Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 740 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36951 REFINE 15 Refine Miner (SO) 1344 5-8 31% 15 AL
36952 Camas Prairie 16 1344 2-2 50% 16 WA
36953 QC Panthers 13-Blue 1344 1-7 11% 13 IA
36954 High Voltage 15-Purple 1344 2-8 20% 15 MN
36955 FoothillVBC 17-Red 1344 22-32 41% 17 CA
36956 FTL 13-Atomic darrel 1344 14-20 41% 13 FL
36957 TVC 13-Local 1344 4-9 31% 13 FL
36958 Xtreme 17-Black 1344 11-17 39% 17 CO
36959 CLASH Longhorns 17 1344 14-15 48% 17 CO
36960 REVO 15-2 1344 0-5 0% 15 MI
36961 CCAVBC 15-Navy 1344 17-22 44% 15 FL
36962 PVA 15-Sully 1344 10-12 45% 15 FL
36963 EVC 17-Falcons 1344 6-12 33% 17 FL
36964 Red Rock 13-Kaylene - redwood city 1344 5-10 33% 13 CA
36965 Club V South 18 Jackie 1344 9-22 24% 18 UT
36966 TC ELITE 15 BTJ 1344 14-17 44% 15 LA
36967 Legacy 14-1 1344 1-4 20% 14
36968 MoCo Jrs 12-Molten 1344 5-12 26% 12 TX
36969 SC Legends 18-Nike 1343 16-22 42% 18 CA
36970 CVA 12-2 morrow 1343 5-11 29% 12 IA
36971 Liberty 16-Regional blue 1343 13-23 30% 16 TX
36972 LPA 14-Red 1343 2-7 22% 14 MN
36973 GSEVC 18-National blue 1343 15-25 38% 18 NJ
36974 PVA 18-National 1343 2-12 14% 18 MO
36975 SC Scorchers Ignite 18-S 1343 13-21 35% 18 TX
36976 MAVC 18-3 1343 2-7 20% 18 MT
36977 WC 16-Elite black 1343 0-7 0% 16 TX
36978 RCVC 16-3 1343 3-7 27% 16 AL
36979 BAVC 17-Regional alejandro 1343 4-11 27% 17 CA
36980 Wisconsin Elite 13-Blue 1343 10-18 34% 13 WI
36981 Riptide 14-S elite 1343 10-15 40% 14 FL
36982 BLVC 12-Black 1343 2-5 29% 12 UT
36983 StriveVBC 18-1 1343 1-6 14% 18 TX
36984 Rosebud Rebels 12-2 1343 7-17 24% 12 MT
36985 MISSION VOLLEYBALL 18-1 1343 9-16 36% 18 TX
36986 VAAVBC 15 Regional 1343 13-19 38% 15 VA
36987 2Legit 14-2 1343 0-3 0% 14 FL
36988 LAVA Mission 17-Premier 1343 17-24 41% 17 CA
36989 CPVB 17-Select 1343 11-24 30% 17 CT
36990 Storm 17 1343 0-4 0% 17 AR
36991 Texas Serve 18-S gold 1343 18-25 40% 18 TX
36992 Apex 13 Predators 1343 12-20 38% 13 IL
36993 TX Premier 14-Club 1343 11-25 29% 14 TX
36994 Spire VC 14 Kubec 1343 9-13 41% 14 OH
36995 Absolute Zero BVC 13-Mcdoubles 1343 0-4 0% 13 WA
36996 Urban VBC 14-Black 1343 1-3 20% 14 TX
36997 Hoosier Elite Vipers 13-2 1343 22-49 31% 13 IN
36998 R1SE 14 1343 0-4 0% 14 TX
36999 LevelUp 13-2 1343 4-11 24% 13 MS
37000 AVC CLE 14 Scarlet 1343 8-10 44% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.