2025-2026 Season — Page 741 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37001 | Carolina Rogue 12-Black | 1343 | 12-28 | 30% | 12 | SC |
| 37002 | Hornet Elites 12 | 1343 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | IN |
| 37003 | OK Glory 16-1 | 1343 | 8-13 | 38% | 16 | OK |
| 37004 | PV 14-Pink panthers | 1343 | 11-16 | 41% | 14 | MA |
| 37005 | ELLEVATE Academy 12 | 1343 | 18-36 | 33% | 12 | LA |
| 37006 | Top Flight 15-Tao sp | 1343 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IL |
| 37007 | HOU VIE 15-1 | 1343 | 4-12 | 25% | 15 | TX |
| 37008 | STARZ 13-Yellow | 1343 | 15-22 | 41% | 13 | IL |
| 37009 | DaKine 15-Regional pink | 1343 | 13-27 | 33% | 15 | WA |
| 37010 | Fundamental Sports Academy 14 FSA Impact | 1343 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | GA |
| 37011 | CLASH Rams 18 | 1343 | 10-15 | 40% | 18 | CO |
| 37012 | Actyve 12-Adidas | 1343 | 17-27 | 39% | 12 | CA |
| 37013 | Eastside 16-Sara | 1343 | 4-9 | 31% | 16 | NC |
| 37014 | HBJ 14-Central arkansas | 1343 | 9-17 | 35% | 14 | AR |
| 37015 | The Edge 12 Black (GL) | 1343 | 4-9 | 31% | 12 | IL |
| 37016 | 207VBC 16-2 | 1343 | 23-26 | 45% | 16 | ME |
| 37017 | RCVC 15-2 | 1343 | 6-6 | 33% | 15 | AL |
| 37018 | Kings County KCV 14-1 | 1343 | 7-9 | 44% | 14 | NV |
| 37019 | CVVC 14-1 | 1343 | 15-24 | 33% | 14 | MT |
| 37020 | Mavericks Volleyball 13 13U LOCAL MAVERICKS (BY) | 1343 | 1-6 | 14% | 13 | LA |
| 37021 | Ozark Juniors 12-White | 1343 | 11-24 | 31% | 12 | AR |
| 37022 | 513VB 12-4 | 1343 | 8-18 | 31% | 12 | OH |
| 37023 | KC Force 17 Teal | 1343 | 9-15 | 38% | 17 | MO |
| 37024 | Hāna Hou 14-Carla | 1343 | 4-12 | 24% | 14 | HI |
| 37025 | C-Force VBC 16-Teal | 1343 | 12-17 | 41% | 16 | TN |
| 37026 | MSVBC 13-Navy | 1343 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | AZ |
| 37027 | MAC 17-1 | 1343 | 0-7 | 0% | 17 | MA |
| 37028 | EuroWay 12-Onyx | 1343 | 4-7 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 37029 | DCVA 17-2 | 1343 | 0-8 | 0% | 17 | NM |
| 37030 | Tamales 16-2 | 1343 | 2-7 | 22% | 16 | MO |
| 37031 | T4VBC 12-Navy | 1343 | 7-17 | 29% | 12 | TX |
| 37032 | DSVC 14-Power blue | 1343 | 7-18 | 28% | 14 | AL |
| 37033 | OK Charge 17-Amer tulsa | 1343 | 16-29 | 36% | 17 | OK |
| 37034 | 513VB 15-3 | 1343 | 10-21 | 32% | 15 | OH |
| 37035 | NMBVB 13-Regional blue isa | 1343 | 2-6 | 25% | 13 | FL |
| 37036 | Oasis 16 Select | 1343 | 15-29 | 34% | 16 | CA |
| 37037 | VolleyLab 15-Sean | 1343 | 1-7 | 13% | 15 | TX |
| 37038 | Block’d Volleyball Club 16 16 Mint | 1343 | 14-19 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 37039 | ACVC 16-Blue | 1343 | 18-29 | 38% | 16 | CA |
| 37040 | Goldenwest 16-Black | 1343 | 11-24 | 31% | 16 | CA |
| 37041 | TVVC 14-Black | 1343 | 7-10 | 41% | 14 | OR |
| 37042 | Big Cat Volleyball 18-1 | 1343 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | IA |
| 37043 | ATTACK 12-3 | 1343 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | ND |
| 37044 | BAVC 14-Cobras | 1343 | 15-26 | 37% | 14 | IL |
| 37045 | ROCK VBC 12-1 | 1343 | 2-9 | 18% | 12 | WI |
| 37046 | Ethos 17 Storm | 1343 | 21-27 | 44% | 17 | TN |
| 37047 | SPVC 15-Elisha | 1343 | 3-10 | 21% | 15 | CA |
| 37048 | ECVBA 18-Ivers | 1343 | 7-21 | 25% | 18 | CA |
| 37049 | DR NET FORCE 17 | 1343 | 2-7 | 22% | 17 | TX |
| 37050 | Northern Heat 14-1 | 1343 | 6-14 | 30% | 14 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.