Dodge 17-1 | 1456 | 9-10 | 47% | 17 | IL |
| 2635 | Cinci Attack 13-Red | 1456 | 13-12 | 52% | 13 | OH |
| 2636 | Five Starz 14-Black | 1456 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 2637 | Alliance 18-S tempo | 1456 | 18-15 | 50% | 18 | MA |
| 2638 | Boys BSVBC 12-Black | 1455 | 17-16 | 52% | 12 | IL |
| 2639 | UVC 14-Damon/farhad | 1455 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 2640 | OD VOLLEYBALL 14 OD Red (GL) (5) | 1455 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 2641 | Lomanview 12-Noris | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | PR |
| 2642 | UNION B14-Green | 1455 | 23-30 | 43% | 14 | IN |
| 2643 | Piedmont Volleyball Club 17-Downtown | 1455 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | NC |
| 2644 | Carolina ICE 16-1 | 1455 | 18-25 | 42% | 16 | SC |
| 2645 | Aloha 16-1 gold | 1454 | 24-27 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 2646 | EndMo Boys 18-1 | 1454 | 10-9 | 48% | 18 | PA |
| 2647 | Pulse 15-Luke | 1454 | 6-8 | 43% | 15 | CA |
| 2648 | Hi Bred VBC 14 Elite | 1454 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | HI |
| 2649 | VOLTAGE 17-1 | 1454 | 6-10 | 38% | 17 | CO |
| 2650 | Club W 14-Black | 1454 | 17-16 | 52% | 14 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.