Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 702 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35051 MMVC 15 Gold 1365 14-23 38% 15 WV
35052 TRUE VBC 16-1 1365 15-25 38% 16 CA
35053 IV Force 16-Regional elite 1365 11-22 33% 16 CA
35054 Actsports 13-Clements/nolette 1365 3-7 30% 13 VA
35055 The Edge 15 Silver 1365 18-20 47% 15 IL
35056 FCVBC 12-Black 1365 2-5 25% 12 CO
35057 Lady Raiders 15 1365 19-29 39% 15 IL
35058 Club Fusion 15 Royal 1365 14-14 50% 15 IL
35059 Rolling Thunder 15-Crimson 1365 20-25 44% 15 IL
35060 AJV 14-Futurewilcoalliance 1365 7-15 32% 14 TX
35061 Coastal 13-Sarah 1365 1-4 20% 13 VA
35062 Jays 12 1365 1-4 20% 12 IL
35063 DYS 13-Thunder 1365 18-25 42% 13 VA
35064 AV Coach Bri / Coach Tommy 18 1365 2-6 25% 18 CA
35065 Valor 17-Black 1365 5-9 28% 17
35066 Jax Pursuit 12 1365 1-5 17% 12 FL
35067 CJHEAT 13-2 1365 5-9 36% 13 NJ
35068 HJVC 18-Red 1365 2-12 13% 18
35069 Cascade 17-Blue 1365 0-4 0% 17 WA
35070 MCJO 18-S 1365 5-7 36% 18 MN
35071 Club North Volleyball KC 15-2 1365 0-3 0% 15 MO
35072 NA PUA O HINA 14 1365 0-4 0% 14 HI
35073 Crank It 15-Gold 1365 18-20 47% 15 MI
35074 HBJ 13-Paris 1365 0-4 0% 13 AR
35075 AVBC 13-White 1365 7-13 35% 13 MI
35076 Thunderstrike 18-Black 1365 2-3 40% 18 MI
35077 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 14 SWVC GR14-CAMIS 1365 0-11 0% 14 WY
35078 FTL Chemical 11-Diego 1365 0-3 0% 11 FL
35079 Dayton Jrs 16-Black 1365 3-8 27% 16 OH
35080 LI Fury 13-1 1365 9-14 39% 13 NY
35081 Club Tonka 14-Blue 1365 9-11 45% 14 MN
35082 Munciana Indy 14-Penguins 1365 9-11 45% 14 IN
35083 NorthShore Volleyball Club 16-Red 1365 2-6 25% 16 OH
35084 St. George Aces 16-Gold 1365 2-10 15% 16 UT
35085 Zona VBC 14-R4 1365 11-9 55% 14 AZ
35086 OVA 13-G select 1365 9-38 19% 13 AZ
35087 RRVC 14 National 1365 32-30 52% 14 VA
35088 UVC 11-Colleen/nicole 1365 3-6 33% 11 IL
35089 YMCA Hitters Volleyball Team 13 13u Select (Winter) (LK) (21) 1365 1-4 20% 13 MI
35090 Hammerin Hawks 14-2g 1365 1-5 17% 14 IA
35091 SLVVC 18-Pink 1365 1-4 20% 18 MO
35092 850 Elite Volleyball Club 17-1 1365 17-38 31% 17 AL
35093 Southland Aces 17-1 black 1365 8-10 44% 17 MO
35094 MOVA UA 17-BLACK 1365 17-29 35% 17 MO
35095 Xcel 16 Armour 1365 13-17 43% 16 NC
35096 MiElite 13-Ns east 1365 14-23 38% 13 MI
35097 BVA 15-S tristin 1365 19-31 38% 15 FL
35098 FB FIERCE 11-Dev - chloe 1365 2-7 20% 11 TX
35099 KODA 15-South 1365 13-26 32% 15 NY
35100 Purple Cows 18-1 1365 11-18 38% 18 AR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.