2025-2026 Season — Page 740 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36951 | REFINE 15 Refine Miner (SO) | 1344 | 5-8 | 31% | 15 | AL |
| 36952 | Camas Prairie 16 | 1344 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 36953 | QC Panthers 13-Blue | 1344 | 1-7 | 11% | 13 | IA |
| 36954 | High Voltage 15-Purple | 1344 | 2-8 | 20% | 15 | MN |
| 36955 | FoothillVBC 17-Red | 1344 | 22-32 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 36956 | FTL 13-Atomic darrel | 1344 | 14-20 | 41% | 13 | FL |
| 36957 | TVC 13-Local | 1344 | 4-9 | 31% | 13 | FL |
| 36958 | Xtreme 17-Black | 1344 | 11-17 | 39% | 17 | CO |
| 36959 | CLASH Longhorns 17 | 1344 | 14-15 | 48% | 17 | CO |
| 36960 | REVO 15-2 | 1344 | 0-5 | 0% | 15 | MI |
| 36961 | CCAVBC 15-Navy | 1344 | 17-22 | 44% | 15 | FL |
| 36962 | PVA 15-Sully | 1344 | 10-12 | 45% | 15 | FL |
| 36963 | EVC 17-Falcons | 1344 | 6-12 | 33% | 17 | FL |
| 36964 | Red Rock 13-Kaylene - redwood city | 1344 | 5-10 | 33% | 13 | CA |
| 36965 | Club V South 18 Jackie | 1344 | 9-22 | 24% | 18 | UT |
| 36966 | TC ELITE 15 BTJ | 1344 | 14-17 | 44% | 15 | LA |
| 36967 | Legacy 14-1 | 1344 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | |
| 36968 | MoCo Jrs 12-Molten | 1344 | 5-12 | 26% | 12 | TX |
| 36969 | SC Legends 18-Nike | 1343 | 16-22 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 36970 | CVA 12-2 morrow | 1343 | 5-11 | 29% | 12 | IA |
| 36971 | Liberty 16-Regional blue | 1343 | 13-23 | 30% | 16 | TX |
| 36972 | LPA 14-Red | 1343 | 2-7 | 22% | 14 | MN |
| 36973 | GSEVC 18-National blue | 1343 | 15-25 | 38% | 18 | NJ |
| 36974 | PVA 18-National | 1343 | 2-12 | 14% | 18 | MO |
| 36975 | SC Scorchers Ignite 18-S | 1343 | 13-21 | 35% | 18 | TX |
| 36976 | MAVC 18-3 | 1343 | 2-7 | 20% | 18 | MT |
| 36977 | WC 16-Elite black | 1343 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | TX |
| 36978 | RCVC 16-3 | 1343 | 3-7 | 27% | 16 | AL |
| 36979 | BAVC 17-Regional alejandro | 1343 | 4-11 | 27% | 17 | CA |
| 36980 | Wisconsin Elite 13-Blue | 1343 | 10-18 | 34% | 13 | WI |
| 36981 | Riptide 14-S elite | 1343 | 10-15 | 40% | 14 | FL |
| 36982 | BLVC 12-Black | 1343 | 2-5 | 29% | 12 | UT |
| 36983 | StriveVBC 18-1 | 1343 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | TX |
| 36984 | Rosebud Rebels 12-2 | 1343 | 7-17 | 24% | 12 | MT |
| 36985 | MISSION VOLLEYBALL 18-1 | 1343 | 9-16 | 36% | 18 | TX |
| 36986 | VAAVBC 15 Regional | 1343 | 13-19 | 38% | 15 | VA |
| 36987 | 2Legit 14-2 | 1343 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | FL |
| 36988 | LAVA Mission 17-Premier | 1343 | 17-24 | 41% | 17 | CA |
| 36989 | CPVB 17-Select | 1343 | 11-24 | 30% | 17 | CT |
| 36990 | Storm 17 | 1343 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | AR |
| 36991 | Texas Serve 18-S gold | 1343 | 18-25 | 40% | 18 | TX |
| 36992 | Apex 13 Predators | 1343 | 12-20 | 38% | 13 | IL |
| 36993 | TX Premier 14-Club | 1343 | 11-25 | 29% | 14 | TX |
| 36994 | Spire VC 14 Kubec | 1343 | 9-13 | 41% | 14 | OH |
| 36995 | Absolute Zero BVC 13-Mcdoubles | 1343 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | WA |
| 36996 | Urban VBC 14-Black | 1343 | 1-3 | 20% | 14 | TX |
| 36997 | Hoosier Elite Vipers 13-2 | 1343 | 22-49 | 31% | 13 | IN |
| 36998 | R1SE 14 | 1343 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 36999 | LevelUp 13-2 | 1343 | 4-11 | 24% | 13 | MS |
| 37000 | AVC CLE 14 Scarlet | 1343 | 8-10 | 44% | 14 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.