2025-2026 Season — Page 701 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35001 | Club 801 15-Comp | 1366 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | UT |
| 35002 | ONE Volleyball Academy 13-2 | 1366 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | KS |
| 35003 | NKJV 10-Blue | 1366 | 2-7 | 22% | 10 | KY |
| 35004 | IGNITE 15-Black | 1366 | 15-23 | 39% | 15 | OH |
| 35005 | White Hawks 15 | 1366 | 8-11 | 42% | 15 | MN |
| 35006 | CVC 15-2 | 1366 | 14-25 | 35% | 15 | MN |
| 35007 | Five Starz 12-White kendall | 1366 | 5-9 | 31% | 12 | CA |
| 35008 | Bluff Impact 13-White | 1366 | 2-5 | 20% | 13 | MO |
| 35009 | Highlands Performance VB 13-1 | 1366 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | MO |
| 35010 | Highlands 13-Black | 1366 | 2-5 | 29% | 13 | MO |
| 35011 | Mission Volleyball Academy 14-White | 1366 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | OH |
| 35012 | Kap City 18 | 1366 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | HI |
| 35013 | The 606 13-Chi | 1366 | 6-13 | 30% | 13 | IL |
| 35014 | P3R 16-Fort pitt | 1366 | 5-12 | 29% | 16 | PA |
| 35015 | ACE 18-Black | 1366 | 14-22 | 39% | 18 | AZ |
| 35016 | Infinity 13-White | 1366 | 8-9 | 47% | 13 | OH |
| 35017 | GCVC 14-CHLOE | 1366 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | IN |
| 35018 | Starlings Tucson 14-Silver | 1366 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | CA |
| 35019 | TeamLVC 14-Pink | 1366 | 21-28 | 43% | 14 | NY |
| 35020 | Topeka Elite 16-1 | 1366 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | KS |
| 35021 | SKILLZ 15-1 | 1366 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IN |
| 35022 | NYC Raptors 18-1 | 1366 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | NY |
| 35023 | Winter League 12-2 | 1366 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | IL |
| 35024 | 603 United 15-Open | 1366 | 7-11 | 39% | 15 | NH |
| 35025 | Legacy 18-Christa | 1366 | 26-25 | 50% | 18 | SC |
| 35026 | Cap City 14-Green | 1366 | 12-18 | 40% | 14 | NC |
| 35027 | CUVC 14-R jordan | 1366 | 3-12 | 20% | 14 | NC |
| 35028 | Altitude 15-White | 1366 | 19-20 | 45% | 15 | AZ |
| 35029 | LPH 14-1 | 1366 | 7-14 | 33% | 14 | NC |
| 35030 | Rockwood 10-Green | 1366 | 0-4 | 0% | 10 | MO |
| 35031 | AVA 17-Blue | 1366 | 26-42 | 38% | 17 | AZ |
| 35032 | Eastside 12-R walpole | 1366 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | OH |
| 35033 | SIVA 14-Gray | 1366 | 7-14 | 29% | 14 | ID |
| 35034 | Rock Volleyball 14-2 | 1366 | 11-10 | 52% | 14 | WA |
| 35035 | Platform 16-Black | 1366 | 23-48 | 31% | 16 | MD |
| 35036 | Cougar 12 | 1366 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | IA |
| 35037 | New York Elite 15-Gray | 1366 | 9-13 | 41% | 15 | NY |
| 35038 | Tropics Girls 17-S elite | 1366 | 9-19 | 32% | 17 | FL |
| 35039 | Cicero Elite SS 11-Purple | 1366 | 2-8 | 20% | 11 | IL |
| 35040 | Flathead Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1366 | 9-18 | 30% | 12 | MT |
| 35041 | Aspire NW 14-3 beaverton | 1366 | 15-18 | 45% | 14 | OR |
| 35042 | HEAT 13-Valley seven | 1366 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | CA |
| 35043 | South Bay 16-Blue | 1366 | 12-27 | 31% | 16 | NY |
| 35044 | 305VBC 12-R ana | 1366 | 21-27 | 44% | 12 | FL |
| 35045 | Envision Volleyball Club 12 EVC Junior (NC) | 1366 | 5-11 | 31% | 12 | CA |
| 35046 | Guahan Girls 17-S | 1366 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | HI |
| 35047 | Bootheel SMASH 17-P | 1366 | 2-6 | 25% | 17 | MO |
| 35048 | Madfrog East 11-Diamond | 1366 | 4-8 | 31% | 11 | |
| 35049 | Northern Tier 18-Blue | 1365 | 6-9 | 33% | 18 | PA |
| 35050 | BG G Force 16-Black | 1365 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.