Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2601 Flight Academy 14 1464 12-20 38% 14 OH
2602 GSL 17-Elite - jackson 1464 7-15 32% 17 UT
2603 Send Me 17-Fabio 1464 2-3 40% 17 AL
2604 Vaqueros 12-M mario 1463 7-11 39% 12 PR
2605 TORRI 17-2 wicho 1463 12-7 63% 17 PR
2606 SC Legends 17-Nike 1463 16-14 53% 17 CA
2607 GSJ 16-B coast 1463 9-12 43% 16 SC
2608 BAVC 17-3 elizabeth 1463 3-2 60% 17 CA
2609 EXCEL 12-White 1463 2-3 40% 12 TX
2610 Husky 18.3 1463 19-19 50% 18 CT
2611 PEAK 12-1 boys 1463 0-0 0% 12
2612 Mentor Volley 15-1 1463 5-27 16% 15 CA
2613 Tribe 18-B premier cardinal 1462 13-22 37% 18 FL
2614 DIGS Boys 15-Red 1462 9-9 50% 15 NJ
2615 RCVA 17-East coast black 1462 20-31 39% 17 VA
2616 Cangrejeras 18-Boys 1462 2-4 33% 18 PR
2617 GVG 15-Guayacanes ata 1462 4-3 57% 15 PR
2618 RVC Boom 17 1462 12-13 48% 17
2619 Empire 14-Blue 1462 14-19 42% 14 KS
2620 Lions Boys 14 1462 9-5 64% 14 IL
2621 PI'OPI'O BEARS 12 1462 2-1 50% 12
2622 CNVKC Mizuno Boys 14-1 1461 4-8 33% 14 MO
2623 CYVB 17-1 1461 14-10 56% 17 CA
2624 South Elite 17-Carlos 1461 3-3 50% 17 PR
2625 LVC 13-Black 1461 1-2 25% 13 NY
2626 Summit Volleyball Club 18-1 1461 2-4 33% 18 MO
2627 BAVC 18-3 boys andy 1461 1-4 20% 18 CA
2628 Tstreet SN 18-Dana [boys] 1461 10-12 45% 18 NV
2629 949 B12-Black 1461 11-17 39% 12 CA
2630 I AM VBC 11-Red 1461 0-0 0% 11 WI
2631 Pulse 15-Luke 1461 6-8 43% 15 MI
2632 Church&Dodge 17-1 1460 9-10 47% 17 IL
2633 A4 Volley Boys 16-Garry 1460 3-3 50% 16 CA
2634 EXILE East 14 1460 7-11 39% 14 PA
2635 MVP Boys 15-Blue 1460 36-40 47% 15 TX
2636 SVC 17 Boys 1460 7-14 33% 17 GA
2637 Aspire 16 Loki 1460 3-16 16% 16 AZ
2638 Ignite 18-National boys 1459 0-9 0% 18 AZ
2639 Team Rockstar 17 Jo 1459 5-9 36% 17 CA
2640 UNION B14-Green 1459 23-30 43% 14 IN
2641 NE Storm 17 Landslide 1459 21-25 46% 17 MA
2642 No Panic 17-Boys 1459 28-25 51% 17 VA
2643 Texas Forge 18U 1459 3-4 43% 18 TX
2644 Club 1 B 14-Skronkstrong 1459 23-25 48% 14 IL
2645 Cinci Attack 13-Red 1458 13-12 52% 13 OH
2646 TI Elite 17-1 1458 17-33 34% 17 IN
2647 NF 18 Crimson 1458 13-22 33% 18 NY
2648 Gallant 16-White 1458 1-4 20% 16
2649 Next Level 15-Boys 1458 1-3 25% 15 MN
2650 Barrie Elites 18-1 - blizzard 1458 1-4 20% 18
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.