Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 700 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34951 Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 14 SAVA Vipers 1366 8-17 32% 14 AL
34952 ERAA 12-1 1366 8-25 24% 12 MN
34953 SAJO 12-2 1366 18-20 47% 12 MN
34954 NANI O WAIMEA 16 1366 0-4 0% 16 HI
34955 Penuelas Volley Club 15-1 1366 2-5 29% 15 PR
34956 PVA 15-Jerry girl 1366 1-4 20% 15 PR
34957 Atomic VC 12 1366 2-6 22% 12 AZ
34958 COA 12-Force 1366 12-15 44% 12 IN
34959 Attack 14-2 1366 4-8 33% 14 ND
34960 Iowa Heart 17-Black 1366 9-15 35% 17 IA
34961 Cardinals 17-Fullerton 1366 0-3 0% 17 IA
34962 Drive 14-Blue 1366 13-23 36% 14 IL
34963 WI Flight 17 Silver 1366 5-12 29% 17 WI
34964 Borderline 16-Attack 1366 15-19 44% 16 OH
34965 EP STRiVE VBC 16-S purple 1366 18-26 39% 16 TX
34966 OK Elite 14-Blue 1366 6-9 40% 14 OK
34967 CPVB 14-Regional black 1366 5-11 29% 14 CT
34968 TPV 15-Navy 1366 15-28 35% 15 TN
34969 Riptide 13-S elite 1366 15-20 43% 13 FL
34970 Mem Metro 15-Elite gld 1366 16-32 33% 15 TN
34971 APXVB 16-Jenessa 1366 9-8 39% 16 UT
34972 North Point 11-Regional 1366 2-8 15% 11 TX
34973 Platinum 16-Peak 1366 10-22 30% 16 UT
34974 Flatlands 14 1366 4-11 27% 14 OH
34975 Summit Volleyball Club 18-2 1366 0-5 0% 18 MO
34976 Sedalia Stealth VBC 18-1 1366 9-10 39% 18 MO
34977 Left Coast 17-Lou 1366 22-30 42% 17 CA
34978 LEH 16-1 1366 8-13 38% 16 MI
34979 Titanium 15 Navy 1366 15-17 47% 15 MO
34980 Dynamites Lady Black 16-1 1366 23-24 49% 16 AZ
34981 DVC 14-1 1366 3-6 23% 14 OH
34982 Club V South 13-Caden 1366 10-17 29% 13 UT
34983 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 18 SWVC RS18-LONG 1366 0-3 0% 18 WY
34984 WWVC 15 1366 14-16 47% 15 WY
34985 BCVC 17-Smack 1366 18-23 44% 17 CA
34986 Riverton Volleyball Club 15 RVA 1366 0-4 0% 15 WY
34987 OCVC 16-Janelle 1366 19-33 37% 16 WY
34988 Next Level 14-2 karla 1366 2-6 25% 14 PR
34989 Active 13 Marlow 1366 4-9 31% 13 VA
34990 Red Rock 16-Gabriel - redwood city 1366 12-33 27% 16 CA
34991 SoCal Athletics Volleyball Club 16-Pipes 1366 15-22 41% 16 CA
34992 Star Aquila 15-1 1366 3-4 30% 15
34993 513VB 11-1 1366 15-27 36% 11 OH
34994 Flathead Volleyball Club 17 1366 3-14 12% 17 MT
34995 Legends 17-1 angel 1366 4-8 33% 17 PR
34996 Renaissance 16-White 1366 3-8 27% 16 OH
34997 CVBC 16-1 1366 8-25 21% 16 VA
34998 FABVC CO 15 1366 0-3 0% 15 CO
34999 LAV 11-Local white 1366 10-21 32% 11 AL
35000 NCISVBC 16-2 1366 15-23 39% 16 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.