Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 698 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34851 RRVB 18 Margaret 1368 4-6 40% 18 GA
34852 X-Factor Volleyball 16-1 1368 23-38 38% 16 VA
34853 Belles 14-1 blue 1368 14-24 37% 14 PA
34854 Top Flight AZ 17 Hera 1368 19-31 37% 17 AZ
34855 Blue Ridge 12u 1368 11-19 37% 12 SC
34856 Pipeline 12-Academy 1368 5-9 36% 12 CA
34857 Sportime 15-White 1368 15-28 35% 15 NY
34858 C325V 17-1 1368 6-11 35% 17 TX
34859 VU 17 1368 7-13 35% 17 MS
34860 KRATOS Volley Academy 15 Ravens 1368 17-31 34% 15 CT
34861 UEPA 16-G 1368 13-25 34% 16 TX
34862 VVVBC 13 Sapphire 1368 9-18 33% 13 WA
34863 Volley Pro 13-Black 1368 4-7 33% 13 NV
34864 Sunbirds 15 1368 2-6 25% 15
34865 Predators Volleyball Club 15 1367 1-6 14% 15
34866 CHD 18 1367 1-4 20% 18 FL
34867 Core Elite VBC 15-National 1367 0-6 0% 15 LA
34868 Apex 12-3 1367 1-6 14% 12 GA
34869 Madfrog 15-E black 1367 13-31 26% 15 TX
34870 Club Tonka 15-2 1367 15-24 38% 15 MN
34871 NSVBC 14-Select black 1367 4-12 25% 14 WI
34872 AVA TX 17 Power 1367 16-22 38% 17 TX
34873 SVBC 17-Navy 1367 1-4 20% 17 IA
34874 Knoxville 17 1367 0-4 0% 17 IA
34875 Gensis 14-1 1367 0-5 0% 14 IA
34876 Gulf Coast 14-Hurricanes 1367 3-6 33% 14 FL
34877 Matchbox 17-Black 1367 1-7 13% 17 SD
34878 FAV 11-Black 1367 3-8 23% 11 CA
34879 Synergy 16-Carbon 1367 14-25 35% 16 PA
34880 FVC 14-Alpha 1367 0-4 0% 14 NE
34881 Mass Pats 17-2 mental toughness 1367 10-13 38% 17 MA
34882 Citrus Fusion 12-Lime 1367 8-14 36% 12 FL
34883 BVA FC 14-Navy chistan 1367 6-8 43% 14 KY
34884 Aggression 18-1 premier 1367 1-4 20% 18 IL
34885 Honolulu Wave 12 1367 2-7 18% 12 HI
34886 Piedmont VBC 13-Vapor 1367 3-7 30% 13 NC
34887 HAVC 16-M blue 1367 0-4 0% 16 SD
34888 Rev 17-3 sirens 1367 16-24 40% 17 IN
34889 Oakland Rockstars 14-Orange 1367 12-12 50% 14 CA
34890 Legacy 14-Green 1367 10-11 48% 14 MI
34891 Club Net 15-Premier 1367 19-34 36% 15 AR
34892 ASVC 11-N1 1367 23-36 39% 11 AZ
34893 South KC Juniors 16-2 1367 1-3 25% 16 KS
34894 ONE Volleyball Academy 14-3 1367 2-5 29% 14 KS
34895 Raleigh 17-Silver a 1367 4-9 31% 17 NC
34896 GRV 13-Red 1367 12-28 30% 13 IN
34897 Texas Diamonds 17-Teal 1367 13-14 46% 17 TX
34898 SMASH Volleyball 15-Sapphire 1367 1-5 17% 15 MA
34899 RVA 17-1 1367 25-45 36% 17 OH
34900 Cowlitz 16-2 blue 1367 13-23 36% 16 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.