Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 686 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34251 EVA 18-Blue 1374 0-5 0% 18 KY
34252 AJ 16-Navy 1374 10-21 32% 16 LA
34253 RIV RED 14 1374 1-4 20% 14 WY
34254 Titans 14 1374 13-14 48% 14 VA
34255 Summit VC 14-Blue 1374 5-13 28% 14 MO
34256 Alpha Omega 14-Select 1374 2-5 29% 14 MO
34257 Elite Mountain 14-2 1374 12-12 50% 14 AZ
34258 COYOTES 14-1 1374 10-5 67% 14 AZ
34259 Dubuque Insanity 12-Grey 1374 0-4 0% 12 IA
34260 Rocketfuel318 12-R 1374 1-4 20% 12 LA
34261 LB Power 15-2 1374 2-5 29% 15 NV
34262 Palm Beach Jrs 12 Elite 1374 8-13 38% 12 FL
34263 Landshark 11-Black 1374 1-4 20% 11 KS
34264 Jax Skyline 12-Grey 1374 3-5 38% 12 FL
34265 1United 13-Texoma 1374 11-10 44% 13 TX
34266 Illini Elite 14-Maroon 1374 5-9 36% 14 IL
34267 ENVY Volleyball Club 18 18 GREEN 1374 1-6 14% 18 IA
34268 SFVC 13-Regional 1374 1-3 25% 13 FL
34269 Island Mixx 13-2 1374 1-4 20% 13 FL
34270 TNT 14-Ac/dc 1374 7-10 39% 14 PA
34271 Club Ashtabula 17 AOA/Spire VC-Fitzgerald (OV) 1374 7-14 33% 17 OH
34272 EliteZ 17-Girls hp black 1374 14-22 39% 17 NH
34273 Infinity 16-National-2 1374 21-23 48% 16 CO
34274 CYVB 17-2 1374 4-6 40% 17 MA
34275 The Lab 16-Black 1374 0-4 0% 16 IA
34276 Hutchinson 16-S 1374 1-4 20% 16 MN
34277 Illini Elite 11-Sam 1374 5-10 33% 11 IL
34278 NorthShore 13-Seahorses 1374 23-18 56% 13 MI
34279 Pure Aloha 17-1 1374 4-6 40% 17 HI
34280 Santa Fe Storm 11-1 dominic 1374 1-6 14% 11 CO
34281 SEIVB 14-Hildebrand 1374 5-9 36% 14 IN
34282 Scotia Juniors VBC 14-Black 1374 1-6 14% 14
34283 Academy 16-R gryphons 1374 16-23 41% 16 IN
34284 Oakville Thunder Volleyball Club 16 Force (CA) 1374 0-3 0% 16 ON
34285 A5 Regional 16-Tishara 1374 16-16 50% 16 GA
34286 85 South VBC 14-Red 1374 14-12 54% 14 GA
34287 EVC 15-Falcons 1374 10-12 45% 15 FL
34288 TxINV 12-Cp 1374 1-3 25% 12
34289 Mighty Mo 14-Reed 1374 7-20 25% 14 MT
34290 clubSAV 14-National denny 1373 17-29 37% 14 GA
34291 Vortex 12-Ella local 1373 3-6 33% 12 UT
34292 DCVB 14 1373 12-21 32% 14 OK
34293 Ichiban 13-1 jack 1373 1-4 20% 13 GA
34294 Piedmont VBC 15-Jdi 1373 19-22 46% 15 NC
34295 Starling South Central Los Angeles 16 Starling SCLA Anna 1373 4-5 44% 16 CA
34296 KKVC 16-Sc - blue 1373 0-4 0% 16 SD
34297 East Alberta Volleyball Club 15 1373 1-6 14% 15 AB
34298 Metro VBC 14-Blue 1373 16-19 46% 14 IN
34299 BVA 13-S jenna 1373 21-30 41% 13 FL
34300 Blitz 14-Natalie 1373 7-7 50% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.