Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 741 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
37001 Carolina Rogue 12-Black 1343 12-28 30% 12 SC
37002 Hornet Elites 12 1343 0-4 0% 12 IN
37003 OK Glory 16-1 1343 8-13 38% 16 OK
37004 PV 14-Pink panthers 1343 11-16 41% 14 MA
37005 ELLEVATE Academy 12 1343 18-36 33% 12 LA
37006 Top Flight 15-Tao sp 1343 2-3 40% 15 IL
37007 HOU VIE 15-1 1343 4-12 25% 15 TX
37008 STARZ 13-Yellow 1343 15-22 41% 13 IL
37009 DaKine 15-Regional pink 1343 13-27 33% 15 WA
37010 Fundamental Sports Academy 14 FSA Impact 1343 3-6 33% 14 GA
37011 CLASH Rams 18 1343 10-15 40% 18 CO
37012 Actyve 12-Adidas 1343 17-27 39% 12 CA
37013 Eastside 16-Sara 1343 4-9 31% 16 NC
37014 HBJ 14-Central arkansas 1343 9-17 35% 14 AR
37015 The Edge 12 Black (GL) 1343 4-9 31% 12 IL
37016 207VBC 16-2 1343 23-26 45% 16 ME
37017 RCVC 15-2 1343 6-6 33% 15 AL
37018 Kings County KCV 14-1 1343 7-9 44% 14 NV
37019 CVVC 14-1 1343 15-24 33% 14 MT
37020 Mavericks Volleyball 13 13U LOCAL MAVERICKS (BY) 1343 1-6 14% 13 LA
37021 Ozark Juniors 12-White 1343 11-24 31% 12 AR
37022 513VB 12-4 1343 8-18 31% 12 OH
37023 KC Force 17 Teal 1343 9-15 38% 17 MO
37024 Hāna Hou 14-Carla 1343 4-12 24% 14 HI
37025 C-Force VBC 16-Teal 1343 12-17 41% 16 TN
37026 MSVBC 13-Navy 1343 1-5 17% 13 AZ
37027 MAC 17-1 1343 0-7 0% 17 MA
37028 EuroWay 12-Onyx 1343 4-7 33% 12 TX
37029 DCVA 17-2 1343 0-8 0% 17 NM
37030 Tamales 16-2 1343 2-7 22% 16 MO
37031 T4VBC 12-Navy 1343 7-17 29% 12 TX
37032 DSVC 14-Power blue 1343 7-18 28% 14 AL
37033 OK Charge 17-Amer tulsa 1343 16-29 36% 17 OK
37034 513VB 15-3 1343 10-21 32% 15 OH
37035 NMBVB 13-Regional blue isa 1343 2-6 25% 13 FL
37036 Oasis 16 Select 1343 15-29 34% 16 CA
37037 VolleyLab 15-Sean 1343 1-7 13% 15 TX
37038 Block’d Volleyball Club 16 16 Mint 1343 14-19 42% 16 CA
37039 ACVC 16-Blue 1343 18-29 38% 16 CA
37040 Goldenwest 16-Black 1343 11-24 31% 16 CA
37041 TVVC 14-Black 1343 7-10 41% 14 OR
37042 Big Cat Volleyball 18-1 1343 1-6 14% 18 IA
37043 ATTACK 12-3 1343 0-4 0% 12 ND
37044 BAVC 14-Cobras 1343 15-26 37% 14 IL
37045 ROCK VBC 12-1 1343 2-9 18% 12 WI
37046 Ethos 17 Storm 1343 21-27 44% 17 TN
37047 SPVC 15-Elisha 1343 3-10 21% 15 CA
37048 ECVBA 18-Ivers 1343 7-21 25% 18 CA
37049 DR NET FORCE 17 1343 2-7 22% 17 TX
37050 Northern Heat 14-1 1343 6-14 30% 14 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.