Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 719 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35901 IMUA UVC 18-Ua 1356 15-25 38% 18 CA
35902 Premier 17-Gold 1356 3-7 30% 17 PA
35903 PREVA 15-Kike 1356 9-12 43% 15 PR
35904 Jersey Jrs 14-2 1356 11-18 38% 14 NJ
35905 WRVC 12 1356 0-4 0% 12 WI
35906 Motion Volleyball Program 14-Black 1356 20-28 42% 14 WI
35907 All Out VBC 15 1356 1-7 13% 15 WA
35908 417 Resilience VBC 15-1 1356 1-3 20% 15 MO
35909 High Tide 14-Malia 1356 16-25 39% 14 CA
35910 ProPlay 14-Tyler 1356 13-22 37% 14 CA
35911 WC 14-3 1356 4-8 33% 14 FL
35912 Nox 14-Galactic 1356 6-15 29% 14 PA
35913 X2 Volleyball 16-1 1356 17-25 40% 16 MA
35914 Southland 14-Red 1356 12-20 38% 14 LA
35915 MN CORE 13-3 1356 7-12 35% 13 MN
35916 Illinois Select 11 1356 5-11 29% 11 IL
35917 clubSAV 13-National 1356 18-26 41% 13 GA
35918 Northern Current 17-Z 1356 0-5 0% 17 MI
35919 Criollas 16-1 1356 4-9 31% 16 PR
35920 KeAloha 13-1 cp 1356 13-23 36% 13 IN
35921 OCVC 13 1356 11-15 42% 13 KY
35922 OT 15-T veronika 1356 8-10 44% 15 FL
35923 OPU 14-3 1356 9-19 32% 14 FL
35924 Mission Trails 12-Sofia 1356 2-6 25% 12 CA
35925 Panther Girls 14-Red 1356 15-24 38% 14 CO
35926 NCWVBC 14-4 white 1356 1-6 14% 14 WA
35927 Cypress Huskies 14-Elite 1356 5-13 28% 14 TX
35928 2L 17-1 matt 1356 0-8 0% 17 FL
35929 Church&Dodge 13-5 1356 3-4 38% 13 IL
35930 NO LIMITZ 17 17U No Limitz Volleyball 1356 8-13 38% 17 FL
35931 EC Power DE 16-White 1356 9-28 24% 16 MD
35932 Club One AZ 13-Red 1356 11-18 38% 13 AZ
35933 Prime Time 13-White 1356 9-16 36% 13 IL
35934 West Valley Dragons 14-2 1356 13-24 35% 14 OR
35935 BVA 16 1356 12-28 29% 16 NY
35936 Ghost Elite 18 1356 8-23 26% 18 WY
35937 LRJ 14-Premier blue 1356 16-28 36% 14 AR
35938 Calcasieu Impact 12 Calcasieu Impact 1356 2-7 15% 12 LA
35939 Digs 13-White 1356 8-15 35% 13 NJ
35940 MVP 16-White 1356 20-28 42% 16 WI
35941 LCVC 18 (NO) 1356 4-8 33% 18 MN
35942 Voltage 14-White - savannah 1356 0-3 0% 14 FL
35943 CSRA Heat 14-White 1356 7-12 35% 14 GA
35944 OK Charge 10-National 1356 13-23 35% 10 OK
35945 Seekers 15-S26 1356 13-13 50% 15 MI
35946 NIVA 15 OPAL 1356 15-27 36% 15 IN
35947 LAVA North 15 Premier 1356 12-29 29% 15 CA
35948 Lakes Elite 15-1 1356 4-10 29% 15 MN
35949 MARIN 16-West 1356 6-13 32% 16 CA
35950 797 Empire 13 1356 0-4 0% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.