2025-2026 Season — Page 704 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35151 | Zoom 12-1 amy/ashlyn | 1364 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | KS |
| 35152 | ENVY 18-Green | 1364 | 4-14 | 21% | 18 | IA |
| 35153 | Colorado Xtreme VBC 13-Black | 1364 | 3-7 | 30% | 13 | CO |
| 35154 | Prime 13-Kassidy | 1364 | 18-28 | 39% | 13 | CO |
| 35155 | NMB 15-Blue wade | 1364 | 11-19 | 37% | 15 | FL |
| 35156 | Iowa United 16-2 premier | 1364 | 9-16 | 36% | 16 | IA |
| 35157 | Red Rock 17-Jho jho - martinez | 1364 | 14-27 | 34% | 17 | CA |
| 35158 | SEVC 11-2 | 1364 | 4-8 | 33% | 11 | IN |
| 35159 | CTX Juniors 13-Pink | 1364 | 12-16 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 35160 | NM Cactus VBC 15-2 | 1364 | 1-5 | 14% | 15 | CO |
| 35161 | Ace Volleyball Club 15 U15 Black | 1364 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | CO |
| 35162 | TKVBC 14-Ranger premier | 1364 | 28-38 | 42% | 14 | GA |
| 35163 | OptimalVBC 14-2 | 1364 | 16-17 | 44% | 14 | GA |
| 35164 | CI ELITE 18-NAVY | 1364 | 20-19 | 51% | 18 | IL |
| 35165 | IVC 14 Regionals | 1364 | 5-12 | 29% | 14 | AK |
| 35166 | Sandburg 16-Black | 1364 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | IL |
| 35167 | VC United 16-4 premier | 1364 | 8-8 | 50% | 16 | IL |
| 35168 | Tsunami 11-1a | 1364 | 33-38 | 46% | 11 | GA |
| 35169 | SW Pursuit Volleyball 15-2 | 1364 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | MO |
| 35170 | Corozal TIV 14-3 anthony | 1364 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | PR |
| 35171 | Vaqueras 14-F edwin | 1364 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | PR |
| 35172 | Low Country 14-Campos | 1364 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | SC |
| 35173 | DVBC Defiance 12-S - lori | 1364 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | CO |
| 35174 | CPAC 14-Chamberlain | 1364 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | SD |
| 35175 | SECC Rebels VBA 10-1 | 1364 | 2-21 | 8% | 10 | MA |
| 35176 | APEX1 15-Green | 1364 | 18-29 | 38% | 15 | CA |
| 35177 | Rise 12-2 | 1364 | 3-8 | 27% | 12 | WV |
| 35178 | HP Illinois 10-Future | 1364 | 4-13 | 24% | 10 | MO |
| 35179 | shockwave reading 18-1 | 1364 | 5-11 | 31% | 18 | PA |
| 35180 | Whirlwind 14 Elite | 1364 | 7-10 | 39% | 14 | NY |
| 35181 | ARMOR 17 Tango | 1364 | 8-44 | 15% | 17 | SC |
| 35182 | Carolina Rogue 13-Blue | 1364 | 20-28 | 42% | 13 | SC |
| 35183 | MEVC 13 France | 1364 | 11-16 | 41% | 13 | SC |
| 35184 | FTL 14-Atomic catalina | 1364 | 16-18 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 35185 | Honu 14-Nalu | 1364 | 12-19 | 38% | 14 | FL |
| 35186 | BRAVO 16-Red | 1364 | 19-29 | 40% | 16 | KY |
| 35187 | Renaissance VBC Pittsburgh 13-Red | 1364 | 9-20 | 29% | 13 | PA |
| 35188 | Marion Magic 12-S | 1364 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | IA |
| 35189 | Omni 16-N3 | 1364 | 29-31 | 48% | 16 | AZ |
| 35190 | CVVC 16-National | 1364 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | UT |
| 35191 | 417 Juniors 11-1 | 1364 | 0-5 | 0% | 11 | MO |
| 35192 | TNT 13-Swatlife | 1364 | 2-5 | 25% | 13 | MA |
| 35193 | Slam VBC 14-1 | 1364 | 10-18 | 36% | 14 | WI |
| 35194 | FCA COWLITZ 16 | 1364 | 1-7 | 13% | 16 | OR |
| 35195 | PSVA 12-Regional | 1364 | 3-7 | 30% | 12 | FL |
| 35196 | Bootheel SMASH 16-C | 1364 | 11-17 | 37% | 16 | MO |
| 35197 | Titanium 16-Pink | 1364 | 8-12 | 38% | 16 | MO |
| 35198 | SCWave 14-Rivercrest mark | 1364 | 13-21 | 38% | 14 | IN |
| 35199 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-United | 1364 | 23-24 | 49% | 16 | FL |
| 35200 | Duval Aces 16-Royal | 1364 | 9-12 | 43% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.