Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 706 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35251 Horseshoe VBC 12-Black 1363 5-13 28% 12 PA
35252 WOVC 15-Black 1363 20-26 43% 15 FL
35253 Wisconsin Elite 15-Silver 1363 17-22 44% 15 WI
35254 Northern Storm 15 1363 5-14 26% 15 WI
35255 NET 14-White 1363 5-7 36% 14 AR
35256 Independent 12-Brooke 1363 0-4 0% 12 IN
35257 ESVBC 13-Geckos local 1363 9-14 39% 13 IA
35258 Net Force Volleyball Club 13 Net Force Fury (IA) 1363 3-8 23% 13 IA
35259 Tenacity 16-2 1363 7-8 47% 16 WI
35260 JVBC 17-S 1363 9-16 35% 17 NJ
35261 HBJ 16-Paris 1363 6-10 38% 16 AR
35262 PR Select 14-1 1363 3-7 30% 14 PR
35263 VOLT 13-Pink 1363 9-17 35% 13 ND
35264 Allegiant 15-Black 1363 7-18 23% 15 TX
35265 FSV ELITE 13-1 1363 1-4 20% 13 NC
35266 MVP 15-National black 1363 13-27 30% 15 TX
35267 Academy Skyline 15-1 1363 6-13 32% 15 TX
35268 SFSVC 18-1 max 1363 23-27 46% 18 NM
35269 K2 14-Frilled lizards 1363 17-25 40% 14 TN
35270 Mt. Lake Panthers 17-1 1363 0-4 0% 17 MN
35271 TFVBC 15-2 1363 14-23 38% 15 TN
35272 2Legit 15-1 1363 5-7 42% 15 FL
35273 FTLUTD Fusion 15-Alex 1363 6-9 40% 15 FL
35274 Decatur Force 13 Royal 1363 11-13 46% 13 IN
35275 Velocity 219 17-National 1363 20-25 44% 17 IN
35276 MMP 14-1 1363 6-10 38% 14 MO
35277 PVA 14-4 1363 1-9 6% 14 MO
35278 SMASH 14-Black elite 1363 11-21 34% 14 MO
35279 Benson 16-S 1363 0-4 0% 16 MN
35280 Riptide 16-Hurricane 1363 14-26 35% 16 ID
35281 Renaissance 14-White cran 1363 4-6 40% 14 OH
35282 GO Volley 17-Black 1363 12-22 31% 17 VA
35283 St. Croix Select 14 SC Select Black 1363 4-6 40% 14 WI
35284 Caroga Lake 15 1363 1-8 8% 15 NY
35285 Endless 14-Maroon 1363 6-14 23% 14 TX
35286 Synergy 16-Nitrogen 1363 12-33 24% 16 PA
35287 United 10 1363 0-4 0% 10 HI
35288 TX Ultimate 14-Blue 1363 5-9 33% 14 TX
35289 WVBC 16-Maggie 1363 13-16 45% 16 SC
35290 Lakes 12 Maroon 1363 2-9 18% 12 MN
35291 Wolfpack Dynasty VBC 16 16 Elite Black 1363 1-6 14% 16 TX
35292 G1 12-1 1363 1-3 25% 12 AR
35293 Freedom G13-3 1363 1-3 25% 13 MO
35294 CHiX 15-BLACK 1363 14-30 32% 15 OH
35295 LIV 16 Reg 1363 3-11 21% 16 LA
35296 Princeton 12-2 1363 2-6 25% 12 NJ
35297 Metro Volleyball Club 17-East 1363 28-28 49% 17 DC
35298 TX Ultimate 10-Blue 1363 0-5 0% 10 TX
35299 Matchbox 14-Black 1363 4-10 29% 14 SD
35300 RISE ELITE Tabari 14-S 1363 23-22 51% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.