Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 720 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35951 Club 801 17-National trey 1356 11-45 20% 17 UT
35952 ADREN 13-3 1356 0-4 0% 13 OH
35953 TopSpin 14-Blue 1356 12-17 41% 14 KY
35954 WWVC 16 1356 20-22 48% 16 WY
35955 Prodigy Volleyball Academy 16-3 elite 1356 13-20 39% 16 NY
35956 Charleston Crush Volleyball Club 14 1356 12-16 43% 14 SC
35957 608 Juniors 15-Red 1356 11-25 31% 15 WI
35958 Project Spikers 18-2 1356 0-4 0% 18
35959 EVL 15-Angela 1356 5-6 45% 15 PR
35960 PowerPlex Iowa Heart 13-Black 1356 0-5 0% 13 IA
35961 BAVC 15-Premier jen 1355 7-21 25% 15 CA
35962 All Set 18 Junior 1355 3-13 19% 18 AK
35963 IA.Together VBC 14-1 togs 14 1355 4-4 44% 14 IA
35964 Vigilante 15-Travel 1355 23-37 38% 15 AZ
35965 Gulfside 15-Elite s 1355 20-26 43% 15 FL
35966 ORANGE CRUSH ORANGE 13 1355 0-4 0% 13 IA
35967 MiElite 15-Piper west 1355 5-12 24% 15 MI
35968 Midwest Juniors 17-2 1355 4-9 31% 17 KS
35969 Air Strike 17 AirStrike T 1355 3-8 27% 17 MI
35970 TEV 15-M amanda 1355 13-18 42% 15 TN
35971 Rome Area Volleyball Club 14 14 Blue (SO) 1355 0-4 0% 14 GA
35972 RSVBC 16-Sky 1355 6-9 38% 16 NV
35973 Tsunami 12-1n 1355 25-22 53% 12 GA
35974 Ho'okino 14-Ho'omau 1355 5-7 42% 14 HI
35975 SVC 16-1 (CA) 1355 9-32 22% 16 CA
35976 Full Force 16-American 1355 8-11 42% 16 OH
35977 FSV ELITE 15 1355 1-4 20% 15 NC
35978 Maricopa Elite 16 1355 19-25 43% 16 AZ
35979 TVO 15-Electric 1355 21-21 50% 15 MI
35980 LVA 13-1 1355 3-7 30% 13 PR
35981 PBEVC Tiny Titans 12-3 1355 10-19 34% 12 TX
35982 PROZONE FL 16-Blue 1355 13-21 38% 16 FL
35983 Integrity 14-Limited club 1355 6-13 25% 14 PA
35984 CYVBC Surge 12-Blue 1355 8-17 32% 12 OH
35985 SynVBC 14-1 1355 9-13 39% 14 NY
35986 WOVC 16-1 1355 3-8 27% 16 FL
35987 F5 Sports Complex 15-2 1355 9-16 36% 15 TN
35988 Rosemount Irish 12-4 1355 0-4 0% 12 MN
35989 Parker VC 14-J 1355 8-10 44% 14 AZ
35990 LES 16-Zoe 1355 7-16 29% 16 AL
35991 IFJ 14-Katie 1355 0-5 0% 14 UT
35992 310VBC 18-N ryan 1355 13-17 43% 18 CA
35993 MAVA 11-White 1355 0-4 0% 11 MN
35994 Mason Dixon Volleyball Club 18 18U Ed (CH) 1355 7-15 30% 18
35995 1W 13-Black 1355 12-21 36% 13 WI
35996 Quicksets 16-2 1355 8-19 27% 16 HI
35997 BWVC 14 Premier 1355 9-13 41% 14 FL
35998 Elite 15-Select 1355 1-4 20% 15 MO
35999 Direction 16-Silver 1355 4-6 40% 16 NC
36000 Hurricanes 16-Black 1355 6-10 38% 16 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.