2025-2026 Season — Page 698 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34851 | RRVB 18 Margaret | 1368 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | GA |
| 34852 | X-Factor Volleyball 16-1 | 1368 | 23-38 | 38% | 16 | VA |
| 34853 | Belles 14-1 blue | 1368 | 14-24 | 37% | 14 | PA |
| 34854 | Top Flight AZ 17 Hera | 1368 | 19-31 | 37% | 17 | AZ |
| 34855 | Blue Ridge 12u | 1368 | 11-19 | 37% | 12 | SC |
| 34856 | Pipeline 12-Academy | 1368 | 5-9 | 36% | 12 | CA |
| 34857 | Sportime 15-White | 1368 | 15-28 | 35% | 15 | NY |
| 34858 | C325V 17-1 | 1368 | 6-11 | 35% | 17 | TX |
| 34859 | VU 17 | 1368 | 7-13 | 35% | 17 | MS |
| 34860 | KRATOS Volley Academy 15 Ravens | 1368 | 17-31 | 34% | 15 | CT |
| 34861 | UEPA 16-G | 1368 | 13-25 | 34% | 16 | TX |
| 34862 | VVVBC 13 Sapphire | 1368 | 9-18 | 33% | 13 | WA |
| 34863 | Volley Pro 13-Black | 1368 | 4-7 | 33% | 13 | NV |
| 34864 | Sunbirds 15 | 1368 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | |
| 34865 | Predators Volleyball Club 15 | 1367 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | |
| 34866 | CHD 18 | 1367 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | FL |
| 34867 | Core Elite VBC 15-National | 1367 | 0-6 | 0% | 15 | LA |
| 34868 | Apex 12-3 | 1367 | 1-6 | 14% | 12 | GA |
| 34869 | Madfrog 15-E black | 1367 | 13-31 | 26% | 15 | TX |
| 34870 | Club Tonka 15-2 | 1367 | 15-24 | 38% | 15 | MN |
| 34871 | NSVBC 14-Select black | 1367 | 4-12 | 25% | 14 | WI |
| 34872 | AVA TX 17 Power | 1367 | 16-22 | 38% | 17 | TX |
| 34873 | SVBC 17-Navy | 1367 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | IA |
| 34874 | Knoxville 17 | 1367 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | IA |
| 34875 | Gensis 14-1 | 1367 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | IA |
| 34876 | Gulf Coast 14-Hurricanes | 1367 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | FL |
| 34877 | Matchbox 17-Black | 1367 | 1-7 | 13% | 17 | SD |
| 34878 | FAV 11-Black | 1367 | 3-8 | 23% | 11 | CA |
| 34879 | Synergy 16-Carbon | 1367 | 14-25 | 35% | 16 | PA |
| 34880 | FVC 14-Alpha | 1367 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | NE |
| 34881 | Mass Pats 17-2 mental toughness | 1367 | 10-13 | 38% | 17 | MA |
| 34882 | Citrus Fusion 12-Lime | 1367 | 8-14 | 36% | 12 | FL |
| 34883 | BVA FC 14-Navy chistan | 1367 | 6-8 | 43% | 14 | KY |
| 34884 | Aggression 18-1 premier | 1367 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | IL |
| 34885 | Honolulu Wave 12 | 1367 | 2-7 | 18% | 12 | HI |
| 34886 | Piedmont VBC 13-Vapor | 1367 | 3-7 | 30% | 13 | NC |
| 34887 | HAVC 16-M blue | 1367 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | SD |
| 34888 | Rev 17-3 sirens | 1367 | 16-24 | 40% | 17 | IN |
| 34889 | Oakland Rockstars 14-Orange | 1367 | 12-12 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 34890 | Legacy 14-Green | 1367 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 34891 | Club Net 15-Premier | 1367 | 19-34 | 36% | 15 | AR |
| 34892 | ASVC 11-N1 | 1367 | 23-36 | 39% | 11 | AZ |
| 34893 | South KC Juniors 16-2 | 1367 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | KS |
| 34894 | ONE Volleyball Academy 14-3 | 1367 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | KS |
| 34895 | Raleigh 17-Silver a | 1367 | 4-9 | 31% | 17 | NC |
| 34896 | GRV 13-Red | 1367 | 12-28 | 30% | 13 | IN |
| 34897 | Texas Diamonds 17-Teal | 1367 | 13-14 | 46% | 17 | TX |
| 34898 | SMASH Volleyball 15-Sapphire | 1367 | 1-5 | 17% | 15 | MA |
| 34899 | RVA 17-1 | 1367 | 25-45 | 36% | 17 | OH |
| 34900 | Cowlitz 16-2 blue | 1367 | 13-23 | 36% | 16 | OR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.