2025-2026 Season — Page 699 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34901 | Black Canyon 17-S sara | 1367 | 11-12 | 41% | 17 | CO |
| 34902 | RVC 14-Hustle | 1367 | 13-14 | 48% | 14 | CO |
| 34903 | Team Ok 13-BLACK | 1367 | 15-19 | 44% | 13 | OK |
| 34904 | TXRV 16-1 | 1367 | 1-6 | 14% | 16 | TX |
| 34905 | TTC 15-Elite | 1367 | 12-19 | 39% | 15 | FL |
| 34906 | DFVOS 12 Royals | 1367 | 7-14 | 33% | 12 | AZ |
| 34907 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 15-United | 1367 | 24-29 | 45% | 15 | FL |
| 34908 | GENERATION NEXT 18 | 1367 | 9-19 | 32% | 18 | NJ |
| 34909 | Hive 16-Black | 1367 | 11-36 | 23% | 16 | UT |
| 34910 | Ohana Volleyball 16-1 | 1367 | 9-10 | 47% | 16 | FL |
| 34911 | PAVC - NC 16-Emerald | 1367 | 11-11 | 50% | 16 | NC |
| 34912 | SA MAGIC 14 PLATINUM | 1367 | 13-20 | 38% | 14 | TX |
| 34913 | SEMO WAVE 18-1 | 1367 | 7-12 | 35% | 18 | MO |
| 34914 | PTV 18 | 1367 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | MI |
| 34915 | Alpha VC 16-Pink | 1367 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | MI |
| 34916 | Tstreet SN 13-Arayah | 1367 | 10-19 | 34% | 13 | NV |
| 34917 | SA Elite 14-3 gold | 1367 | 12-27 | 31% | 14 | TX |
| 34918 | Ho'ola Athletic Club 17-Jerry | 1367 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | HI |
| 34919 | Matrix 17-S girls | 1367 | 3-7 | 30% | 17 | AZ |
| 34920 | AR SELECT 13-Reg navy | 1367 | 13-20 | 39% | 13 | AR |
| 34921 | Insanity VB 16-1 | 1367 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | GA |
| 34922 | Kokoro Volleyball 13 Org | 1367 | 17-21 | 45% | 13 | MN |
| 34923 | SVC 16-2 | 1367 | 26-39 | 40% | 16 | NY |
| 34924 | Vortex 13-Lora | 1367 | 4-13 | 18% | 13 | UT |
| 34925 | CPVB 16-Select black | 1367 | 14-20 | 37% | 16 | CT |
| 34926 | A4 Volley 17-Garry | 1367 | 18-25 | 42% | 17 | CA |
| 34927 | Devils Tower 15 | 1367 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | WY |
| 34928 | Sting 10 Bumblebees | 1367 | 11-24 | 31% | 10 | WI |
| 34929 | Passion 17 | 1367 | 14-16 | 47% | 17 | MI |
| 34930 | FOCUS 16 16-Jordyn | 1367 | 14-22 | 39% | 16 | |
| 34931 | Living Aloha Vollleyball Academy 13 LAVA Makoa (CH) | 1367 | 22-27 | 43% | 13 | |
| 34932 | Hi Bred VBC Pink Wahine 16-1 | 1367 | 9-19 | 32% | 16 | HI |
| 34933 | Adversity 15-Blk adidas | 1367 | 5-6 | 45% | 15 | IL |
| 34934 | Iowa Vibe 15-4 larry | 1367 | 11-19 | 35% | 15 | IA |
| 34935 | Idaho ONE 10-Blue | 1367 | 5-10 | 33% | 10 | ID |
| 34936 | CE LFT - Lite 14-Graycee | 1367 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | LA |
| 34937 | Nova Juniors 13-White | 1367 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | OH |
| 34938 | United 11-Black | 1367 | 9-23 | 28% | 11 | AL |
| 34939 | Arsenal 15 | 1367 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | TX |
| 34940 | Goldfish Volleyball Club 15 15U Teal | 1367 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | CO |
| 34941 | JAG VBC 14-3 | 1367 | 9-7 | 56% | 14 | WI |
| 34942 | LV 12-Storm | 1367 | 3-9 | 25% | 12 | TX |
| 34943 | SA Lightning 12-1 | 1367 | 8-16 | 31% | 12 | TX |
| 34944 | Fortitude 16 | 1367 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | WY |
| 34945 | HardRock 15 | 1367 | 18-23 | 44% | 15 | NH |
| 34946 | Downstate 13-Vipers | 1366 | 10-14 | 42% | 13 | NY |
| 34947 | SIVBA 11-Sapphire | 1366 | 1-7 | 13% | 11 | MO |
| 34948 | Rush City Digz 14-2 | 1366 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | WI |
| 34949 | Wisconsin Blaze 14-Orange | 1366 | 8-15 | 35% | 14 | WI |
| 34950 | Monsters 13-Blue | 1366 | 12-13 | 48% | 13 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.