Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 701 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35001 Club 801 15-Comp 1366 1-6 14% 15 UT
35002 ONE Volleyball Academy 13-2 1366 1-5 17% 13 KS
35003 NKJV 10-Blue 1366 2-7 22% 10 KY
35004 IGNITE 15-Black 1366 15-23 39% 15 OH
35005 White Hawks 15 1366 8-11 42% 15 MN
35006 CVC 15-2 1366 14-25 35% 15 MN
35007 Five Starz 12-White kendall 1366 5-9 31% 12 CA
35008 Bluff Impact 13-White 1366 2-5 20% 13 MO
35009 Highlands Performance VB 13-1 1366 1-3 25% 13 MO
35010 Highlands 13-Black 1366 2-5 29% 13 MO
35011 Mission Volleyball Academy 14-White 1366 4-6 40% 14 OH
35012 Kap City 18 1366 3-4 43% 18 HI
35013 The 606 13-Chi 1366 6-13 30% 13 IL
35014 P3R 16-Fort pitt 1366 5-12 29% 16 PA
35015 ACE 18-Black 1366 14-22 39% 18 AZ
35016 Infinity 13-White 1366 8-9 47% 13 OH
35017 GCVC 14-CHLOE 1366 3-6 33% 14 IN
35018 Starlings Tucson 14-Silver 1366 2-5 29% 14 CA
35019 TeamLVC 14-Pink 1366 21-28 43% 14 NY
35020 Topeka Elite 16-1 1366 2-5 29% 16 KS
35021 SKILLZ 15-1 1366 2-3 40% 15 IN
35022 NYC Raptors 18-1 1366 1-4 20% 18 NY
35023 Winter League 12-2 1366 0-4 0% 12 IL
35024 603 United 15-Open 1366 7-11 39% 15 NH
35025 Legacy 18-Christa 1366 26-25 50% 18 SC
35026 Cap City 14-Green 1366 12-18 40% 14 NC
35027 CUVC 14-R jordan 1366 3-12 20% 14 NC
35028 Altitude 15-White 1366 19-20 45% 15 AZ
35029 LPH 14-1 1366 7-14 33% 14 NC
35030 Rockwood 10-Green 1366 0-4 0% 10 MO
35031 AVA 17-Blue 1366 26-42 38% 17 AZ
35032 Eastside 12-R walpole 1366 0-4 0% 12 OH
35033 SIVA 14-Gray 1366 7-14 29% 14 ID
35034 Rock Volleyball 14-2 1366 11-10 52% 14 WA
35035 Platform 16-Black 1366 23-48 31% 16 MD
35036 Cougar 12 1366 0-4 0% 12 IA
35037 New York Elite 15-Gray 1366 9-13 41% 15 NY
35038 Tropics Girls 17-S elite 1366 9-19 32% 17 FL
35039 Cicero Elite SS 11-Purple 1366 2-8 20% 11 IL
35040 Flathead Volleyball Club 12-1 1366 9-18 30% 12 MT
35041 Aspire NW 14-3 beaverton 1366 15-18 45% 14 OR
35042 HEAT 13-Valley seven 1366 1-4 20% 13 CA
35043 South Bay 16-Blue 1366 12-27 31% 16 NY
35044 305VBC 12-R ana 1366 21-27 44% 12 FL
35045 Envision Volleyball Club 12 EVC Junior (NC) 1366 5-11 31% 12 CA
35046 Guahan Girls 17-S 1366 1-6 14% 17 HI
35047 Bootheel SMASH 17-P 1366 2-6 25% 17 MO
35048 Madfrog East 11-Diamond 1366 4-8 31% 11
35049 Northern Tier 18-Blue 1365 6-9 33% 18 PA
35050 BG G Force 16-Black 1365 0-4 0% 16 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.