Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 739 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36901 WPVC 14-Elite silver 1344 29-31 48% 14 FL
36902 FIVE 14-1 1344 16-18 47% 14 FL
36903 HBJ 18-Dover 1344 4-7 36% 18 AR
36904 OT 12-O jamir 1344 0-4 0% 12 FL
36905 SGJO 11-1 1344 0-4 0% 11 MN
36906 TuoCo 14 1344 0-5 0% 14 CA
36907 CJV 14-Local+ white 1344 7-8 47% 14 NC
36908 YSVC 14-2 1344 3-9 25% 14 NC
36909 Jays 14-Black 1344 0-4 0% 14 ND
36910 Cuzins 12-1 1344 1-4 20% 12 HI
36911 HBJ 14-St. joe 1344 10-17 37% 14 AR
36912 Caroga Lake 14 1344 1-6 14% 14 NY
36913 Panther Pride VBC 14 1344 1-7 9% 14 NY
36914 VC United SP 11-White regional 1344 6-15 26% 11 IL
36915 Panhandle Boomers 13-1 1344 6-10 29% 13 WV
36916 1W 13-1 elite 1344 15-39 28% 13 WI
36917 CTX Slam 15-N 1344 22-34 39% 15 TX
36918 ME VA 15-Blue 1344 7-13 35% 15 TX
36919 MWS 12-Teal 1344 3-8 27% 12 IL
36920 Vernal Velocity 13-Pink 1344 7-15 29% 13 UT
36921 St. George Aces 13-Malia 1344 1-4 20% 13 UT
36922 NM Storm 13 Stealth 1344 19-24 44% 13 TX
36923 South Coast 14-1 1344 7-14 33% 14 OR
36924 Xcel VB 13-3 white 1344 12-19 36% 13 TX
36925 Mets 14-Janeliz 1344 4-8 33% 14 PR
36926 CMASS EDGE 12-White 1344 13-23 36% 12 MA
36927 MIDTN Volleyball 13 Silver 1344 16-25 38% 13 TN
36928 Insanity Volleyball 14-1 1344 11-22 33% 14 TN
36929 TVVC 16-Black 1344 10-9 53% 16 OR
36930 Aus Velocity 14-Lt white 1344 6-12 32% 14 TX
36931 Mojo 14-Blue 1344 3-8 25% 14 TX
36932 Renegades 14 Adidas 1344 19-22 43% 14 TX
36933 AP 14-Wilco lite 1344 7-11 39% 14 TX
36934 VSTX 14-Camilla 1344 11-15 35% 14 TX
36935 W Pride 18-1 1344 0-6 0% 18 NY
36936 Club Falcons 12-S 1344 0-4 0% 12 MN
36937 Aspire 11-Alpha 1344 11-25 31% 11 AZ
36938 MAC 17-1 elite 1344 10-25 29% 17 OR
36939 SSAVC 12 1344 14-28 33% 12 MO
36940 FINESSE VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY 12-1 1344 9-20 28% 12 MO
36941 KC ZOOM 13-1 susan/reagan 1344 2-6 25% 13 MO
36942 Club Four 13-White 1344 6-11 30% 13 MO
36943 SUSA 14-Red 1344 1-4 14% 14 UT
36944 SWVA Elite 14-Anna 1344 8-17 32% 14 VA
36945 Club Ace 18 1344 16-20 43% 18 OK
36946 JET 10 Williams 1344 5-12 29% 10 TX
36947 Level Up 13-2 1344 2-8 20% 13 MI
36948 SCWave 12-Rivercrest karmen 1344 7-12 37% 12 IN
36949 Victory 16-Metro 1344 2-14 12% 16 TX
36950 I AM VBC 14-Gold 1344 14-24 37% 14 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.