Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 722 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36051 Midwest United 13-Red 1354 16-24 40% 13 MN
36052 Borderline 12-Lizards 1354 3-6 33% 12 OH
36053 Watertown JO 17-Red 1354 0-4 0% 17 MN
36054 TNT 14-Styx 1354 13-21 38% 14 PA
36055 Anthracite 14-Kyra 1354 1-5 17% 14 PA
36056 S-MAQ 16-1 silver 1354 10-17 37% 16 OH
36057 PVC 15-1b 1354 17-30 36% 15 FL
36058 Mo Mighty Piranhas 16-1 1354 2-2 50% 16 MO
36059 QC Panthers 14-Pink 1354 0-4 0% 14 IA
36060 New WAVE 17-Hurricane 1354 20-28 42% 17 IL
36061 Architects Volleyball Club 14-Black 1354 1-6 14% 14 TX
36062 Woodburn 14-3 1354 0-4 0% 14 OR
36063 McMinnville 14-1 1354 9-13 41% 14 OR
36064 Arch City 14 1354 19-28 40% 14 MO
36065 ID ONE 14-Pink lidia 1354 2-8 20% 14 ID
36066 ACES BLUE 15-1 1354 15-21 42% 15 OK
36067 TW Skyline 12-White 1354 14-14 50% 12 TX
36068 Ocean 16-Alexis 1354 9-20 31% 16 NJ
36069 Legacy Jrs 17-Black 1354 2-5 29% 17 NE
36070 A3 13 EOS 1354 15-21 42% 13 TN
36071 Prime 13 1354 1-4 20% 13 MO
36072 ForwardVB 14-White 1354 9-17 35% 14 FL
36073 603 United 14-Open 1354 3-7 30% 14 NH
36074 Send Me Surge 17-Ricardo 1354 6-13 32% 17 AL
36075 Miami Wave 12-Black mizuno 1354 9-19 32% 12 FL
36076 HVC 17-1 chaos 1354 1-6 14% 17 ON
36077 SVC 15 Gold 1354 7-17 29% 15 IA
36078 407 10-Orange 1354 15-27 36% 10 FL
36079 SR 15-1 1354 8-12 40% 15 MN
36080 Kūlia 16 1354 3-6 23% 16 HI
36081 SOSVBC 18-N jamie 1354 0-7 0% 18 NY
36082 Aggression 13-3 premier 1354 4-7 36% 13 IL
36083 Horseshoe 13-1 1354 17-17 44% 13 MT
36084 Ethos 14 Panthers 1354 15-21 42% 14 TN
36085 IMPACT - 13-2 1354 11-29 27% 13 TX
36086 Eastlake 14-Ani 1354 2-6 25% 14 CA
36087 PRVA 14 Hurricane 1354 0-4 0% 14 CA
36088 NW Elite 16-7 gray 1354 13-19 41% 16 OR
36089 PREVAIL Girls 15-Pink 1354 1-4 20% 15 PA
36090 CW Raptors 16-S 1354 0-4 0% 16 MN
36091 Aspire 12-2 pink 1354 4-8 33% 12 AB
36092 AMBITION 12-2 passion 1354 2-7 22% 12 WA
36093 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 17-Blue 1354 18-35 34% 17 FL
36094 Gators 11-Green 1354 4-11 21% 11 MA
36095 JSSA-VC 13-Chandy 1354 0-4 0% 13 NE
36096 Milwaukee Jr's 15-Select 1354 125-149 46% 15 WI
36097 ARVC 12-Lobos 1354 7-14 33% 12 NM
36098 Hot City - HCVC 14 1354 7-7 47% 14 WY
36099 CSVC 14-3 boomerangs 1354 6-14 30% 14 IN
36100 KIVA Marshall 13-1 1354 4-7 36% 13 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.