Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 721 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36001 Omaha Roadrunners 18 1355 1-6 14% 18 NE
36002 Ho'omau 16 1355 0-7 0% 16 HI
36003 WAVE 11-Taija 1355 10-18 36% 11 CA
36004 Spire VC 14-Johnson 1355 0-4 0% 14 OH
36005 Delaware Juniors 10-1 1355 2-6 18% 10 PA
36006 CCC - Hawks 16 1355 3-5 38% 16 NY
36007 BOA 13-1 1355 8-12 40% 13 AL
36008 PCVBC 16-Litzau 1355 5-9 36% 16 OH
36009 513VB 16-1 1355 8-46 15% 16 OH
36010 RZVC 14-2 velocity 1355 9-15 38% 14 TX
36011 KW Revolution 17 Molten 1355 15-20 43% 17 TX
36012 VCN 16-White 1355 10-13 43% 16 NE
36013 VC United 17-2 premier 1355 12-21 36% 17 IL
36014 NCVC 14-Rush - black 1355 6-16 24% 14 NY
36015 JET 15 RODRIGUEZ 1355 6-9 40% 15 TX
36016 New Mexico OnSite Volleyball Club 15 OnSite Capsaicin Sparks 1 1355 9-12 41% 15 TX
36017 MVP 16-Gold 1355 4-9 31% 16 OH
36018 BOSS VBC 14-White 1355 15-25 37% 14 WI
36019 EPFURY VBC 15-1 1355 3-5 38% 15 TX
36020 CVVBH 15-Felipe 1355 2-7 22% 15 PR
36021 COAST 14-R2 steve 1355 6-15 29% 14 CA
36022 BAVC 14-National justine 1355 15-29 34% 14 CA
36023 Dolphin VBC 11-Green 1355 10-22 31% 11 AL
36024 UNION 11-In grey 1355 18-27 40% 11 IN
36025 Dunes 13-Brett 1355 0-4 0% 13 IN
36026 Eman 13-2 1355 0-4 0% 13 IN
36027 SMVA 11-1 1355 4-9 24% 11 AL
36028 CVC 12-Grey 1355 2-7 22% 12 OH
36029 West Coast 15-Waves 1355 1-6 14% 15 CA
36030 ClubCENTRAL 14-White 1355 0-4 0% 14 SD
36031 Direction 18 Royal 1355 20-23 47% 18 NC
36032 Upstate 15 Hope 1355 15-22 41% 15 SC
36033 Sky High 16-Kim 1355 11-17 39% 16 IL
36034 BOOST 15 Silver 1355 4-12 25% 15 IA
36035 Sunnyside 12-Red 1355 1-5 17% 12 WA
36036 MHE 18-Green 1355 5-10 33% 18 ND
36037 Southern Storm 14-Ice blu 1355 9-25 26% 14 TN
36038 Aura 13-Blue 1355 9-17 35% 13 CA
36039 CVVC 16-1 1355 15-22 35% 16 MT
36040 APVA 18 Ryan 1355 13-20 39% 18 TN
36041 Storm 17-Onyx 1355 1-5 17% 17 CO
36042 NM Cactus VBC 17-2 1355 2-9 15% 17 CO
36043 MVI 15-Autumn 1355 5-8 38% 15 ID
36044 SVE 17-1 1355 1-7 13% 17 GA
36045 Madtown 11-White 1355 0-4 0% 11 WI
36046 PSVA Tri County 15-Hayley 1355 14-19 42% 15 FL
36047 Fission 16-Regional 1 1354 8-12 40% 16 GA
36048 Siouxland VC 16-Silver 1354 7-12 37% 16 IA
36049 MI Legends 18-Black 1354 19-21 48% 18 MI
36050 Princeton Volleyball Club 14-Elite 1354 14-22 39% 14 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.