Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 705 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35201 Emerald Raindrops 14-2 1364 8-12 40% 14 WA
35202 FTL 16-Nuclear ko 1364 4-5 44% 16 FL
35203 Tx Evolution 14-Blue 1364 4-7 36% 14 TX
35204 EMV 14-Metro white mariah 1364 4-10 27% 14 TX
35205 TX LEGACY 14 TEXAS 1364 5-13 25% 14 TX
35206 ESA 14-Yellow 1364 11-26 30% 14 NV
35207 Cutthroat 14-4 mission 1364 10-7 48% 14 MT
35208 TX Legends 14-Blue 1364 12-18 36% 14 TX
35209 Roots 14-4 mesquite 1364 13-18 42% 14 TX
35210 915 16-Canelo 1364 17-44 28% 16 TX
35211 Club GSL 14-Comp - connor 1364 13-15 38% 14 UT
35212 Annapolis 18-Travel 1364 16-29 34% 18 MD
35213 Flight 16-Betsy 1364 1-4 20% 16 MI
35214 Instinct VBC 13-Wild black 1364 1-6 14% 13 MN
35215 Iron 11-Grey 1364 0-5 0% 11 AL
35216 G3 13-Elite lydia 1364 9-20 27% 13 MO
35217 Club V 17-Jolana 1364 19-26 40% 17 UT
35218 LAVA Oaks 14 Gold 1364 9-17 35% 14 CA
35219 Keweenaw VBC 15 1364 8-13 38% 15 WI
35220 Hurricane Volleyball Club 14-Black 1364 8-13 38% 14 NC
35221 USANY Patience 18 1364 1-13 7% 18 NY
35222 Banzai VBC 14-Power 1364 4-8 33% 14 NE
35223 LMVC 18-Nat chi 1364 15-25 38% 18 SC
35224 IMUA 12-Blue 1364 1-4 20% 12 MI
35225 360VBA 12-1 1363 7-13 32% 12 WI
35226 BC Bombers 14-Black 1363 10-18 36% 14 LA
35227 Princeton JO 15-3 1363 0-4 0% 15 MN
35228 Atomic! 12-Riley 1363 0-3 0% 12 MI
35229 Club Fusion 11-Heat 1363 4-6 40% 11 IL
35230 Crush South 16-Murray 1363 2-8 20% 16 GA
35231 United 17-Blue 1363 11-19 37% 17 AL
35232 Intense Adidas 16-Nat 1363 13-22 37% 16 SC
35233 Dig This 15-White 1363 7-16 30% 15 NV
35234 Pacific Rim Volleyball Academy 16 PRVA Typhoon 1363 1-4 20% 16 CA
35235 IMPACT 15-Shelby/gaby 1363 4-13 24% 15 AK
35236 EVA 11 1363 0-7 0% 11 CT
35237 MCV 15-Painter 1363 6-7 46% 15 NC
35238 SVVC 15 1363 5-9 36% 15 KY
35239 Blitz 15-Gracie 1363 9-8 53% 15 NC
35240 Apex VBTC 11-Summit white 1363 0-4 0% 11 OH
35241 Woodburn Cyclones 18-1 1363 5-8 36% 18 OR
35242 Titan Travel 16-Taylor 1363 20-31 39% 16 CA
35243 Crossfire 15-White 1363 22-22 50% 15 MN
35244 Fusion 14-Reeder 1363 4-7 25% 14 UT
35245 Athlete HQ 14-Merril 1363 13-22 37% 14 OH
35246 JVC 14-Gold 1363 4-10 27% 14 IN
35247 DENVER JUNIORS 16 Leah 1363 13-22 37% 16 CO
35248 Blast 18-Lions 1363 9-17 35% 18 RI
35249 NK 16-Chill 1363 4-6 29% 16 ND
35250 Belles 12-1 blue 1363 6-10 33% 12 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.